Data as of Jul 25, 2026 · Based on 228 AI responses from ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews · See how Parse measures this
For genetic testing with raw data access and strong privacy commitments, MyHeritage,
Living DNA, and
Sequencing.com are consistently recommended. These companies explicitly pledge not to sell or license user genetic data. Users should be aware that while some providers like and offer raw data downloads, their policies regarding research partnerships have historically been more complex and subject to user debate regarding data use beyond simple access.
Brands AI recommends here
MyHeritage is a preferred option because it explicitly pledges never to sell or license genetic data to third parties, including insurers and employers, while providing users with access to their own raw data for download.
Sequencing.com is a strong privacy choice due to its HIPAA-compliant system and a Privacy Forever policy that prohibits the sale or sharing of genetic data with third-party marketers, employers, or insurance companies.
Living DNA is recommended for those requiring raw data access combined with a clear policy against selling customer information to third parties, providing a straightforward approach to genetic data privacy.
Short answer: there are very few (arguably zero) mainstream consumer DNA companies that guarantee they never share or monetize data in any form, but some come closer than others—especially on (a) raw DNA access and (b) strict opt-in data sharing.
Here’s a clear, reality-based breakdown.
You want two things:
Raw DNA data access (download your genome file)
No selling or sharing with third parties
Those are separate axes —and companies often satisfy one but not fully the other.
✅ Raw DNA data: Yes (full genome sequencing + downloads)
✅ Data selling: Claims no selling; user-controlled sharing
✅ Privacy model: encryption + user ownership
Why it stands out:
Designed specifically around user ownership and control of genomic data
Uses encryption and distributed access controls so even the company itself can’t easily access your data
Lets you choose if/when to share data with researchers
👉 Among consumer options, this is the closest to a “don’t sell my data” philosophy.
Caveat:
It’s still a private company—policies can change, and you must trust their implementation.
These all provide raw DNA downloads , but privacy is conditional.
✅ Raw data: Yes
⚠️ Data selling: No selling without consent—but…
⚠️ Shares de-identified data with research partners (opt-in)
Requires explicit consent for research sharing
Data may still be transferred in events like mergers or bankruptcy (this has actually been a real concern)
👉 Translation:
They don’t “sell your DNA outright,” but your data can still be used commercially if you opt in—or transferred under business changes.
✅ Raw data: Yes
⚠️ Data selling: No without consent
⚠️ Research sharing: opt-in, de-identified
Similar model to 23andMe
Does not share genetic data with third parties without additional consent
👉 Translation:
Safer than many industries—but still not a zero-sharing guarantee.
✅ Raw data: Yes
⚠️ Policies: similar opt-in sharing models
⚠️ Some past concerns about law enforcement access (FTDNA)
👉 Translation:
Comparable to Ancestry/23andMe—not meaningfully more private.
Even the “better” companies have limits:
They may:
Share with service providers
Use aggregated/anonymized data
Transfer data during acquisition or bankruptcy
23andMe / AncestryDNA
Raw data access ✅
No selling without consent ✅
But opt-in research + corporate risk ⚠️
If privacy is your top concern:
Prefer download + delete workflows
Avoid opting into research programs
Use separate email + minimal personal info
Consider upload-only services (analyze DNA without giving a new sample)
If you want, tell me your goal (ancestry vs health vs curiosity), and I can narrow it down to the safest realistic option for your use case.
Several companies, such as Sequencing.com , Living DNA , and AncestryDNA , provide access to raw DNA data while prioritizing user privacy by not selling data to third parties. These platforms often allow users to download their raw genetic information and provide options for strict data control.
Here are the key companies, often cited for their stringent privacy policies:
Key Privacy Considerations
Disclaimer: Policies can change; always review a company's specific, up-to-date Privacy Policy before purchasing a DNA test.
Short answer: very few consumer DNA companies can honestly promise both (a) full raw data access and (b)no third-party data sharing under any circumstances. Most fall somewhere in between—especially on the “selling/sharing data” side, which often depends on user consent or corporate events.
