Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 4,655 AI responses · See how Parse measures this
Blockchain Platform and Payment Tokens
Parse
https://parse.gl
Arbitrum maintains its position as the leading Layer 2 solution in AI-generated recommendations. However, the conversation is increasingly focused on the competition between established Optimistic Rollups and rising ZK-Rollup platforms like and .
| # | Brand | What AI says | Mention rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Consistently ranked as the top L2 for its mature DeFi ecosystem and deep liquidity. | 38% | |
| 2 | A leading ZK-Rollup praised for low fees, fast finality, and EVM compatibility. | 36% | |
| 3 | A top contender, frequently recommended for its developer-friendly OP Stack and Superchain vision. | 35% | |
| 4 | Framed by its significant pivot to ZK technology and custom-chain development kits. | 33% | |
| 5 | A rising ZK-Rollup competitor noted for its high-performance STARK proof technology. | 30% | |
| 6 | The foundational settlement layer, seen as the ultimate 'beta bet' on all rollups. | 27% | |
| 7 | Cited for its CCIP protocol for secure cross-chain messaging and token transfers. | 14% | |
| 8 | Praised for user-friendly onboarding via | 14% | |
| 9 | A leading specialized ZK-Rollup focused on NFTs and high-speed gaming transactions. | 12% | |
| 10 | 11% | ||
| 11 | 11% | ||
| 12 | 9% | ||
| 13 | 8% | ||
| 14 | 7% | ||
| 15 | 7% | ||
| 16 | 7% | ||
| 17 | 7% | ||
| 18 | 7% | ||
| 19 | 6% | ||
| 20 | 5% | ||
| 21 | 5% | ||
| 22 | 5% | ||
| 23 | 4% | ||
| 24 | Frequently compared to L2s as a high-performance, low-fee monolithic Layer 1 alternative. | 4% | |
| 25 | 4% |
Who wins on each AI
The same market, seen by two models.
Sources AI cited
medium.com is the page AI reaches for most here, cited in 31% of analyzed answers.
Mention rate for ZK-focused prompts rose from 67% in Nov to over 89% by Mar.
Fell from overall rank #2 in Oct to #6 by Mar, overtaken by ZK-focused competitors.
“A scaling solution committed to future ZK-rollup development.” → “A platform that has fully pivoted to its ZK technology stack, including Polygon zkEVM.”
Mention rate for ZK-focused prompts increased from 60% in Nov to over 89% by Mar.
Arbitrum maintains its position as the leading Ethereum Layer 2 solution in AI-generated recommendations. However, the conversation is increasingly focused on the competition between established Optimistic Rollups and rising ZK-Rollup platforms like zkSync and StarkNet.
Across 4,655 AI responses, Arbitrum is mentioned most, named in 38% of them, followed by zkSync (36%) and Optimism (35%).
Parse measures each brand's mention rate — the share of answers naming it — across 4,655 AI responses to this market's buyer questions. Answers are collected daily and the ranking is published weekly.
Brands enter the ranking when AI answers mention them. Parse collects answers daily and publishes the re-measured set weekly, so new brands appear as AI starts recommending them.
Conversely, what's the best token to hold if I believe ZK-Rollups are the ultimate scaling solution?
AI responses consistently recommend tokens from dedicated ZK-Rollup platforms. While ChatGPT initially included general L2s in November, by December both platforms focused exclusively on zkSync,
StarkNet,
Polygon, and as the primary candidates.
Brands mentioned
Initially, AI assistants pointed to Arbitrum's first-come, first-served sequencer as the fairest system. Since December, responses have become more nuanced, highlighting
Chainlink's Fair Sequencing Services (FSS) and privacy-focused solutions like
Aztec Network as superior for mitigating MEV.
The market map
Recommended by need