Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 728 AI responses · See how Parse measures this
Enterprise AI Coding Assistants
Parse
https://parse.gl
GitHub Copilot remains the dominant AI coding assistant, consistently cited by AI platforms for a wide range of development tasks. However, newer tools like are rapidly gaining prominence, particularly for tasks requiring deep, repository-wide context awareness.
| # | Brand | What AI says | Mention rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 81% | ||
| 2 | A fast-rising 'AI-native IDE' recognized for its deep repository-wide context awareness. | 62% | |
| 3 | Frequently recommended for privacy features, including self-hosted and on-premise deployment options. | 57% | |
| 4 | Cited for its ability to index and navigate large enterprise codebases. | 50% | |
| 5 | 32% | ||
| 6 | 31% | ||
| 7 | 31% | ||
| 8 | 22% | ||
| 9 | 13% | ||
| 10 | A rising tool for large, complex enterprise codebases and multi-file refactoring. | 13% | |
| 11 | 11% | ||
| 12 | 10% | ||
| 13 | 10% | ||
| 14 | 7% | ||
| 15 | 6% | ||
| 16 | 4% | ||
| 17 | 4% | ||
| 18 | 3% | ||
| 19 | 3% | ||
| 20 | 3% | ||
| 21 | 2% | ||
| 22 | 2% | ||
| 23 | 2% | ||
| 24 | 1% | ||
| 25 | 1% |
Who wins on each AI
The same market, seen by two models.
Sources AI cited
medium.com is the page AI reaches for most here, cited in 36% of analyzed answers.
Rose from #12 to #5 in overall mentions between Oct 2025 and Mar 2026.
Jumped from #30 to #6 in overall mentions between Oct 2025 and Mar 2026.
“A general provider of AI services with vague utility.” → “A specific recommendation for Gemini Code Assist and its enterprise features.”
| Brand | ChatGPT Search | Google AI Mode | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 81% | 91% | ||
| 96% | 52% | ||
| 45% | 37% | ||
| 26% | 17% | ||
| 0% | 35% |
The two models disagree most about Gemini Code Assist (ChatGPT #9, Google #22) and AWS CodeWhisperer (ChatGPT #7, Google #18).
GitHub Copilot remains the dominant AI coding assistant, consistently cited by AI platforms for a wide range of development tasks. However, newer tools like Cursor are rapidly gaining prominence, particularly for tasks requiring deep, repository-wide context awareness.
Across 728 AI responses, GitHub is mentioned most, named in 81% of them, followed by Cursor (62%) and Tabnine (57%).
Parse measures each brand's mention rate — the share of answers naming it — across 728 AI responses to this market's buyer questions. Answers are collected daily and the ranking is published weekly.
Brands enter the ranking when AI answers mention them. Parse collects answers daily and publishes the re-measured set weekly, so new brands appear as AI starts recommending them.
AI responses consistently name GitHub Copilot and
Tabnine as the top choices for C++ in VS Code. Since early 2026, answers have increasingly included tools with deeper repository context like
Sourcegraph and
Cursor, highlighting their value for navigating complex legacy systems.
Brands mentioned
AI responses consistently name GitHub Copilot and
Tabnine as the top choices for C++ in VS Code. Since early 2026, answers have increasingly included tools with deeper repository context like
Sourcegraph and , highlighting their value for navigating complex legacy systems.
GitHub Copilot is the constant top recommendation for this prompt. However, since late 2025,
has emerged as a strong alternative, with AI Overviews and ChatGPT frequently citing its superior project-wide context awareness.
Brands mentioned
GitHub Copilot is the constant top recommendation for this prompt. However, since late 2025,
Cursor has emerged as a strong alternative, with
Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT frequently citing its superior project-wide context awareness.
The market map
Recommended by need