If you want website analytics that respects visitors’ privacy and does not use cookies, I’d start with Plausible Analytics. It provides useful traffic statistics without persistent identifiers or cross-site tracking, and it’s open source.
Here are the best alternatives, depending on whether you prioritize simplicity, advanced reporting, or keeping the data on your own server.
A clean, lightweight dashboard for pageviews, traffic sources, popular pages, countries, devices, and campaigns. Open source, with hosted and self-hosted options. No cookies or persistent identifiers.
Best for: blogs, business websites, and marketing sites.
A strong choice if you want an open-source tool that you can host yourself. It supports traffic analytics, campaigns, custom events, conversions, and revenue tracking, without cookies by default.
Best for: developers and people who want control over their data.
Particularly privacy-focused: no cookies, local storage, IP-address collection or device fingerprinting. It provides aggregated traffic, referrer, campaign, and event reports.
Best for: maximum data minimization and simple reporting.
A straightforward, paid analytics service with pageviews, referral sources, campaign tracking, and conversion metrics. It doesn't use analytics cookies and is designed to avoid collecting personal data for analytics.
Best for: businesses that want a managed service with minimal setup.
These features are based on the vendors' published documentation.
One important caveat: Cookie-free doesn't automatically mean that every use of analytics is exempt from privacy-law requirements. Your jurisdiction, configuration, and other website scripts can still matter.
Which would I choose?
For the easiest setup: Plausible.
For free software you can run on your own server: Umami (the software is free; hosting may cost money).
For the strictest approach to minimizing visitor data: Simple Analytics.
One question so I can narrow this down: Do you want a free tool, or are you happy to pay for a hosted service?
The best privacy-focused website analytics tools that do not use cookies include Plausible Analytics, Fathom Analytics , and Umami , which allow you to track traffic legally without needing intrusive cookie consent banners.
Top Privacy-Focused Cookieless Analytics Tools
Plausible Analytics : An open-source, ultra-lightweight (< 1 KB) script that tracks core metrics like unique visitors and pageviews entirely without cookies or personal data collection.
Fathom Analytics : A fast, privacy-first paid alternative running on independent European and global infrastructure that completely bypasses the need for GDPR/CCPA cookie consent banners.
Umami : A self-hosted or cloud-managed open-source alternative that provides a clean, Google Analytics-style dashboard while maintaining a strict cookieless and privacy-centric data collection model.
Simple Analytics : A European-hosted analytics tool that focuses heavily on data protection, compliance, and lightweight scripts without any tracking identifiers or cross-site profiling.
Yes. I’d narrow the field to Umami, Plausible, Fathom, and Matomo configured for cookieless tracking. The important distinction is that “cookieless” does not necessarily mean “no identifiers whatsoever”—some tools use short-lived/hashed identifiers to calculate unique visitors.
Platform
Cookieless
Custom events
Funnels
Campaign attribution
Raw personal identifiers
Umami
✅
✅
✅
✅
Designed not to collect personal data
Plausible Analytics
✅
✅
✅*
UTM/source attribution
No PII; uses privacy-preserving visitor counting
Fathom Analytics
✅
*Plausible's funnel functionality depends on the plan.
The closest match: Umami
Umami appears to be the strongest match for your exact requirements. Its current documentation explicitly lists funnels, custom events, attribution, campaign analysis, custom event properties, and revenue attribution, while stating that it operates without cookies and without collecting personal data.
without needing a conventional persistent user ID.
It also supports self-hosting, which gives you additional control over what is retained and where.
Plausible
Plausible is a good fit if you want a lighter-weight marketing analytics product. It supports custom events and campaign/UTM attribution, and its cookieless approach avoids collecting conventional personal identifiers. Its limitation is depth: it isn't intended to reproduce the user-level behavioral analysis of GA4/Mixpanel.
Fathom
Fathom is another straightforward cookieless option. It supports goals/events and campaign/source reporting, while deliberately avoiding persistent user tracking. It's consequently better suited to website/conversion analytics than detailed product analytics.
Matomo
Matomo is the interesting choice if you need more sophisticated analytics. It can operate without cookies and offers custom reports, funnels, segmentation and attribution capabilities. However, unlike the privacy-first products above, cookieless operation is a configuration choice, so you'd need to implement and audit the privacy settings carefully.
One important caveat
If by “without collecting raw personal identifiers” you mean literally no IP address, user-agent-derived identifier, fingerprint, persistent visitor ID, email address, etc. entering the analytics system, I'd distinguish that from merely saying “cookieless.”
For example, some cookieless systems still derive an anonymous/rotating visitor identifier from request information so they can calculate unique visitors.
So I'd categorize them this way:
Need funnels + events + campaign attribution + privacy:Umami
Mostly marketing/site analytics, very simple:Plausible or Fathom
Need advanced analytics/attribution and are willing to configure privacy carefully:Matomo
Need absolutely no visitor-level identifier at all: look specifically for an aggregate-only design rather than simply searching for “cookieless.”
If you tell me whether this is for a marketing site, SaaS product, or e-commerce site, I can also compare these four on exactly what data they send/store, attribution methodology, self-hosting, retention, and GDPR/CCPA implications.
Yes, finding platforms that thread the needle between advanced product/marketing features (funnels, custom events, and campaign/UTM attribution) and strict privacy requirements (cookieless tracking, zero persistent profiles, and no raw personal identifiers like unmasked IP addresses) requires looking at privacy-first analytics tools.
