Data as of Oct 18, 2026Based on 177 AI responses
Reviewed by Dimitry Apollonsky
AI summary
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) and 42Crunch share the lead in recommendations, with ZAP cited for open-source pipeline scanning and 42Crunch for API contract security. For aggregating penetration test reports alongside vulnerability scan data, PlexTrac is the usual answer.
Rank and Mentioned in · since Jul 5
| # | Brand | Recommended for | Mentioned in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | open-source dynamic scanning of API endpoints in CI pipelines | open-source dynamic scanning of API endpoints in CI pipelines | 29% |
| 2 | contract security and OpenAPI specification auditing in CI/CD pipelines | contract security and OpenAPI specification auditing in CI/CD pipelines | 27% |
| 3 | developer-focused dynamic application security testing for REST, GraphQL, and gRPC | developer-focused dynamic application security testing for REST, GraphQL, and gRPC | 27% |
| 4 | accurate network and application vulnerability scanning with minimal false positives | accurate network and application vulnerability scanning with minimal false positives | 26% |
| 5 | consolidating penetration test findings and vulnerability scanner data into reporting dashboards | consolidating penetration test findings and vulnerability scanner data into reporting dashboards | 24% |
| 6 | cloud-based asset discovery, continuous vulnerability monitoring, and patch prioritization | cloud-based asset discovery, continuous vulnerability monitoring, and patch prioritization | 23% |
| 7 | real-time risk scoring and prioritizing remediation across scan findings | real-time risk scoring and prioritizing remediation across scan findings | 21% |
| 8 | comprehensive vulnerability coverage using extensive plugin libraries and targeted templates | comprehensive vulnerability coverage using extensive plugin libraries and targeted templates | 19% |
| 9 | balanced vulnerability scanning with false-positive reduction for smaller teams | balanced vulnerability scanning with false-positive reduction for smaller teams | 18% |
| 10 | ingesting scanner outputs and penetration test reports for risk-based management | ingesting scanner outputs and penetration test reports for risk-based management | 12% |
| 11 | 11% | ||
| 12 | 11% | ||
| 13 | 11% | ||
| 14 | 11% | ||
| 15 | 10% |
What’s changing · since July
Since July, PlexTracrising has become the usual answer for consolidating scanner data with penetration test findings, while 42Crunchrising has become the most named option for CI pipeline API testing. Intruderrising and XBOWrising have also seen broader visibility across prompts.
Weeks of Jul 27 – Sep 6, 2026 · Since Jul 5
Widest split: Rapid7 InsightVM, 30% on ChatGPT Search and 13% on Google AI Mode.
| Brand | ChatGPT Search | Google AI Mode | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | 33% | 24% | |
| 42Crunch | 28% | 26% | |
| StackHawk | 31% | 22% | |
| Tenable Nessus | 24% | 28% | |
| PlexTrac | 24% | 24% | |
| Qualys VMDR | 29% | 17% | |
| Rapid7 InsightVM | 30% | 13% | |
| Tenable | 24% | 13% | |
| Intruder | 13% | 23% | |
| Nucleus Security | 10% | 15% |
46% of citations point at the ranked brands’ own sites. youtube.com, reddit.com, gartner.com are the most-cited sites outside the ranked brands’ own domains.
+298 more
Market map
Mentioned in · since Jul 5
Leading brands by topic
As an SMB evaluating vulnerability management tools, which platforms balance scan thoroughness with minimal false positives?
Best API security testing for CI pipelines?
Which service is the best for running continuous, automated red teaming exercises against our security controls?
Which AI-powered service is the best for autonomously conducting penetration tests on our web applications?