Parse
Work with usPricing
Sign inCheck your brand
Research/Which brand owns each adjective in AI answers?

Which brand owns each adjective in AI answers?

Mostly nobody. Of 615 high-value adjective-category pairs in AI answers, only 170, or 27.6%, have a brand that supplies a majority of the uses. The words buyers decide on are still unclaimed.

By Dimitry Apollonsky · August 29, 2026 · 9 min read

72.4%
of high-value adjective-category pairs have no majority owner
445 of 615
▸Contents
  • 72.4% of high-value adjectives have no majority owner
  • When a word is owned, the owner can take 95% of it
  • A high-value word is 8.5 times more ownable than generic praise
  • "Industry standard" is the most owned word; "cost-effective" the least
  • "Excellent" has a majority owner in 5 of 531 categories
  • Half of all pairs have a leader who is short of a majority
  • 141 brands own the 170 owned pairs; almost nobody owns two
  • One in four words is a near-tie between two brands
  • When both engines have volume, they usually name the same owner
  • How we measured this
  • The GEO takeaway
  • Get the data
  • Sources
  • Related research
Contents
  • 72.4% of high-value adjectives have no majority owner
  • When a word is owned, the owner can take 95% of it
  • A high-value word is 8.5 times more ownable than generic praise
  • "Industry standard" is the most owned word; "cost-effective" the least
  • "Excellent" has a majority owner in 5 of 531 categories
  • Half of all pairs have a leader who is short of a majority
  • 141 brands own the 170 owned pairs; almost nobody owns two
  • One in four words is a near-tie between two brands
  • When both engines have volume, they usually name the same owner
  • How we measured this
  • The GEO takeaway
  • Get the data
  • Sources
  • Related research

We analyzed 3,618,541 brand descriptors attached to 145,001 brands in 369,855 answers to 16,894 organic prompts on ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode from May 24 through July 19, 2026.

8.5x
high-value words are majority-owned 8.5 times as often as generic praise
27.6% vs 3.3%
141
brands own the 170 majority-owned pairs
24.6%
of pairs are a near-tie between two brands
151 of 615

72.4% of high-value adjectives have no majority owner

A descriptor is a word or short phrase an AI answer attaches to a named brand: "fastest", "enterprise-grade", "all-in-one". We studied 15 high-value descriptors, the highest-volume buyer-decision superlatives and positioning phrases in the corpus, and measured them at the category grain. An adjective-category pair is one descriptor in one category with at least 20 observed uses; a pair is majority-owned when one brand supplies at least 50% of those uses.

Of 615 high-value adjective-category pairs, 170, or 27.6%, are majority-owned. The other 445, or 72.4%, have no majority owner. Positioning theory says the most valuable asset in a category is owning one word. In AI answers, most of those words are still open.

Takeaway

The words buyers decide on are mostly unclaimed. An unowned adjective in your category is a position no competitor holds yet.

When a word is owned, the owner can take 95% of it

Where a majority owner exists, ownership is often decisive. Carta supplies 95.3% of "industry standard" uses in cap table and equity management software. Semrush supplies 77.8% of "all-in-one" in SEO and competitive intelligence tools. Wise supplies 77.5% of "cheapest" in international money transfers, and Patagonia 72.5% of "gold standard" in sustainable clothing.

The table shows the largest majority-owned pair for each of the 15 high-value descriptors. One descriptor is missing: "best value" had no majority owner in any category. Only 58 of the 615 pairs have an owner at the two-thirds level, and exactly one pair has a single brand supplying every use.

The largest majority-owned pair per descriptor
For each high-value descriptor: the category where the leading brand's use count is highest among majority-owned pairs, restricted to categories with an active public index page. Share = leader uses / pair uses.
industry standardCap Table & Equity Management SoftwareCarta logoCarta95.386
user-friendlyPC Game Trainers and Mod ManagersWeMod logoWeMod80.587
all-in-oneSEO & Competitive Intelligence ToolsSemrush logoSemrush77.854
open-sourceSubscription and Usage-Based Billing PlatformsLago77.589
cheapestInternational Money Transfer ServicesWise logoWise77.540
cost-effectiveEmail and Messaging Delivery PlatformsAmazon logoAmazon75.833
gold standardSustainable Clothing BrandsPatagonia logoPatagonia72.540
easiestOnline Sports Betting AppsFanDuel logoFanDuel71.442
most popularSports Betting and Fantasy PlatformsPrizePicks logoPrizePicks68.222
fastestConsumer VPN ServicesNord Security63.330
best overallOnline Stock & Options BrokersFidelity Investments logoFidelity Investments60.363
enterprise-gradeEdge Security and DDoS PlatformsAkamai logoAkamai52.951
budget-friendlyMeal Kit Delivery ServicesEveryPlate logoEveryPlate52.987
scalablePayroll and HRIS SoftwareADP logoADP51.533

Takeaway

Ownership compounds: once AI settles on one brand for one word in one category, that brand can supply three quarters or more of the uses.

