Automated red teaming suites for prompt injection testing
Data as of Oct 25, 2026
Reviewed by Dimitry Apollonsky
Which brands AI mentions
Mentioned in · Jul 7 – Oct 25, 2026
ChatGPT SearchChatGPT SearchGoogle AI ModeGoogle AI Mode
Widest split: HiddenLayer, 78% on ChatGPT Search and 50% on Google AI Mode.
- =1NVIDIA GarakChatGPT Search 87%Google AI Mode 77%
- =1PromptfooChatGPT Search 87%Google AI Mode 77%
- =1PyRITChatGPT Search 83%Google AI Mode 59%
- =4HiddenLayerChatGPT Search 78%Google AI Mode 50%
- =4MindgardChatGPT Search 61%Google AI Mode 64%
Questions and answers
Google AI ModeOct 25, 2026
Several open-source projects,
enterprise security frameworks, and commercial platformsoffer automated or agentic red teaming suites specifically designed for prompt injection, jailbreaking, and LLM application security testing.The primary automated red teaming suites available for penetration testers are organized below by category:
Open-Source & Community Suites
- Promptfoo : A widely used CLI tool and library for automated LLM evaluation and security vulnerability scanning. It includes a dedicated red teaming module that runs automated adversarial probes against RAG setups, LLM endpoints, and agent pipelines to find direct/indirect prompt injections, PII leaks, and system prompt overrides.
- Garak (Generative AI Red-teaming & Assessment Kit) : Backed heavily by the community and NVIDIA, Garak functions like an "Nmap for LLMs." It systematically scans models and application endpoints for over 50 vulnerability types, probing explicitly for prompt injection, data leakage, toxic outputs, and jailbreaks.
- Microsoft PyRIT (Python Risk Identification Tool) : An open-source orchestrator framework built by Microsoft’s AI Red Team. PyRIT automates risk identification for generative AI systems, managing multi-turn and single-turn attack sequences (such as Crescendo and TAP), converting objectives into adversarial payloads, and scoring target responses using auxiliary models or content filters.
Specialized & Enterprise Platforms
- Commercial AI Security & Compliance Platforms : A growing market of enterprise tools (including platform offerings from major cloud and security vendors like Microsoft and Cisco, alongside dedicated startups like PromptBrake) embed automated adversarial suites. These tools are built to integrate into CI/CD pipelines for continuous regression testing of prompt adjustments, model updates, and tool-use boundaries.
If you'd like, let me know:
- Are you targeting a raw LLM foundation model or an agentic application with external tools/RAG?
- Do you prefer a CLI/Python-based open-source framework or an enterprise web dashboard?
I can help tailor a specific testing strategy or command configuration for your scope.
Sources cited in this answer9
- tigera.ioAI Red Team Agents Automate Attacks on your AI ...
- promptfoo.devAI Red Teaming | Promptfoo
- github.comGitHub - promptfoo/promptfoo: Test your prompts, agents, and RAGs. Red teaming/pentesting/vulnerability scanning for AI. Compare performance of GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, and more. Simple declarative configs with command line and CI/CD integration. Used by OpenAI and Anthropic. · GitHub
- github.comGitHub - NVIDIA/garak: the LLM vulnerability scanner · GitHub
- garak.aigarak: LLM vulnerability scanner
- azure.github.ioPyRIT — Python Risk Identification Tool - PyRIT Documentation
ChatGPT SearchOct 25, 2026
For a prompt-injection penetration test, there are several established providers of automated AI red-teaming suites. They range from open-source tools you can run in CI/CD to commercial platforms that continuously test LLM applications, RAG pipelines, and AI agents for prompt injection, jailbreaks, data leakage, and unsafe tool use.
Leading automated red-teaming suites
1. Promptfoo
(Best starting point)
Open source + enterprise
Automates adversarial testing for prompt injection, jailbreaks, RAG poisoning, and data exfiltration. Supports API and browser-based targets and CI/CD integration. A strong choice for repeatable penetration tests and regression testing.
2. Mindgard
Commercial platform + expert services
Emulates attacker behavior across complete AI systems, including multi-step prompt injection, agent hijacking, tool abuse, and data extraction. Particularly relevant when you need evidence of exploitability, remediation guidance, and continuous testing.
3. HiddenLayer
Commercial enterprise platform
Offers automated adversarial testing alongside broader AI security capabilities. Worth evaluating for organizations that want to test prompt-injection resistance and jailbreak defenses across multiple AI systems.
4. garak
Free, open-source scanner
Runs probe libraries against LLMs to identify weaknesses such as prompt injection, jailbreaks, and information leakage. Best for technical teams wanting a scriptable scanner and control over their test environment.
