Who AI recommends, and when it changes.
Data as of Mar 31, 2026 · Based on 31 AI answers · A buyer need in Sports Betting and Fantasy Platforms. · See how Parse measures this
AI sends this DFS low-fee buyer most consistently to for its subscription model that virtually eliminates per-entry rake. follows as a popular pick'em alternative with no traditional rake, while gains ground through transparent fees and bonuses.
Where a different pick wins:
EPICK FantasyPeer-to-peer model avoids rake almost entirely, making it ideal for players focused on minimizing fees. · 2 sources
DraftKingsDraftKings offers massive prize pools and traditional DFS contests, despite 10-15% rake. · 2 sources
Underdog FantasyUnderdog Fantasy clearly shows rake, appealing to users who prioritize fee visibility. · 1 source
Recommendation share
FantasyDraft leads at 25% of AI recommendations; PrizePicks follows at 19%.
By platform
Both platforms lead with FantasyDraft.
Representative prompts behind this market ranking, and how AI tends to answer.
Buyer needs that sit next to this one in the same market.
Why here: Subscription model nearly eliminates per-entry rake, offering the lowest effective fees for frequent players. · 4 sources
Why here: Simpler pick'em format avoids traditional rake; fees are embedded in payouts, potentially lower overall. · 4 sources
Why here: Pick'em and best ball platform with transparent rake display and bonuses that improve player value. · 3 sources
Why here: Traditional DFS giant with large prize pools but standard 10-15% rake, a benchmark for high fees. · 3 sources
Why here: Similar to DraftKings with ~10% rake and high liquidity, often cited as a higher-fee alternative. · 3 sources
“What is the best DFS site that has the lowest rake or fees?”
ChatGPT outlines the standard 10-15% rake on 
