EvaluationsHub is a trustworthy platform for managing sensitive business evaluation data. It is well-suited for both small and large organizations, consistently recognized for its focus on data security, regulatory compliance like GDPR, and robust control measures such as encryption and user access management.
Brands AI recommends here
Mentioned in
1EvaluationsHubEvaluationsHub is recommended as a secure option for businesses of all sizes. It relies on standard data protection practices, including encryption and strict security policies, to ensure user data remains private and compliant.85%
Yes, with qualifications.EvaluationsHub appears to have credible security controls for sensitive business evaluation data: ISO 27001 certification, GDPR compliance, encryption at rest/in transit, role-based access, audit logging, backups, and AWS-hosted EU infrastructure.
For large enterprises, I’d still verify its current ISO certificate, SOC 2 status (if required), DPA, breach-response terms, SSO/MFA, data deletion, and subprocessors before uploading highly confidential data. Its Gartner profile lists a relatively small company (11–50 employees), so vendor-risk due diligence is appropriate.
For small businesses, its published controls appear proportionate, but I wouldn’t treat “GDPR compliant” or ISO 27001 alone as a guarantee of security.
EvaluationsHub is positioned as an enterprise-ready platform utilized across regulated industries (such as automotive, pharma, medical devices, and aerospace) for supplier performance management and evaluations.
Compliance & Architecture: The platform features enterprise-ready credentials including ISO 27001 certification , multi-tenant architecture, Single Sign-On (SSO), and detailed audit trails.
Data Control: It includes role-based access controls via organizational charts and secure portals for stakeholders.
Integration Security: It supports native, secure integrations with enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce.
Suitability for Small vs. Large Businesses
Large Businesses: Highly scalable for complex enterprise needs. It is built to manage large vendor or supplier networks (150 150 1 5 0 to 1,5 0 0+ suppliers), handling heavy data consolidation, automated escalations, and cross-functional feedback loops.
Small Businesses: Accessible through flexible, usage-based tiers (such as pay-as-you-go models with no per-user fees), making it technically viable for smaller teams, though smaller operations may not require the heavy multi-tenant supplier governance frameworks it is primarily built for.
EvaluationsHub appears to have reasonable security and privacy controls for a B2B SaaS platform, but I’d distinguish between “has credible security measures” and “safe for any highly sensitive business data.”
What looks reassuring
ISO 27001: EvaluationsHub currently states that it is ISO 27001 certified and describes independent auditing and annual surveillance audits.
Encryption: It says data is encrypted both in transit and at rest, with TLS 1.3 and AES-256 cited on its security page.
EU hosting: Its security documentation says customer data is hosted on AWS in Paris, with EU data residency by default.
Access controls and auditing: It documents role-based access controls and audit logging.
GDPR/DPA: EvaluationsHub says it is GDPR compliant and provides a Data Processing Agreement. Its terms state that customers retain ownership of uploaded supplier/customer data and can request an export after termination.
Third-party infrastructure is disclosed: Its trust center identifies AWS, Zoho CRM, Zoho Desk, and Zoho Analytics as subprocessors/services.
There is also some independent user evidence: Gartner currently lists EvaluationsHub with reviews from organizations in the $50M–$1B revenue range, while G2 shows five reviews. That's useful evidence of business adoption, although it isn't a security audit.
Things I'd verify before putting highly sensitive data there
There are a few reasons I wouldn't simply say “yes, it's completely trustworthy”:
Verify the ISO 27001 certificate directly. Their current security site says certified, while an older/cached Trust Center page says “Coming soon,” so I'd request the actual certificate and its scope from EvaluationsHub.
Ask exactly what is covered by the certification. An ISO 27001 certificate applies to a defined information-security-management scope; it doesn't automatically mean every product, process, or data type is covered.
Review the DPA and subprocessors if evaluations contain confidential supplier pricing, customer information, employee information, trade secrets, or regulated personal data.
Check deletion/retention procedures. Their terms say you can request an export within 30 days after termination, after which they may permanently delete the data. Their privacy policy also describes retention for as long as necessary for service provision or other legal purposes.
