StarkNet holds a clear lead, frequently highlighted for high-performance STARK-based scalability across complex decentralized applications and gaming. For deploying custom Layer 2 rollups, however, Arbitrum is the usual answer.
StarkNet Gaining: StarkNet now leads Arbitrum in Ethereum Layer 2 Rollup Tokens, #2 to #3
StarkNet Gaining: StarkNet now ranks #2 in Ethereum Layer 2 Rollup Tokens, up from #3
Arbitrum Slipping: Arbitrum ranked #2 in Ethereum Layer 2 Rollup Tokens last week and #3 this week
Arbitrum Slipping: Arbitrum now trails StarkNet in Ethereum Layer 2 Rollup Tokens, #3 to #2
Arbitrum Gap between platforms: ChatGPT Search now names Arbitrum 7.9 points more often than Google AI Mode in Ethereum Layer 2 Rollup Tokens, a widened gap
If by “best” you mean the ZK-rollup token with the strongest combination of protocol exposure, token utility, and potential value accrual, I’d compare ZK (ZKsync), STRK (Starknet), and SCR (Scroll) rather than treating all ZK tokens as equivalent.
Token
What the token does
Key consideration
ZK — ZKsync
Governance and protocol/ecosystem economics
Large ecosystem ambitions, but substantial supply remains subject to future unlocks
I'm convinced ZK-Rollups will dominate scaling, so which tokens should I buy to get exposure to that?
If I believe that Ethereum's future success depends entirely on its rollup ecosystem, what single token is the best "beta bet" on all rollups combined?
What is the best token whose network allows for the easy creation and deployment of custom Layer 2 rollups?
STRK — Starknet
Governance + network staking/security
Particularly interesting token utility because STRK is used for PoS security and staking rewards
SCR — Scroll
Governance
More straightforward governance exposure, but currently less direct token utility
ZKsync's ZK has a particularly interesting setup: the official documentation says the token is the backbone of protocol upgrades and ecosystem-growth programs, with 21 billion total supply. Team and investor allocations vest through June 2028.
Starknet's STRK arguably has the clearest economic role today. Starknet is transitioning to proof-of-stake, and STRK can be staked by validators/delegators; staking rewards are paid through newly minted STRK.
Scroll's SCR is currently primarily a governance token: holders can vote and submit proposals, with 1 billion total SCR supply.
The important distinction
I'd separate the thesis into:
Bullish on ZK technology: you want exposure to a ZK-rollup whose network usage and token economics are likely to reinforce each other.
Bullish on a particular ZK ecosystem: you're betting on developers, applications, liquidity, and adoption of one chain.
Bullish on the token itself: you need to examine FDV, circulating supply, unlock schedule, token utility, and how network activity actually creates demand for the token.
That last point is crucial. A technically excellent ZK-rollup doesn't automatically imply an attractive token. For example, ZKsync has significant future vesting: its official token paper describes team/investor vesting through June 2028.
So I wouldn't call one “the best” without specifying your investment horizon and risk tolerance. If you give me your horizon (e.g. 6 months vs. 3–5 years) and whether you're optimizing for upside or lower dilution risk, I can do a neutral ZK vs. STRK vs. SCR comparison using current market cap/FDV, unlocks, TVL, fees, activity, staking, and token utility.
Choosing the "best" token for a ZK-rollup depends on whether you are looking at ecosystem adoption, technical maturity, or specific application verticals. Because ZK-rollups (validity rollups) compete heavily on developer adoption, decentralization stage, and throughput, several standout Layer 2 (L2) networks lead the conversation.
The top-contending ZK-rollup native tokens vary by their unique focus:
Immutable X (IMX ): If you are looking at application-specific ZK utility rather than general-purpose L2s, Immutable uses StarkWare's ZK technology tailored explicitly for Web3 gaming, NFT scaling, and zero-gas trading.
Scroll (SCROLL ) / Linea (LINEA / Consensys ecosystem): Both focus aggressively on native EVM equivalence (making it seamless to port Ethereum smart contracts over without code changes), leveraging heavy ecosystem backing like Consensys's integration with MetaMask.[](https://www.starknet.io/blog/layer-2-ecosystem/)