Network and Data Center Monitoring Software has unclaimed recommendation contexts.
Share of supported contexts
share of answers
Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 2,059 AI responses · See how Parse measures this
Network and Data Center Monitoring Software
Parse
https://parse.gl
SolarWinds maintains its leadership position in AI-generated recommendations for network monitoring. However, the most significant shift between October 2025 and March 2026 is the dramatic rise of , which catapulted from #10 to #2 in overall mentions.
| # | Brand | What AI says | Mention rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AI's top recommendation for complex, scalable, and hybrid enterprise networks. | 69% | |
| 2 | A fast riser, recommended for its AI-driven, SaaS-based platform. | 54% | |
| 3 | A leader in unified observability for cloud-native and hybrid environments. | 54% | |
| 4 | Praised for usability, rapid setup, and flexible sensor-based licensing. | 45% | |
| 5 | Recommended for full-stack observability with AI-powered root cause analysis. | 42% | |
| 6 | Frequently cited as a cost-effective, all-in-one solution for mid-sized enterprises. | 41% | |
| 7 | A leading open-source recommendation for customizable, self-hosted infrastructure monitoring. | 38% | |
| 8 | 26% | ||
| 9 | The go-to open-source standard for monitoring Kubernetes and cloud-native metrics. | 22% | |
| 10 | 19% | ||
| 11 | Losing ground overall, but still a top choice for automated network discovery. | 17% | |
| 12 | 14% | ||
| 13 | 14% | ||
| 14 | 13% | ||
| 15 | 8% | ||
| 16 | 8% | ||
| 17 | 6% | ||
| 18 | 6% | ||
| 19 | 6% | ||
| 20 | 6% | ||
| 21 | 5% | ||
| 22 | 5% | ||
| 23 | 5% | ||
| 24 | 5% | ||
| 25 | 5% |
Who wins on each AI
The same market, seen by two models.
Sources AI cited
solarwinds.com is the page AI reaches for most here, cited in 40% of analyzed answers.
Share of supported contexts
share of answers
Share of direct mentions
share of answers
Share of direct mentions
share of answers
Climbed from rank #18 in Oct 2025 to #4 in Mar 2026.
Jumped from rank #10 in Oct 2025 to #2 in Mar 2026.
Dropped from rank #2 in Oct 2025 to #13 in Mar 2026.
| Brand | ChatGPT Search | Google AI Mode | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 64% | 60% | ||
| 58% | 48% | ||
| 53% | 52% | ||
| 35% | 40% | ||
| 35% | 15% |
The two models disagree most about Kentik (ChatGPT #20, Google #6) and New Relic (ChatGPT #6, Google #16).
SolarWinds maintains its leadership position in AI-generated recommendations for network monitoring. However, the most significant shift between October 2025 and March 2026 is the dramatic rise of Paessler, which catapulted from #10 to #2 in overall mentions.
Across 2,059 AI responses, SolarWinds is mentioned most, named in 69% of them, followed by LogicMonitor (54%) and Datadog (54%).
Parse measures each brand's mention rate — the share of answers naming it — across 2,059 AI responses to this market's buyer questions. Answers are collected daily and the ranking is published weekly.
Brands enter the ranking when AI answers mention them. Parse collects answers daily and publishes the re-measured set weekly, so new brands appear as AI starts recommending them.
AI consistently recommends SolarWinds,
LogicMonitor, and
Datadog for this use case. Since early 2026,
Paessler's PRTG Network Monitor has also been increasingly suggested as a viable option for large enterprises, highlighting its growing presence in AI responses.
AI consistently recommends SolarWinds,
LogicMonitor, and
Datadog for this use case. Since early 2026, 's PRTG Network Monitor has also been increasingly suggested as a viable option for large enterprises, highlighting its growing presence in AI responses.
AI responses directly compare SolarWinds and
PRTG, consistently framing as the choice for complex, scalable networks and PRTG as the easier-to-use, more cost-effective option for simpler mid-sized deployments. This positioning has remained stable throughout the analysis window.
Brands mentioned
Brands mentioned
AI responses directly compare SolarWinds and
Paessler PRTG, consistently framing
SolarWinds as the choice for complex, scalable networks and PRTG as the easier-to-use, more cost-effective option for simpler mid-sized deployments. This positioning has remained stable throughout the analysis window.
The market map
Recommended by need