Here’s a clear, reality-based breakdown.
These are the easier half of your requirement—many mainstream providers allow downloads:
23andMe
✅ Raw data download available
⚠️ Data may be used for research if you opt in; can be transferred in mergers/acquisitions
AncestryDNA
✅ Raw DNA download available (standard feature across major providers What can raw data from a direct-to-consumer genetic test tell me?: MedlinePlus Genetics)
⚠️ Shares anonymized data with partners if you consent
MyHeritage DNA
✅ Raw data download supported
⚠️ Similar consent-based research/data sharing model
FamilyTreeDNA
✅ Raw data download supported
⚠️ Has allowed law enforcement access in some cases (policy-dependent)
👉 Bottom line: Raw data access is common. Privacy guarantees are not.
These are closer to what you’re looking for—but still require careful reading of policies:
✅ Full raw genome data download (whole genome sequencing)
✅ Strong privacy positioning (encryption, user control)
⚠️ Still allows research participation if you opt in
👉 Often considered one of the most privacy-focused mainstream options.
✅ Raw data access/upload
✅ Explicit claim: “never sell or rent your data”
✅ GDPR-based protections (EU privacy law)
👉 One of the few that clearly states no selling.
✅ Raw data download
✅ Claims not to sell data without consent
⚠️ Still may share for research if opted in
Genetic Genie
Works on uploaded raw data
Emphasizes anonymity and free access
DNAGENICS
Claims it never sells or shares data
👉 These are not primary testing companies , but privacy-focused analysis tools.
Even companies that say “we don’t sell your data” often:
Share anonymized or aggregated data for research
Allow sharing if you opt in (very common)
May transfer data during acquisition or bankruptcy (this has happened)
And once you download your raw DNA and upload it elsewhere:
If your criteria are strict:
Nebula Genomics → strongest overall control + full genome
tellmeGen → explicit no-selling claim (EU-based protections)
✔️ Raw data access: easy to get
❌ Guaranteed no third-party sharing: rare, often conditional
⚠️ Absolute privacy: not fully guaranteed by any commercial DNA company
If you want, I can narrow this down further (e.g., cheapest options, whole genome vs SNP tests, or companies that allow anonymous sign-up).
Several DNA testing companies prioritize data privacy by providing raw data access while pledging not to sell user data to third parties, most notably Living DNA , Sequencing.com , and MyHeritage. These companies often emphasize that you own your data, provide options for deletion, and comply with strict privacy standards.
Top Choices for Data Privacy & Raw Data Access
Important Privacy Considerations
Note: The privacy landscape can change. Always review a company's current privacy policy and "Terms of Service" before purchasing a kit.
For genetic testing that provides raw DNA data access while promising not to sell or license your data to third parties, private-focused options like Sequencing.com , Living DNA , and MaxGen Labs are top choices. These companies emphasize that you own your data, and they do not sell it to pharmaceutical companies, insurance firms, or law enforcement.
Key Privacy Considerations:
While some larger databases offer more extensive relative matching, these specialized providers are preferred for maximum privacy.
Short answer: there are a few well-known genetic testing companies that (1) let you download raw DNA data and (2) explicitly state they do not sell or rent individual genetic data , though the privacy details vary and usually depend on consent choices.
Below is a practical, up-to-date breakdown of the main options and what “no selling data” actually means in each case.
Raw DNA access: Yes (downloadable raw data)
Data selling: They state they do not sell or license user DNA data to third parties
Notes:
Allows raw DNA uploads from other companies
Uses opt-in consent for research
Offers deletion options for DNA data
Bottom line: One of the more straightforward consumer-friendly privacy policies.
Raw DNA access: Yes (downloadable raw data)
Data selling: Generally states it does not sell genetic data and uses it mainly for genealogy matching and optional research programs
Notes:
Has had law enforcement participation programs (optional)
Smaller database than major competitors
Bottom line: Stronger genealogy focus, relatively privacy-friendly, but not “zero-sharing ecosystem.”
