Microsoft vs Microsoft Teams: which does AI recommend?

· ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode

Based on every AI answer that names bothReviewed by

How we measure

MicrosoftMicrosoft Teams

Listed first when AI names both

Microsoft: 36%
Microsoft Teams: 64% (Microsoft Teams leads)

Recommended when named

Microsoft: 71% (Microsoft leads)
Microsoft Teams: 60%

Topic by topic

Mentioned in, as a share of each topic’s answers

Level: Multi-party claims collaboration platform, Nonprofit board management, Regulatory compliance VoIP, Safety checklist enforcement, Collaboration tool with tasks and wikis, Shared team inbox, Affordable digital asset management, Team project and task management, Customer screen sharing, Affordable helpdesk and ticketing, Interview scheduling automation, AI post-mortem generation, Fraud investigation management, Executive deepfake monitoring, Shop floor work instructions, Multi-department call routing, Speech to summary software for support calls, FinOps tools with showback and chargeback workflows, Competitor tracking software, Agency project management, Code vulnerability ticketing, Reverse ETL data sync, CRM with native phone integration, HIPAA compliance management, Modular low-code claims management platforms for insurance startups and Research repositories with transcription

Who AI mentions first

Microsoft listed firstMicrosoft Teams listed first

MayMicrosoft listed first: 7%Microsoft Teams listed first: 93%

JunMicrosoft listed first: 31%Microsoft Teams listed first: 69%

JulMicrosoft listed first: 58%Microsoft Teams listed first: 42%

AugMicrosoft listed first: 34%Microsoft Teams listed first: 66%

SepMicrosoft listed first: 42%Microsoft Teams listed first: 58%

Oct, so farMicrosoft listed first: 28%Microsoft Teams listed first: 72%

ChatGPT SearchMicrosoft listed first: 35%Microsoft Teams listed first: 65%

Google AI ModeMicrosoft listed first: 39%Microsoft Teams listed first: 61%

Sources cited in the comparisons

  • The bar’s length is this source’s share of the comparison’s claims; its parts show which brand those claims favour.

  • The bar’s length is this source’s share of the comparison’s claims; its parts show which brand those claims favour.

  • The bar’s length is this source’s share of the comparison’s claims; its parts show which brand those claims favour.

  • The bar’s length is this source’s share of the comparison’s claims; its parts show which brand those claims favour.

  • The bar’s length is this source’s share of the comparison’s claims; its parts show which brand those claims favour.

  • The bar’s length is this source’s share of the comparison’s claims; its parts show which brand those claims favour.

  • The bar’s length is this source’s share of the comparison’s claims; its parts show which brand those claims favour.

  • The bar’s length is this source’s share of the comparison’s claims; its parts show which brand those claims favour.

Get your brand into the conversation