Data as of Oct 18, 2026Based on 395 AI responses
Reviewed by Dimitry Apollonsky
AI summary
Deloitte holds a narrow lead over Babl for algorithmic bias auditing, with recommendations centering on broad enterprise risk and lending fairness. For specialized requirements like public sector algorithmic audits and general racial or gender bias assessments, O'Neil Risk Consulting & Algorithmic Auditing (ORCAA) serves as the usual answer.
Rank and Mentioned in · since Jul 5
| # | Brand | Recommended for | Mentioned in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | recommended for enterprise-wide algorithmic fairness reviews and lending model audits | recommended for enterprise-wide algorithmic fairness reviews and lending model audits | 44% |
| 2 | recommended for NYC Local Law 144 certifications and regulator-ready audit reports | recommended for NYC Local Law 144 certifications and regulator-ready audit reports | 43% |
| 3 | recommended for public sector algorithmic fairness audits and independent bias assessments | recommended for public sector algorithmic fairness audits and independent bias assessments | 41% |
| 4 | recommended for external AI Governance Board oversight and AICPA assurance | recommended for external AI Governance Board oversight and AICPA assurance | 38% |
| 5 | recommended for global regulatory compliance workflows and automated subgroup bias testing | recommended for global regulatory compliance workflows and automated subgroup bias testing | 37% |
| 6 | recommended for enterprise Responsible AI practices and lending compliance reviews | recommended for enterprise Responsible AI practices and lending compliance reviews | 26% |
| 7 | recommended for NYC Local Law 144 compliance and continuous HR monitoring | recommended for NYC Local Law 144 compliance and continuous HR monitoring | 23% |
| 8 | 18% | ||
| 9 | recommended for independent third-party audits with strict vendor neutrality | recommended for independent third-party audits with strict vendor neutrality | 16% |
| 10 | recommended for responsible AI governance platforms embedding automated fairness checks | recommended for responsible AI governance platforms embedding automated fairness checks | 16% |
| 11 | 15% | ||
| 12 | 13% | ||
| 13 | 10% | ||
| 14 | 9% | ||
| 15 | 9% |
What’s changing · since July
Since July, Bablrising, FairGaprising, and Holistic AIrising have seen broader adoption across independent auditing queries. Meanwhile, PwCrising has become the most named option for AI Governance Board oversight services.
Week of Aug 31–Sep 6 · Since Jul 5
Widest split: EY, 14% on ChatGPT Search and 38% on Google AI Mode.
| Brand | ChatGPT Search | Google AI Mode | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deloitte | 35% | 53% | |
| Babl | 46% | 41% | |
| O'Neil Risk Consulting & Algorithmic Auditing (ORCAA) | 39% | 44% | |
| PwC | 31% | 46% | |
| Holistic AI | 39% | 34% | |
| EY | 14% | 38% | |
| Warden AI | Outside ChatGPT Search's top 25 | 41% | |
| Kpmg | 9% | 28% | |
| FairGap | 32% | Outside Google AI Mode's top 25 | |
| Credo AI | 12% | 20% |
45% of citations point at the ranked brands’ own sites. orcaarisk.com, arxiv.org, nyc.gov are the most-cited sites outside the ranked brands’ own domains.
Market map
Mentioned in · since Jul 5
Leading brands by topic
I need to find companies that perform algorithmic fairness audits specifically for predictive policing tools used by government agencies. We are concerned about ethical risks.
I am planning to audit our algorithms for racial and gender bias. Who offers independent algorithmic auditing?
I am planning to audit my algorithm for disparate impact. Who offers statistical bias testing tools?
We are establishing an AI Governance Board. Who offers external oversight services?
We are facing bias in our lending algorithms. Who consults on algorithmic fairness and bias mitigation?
Can you list companies that perform the required bias audit certifications for AI employment software in New York City?
We need to comply with NYC regulations for our hiring AI. Which companies provide bias audit certification services for these tools?
Can you recommend independent firms that specialize in auditing deployed AI for disparate impact, specifically for compliance and regulatory evidence?
Can you recommend independent audit services that test deployed AI for disparate impact and produce evidence-based reports for compliance purposes?