Data as of Jul 25, 2026 · Based on 313 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
You can find many websites that use voting to curate content, ranging from social hubs like Reddit and
Hacker News to product discovery sites like Product Hunt. If you are specifically looking to collect feedback or evaluate ideas, tools like Tricider, Canny, and UserVoice offer simplified voting mechanisms tailored for teams and public collaboration without the complexity of a social network.
Brands AI recommends here
Best for broad community content curation. Uses a ubiquitous upvote/downvote system to rank posts and comments based on user interest, significantly impacting visibility and user profile status, or karma.
Best for lightweight idea evaluation. Allows users to vote on ideas and add pros or cons without requiring a login, making it a highly accessible choice for gathering quick, public feedback on new features or proposals.
Best for product discovery and promotion. Users upvote new products to increase their visibility on the daily leaderboards, acting as a crucial signal for which new technologies reach top ranking status.
Best for dedicated feature feedback collection. Designed specifically for product teams to gather user insights and allow customers to vote on upcoming features to influence the company roadmap.
Several prominent online platforms and communities utilize an upvote/downvote (or score-based) mechanism to surface high-quality contributions and filter out low-value content.
If you are looking to build or integrate a system like this yourself, let me know if you need help with database schema design or frontend implementation approaches.
Many websites let users upvote and/or downvote content to surface useful material and suppress low-quality material. Common examples include:
If you're specifically looking for sites with a true Reddit-style “↑ / ↓” voting system, the strongest examples are Reddit and Stack Exchange. Hacker News is similar but deliberately limits downvoting, while sites such as Product Hunt primarily use upvotes only.
Websites that feature upvoting and downvoting systems allow communities to curate and rank content based on quality and relevance.
Would you like to explore how karma and scoring systems work on one of these specific platforms, or are you looking for a website recommendation for a particular niche or project?
Yes. A number of websites let users vote content up or down, though the exact mechanics differ.
| Website | Upvote | Downvote | What gets voted on |
|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | ✅ | Posts and comments | |
| Stack Overflow / Stack Exchange | ✅ | ✅ | Questions and answers |
| Lemmy | ✅ | ✅ | Posts and comments |
| Slashdot | ✅ | ✅ | Stories/comments |
| Quora | ✅ | ✅ | Answers and some content |
| Hacker News | ✅ | ⚠️ Limited | Stories are upvoted; downvotes are available on comments to sufficiently established users en.wikipedia.org |
| YouTube | ✅ Like | ✅ Dislike | Videos; public dislike counts are hidden |
| Product Hunt | ✅ | ❌ | Products/projects |
| Digg | Historically ✅ | Historically ✅ | News/content — but Digg shut down in March 2026 en.wikipedia.org |
The closest matches to Reddit are Reddit, Lemmy, Stack Exchange/Stack Overflow, and Slashdot. Stack Overflow explicitly describes upvotes as signals that content is useful and downvotes as signals that it is wrong, poorly researched, or otherwise low quality.
There is an important distinction between voting systems and simple like/dislike systems. For example, YouTube has Like/Dislike, but it doesn't use those votes in quite the same community-ranking/reputation-oriented way as Reddit or Stack Exchange.
If you're looking for websites where essentially any user can submit content and have the community upvote/downvote it, I can also give you a longer list of 20–50 such sites, including smaller Reddit alternatives.
Yes. A number of websites use upvotes and/or downvotes to let users collectively rank content.
| Website | What users vote on | Upvote | Downvote |
|---|---|---|---|
| Posts and comments | ✅ | ✅ | |
| Stack Overflow / Stack Exchange | Questions and answers | ✅ | ✅ |
| Lemmy | Posts and comments | ✅ | ✅ |
| Slashdot | Articles and comments | ✅ | ✅ |
| Hacker News | Submissions and comments | ✅ | ⚠️ Limited |
| Quora | Answers | ✅ | ✅ |
| YouTube | Videos | 👍 | 👎* |
| Product Hunt | Product launches | ✅ | ❌ |
| Digg | News/content | Historically ✅ | Historically ✅ |
A few important distinctions:
If you're looking specifically for current websites where ordinary users can both upvote and downvote almost any user-submitted content, the strongest examples are Reddit, Stack Exchange, Lemmy, and Slashdot.
Here are some popular platforms and websites that feature a voting system allowing users to upvote or downvote content:
Would you like to know more about how voting algorithms work on any of these specific platforms, or are you looking for a website with this feature for a specific project or use case?
Several popular websites and platforms use an upvote and downvote system (or a close variation) to allow users to curate, rank, and moderate content:
Are you looking for a platform to join and browse , or are you trying to add an upvote/downvote feature to your own website or app?
Several major websites let users upvote and/or downvote content, using community voting to influence ranking and visibility:
| Website | What users vote on | Downvotes? |
|---|---|---|
| Posts and comments | ✅ Yes | |
| Stack Overflow / Stack Exchange | Questions and answers, plus some comments | ✅ Yes |
| Hacker News | Submitted stories and comments | ✅ Yes, with some restrictions |
| Product Hunt | Product launches | ❌ Primarily upvotes |
| YouTube | Videos/comments | ❌ Public downvote counts are no longer shown |
| Lemmy | Posts and comments | ✅ Yes |
| Slashdot | Comments | ✅ Yes |
| Quora | Answers and some content | ✅ Yes |
| GitHub | Issues/discussions can receive reactions, but not a traditional up/down ranking system | ❌ Not generally |
Reddit is probably the clearest example: its posts and comments have explicit upvote and downvote buttons, and votes help determine what gets surfaced.
Stack Overflow has an especially formal voting system: upvotes indicate useful content, while downvotes indicate problems with quality, accuracy, research effort, or usefulness. Votes also affect reputation and ranking.
Product Hunt is an example where voting is primarily positive—users upvote product launches, and those votes contribute to ranking/points.
If you're looking for websites specifically designed around an upvote/downvote model (rather than just sites that happen to have voting), I can give you a longer list of 20–50 examples.
Many websites and online platforms use a voting mechanism (upvoting and downvoting) to curate, rank, and moderate user-submitted content.
Here are the most prominent websites that feature upvoting and downvoting:
Are you looking for a platform with an upvote/downvote system for casual social discussion , a knowledge-sharing Q&A community , or do you need to build one yourself?
Many websites use community voting to rank content, highlight quality contributions, or gather feedback. Here are some of the best-known examples:
| Website | Upvote | Downvote | What gets voted on |
|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | ✅ | Posts and comments en.wikipedia.org | |
| Stack Overflow | ✅ | ✅ | Questions and answers www.parse.gl |
| Stack Exchange | ✅ | ✅ | Questions and answers across many topics www.parse.glarxiv.org |
| Lemmy | ✅ | ✅ | Posts and comments (some servers can disable downvotes) www.parse.glarxiv.org |
| Slashdot | ✅ | ✅ | Comment moderation and ranking www.parse.glarxiv.org |
| Steemit | ✅ | ✅ | Posts and comments; voting also affects rewards www.parse.glarxiv.org |
Some websites use only positive voting (or have limited downvoting):
There are also specialized feedback platforms that let users vote on feature requests rather than social posts, such as Feevox, where users can both upvote and downvote ideas to help prioritize product roadmaps.
If you're looking for websites with a Reddit-style system where all users can both upvote and downvote content, the most prominent examples are: