Which brands AI mentions

#BrandMentioned in

1Workable100%

=2JazzHR78%

=2Breezy HR76%

=4Recruitee40%

=4Greenhouse27%

Mentioned in · Jul 5 – Oct 15, 2026

ChatGPT SearchChatGPT SearchGoogle AI ModeGoogle AI Mode

Widest split: Greenhouse, 48% on ChatGPT Search and 5% on Google AI Mode.

1WorkableChatGPT Search 100%Google AI Mode 100%
=2JazzHRChatGPT Search 65%Google AI Mode 91%
=2Breezy HRChatGPT Search 78%Google AI Mode 73%
=4RecruiteeChatGPT Search 26%Google AI Mode 55%
=4GreenhouseChatGPT Search 48%Google AI Mode 5%

Questions and answers

Google AI ModeOct 15, 2026

For a small company where screening is a team effort (often involving founders, department heads, and team members who aren't professional recruiters), you need an ATS that is visual, low-friction, and doesn't require a manual or extensive training to use.

The top applicant tracking systems tailored for small-team collaboration include:

Recruitee: Widely considered the gold standard for manager-led, collaborative hiring. It features a clean, highly visual drag-and-drop pipeline that makes it exceptionally easy to @tag colleagues, leave inline feedback, and review candidate scorecards without getting lost in administrative clutter.
Workable: Excellent for lean teams that want speed-to-value. It balances an intuitive interface with robust collaboration tools (shared candidate notes, mobile app approvals, and clear pipeline visibility) alongside modern AI-assisted screening options if you want help sorting high volumes of resumes.
Lever: Known for blending an ATS with light CRM features, Lever shines if you want cross-functional transparency. It makes loop-scheduling and gathering multi-interviewer feedback seamless, keeping everyone on the same page without endless email threads.
JazzHR: A budget-friendly, highly intuitive choice built specifically for small businesses. It strips away enterprise bloat to focus on centralized team feedback, collaborative scorecards, and straightforward candidate communication.

To help narrow down the best fit, tell me:

How many people will regularly be screening and leaving feedback on candidates?
Do you need it to double as a general HR/onboarding system (like BambooHR), or do you just need a pure, dedicated hiring tool?

ChatGPT SearchOct 15, 2026

For a small company where several people need to review candidates and agree on whom to interview or hire, I’d prioritize an ATS with shared candidate feedback, interview scorecards, collaborative notes, and a clear hiring pipeline — not just resume storage and job posting.

Based on current 2026 comparisons, these are the strongest options to evaluate. The best fit depends on whether you want a lightweight, affordable tool or a more structured hiring process.

Best ATS options for collaborative screening

1. JazzHR

(Best starting point for small teams)

JazzHR is worth a close look if you want hiring managers and recruiters to collaborate without the complexity of an enterprise platform. It supports recruiting teams, customizable workflows, candidate assessments, and ranking tools.

Best for: Small companies hiring for a handful of roles at a time.

Pricing: Paid plans; confirm current pricing and user limits with the vendor.

Visit JazzHR

2. Greenhouse

Best for structured, consistent evaluations

Greenhouse is a strong candidate when multiple interviewers need to assess applicants against the same criteria. Its structured hiring approach is particularly useful for standardized interviews and scorecards. Its main drawback for smaller businesses is custom-quoted pricing and potentially more process than you need.

Best for: Growing companies that want consistent, documented hiring decisions.

Visit Greenhouse

3. Breezy HR

Best for a simple visual workflow

Breezy HR uses a visual hiring pipeline to help teams see where candidates stand and coordinate the hiring process. It is a good option if your current process involves spreadsheets, email threads, and manual status updates. A free entry tier is available, with feature limits to check.

Best for: Small teams that value simplicity and visual organization.

Visit Breezy HR

4. Workable

Best for a broader recruiting toolkit

Workable combines applicant tracking with job distribution, sourcing, scheduling, and recruiting automation. It makes sense when you want a more comprehensive hiring workflow, although it may cost more than a lean company needs.

Best for: Companies hiring regularly across multiple departments.

Visit Workable

5. Zoho Recruit

Best for budget-conscious hiring

Zoho Recruit offers a free tier for limited recruiting needs and paid plans with more features. It is worth considering if affordability is important, especially if your company already uses Zoho products. Verify that the tier you choose supports the collaborative screening workflow you want.

Best for: Small businesses that want to keep initial software costs low.

Visit Zoho Recruit

How they compare

ATS	Collaboration strength	Cost approach	Main trade-off
JazzHR	Recruiting teams and candidate ranking	Paid plans	Verify current plan limits
Greenhouse	Structured interviews and scorecards	Custom quote	May be too complex or costly
Breezy HR	Visual pipeline and shared workflow	Free tier and paid plans	Advanced features may cost extra
Workable	End-to-end recruiting coordination	Paid subscription	Higher potential cost
Zoho Recruit	Candidate management and workflow automation	Free tier and paid plans	Check collaboration features by tier

These are qualitative comparisons based on published product descriptions and small-business ATS reviews, not results from a hands-on product test.

What I would test in a demo

The most important distinction is whether an ATS simply lets people see a candidate or genuinely helps them make a decision together.

Shared evaluations: Can every interviewer submit feedback and score candidates against consistent criteria?
Centralized notes: Can colleagues read each other's comments without searching email or Slack?
Independent feedback: Can interviewers submit their assessments before seeing other people's scores, reducing groupthink?
Decision tracking: Can you compare finalists and see who has submitted feedback or still needs to weigh in?
Ease of use: Can a busy hiring manager participate without needing extensive training?
Pricing: Does the subscription include all your hiring managers, or are there extra charges for seats, active jobs, or advanced features?

My recommendation

I would start by demoing JazzHR and Breezy HR, then include Greenhouse if structured, scorecard-based screening is especially important. Compare the actual candidate evaluation workflow rather than relying on feature lists alone.

One question would help me narrow this to the best fit for your company:

How many people typically collaborate on screening each candidate?

1. Hiring team size

1–2 people

3–5 people

6+ people

2. How often do you hire?

1–2 hires per year

2–5 hires per year

6–20 hires per year

More than 20 hires per year

3. Monthly software budget

Free only

Under $150/month

$150–$300/month

$300+/month

[Find the best fit]

Sources cited in this answer12

Also asked as

We are a small business looking for an ATS that lets our team work together easily when reviewing job applicants.
Which ATS platforms are best suited for small companies that need to work together to screen job applicants?

Applicant tracking system for small companies

Which brands AI mentions

Questions and answers