Data as of Oct 18, 2026Based on 331 AI responses
Reviewed by Dimitry Apollonsky
AI summary
Mindgard and HiddenLayer run nearly even in recommendations, with Mindgard suggested for continuous, automated security testing of AI models and HiddenLayer for adversarial attack simulations. When buyers look to autonomously test web applications, XBOW is the usual answer.
Rank and Mentioned in · since Jul 5
| # | Brand | Recommended for | Mentioned in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | continuous, automated adversarial testing across generative models and LLMs | continuous, automated adversarial testing across generative models and LLMs | 31% |
| 2 | open-source vulnerability scanning across prompt injection and model jailbreak vectors | open-source vulnerability scanning across prompt injection and model jailbreak vectors | 30% |
| 3 | automated and human-led adversarial stress testing across the MLSecOps lifecycle | automated and human-led adversarial stress testing across the MLSecOps lifecycle | 29% |
| 4 | developer-focused adversarial testing for prompt injection inside CI/CD pipelines | developer-focused adversarial testing for prompt injection inside CI/CD pipelines | 27% |
| 5 | open-source Python automation for multi-turn generative AI risk discovery | open-source Python automation for multi-turn generative AI risk discovery | 27% |
| 6 | autonomous, AI-powered penetration testing for web applications | autonomous, AI-powered penetration testing for web applications | 19% |
| 7 | real-time guardrail testing and prompt injection defenses for LLMs | real-time guardrail testing and prompt injection defenses for LLMs | 19% |
| 8 | autonomous network penetration testing and continuous attack path validation | autonomous network penetration testing and continuous attack path validation | 16% |
| 9 | hybrid testing combining agentic AI tooling with human penetration testers | hybrid testing combining agentic AI tooling with human penetration testers | 16% |
| 10 | exploit validation and scripted payload deployment against identified vulnerabilities | exploit validation and scripted payload deployment against identified vulnerabilities | 14% |
| 11 | 14% | ||
| 12 | 13% | ||
| 13 | 12% | ||
| 14 | 11% | ||
| 15 | 10% |
What’s changing · since July
Since July, HiddenLayerrising has become the usual answer for prompt injection breach investigations, while HackerOnerising has joined the three most named brands for the same need. PyRITrising has expanded to become one of the three most named options for AI application red teaming.
Since Jul 5
Widest split: Mindgard, 23% on ChatGPT Search and 38% on Google AI Mode.
| Brand | ChatGPT Search | Google AI Mode | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mindgard | 23% | 38% | |
| NVIDIA Garak | 27% | 33% | |
| HiddenLayer | 33% | 25% | |
| Promptfoo | 30% | 25% | |
| PyRIT | 25% | 30% | |
| XBOW | 20% | 19% | |
| Lakera | 23% | 15% | |
| Horizon3.ai | 17% | 15% | |
| Synack | Outside ChatGPT Search's top 25 | 30% | |
| Metasploit | 14% | 15% |
40% of citations point at the ranked brands’ own sites. youtube.com, github.com, arxiv.org are the most-cited sites outside the ranked brands’ own domains.
+511 more
Market map
Mentioned in · since Jul 5
Leading brands by topic
I'm doing AI red teaming and need to scan my web apps for vulnerabilities. Can you suggest some tools for this?
We are investigating a security breach involving prompt injection. Who offers AI Red Teaming services?
Which service is the best for running continuous, automated red teaming exercises against our security controls?
My QA team can't predict how the model will behave on edge cases. Who offers "red teaming" services for AI reliability?
What are the most effective tools for network penetration testing in a corporate environment?
How should a business evaluate the true value of penetration testing firms vs cheaper automated vulnerability scanning tools?
What is the best automated penetration testing tool for continuous security validation?
We are conducting a prompt injection penetration test. Who offers automated red teaming suites?