A high-value word is 8.5 times more ownable than generic praise

We ran the same measurement on the 10 highest-volume generic praise words: excellent, strong, best, recommended, comprehensive, robust, popular, reliable, good, powerful. Across 2,451 generic adjective-category pairs, only 80, or 3.3%, have a majority owner.

High-value words reach 27.6%. That is 8.5 times the generic rate. Generic praise spreads across every brand in a category, so no one can own it. Specific buyer-decision words concentrate, so someone can.

Majority-owned share of adjective-category pairs
  • High-value words27.6% (170 of 615)
  • Generic praise words3.3% (80 of 2,451)

Takeaway

Do not chase "excellent" or "reliable". Chase a specific word: those are the only ones a single brand can hold.

"Industry standard" is the most owned word; "cost-effective" the least

Ownability differs by word. "Industry standard" has a majority owner in 30 of its 52 category pairs, or 57.7%. At the other end, "cost-effective" has one in 2 of 24 pairs, or 8.3%, and "budget-friendly" in 6 of 46, or 13.0%.

Consensus words concentrate: when AI calls something the industry standard, it usually names the same brand each time. Price words scatter: many brands compete on cheapness, so AI spreads the words across them. Five descriptors had too few pairs for the chart: "gold standard" (6 of 8 pairs owned), "easiest" (3 of 8), "fastest" (1 of 4), "best value" (0 of 2), and "most popular" (1 of 1).

Share of category pairs with a majority owner, by word
  • industry standard57.7% (30 of 52)
  • cheapest40.0% (4 of 10)
  • best overall33.7% (31 of 92)
  • all-in-one33.3% (18 of 54)
  • open-source25.6% (31 of 121)
  • enterprise-grade25.5% (13 of 51)
  • scalable23.5% (4 of 17)
  • user-friendly16.0% (20 of 125)
  • budget-friendly13.0% (6 of 46)
  • cost-effective8.3% (2 of 24)
High-value descriptors with at least 10 category pairs of 20+ uses.

"Excellent" has a majority owner in 5 of 531 categories

"Excellent" is the least ownable word we studied. It formed 531 category pairs with at least 20 uses, more than any other of the 25 words, and only 5 of them, or 0.9%, have a majority owner.

The five owners are OpenRefine in AI data cleaning and preparation tools (50.0%), Intuit in tax filing and preparation software (50.0%), Procter & Gamble in electric shavers and toothbrushes (65.4%), Aurora Solar in solar PV design and modeling software (50.0%), and Transistor in podcast hosting and monetization platforms (52.4%). Everywhere else, the word belongs to no one.

0.9%
of "excellent" category pairs have a majority owner
5 of 531

Takeaway

A sentiment dashboard full of "excellent" measures a word no brand can own. Track a specific word instead.

Half of all pairs have a leader who is short of a majority

The most common state of a high-value word is a leader without a majority. In 306 of 615 pairs, or 49.8%, the top brand supplies between 25% and 50% of the uses. In 139 pairs, or 22.6%, no brand reaches even 25%.

That middle band is the actionable one. A brand already leading a word at 30% or 40% is the most frequent association the engines have for it, and the remaining distance to a majority is small.

Adjective-category pairs by the leading brand's share
  • 0-25%139 pairs
  • 25-50%306 pairs
  • 50-75%133 pairs
  • 75-100%37 pairs

141 brands own the 170 owned pairs; almost nobody owns two

Ownership is spread thin. The 170 majority-owned pairs belong to 141 distinct brands, so the typical owner holds exactly one word. Six brands hold three pairs each, and none holds more.

Only two brands own three words inside a single category: WeMod owns "all-in-one", "easiest", and "user-friendly" in PC game trainers and mod managers, and RingCentral owns "best overall", "enterprise-grade", and "scalable" in business VoIP phone systems. Positioning theory says a brand can own one word; in AI answers, even the best-positioned brands rarely own more.

Brands owning three majority-owned pairs
WeMod logoWeMod3user-friendly, easiest, all-in-one in PC Game Trainers and Mod Managers
RingCentral logoRingCentral3best overall, enterprise-grade, scalable in Business VoIP Phone Systems
Nord Security3best overall, fastest in Consumer VPN Services; user-friendly in Password Manager Software
Intuit3user-friendly in Tax Filing & Preparation Software; industry standard, best overall in Small Business Accounting Software
Grafana3cost-effective, scalable in Full-Stack Observability Platforms; cheapest in Log Management & Observability Platforms
Amazon logoAmazon3cost-effective in Email and Messaging Delivery Platforms; industry standard, scalable in Object Storage & Image CDN Services

One in four words is a near-tie between two brands

In 151 of the 615 pairs, or 24.6%, the top two brands are within five percentage points of each other. These are the contested words: AI has two default associations and has not settled on one.

The table names the largest contested pairs. Pipedrive and HubSpot split "user-friendly" in CRM and sales pipeline software. USAA and Travelers split "cheapest" in car insurance quotes comparison. Plausible Analytics and Umami split "open-source" in privacy-focused web analytics.