5. Microsoft PyRIT
Free, open-source framework
Provides components for orchestrating automated, multi-turn adversarial tests against generative AI systems. Suited to security engineers building customized penetration-test workflows; it requires more implementation work than a turnkey commercial suite.
6. Giskard
Open source + hosted options
Generates and executes security tests for LLM applications, agents, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. A useful option when prompt-injection testing needs to sit alongside broader model and application evaluations.
Which should you evaluate first?
Your requirement Shortlist Automated tests in CI/CD Promptfoo End-to-end, multi-step attack simulation Mindgard Enterprise AI security platform HiddenLayer Free, scriptable vulnerability scanning garak Custom research-grade attack workflows Microsoft PyRIT RAG and agent application evaluation Giskard These are different types of products, so compare actual attack coverage rather than treating them as interchangeable. In particular, verify that a suite tests indirect prompt injection through retrieved documents, webpages, emails, and tool outputs—not just malicious text typed directly into a chatbot.
For a penetration test, also check whether it can safely test an authorized staging target, capture reproducible attack traces, validate unauthorized tool calls or data access, and export findings for retesting.
One additional option: OpenAI Red Teaming offers a managed enterprise service, alongside guidance for using Promptfoo for open-source testing.
My recommendation: start with Promptfoo for a fast, reproducible baseline, then evaluate Mindgard if you need deeper, adaptive attacks against agents and connected tools. Run all testing against systems you own or have explicit authorization to assess.
Sources cited in this answer19
- owasp.github.ioAI/LLM Application Security Testing and Red Teaming - OWASP DevSecOps Guideline
- securecoding.comBest LLM Red Team Tools for Prompt Injection
- safeguard.shAutomated Red Teaming Platform: A Buyer's Guide
- promptfoo.devGetting started | Promptfoo
- github.compromptfoo/site/docs/guides/llm-redteaming.md at main · promptfoo/promptfoo · GitHub
- promptfoo.devGetting started | Promptfoo
Google AI ModeOct 15, 2026
When looking for an automated red teaming platform focused on prompt injection and LLM vulnerability testing, options generally fall into open-source frameworks, developer-first testing tools , and enterprise cloud platforms.
The top platforms and tools available for automated prompt injection pen testing include:
1. Developer-First & CLI Platforms (Open Source / Commercial)
- Promptfoo : One of the most popular tools for continuous LLM red teaming. It automates testing across 50+ vulnerability types—including direct/indirect prompt injection, jailbreaking, PII leaks, and system prompt overrides. It generates application-specific attack matrices and maps findings to frameworks like OWASP Top 10 for LLMs and NIST.
- Garak (Generative AI Red-teaming & Assessment Kit) : Created by NVIDIA, Garak functions like an "Nmap for LLMs." It is a robust, open-source vulnerability scanner that probes endpoints for prompt injection, data leakage, jailbreaks, and toxic outputs using both static and dynamic/adaptive probes.
2. Specialized & Penetration-Testing Utilities
- Augustus by Praetorian : An open-source, portable binary built specifically to fit into existing human-led penetration testing workflows. It eliminates heavy Python/npm dependencies and targets classic jailbreak and prompt injection techniques (such as DAN variants and Goodside-style injections).
- Giskard : An open-source testing framework with a strong focus on automated detection of LLM vulnerabilities, hallucination scoring, and security vulnerabilities like prompt injections.
3. Enterprise Cloud & Ecosystem Platforms
- Azure AI Foundry / AI Red Teaming Agent : Microsoft’s enterprise platform includes an automated AI Red Teaming Agent that uses synthetic adversarial datasets to probe target AI systems for direct and indirect jailbreak vulnerabilities and prompt injections prior to production deployment.
- Dedicated Enterprise AI Security Startups : Platforms like General Analysis and others specialize in continuous, agentic AI security testing that stress-tests tool-chains, multi-step business workflows, and multi-agent communication pipelines against indirect prompt poisoning.
To help narrow down the best fit, could you share:
- Are you looking for an open-source CLI tool to run locally/in CI/CD, or an enterprise managed platform?
- Is your application a simple chat endpoint or an agentic system with tool/API access?
Sources cited in this answer9
- promptfoo.devAI Red Teaming | Promptfoo
- github.comGitHub - NVIDIA/garak: the LLM vulnerability scanner · GitHub
- developers.redhat.comRed team your AI model with garak | Red Hat Developer
- praetorian.comIntroducing Augustus: Open Source LLM Prompt Injection Tool | Praetorian
- deeplearning.aiRed Teaming LLM Applications - DeepLearning.AI
- azure.microsoft.comEnhance AI security with Azure Prompt Shields and Azure AI Content Safety | Microsoft Azure Blog
ChatGPT SearchOct 15, 2026
If you're evaluating automated red-teaming platforms specifically for prompt injection penetration testing, I'd focus on tools that can automatically generate adversarial inputs, test whether an LLM or agent follows malicious instructions, detect policy bypasses and data leakage, and run repeatable regression tests.
