Anthropic vs ChatGPT: which does AI recommend?

· ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode

Based on every AI answer that names bothReviewed by

How we measure

AnthropicChatGPT

Listed first when AI names both

Anthropic: 22%
ChatGPT: 78% (ChatGPT leads)

Recommended when named

Anthropic: 46%
ChatGPT: 59% (ChatGPT leads)

Warned against · lower is better

Anthropic: 6% (Anthropic leads)
ChatGPT: 14%

Where each brand stands out

  • FunctionalityAnthropic
    Google AI ModeSep 28, 2026Anthropic1 of 4

    It understands your local codebase, migration files, or surrounding code context to draft accurate JOIN statements inline. Advanced Frontier LLMs (General Purpose): Claude (by Anthropic) and ChatGPT (OpenAI) consistently rank among the highest for raw reasoning capability on complex query logic.If you feed them a clean DDL (Data Definition Language) export of your tables and specify your exact dialect (PostgreSQL, Snowflake, BigQuery, etc.), Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-4o excel at untangling convoluted many-to-many relationship joins and window functions.

Topic by topic

Mentioned in, as a share of each topic’s answers

Level: Natural language code explanation, Bulk product description generation, Financial health analysis service for non-technical founders, Maintaining consistent brand voice, Academic fact-checking and literature reviews, Grade-level text adaptation, Open source compliance scanning, Audit summarizer with corrective actions, Technical presentation slide generator, SEO meta and social copy generation, AI post-mortem generation, Prompt version control and Natural language database querying

Who AI mentions first

Anthropic listed firstChatGPT listed first

JunAnthropic listed first: 16%ChatGPT listed first: 84%

JulAnthropic listed first: 36%ChatGPT listed first: 64%

Sep, so farAnthropic listed first: 29%ChatGPT listed first: 71%

Google AI ModeAnthropic listed first: 25%ChatGPT listed first: 75%

ChatGPT SearchAnthropic listed first: 16%ChatGPT listed first: 84%

Sources cited in the comparisons

  • The bar’s length is this source’s share of the comparison’s claims; its parts show which brand those claims favour.

  • The bar’s length is this source’s share of the comparison’s claims; its parts show which brand those claims favour.

  • The bar’s length is this source’s share of the comparison’s claims; its parts show which brand those claims favour.

  • The bar’s length is this source’s share of the comparison’s claims; its parts show which brand those claims favour.

  • The bar’s length is this source’s share of the comparison’s claims; its parts show which brand those claims favour.

  • The bar’s length is this source’s share of the comparison’s claims; its parts show which brand those claims favour.

  • The bar’s length is this source’s share of the comparison’s claims; its parts show which brand those claims favour.

  • The bar’s length is this source’s share of the comparison’s claims; its parts show which brand those claims favour.

Get your brand into the conversation