Contested words: top two brands within 5 points
Pairs with at least 50 uses where the gap between the top two brands is under 5 percentage points, ordered by pair uses.
open-sourceLog Management & Observability PlatformsSigNoz21.2OpenSearch17.8146
cheapestCar Insurance Quotes ComparisonUSAA26.1Travelers25.4142
open-sourceDeveloper Backend & Vector Search ServicesAppwrite19Supabase logoSupabase19121
open-sourceFeature Flag Management PlatformsUnleash31.4Flagsmith28.1121
budget-friendlyOnline Eyewear and Vision CareZenni Optical logoZenni Optical28Essilorluxottica24100
open-sourceObservability and SRE Monitoring PlatformsGrafana25.5Prometheus22.498
all-in-onePayroll and HRIS SoftwareRippling logoRippling31.8Gusto logoGusto27.185
user-friendlyCRM and Sales Pipeline SoftwarePipedrive logoPipedrive27.5HubSpot logoHubSpot23.880
user-friendlyDigital Asset Management SoftwareBynder logoBynder28.2Brandfolder25.471
open-sourcePrivacy-Focused Web Analytics ToolsPlausible Analytics logoPlausible Analytics35.1Umami33.357

Takeaway

A contested word is the closest thing to winnable: the engines already reach for two brands, and the gap between them is under five points.

When both engines have volume, they usually name the same owner

For 54 pairs, both ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode had at least 10 uses of the word in the category. In 37 of them, or 68.5%, the same brand led on both engines.

Word ownership is mostly an index-wide fact, not an engine quirk. The exact wording the engines use differs answer to answer, but the brand each engine reaches for when it needs a given word is usually the same one.

68.5%
of pairs with volume on both engines had the same leading brand
37 of 54

How we measured this

From 3,618,541 validated brand descriptors in the window we studied 25 normalized descriptors, 223,195 uses in total: the 15 highest-volume buyer-decision words (each with at least 1,000 uses) and 10 generic praise words for comparison. Descriptors were lowercased and trimmed, each use was assigned to its prompt's primary category, and brands were rolled up to their consolidated parent record, so "Nord Security" aggregates NordVPN and sibling products.

A pair needs at least 20 uses to count, each descriptor extraction needs at least 0.7 confidence, and the window ends July 19 because descriptor coverage thins after that date. We counted only exact normalized descriptors, so "cheapest" and "most affordable" are separate words. Ownership here is share of observed descriptor uses in AI answers over the stated window; it is not market share, and the counts describe what the engines said, not why.

25
descriptors studied from the 3.6M-descriptor corpus
223,195 uses
20
minimum uses for an adjective-category pair to count
50%
of a pair's uses from one brand defines a majority owner

The GEO takeaway

Positioning theory says to own one word in the buyer's mind. In AI answers that advice is now measurable: 72.4% of high-value adjective-category pairs have no majority owner, half have a leader stuck below 50%, and one in four is a near-tie.

Pick one word. Check who owns it in your category: if it has a majority owner that is not you, pick a different word; if it is contested or leaderless, claim it. Use the word verbatim on your homepage, your comparison pages, and the third-party pages AI cites in your category, and recheck the pair's share each quarter over a window of the same length.

Get the data

Dataset CSVThe metrics behind every figure in this report.

Sources

  1. Valchanova: Positioning, The Battle for Your Mind (Ries & Trout book notes) · accessed 2026-08-29
  2. Peec: Brand perception documentation · accessed 2026-08-29
  3. Profound: AI search brand sentiment analysis · accessed 2026-08-29
  4. Yoast: How AI is shaping brand perception · accessed 2026-08-29

Related research

What words AI uses to describe brands
AI calls almost every brand excellent. Across 719,860 descriptors, 85% are positive and most are interchangeable praise. The asset is owning the word it won't share.
Do ChatGPT and Google use the same words for brands?
Usually not. ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode shared no exact description word or phrase in 59,707 of 78,167 matched comparisons.
Does AI praise the brands it ranks first?
More often, but praise is common throughout the list. AI used positive language in 640,708 of 788,976 descriptions for brands ranked fourth or lower.
AI recommendation white space: questions no brand owns
Across thousands of buyer questions, many have no brand AI consistently recommends. A map of the open white space by industry.
AI competitor analysis: who AI pairs your brand with
The brand AI names next to yours is a mutual rival only 23.6% of the time. A map of 153,572 brand pairings shows how lopsided AI's competitive set really is.

About this research

Dimitry Apollonsky

Founder, Parse

I built Parse to track where AI answers really come from: the sources they cite and the brands they name. DM me on LinkedIn to talk shop.

See which words AI attaches to your brand, and who owns them.

Run a free check against live AI answers — no account needed.

Parse

See where your brand stands in AI recommendations.

Products

  • Brands
  • Markets
  • Integrations
  • Work with us
  • Pricing
  • MCP

Resources

  • Research
  • Methodology
  • Blog

© 2026 Parse. All rights reserved.

LegalPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service