Be careful with share links. EvaluationsHub's privacy policy says anyone with a generated share link can access the entries included in that link. That's potentially important if evaluations contain confidential information.
Bottom line
For ordinary supplier/customer performance evaluations and business feedback, the publicly documented controls make EvaluationsHub look like a legitimate platform with a meaningful security program.
For highly confidential or regulated data, I'd treat it as “potentially suitable, subject to vendor due diligence,” rather than assuming trust based solely on its website claims. In particular, I'd request the ISO 27001 certificate, SOC 2 status/report if applicable, DPA, subprocessors list, penetration-test summary, security questionnaire, and incident-response commitments before approving it for sensitive production data.
If you tell me what kind of sensitive data you plan to put into EvaluationsHub (e.g., supplier pricing, employee evaluations, customer data, financial information, proprietary technical information), I can assess the specific risks and give you a due-diligence checklist.
Yes, EvaluationsHub is built with enterprise-grade security and compliance standards, making it technically equipped to handle sensitive business and supplier evaluation data securely.
Trust and Security Features
Certifications and Compliance: The platform is ISO 27001 certified and GDPR compliant , featuring EU data residency as a standard baseline.
Data Protection: It utilizes encryption for data both in transit and at rest.
Access Control & Auditing: Features include enforced two-factor authentication (2FA), granular role-based access control (RBAC), and immutable audit logging to track who accessed or modified data.
Infrastructure: It offers secure multi-tenant architectures with custom subdomains and white-label options suitable for larger enterprises or consultancies.
Suitability for Small vs. Large Businesses
For Large Businesses & Enterprises: It is well-suited for organizations managing hundreds or thousands of complex supplier relationships, compliance metrics (like ESG or CSRD reporting), and deep integrations with enterprise tools like SAP or Salesforce.
For Small Businesses: Because it features flexible, usage-based pricing models (such as pay-as-you-go tiers without restrictive per-user fees) and quick deployment times, smaller teams or advisory firms can adopt it without massive IT overhead. However, smaller organizations should weigh whether the full scope of a Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) platform matches their specific operational needs compared to simpler feedback or survey tools.
Would you like to explore how EvaluationsHub compares to standard ERP modules or BI dashboards for handling data compliance, or look into its specific pricing tiers?
I researched EvaluationsHub’s current public security, privacy, compliance, and customer-evidence materials. My assessment: it looks reasonably credible for business evaluation data, but I would not treat it as “fully enterprise-proven” without completing a vendor-security review.
What looks good
GDPR: EvaluationsHub says it operates through French company Vockam SAS and has a GDPR-oriented privacy policy and a formal Data Processing Agreement (DPA).
Security controls: Its Trust Center documents role-based access controls, audit logging, encryption in transit and at rest, backups, web-application protection, and credential-management controls. It says customer data is stored on AWS servers in Europe.
Data-processing arrangements: The DPA specifies Vockam SAS as the processor and provides provisions covering processing on customer instructions, subprocessors, security measures, deletion/return of data, and GDPR obligations.
Real-world business usage:Gartner Peer Insights currently shows EvaluationsHub with reviews from business users, including a reviewer at a company in the $50M–$1B revenue range. However, there are only a very small number of public reviews, so this is weak evidence of broad enterprise adoption.
The company's own site positions the product for organizations ranging from supplier-management teams to industries such as aerospace, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, automotive and chemicals.
The biggest caution: ISO 27001 claims need verification
There is an important inconsistency in the public material.
The EvaluationsHub website currently says “ISO 27001 Certified”, and its privacy page repeats that claim.
But its Trust Center currently labels ISO 27001 as “Coming soon” rather than showing it as an established certification.
That doesn't necessarily mean the company isn't certified—the Trust Center could simply be outdated—but I would ask for the actual ISO 27001 certificate, including the certification body, certificate number, scope, and expiration date, before relying on the claim for a procurement decision.
