Data as of Oct 18, 2026Based on 504 AI responses
Reviewed by Dimitry Apollonsky
Rank and Mentioned in · since Jul 5
| # | Brand | Recommended for | Mentioned in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | developer-focused dependency fixes and catching vulnerabilities across pipelines | developer-focused dependency fixes and catching vulnerabilities across pipelines | 67% |
| 2 | fast, customizable, lightweight source code analysis that reduces noise | fast, customizable, lightweight source code analysis that reduces noise | 62% |
| 3 | built-in pull request workflows with native code scanning | built-in pull request workflows with native code scanning | 39% |
| 4 | integrating security checks across the software development lifecycle | integrating security checks across the software development lifecycle | 34% |
| 5 | enterprise compliance, deep static analysis, and broad language support | enterprise compliance, deep static analysis, and broad language support | 34% |
| 6 | continuous code inspection and static analysis using build quality gates | continuous code inspection and static analysis using build quality gates | 32% |
| 7 | lightweight, fast container and infrastructure-as-code vulnerability scanning | lightweight, fast container and infrastructure-as-code vulnerability scanning | 29% |
| 8 | custom rule creation and GitHub-centric code scanning engines | custom rule creation and GitHub-centric code scanning engines | 27% |
| 9 | enterprise compliance, centralized dashboards, and binary scanning workflows | enterprise compliance, centralized dashboards, and binary scanning workflows | 21% |
| 10 | cloud-native enterprise security across static analysis and container testing | cloud-native enterprise security across static analysis and container testing | 16% |
| 11 | 15% | ||
| 12 | 14% | ||
| 13 | 13% | ||
| 14 | 13% | ||
| 15 | 11% |
Weeks of Aug 24 – Sep 6, 2026 · Since Jul 5
Widest split: Semgrep, 73% on ChatGPT Search and 50% on Google AI Mode.
| Brand | ChatGPT Search | Google AI Mode | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snyk | 70% | 65% | |
| Semgrep | 73% | 50% | |
| GitHub Advanced Security | 39% | 40% | |
| Gitlab | 31% | 37% | |
| Checkmarx | 40% | 27% | |
| SonarQube | 33% | 31% | |
| Trivy | 29% | 29% | |
| CodeQL | 38% | 15% | |
| Veracode | 25% | 17% | |
| Checkmarx One | 16% | 17% |
46% of citations point at the ranked brands’ own sites. github.com, docs.github.com, youtube.com are the most-cited sites outside the ranked brands’ own domains.
Market map
Mentioned in · since Jul 5
Leading brands by topic
How do I incorporate static analysis security testing into existing CI/CD pipelines?
Which application security platforms combine SAST dependency scanning and secrets detection in one pull-request workflow?
Which CI/CD security scanners produce low-noise findings with clear remediation guidance for developers?
We need a way to run security scans in our CI/CD pipeline. What is the best developer-first security tool that finds issues early?
What is the best tool for creating a secure software development lifecycle (SDLC) by integrating security checks at every stage?
which DevSecOps security provider should I use?
what's a good application security automation tool?
What is the best CI/CD pipeline security scanner to integrate into an existing build pipeline for a DevOps engineer?