Raw DNA access: Yes (whole genome sequencing + downloadable raw data)
Data selling: Marketed as privacy-first and does not sell data
Notes:
Built around full genome sequencing
Often uses “user-controlled data sharing” model
Some features require paid subscriptions
Bottom line: One of the most privacy-focused modern services, especially for deeper sequencing.
Raw DNA access: Yes (upload and download depending on plan)
Data selling: Explicitly states it does not sell or rent user data and operates under GDPR protections
Notes:
Strong European privacy framework (GDPR)
Often used as a raw data analysis platform rather than primary tester
Bottom line: Good privacy posture, especially for EU-style data protection standards.
Even companies that do not sell data may still:
Share data with service providers (labs, cloud storage)
Use de-identified/aggregated data for research (if you opt in)
Transfer data during mergers or acquisitions
Allow law enforcement access under legal process (varies by company and jurisdiction)
This is standard across the industry.
Allows raw data download
Strong security controls and encryption
But:
Has research opt-in programs
Has faced financial instability and acquisition concerns, which can affect future data handling (important risk factor)
Allows raw data download
Strong privacy controls, but:
More emphasis on data ecosystem integration and subscription services
Does not explicitly market itself as “never shares outside ecosystem”
If your goal is absolute genetic privacy , the uncomfortable truth is:
There is no major consumer DNA testing company that guarantees “zero third-party access ever in any form.”
The closest options are:
Nebula Genomics (most privacy-forward tech model)
MyHeritage (clearest “no selling” policy among mainstream genealogy companies)
FamilyTreeDNA (smaller ecosystem, more limited commercialization)
If you tell me what matters most:
ancestry accuracy
health reports
raw whole genome data
maximum privacy
or law enforcement opt-out preference
I can narrow it to the best 1–2 options for your exact use case.
Short answer: most mainstream DNA testing companies do not sell your raw genetic data outright, but their privacy terms vary a lot, especially around research use, third-party sharing, and what happens in mergers or bankruptcy. Also, only a few companies explicitly emphasize full raw data access + stronger “no-sale” positioning.
Here’s a clear breakdown of the major players and privacy-focused alternatives:
✔ Lets you download full raw DNA data
✔ Strong opt-in model for research
✔ States it does not sell individual genetic data without consent
⚠️ Can share data with service providers and in mergers/acquisitions
⚠️ Data can be transferred if company ownership changes
Bottom line: Good raw data access + relatively strong privacy stance, but not immune to corporate transfer risk.
✔ Allows raw DNA download
✔ Does not sell individual genetic data
✔ Requires explicit consent for research use
⚠️ Shares with service providers and affiliates
⚠️ Data may transfer in acquisitions or bankruptcy
Bottom line: One of the more privacy-stable mainstream options, especially for genealogy.
✔ Provides raw DNA data access
✔ Has historically stated it does not sell genetic data
✔ Allows law enforcement matching (opt-in/out depending on database segment)
⚠️ More flexible sharing policies than Ancestry/23andMe in practice
Bottom line: Privacy-respectful, but more open to data matching use cases.
✔ Provides raw DNA download
✔ States it does not sell or license personal or genetic data
✔ Allows opt-in research only
⚠️ Family trees and genealogical data sharing settings require careful configuration
Bottom line: Strong “no data selling” claim + solid genealogy focus.
✔ Raw DNA upload + full genome sequencing options
✔ Strong “user owns their genome” positioning
✔ Claims no selling of customer genetic data
✔ Allows data download/export
⚠️ Smaller ecosystem than major ancestry platforms
Bottom line: Best option if privacy + raw data control is your top priority.