One important distinction: general-purpose LLM security scanners often focus on harmful outputs and jailbreaks, while agent-focused red-team platforms also test indirect prompt injection, untrusted documents, tool misuse, and attempts to exfiltrate sensitive data.
Platforms worth evaluating
1. Promptfoo
(Best starting point)
Open source · Commercial options
Automates adversarial test generation against your application, including direct and indirect prompt injection, system-prompt extraction, RAG poisoning, data leakage, and agent security tests. Supports API and CI/CD workflows.
Best for: AppSec teams wanting repeatable penetration tests and regression testing in development pipelines.
2. Lakera Red
Commercial · Managed platform
Particularly relevant to prompt injection in AI agents. Its documented testing includes indirect attacks that inject instructions into retrieved documents, web pages, and tool results, with evaluation of resulting tool calls.
Best for: Agentic applications that retrieve untrusted content or can take actions through tools.
3. Mindgard
Commercial · Platform and expert-led services
Tests attack paths across LLM applications and agents, including prompt injection, agent hijacking, tool abuse, data extraction, and guardrail bypass. Offers reproducible findings and remediation guidance.
Best for: Organizations seeking a more comprehensive security assessment with expert support.
4. Microsoft PyRIT
Open source · Extensible Python framework
Automates single- and multi-turn attack campaigns, including iterative adversarial strategies, and supports custom scenarios and scoring. It's a framework rather than a fully managed security platform.
Best for: Security researchers who need custom attack logic and control over their testing harness.
5. NVIDIA garak
Open source · Scanner
Runs libraries of probes against language models to uncover weaknesses such as prompt injection, jailbreaks, and data leakage. It's useful for broad model-level testing, though less comprehensive for realistic, tool-using agent workflows.
Best for: Baseline vulnerability scanning and model comparisons.
6. HiddenLayer
Commercial · Enterprise security
Offers AI red teaming alongside model security and runtime protection. Its agent-security capabilities cover indirect prompt injection, unsafe tool use, and agentic workflows. Verify the specific automated testing features and deployment model in a proof of concept.
Best for: Enterprises looking to integrate AI testing with broader AI security controls.
Additional options to consider
Platform What makes it relevant Azure AI Foundry red teaming Managed, PyRIT-powered red-team scans for supported models and agents deployed in Azure AI Foundry. DeepTeam Open-source Python framework for automated LLM red teaming and repeatable evaluations. Giskard LLM evaluation and vulnerability testing, useful for testing model and application behavior. How I'd shortlist them
For a practical first evaluation: Promptfoo
Start here if you want automated attack generation, configurable security policies, repeatable runs, and CI/CD integration.
For realistic indirect prompt injection: Lakera Red
Prioritize it if the target is an agent that reads emails, web pages, retrieved documents, or tool responses and can then perform actions.
For expert-assisted penetration testing: Mindgard
Evaluate it if you want attack-chain discovery, documented evidence, and help interpreting and remediating findings.
For custom testing and research: PyRIT
Choose it if your team has Python and AI security engineering expertise and wants to build bespoke attack campaigns.
What to test in a proof of concept
For prompt injection specifically, I would require each vendor to demonstrate these capabilities against your actual application architecture:
- Direct injection: Can an attacker override system instructions or bypass guardrails?
- Indirect injection: Can malicious instructions in a retrieved document, email, web page, or tool output hijack the agent?
- Objective-based attacks: Can the platform automatically discover multi-step attack paths rather than just replay a static list of prompts?
- Impact verification: Does it detect actual unauthorized tool calls, access to restricted data, or attempted exfiltration—not just suspicious text in a response?
- Repeatability: Can you rerun tests after model, prompt, or application changes and compare results?
- Operational fit: Can it run in your environment, meet your data-handling requirements, and produce actionable evidence?
Run tests against an isolated staging environment with synthetic data and sandboxed tools, especially when testing actions such as sending emails, modifying records, or calling external APIs.
One question to narrow this down
What are you primarily pen testing?
1. Target architecture
Standalone LLM chatbots and APIs
RAG applications and knowledge assistants
AI agents with tools, APIs, or MCP servers
A mix of these
2. Preferred deployment
Commercial platform with support
Self-hosted / on-premises
Open to either
3. Main testing priority
Direct prompt injection and jailbreaks
Indirect prompt injection and agent hijacking
Data leakage and unauthorized tool actions
Continuous automated testing in CI/CD
[Build my shortlist]
Sources cited in this answer17
Also asked as
- What automated red teaming suites are available for conducting prompt injection penetration tests?