Traditional tools collect raw IPs or persistent cross-site cookies, whereas privacy-compliant platforms utilize techniques like daily-rotating server-side salts to hash IP/User-Agent data (rendering it non-reversible and non-personal) or rely purely on session-scoped first-party parameters.
The platforms that support these capabilities include:
Campaign Attribution: Features a Multi-Channel Conversion Attribution tool supporting models like linear, time-decay, and position-based credit across UTM parameters.
Privacy-focused analytics platforms have moved away from persistent tracking (like cookies, local storage, or long-term browser fingerprinting). However, they differ significantly in how they calculate visitor numbers and sessions without them.
The two main transparency models used by leading cookieless platforms clarify how they count traffic without compromising user privacy:
1. The Hashing/Daily-Rotating Salt Model (e.g., Plausible & Fathom)
These platforms do not write anything to the browser, but they do temporarily process transient connection data (IP address and User-Agent) on the server side to calculate a unique signature.
How Session/Visitor Counting Works:
They generate a temporary cryptographic hash using a combination of the visitor's IP address, User-Agent, domain name, and a daily-rotating random salt (a random string of data that changes and deletes every 24 hours at midnight UTC).
Hash = SHA256(daily_salt + domain + IP + User-Agent)
Raw IP addresses and User-Agents are never stored in a database.
Attribution & Session Definition:
Because the hash resets every 24 hours, a person visiting on Monday and returning Tuesday is counted as two unique daily visitors.
A session/visit is typically defined as a continuous block of activity ending after 30 minutes of complete inactivity. Within that single day, multiple visits from the same hashed signature are grouped or tallied as separate sessions if separated by the inactivity timeout.
2. The Strict Referrer-Based Model (e.g., Simple Analytics)
This approach goes a step further than daily hashing by completely refusing to derive any visitor identifier or hash from IP addresses or user agents.
How Session/Visitor Counting Works:
They do not track individual people or try to stitch together unique humans over a 24-hour period . Instead, they measure unique pageviews (which they label as "visitors" in the dashboard).
A pageview is counted as a "unique visitor" purely based on the HTTP Referrer header:
Counted as unique: If there is no referrer (direct traffic) or if the referrer hostname does not match your own website's domain (external traffic source).
Not counted as unique (internal navigation): If the referrer hostname already matches your own website, or if it's an internal click, page reload, or browser back/forward action.
Attribution & Session Definition:
Traffic sources and attribution are derived strictly from incoming UTM parameters and external HTTP referrer URLs attached to the initial entry event. There is no persistent session tracking across internal page clicks—each internal movement is just mapped as an aggregate event tied to that initial referral source.
If you are trying to choose between these models for a specific project, let me know:
Do you need precise daily unique visitor counts (which requires the daily-hash approach like Plausible/Fathom)?
Or do you need zero IP-derived data whatsoever for strict regulatory compliance (which points to Simple Analytics)?
Simple Analytics — explicitly explains visitor/session counting without cookies, persistent IDs, or fingerprinting. Its newer session methodology treats pageviews independently rather than identifying a visitor.
Fathom Analytics — documents its cookieless method: a site-specific, daily-rotating SHA-256 signature derived from IP/user-agent, explicitly designed not to persist or track across days.
Plausible — documents cookieless unique visitors using a daily rotating hash, with no persistent identifier.
Matomo — documents both its short-lived approach and what changes when cookies are disabled, including effects on attribution and returning visitors.
No
No
Umami
Free (Self-hosted)
< 2 KB
Yes
No
Simple Analytics
~$9/month
< 2 KB
No
No
✅
Limited
UTM/source attribution
No persistent personal identifiers
Matomo
✅ configured
✅
✅
✅, including advanced attribution options
Can be configured to avoid personal identifiers
Privacy/Cookieless: Can be configured into a strict cookieless tracking mode alongside IP anonymization, meaning it can operate without persistent cookies or raw identifier collection. Self-hosting gives you 100% data ownership.
Funnels & Custom Events: Best-in-class product analytics featuring deep custom event instrumentation, trend analysis, and advanced funnel conversion drop-offs.
Campaign Attribution: Handles first-touch/initial UTM andreferrer campaign attribution natively, though deeper multi-touch revenue attribution tied to external CRMs requires data warehouse blending.
Privacy/Cookieless: Supports a cookieless mode that stops storing persistent device IDs on the client, utilizing temporary daily-rotating salted hashes of request data instead of logging raw personal identifiers.
Funnels & Custom Events: Offers native conversion funnels, behavior analytics, and custom event tracking via its API for mapping complex data layers.
Campaign Attribution: Tracks standard traffic sources and campaign tags.
Privacy/Cookieless: Built from the ground up as a cookieless, privacy-compliant solution tailored for audience cohorts and visitor behavior without persistent tracking.
Note on lighter alternatives: Simpler cookieless tools like Plausible or Fathom support custom events/goals and basic UTM campaign tracking, but they intentionally omit multi-step conversion funnels and advanced multi-touch attribution models to preserve extreme minimalism.
Would you prefer a self-hosted open-source platform (like Matomo) or a managed cloud tool , and what is your primary campaign attribution need (e.g., basic UTM tracking vs. complex multi-touch revenue attribution)?
If your criterion is specifically “show me exactly how visitors, sessions, and attribution are computed without cookies or persistent fingerprinting,” Simple Analytics and Fathom have particularly explicit technical explanations.