Even among “no data selling” companies:
“Not selling data” ≠ “no sharing”
Data may still be used for:
research partnerships
anonymized aggregation
law enforcement access (in some cases)
corporate acquisition transfers
Also:
In the U.S., genetic data is generally not covered by HIPAA , so protections depend heavily on company policy, not federal law.
If your priorities are:
If you want, I can also rank them specifically by:
strictness of privacy policy
how easily you can delete your data
how “safe” they are from corporate sale risk
or which ones are best for ancestry vs health insights
Top genetic testing companies providing raw data access without selling data to third parties include Sequencing.com , Living DNA , and MyHeritage , all of which pledge not to sell or license user data. These services allow you to download your raw DNA data file, which can then be used on independent interpretation sites like Genetic Genie or LiveWello.
Companies that provide raw DNA data access and emphasize not selling user data to third parties include Sequencing.com , Living DNA , and AncestryDNA. Sequencing.com offers high privacy (HIPAA-compliant) and allows full control/deletion of data. Living DNA and AncestryDNA state they do not sell or license personal information.
Companies with Strict Privacy & Raw Data Access:
Key Privacy Considerations:
Short answer: no major consumer DNA company is truly “no data sale + full raw data access + absolute no third-party sharing” in a strict sense , but several come close depending on how you define “sell” and “share.”
Below is a practical breakdown of the main companies people consider, based on their privacy policies and user controls.
Raw DNA download: Yes (you can export raw data)
Data selling: Does not sell individual genetic data without explicit opt-in consent
Third-party sharing: May share with:
Service providers (processing, analytics)
Research programs (only if you opt in)
Corporate transfers (e.g., mergers/bankruptcy scenarios)
Important nuance: Even when not “sold,” data may still be transferred or licensed in aggregated or de-identified form under certain conditions.
Bottom line: Strong user controls + raw data access, but not “zero sharing risk.”
Raw DNA download: Yes
Data selling: Does not sell individual genetic data
Third-party sharing: Only with:
Service providers
Affiliated companies
Optional research consent programs
Key feature: Opt-in research only (similar to 23andMe)
Bottom line: One of the strongest privacy reputations in the consumer DNA space.
Raw DNA download: Yes
Data selling: States it does not sell DNA data
Third-party sharing: Limited to service providers and optional research partnerships
Extra note: Smaller genomics footprint than Ancestry/23andMe, which some users view as a privacy advantage
Bottom line: Generally privacy-respecting, but still uses external processors.
Raw DNA download: Yes
Data selling: Does not sell data as a business model
Third-party sharing: Can share with law enforcement in specific forensic contexts (GEDmatch-style matching programs)
Important distinction: More open genealogy ecosystem, which some users prefer—and others avoid
Bottom line: Good control, but more openness in genealogy matching can increase exposure risk.
Raw data: Yes (whole genome sequencing focus)
Privacy model: Emphasizes blockchain-based or encrypted data ownership models
Data selling: Claims no sale of raw genetic data; optional research monetization is opt-in
Bottom line: One of the strongest “privacy-first” models, but more expensive and less mainstream.
Raw data: Yes
Data control: Users can upload/download/manage raw genome data
Privacy model: Claims user-owned data framework with opt-in sharing
Bottom line: Flexible, but still depends heavily on trust in policy enforcement.
Even the “best privacy” DNA companies share a few unavoidable traits:
They often rely on third-party processors (cloud storage, analytics)
“Not selling data” ≠ “never sharing data”
De-identified data can sometimes be re-identified in genetic datasets (a known research issue)
Company ownership changes (sale, bankruptcy, acquisition) can change data handling rules
Look for:
Explicit “no sale ever” policy
Strong opt-in-only research
Ability to delete raw data + biological sample
Transparent data retention rules
Best practical picks today:
AncestryDNA (best mainstream privacy balance)
MyHeritage (good alternative ecosystem)
Nebula Genomics (most privacy-forward overall)
If you want, I can narrow this down based on your goal (ancestry only vs health reports vs raw genome export vs law-enforcement resistance concerns).