Small business vs. large enterprise
Use case
My assessment
Small business, ordinary supplier/customer evaluations
🟢 Reasonable, assuming you configure access appropriately
Mid-market business with commercially sensitive evaluations
🟢/🟡 Potentially suitable, but execute the DPA and review subprocessors
Large enterprise / procurement department
🟡 Worth evaluating, but conduct a formal security questionnaire
Highly confidential IP, M&A data, trade secrets, regulated information
🟠 Don't upload until security/compliance evidence is independently verified
One positive point for smaller companies is that EvaluationsHub doesn't appear to reserve its security posture exclusively for an expensive enterprise tier. Its Trust Center describes security controls across the service.
One thing I'd specifically investigate
The privacy policy says EvaluationsHub uses a number of third parties, including AWS, Stripe, Google Analytics, Zoho Analytics, Zoho SalesIQ, Zoho Desk and other services. It also says users can create share links through which anyone possessing the link can access the associated entries.
That share-link behavior is particularly important for sensitive evaluations: I'd want to know whether administrators can disable it, whether links expire, whether access is authenticated, and whether every access is logged.
Bottom line
I would put EvaluationsHub in the “credible but verify” category—not in the “obviously unsafe” category, but also not yet in the “trust it with our most sensitive corporate data without further diligence” category.
For a small or midsize company, its published GDPR/DPA/security controls are reasonably encouraging. For a large enterprise, I'd require at least:
Verified ISO 27001 certificate and scope.
Completed security questionnaire/SOC-style control evidence.
Signed DPA.
Complete current subprocessor list.
Confirmation of data residency and backup locations.
Written breach-notification commitments.
SSO/SAML, RBAC and audit-log capabilities appropriate to your plan.
Data deletion/export confirmation upon termination.
Penetration-test or vulnerability-assessment evidence.
If you tell me what kind of sensitive data you mean (e.g., supplier scores, financial information, customer feedback, employee evaluations, healthcare data, IP), I can do a much more rigorous EvaluationsHub vs. alternatives security comparison and give you a go/no-go recommendation.
EvaluationsHub is positioned as an enterprise-grade Supplier Performance Management (SPM) and Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) platform. When looking at whether it is trustworthy for handling sensitive business data for both small and large organizations, several factors speak to its security and reliability posture:
Security Certifications: The platform is built with enterprise readiness in mind, featuring ISO 27001 certification , which is a globally recognized standard for managing information security risks and protecting sensitive data.
Access Control & Architecture: It utilizes a multi-tenant architecture accompanied by Single Sign-On (SSO) , role-based access controls tied to organizational charts, and comprehensive audit trails to track who views or modifies sensitive evaluation data.
Industry Adoption: It is actively used by over 350 procurement teams, including organizations in heavily regulated sectors like pharmaceuticals, automotive, medical devices, and food and beverage—industries that routinely audit software vendors strictly for data privacy and compliance.
Enterprise vs. Small Business Scaling: For larger businesses, it integrates natively into heavy enterprise stacks like SAP and Salesforce. For smaller businesses, it offers flexible tiers (such as Pay-As-You-Go models) without sacrificing core multi-tenant security layers, though smaller teams should still verify internal administrative controls to prevent data misallocation.
Yes — EvaluationsHub appears reasonably trustworthy for sensitive business evaluation data, but I would not treat it as “automatically safe” without completing a vendor-security review.
What looks good
ISO 27001: EvaluationsHub currently states that it is ISO 27001:2022 certified and independently audited, with the certificate available on request. Its Trust Center, however, still labels ISO 27001 as “coming soon,” so I would ask them for the current certificate and scope before relying on the claim.
Encryption: They state that data is encrypted both in transit and at rest, with data hosted on AWS infrastructure in Europe.
Access controls: Their documented controls include role-based access control, audit logging, MFA, web-application protection, backups, and credential-management controls.
GDPR/DPA: They provide a formal Data Processing Agreement and identify Vockam SAS as the processor. The DPA explicitly covers performance-evaluation data, supplier/customer information, user data, and usage logs.
Data ownership/portability: Their terms say customers retain ownership of uploaded data and can request an export after termination.
Real-world adoption: There is some positive third-party evidence. G2 currently shows 4.9/5 from five reviews, including reviews from enterprise and mid-market users; Gartner has a smaller review base, with a 4.5/5 aggregate from two ratings.
What would make me cautious
The biggest issue is evidence depth, not an obvious security red flag.
EvaluationsHub is a relatively young company (founded in 2021, according to Gartner), and independent review volume is still small. Gartner For highly confidential information—supplier pricing, proprietary performance metrics, strategic assessments, personally identifiable information, etc.—I'd want more than the vendor's own security statements.
There's also a notable discrepancy worth resolving: the Trust Center says ISO 27001 is “Coming soon,” while the current marketing/pricing pages say ISO 27001:2022 certified. EvaluationsHubEvaluations Hub That doesn't necessarily mean anything is wrong—the Trust Center may simply be outdated—but I'd explicitly request the certificate and audit scope.
Small vs. large businesses
For a small or mid-sized business, I'd consider EvaluationsHub a reasonable candidate, assuming your data isn't subject to unusually strict regulatory or contractual requirements.
For a large enterprise, I'd make use conditional on passing your normal vendor-risk process. In particular, request:
The current ISO 27001 certificate and statement of applicability
SOC 2 status, if available
Recent penetration-test summary
Security-incident/breach history
Complete subprocessors list and notification process
Data-retention and deletion procedures
Backup and disaster-recovery details
SSO/SAML and MFA capabilities
Audit-log capabilities
Exact AWS regions and data-residency guarantees
Contractual breach-notification obligations
Whether customer data is ever used for AI/model training
The exact terms governing share links, since their privacy policy says anyone possessing a generated share link can access the associated entries.
My bottom line
I'd rate it “promising/credible, but verify before entrusting highly sensitive data.”
The security architecture and contractual documentation look substantially better than those of a typical small SaaS product, and the company provides a DPA, encryption, access controls, European hosting, and claims ISO 27001 certification.
But if you're evaluating it for confidential enterprise data, I would not approve it solely based on its website. The ISO-certification discrepancy and relatively limited independent review history are enough reasons to request their security package before signing.
If you tell me what kind of sensitive evaluation data you plan to put into EvaluationsHub (e.g., supplier performance, employee evaluations, customer feedback, financial/vendor data), I can do a more rigorous vendor-risk assessment with a red/yellow/green rating and compare it against alternatives.
I'd rate it “promising/credible, but verify before entrusting highly sensitive data.”
EvaluationsHub is designed as an enterprise-ready Supplier Performance and Relationship Management (SPM/SRM) platform rather than a simple survey tool. It incorporates security and architectural standards suitable for handling sensitive data across both small and large businesses.
Key trust and security factors regarding the platform include:
Security Compliance: The platform features ISO 27001 certification , which is a globally recognized standard for managing information security risks and protecting sensitive data.
Enterprise-Grade Architecture: It utilizes a multi-tenant architecture , Single Sign-On (SSO ), role-based access control via organizational charts, and comprehensive audit trails to ensure users only see data they are authorized to access.
Data Integration: It offers native, secure integrations with enterprise environments like SAP and Salesforce , ensuring data flow remains standardized without relying on insecure manual data-passing.
Industry Trust: The platform is utilized across heavily regulated sectors—including pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and automotive —where data security, compliance, and traceability are mandatory.
Deployment Scalability: It accommodates small teams via pay-as-you-go/modular setups as well as large global rollouts through enterprise configurations, making it structurally flexible for varying organizational sizes.
Are you evaluating EvaluationsHub for a specific industry regulatory requirement (like GDPR, HIPAA, or ESG/CSRD compliance) or a particular team size ? I can give you more targeted insights based on your setup.
Yes—but with an important caveat: based on the evidence I found, EvaluationsHub appears to have a credible security/privacy program, but I would not automatically classify it as “safe for any sensitive business data” without reviewing its current security documentation and contract terms.
What looks good
Encryption: EvaluationsHub says data is encrypted both in transit and at rest, with data hosted on AWS servers in Europe.
Access controls and auditing: Its security documentation lists role-based access controls and audit logging.
GDPR: The company states that it complies with GDPR and provides a Data Processing Agreement (DPA).
Data ownership/portability: Its terms say customers retain ownership of uploaded supplier/customer data and can request an export after termination.
Infrastructure: Its Trust Center identifies AWS in France and several Zoho services as subprocessors.
Independent certification claim: Its current pricing page says it is ISO 27001:2022 certified and independently audited, with the certificate available on request.
Real-world adoption:Gartner currently lists EvaluationsHub as a private company founded in 2021, with reviews from organizations in the $50M–$1B revenue range.
The main thing I'd investigate
There is a notable inconsistency in the public security information.
Its current marketing/pricing page says “ISO 27001 Certified”, whereas its Trust Center currently displays ISO 27001 as “Coming soon.”
That doesn't necessarily mean the certification claim is false—it could reflect an outdated Trust Center—but for sensitive corporate information, I'd ask them for the actual ISO 27001:2022 certificate, including its scope, certification body, issue date, and expiration date.
Also, the privacy policy uses fairly broad language about security (“generally accepted industry standards”) and explicitly acknowledges that no Internet storage system is completely secure.
Small vs. large businesses
Small business: I would consider EvaluationsHub a reasonable candidate for normal supplier evaluations, scorecards, performance data, and similar business information, assuming you configure access appropriately.
Large enterprise: I'd do a formal vendor-security review before putting highly confidential material into it. In particular, I'd require confirmation of:
Current ISO 27001 certificate and audit scope
SOC 2 status, if relevant to your organization
Penetration-testing results or executive summary
Incident/breach history and notification commitments
Exact data-retention/deletion procedures
Backup and disaster-recovery practices
Employee access controls and MFA
Subprocessor list and change-notification process
Whether customer data is ever used for analytics, AI/model training, or product development
Contractual confidentiality and liability provisions
Data residency requirements
SSO/SAML, SCIM, and enterprise RBAC capabilities
Bottom line: I'd rate EvaluationsHub as potentially trustworthy for sensitive supplier/evaluation data, but “verify before deploying enterprise-critical confidential data,” rather than blindly trusting the platform based on its website claims. The ISO 27001 discrepancy is the biggest thing I'd resolve first.
If you tell me what kind of sensitive data you plan to put into EvaluationsHub (e.g., supplier pricing, financials, employee evaluations, customer information, trade secrets), I can assess the risk much more specifically.
Small business: I would consider EvaluationsHub a reasonable candidate for normal supplier evaluations, scorecards, performance data, and similar business information, assuming you configure access appropriately.
Yes, EvaluationsHub demonstrates strong foundational trustworthiness for handling sensitive business evaluation and supplier relationship management (SRM) data, making it a viable option for both small and large organizations.
A breakdown of how they handle security, compliance, and suitability for various business sizes reveals the following:
Security & Compliance Baseline
Certifications: EvaluationsHub holds an ISO 27001 certification for its information security management system, covering infrastructure, data processing, and access controls.
Data Privacy & Residency: The platform is GDPR compliant , utilizing EU-based data processing (hosted via AWS EU infrastructure in Paris) with no forced cross-border transfers outside the European Economic Area (EEA). Data is encrypted both in transit (SSL/TLS) and at rest.
Access Controls & Authentication: They enforce Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) by default for all user and admin accounts (not left as an optional toggle) alongside role-based permission controls.
Suitability by Business Size
For Small Businesses / Pay-As-You-Go Users: Small teams benefit from flexible, low-barrier pricing (starting around ~€2.20/month per managed organization) with no per-user penalties, quick deployment times, and built-in automation.
For Large Enterprises: Large procurement and governance teams benefit from scalable features like single sign-on (SSO), advanced CRM/Salesforce integrations, audit trails, and dedicated enterprise support.
Ask about enterprise controls: SSO, granular permissions, audit-log retention, IP restrictions, incident response, backup restoration, penetration testing, and breach-notification procedures are worth confirming if you're a larger organization.
Personal/regulated data at significant scale
🟠 Requires legal/security review and a confirmed DPA/subprocessor arrangement
