Data as of Aug 16, 2026 · Based on 184 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Optimizing large language models involves diverse technical and strategic needs. Technical firms like LeewayHertz,
InData Labs, and
DataToBiz provide custom model development, fine-tuning, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to ensure accuracy and enterprise alignment. Infrastructure-focused firms like NVIDIA and Arcee offer frameworks for performance and efficiency, while agencies like Minuttia and NoGood specialize in improving brand visibility in AI-driven search results through structured content.
Brands AI recommends here
Best for end-to-end custom LLM development. They excel at fine-tuning models like Llama and GPT for specialized sectors, providing robust solutions for manufacturing and healthcare.
Best for turning LLMs into practical, production-ready enterprise tools. They provide excellent support for custom model fine-tuning and integrating RAG systems into existing workflows.
Best for RAG-based model development. The firm is recognized for integrating proprietary data into AI models to improve business accuracy and customer interaction.
If by “optimizing for large language models” you mean LLMO/GEO/AEO—getting a company, product, or content cited and recommended by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, etc.—there’s now a fairly substantial specialist market.
There are some unusually focused local specialists:
I'd distinguish real LLM optimization from agencies that have simply renamed SEO as “AI SEO.”
A strong provider should be doing at least four things:
For an enterprise brand, I'd start with iPullRank, Directive or The Enough Agency. For a B2B company wanting a specialist rather than a traditional SEO agency, I'd investigate TrajectoryGEO. For a Portuguese/Lisbon business, AISO Hub or Reach GEO are particularly relevant.
One caveat: LLM optimization is still a young field, and many agencies' claimed “citation lift” figures are self-reported. I'd ask any firm for a before/after prompt set, methodology, and examples where they can demonstrate that their intervention caused the visibility change—not merely that visibility increased.
If you tell me what you're trying to optimize (company, SaaS product, personal brand, ecommerce, etc.) and your target market, I can narrow this to the 5 firms I'd actually interview, including approximate pricing and strengths.
Optimizing for large language models (LLMs) spans two entirely different meanings: technical/inference optimization (making models run faster, cheaper, and more efficiently in production) and Generative Engine Optimization / GEO (optimizing a brand's web presence so AI search tools like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini cite them).
Top-tier firms excel across both categories:
These engineering-first firms help enterprises compress, quantize, and customize models for production:
These marketing and data-science agencies specialize in engineering brand authority so models explicitly recommend your business:
If you're looking to hire or partner with a firm, let me know:
I can narrow down the most suitable agency match for your goals.
Optimizing for large language models—often referred to as LLMO (LLM Optimization), GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) , or AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) —involves ensuring a brand or site is accurately crawled, understood, and cited by AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini.
The leading firms and specialized agencies excelling in this space fall into distinct categories based on their core strengths:
If you are looking to optimize a specific type of property, let me know:
I can help narrow down which partner aligns best with your goals.
If by “optimizing for large language models” you mean LLM/GEO (Generative Engine Optimization)—helping a company get mentioned, recommended, and cited by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews—the market is still relatively young. The strongest firms tend to combine technical SEO, authoritative content, digital PR/entity building, and actual AI-visibility measurement.
| Firm | Best for | Why it stands out |
|---|---|---|
| iPullRank | Enterprise / sophisticated technical work | One of the better-known SEO firms moving deeply into AI search and LLM visibility. |
| 7 Eagles | GEO strategy & execution | Frequently cited among specialist GEO agencies in 2026. www.sona.com |
| Aimers | AI-search visibility | Another specialist agency appearing in current 2026 GEO rankings. www.sona.com |
| Searchbloom | SEO + GEO | Currently ranked #1 in GoodFirms' August 2026 GEO category, with 94 verified reviews. www.goodfirms.co |
| Parachute Design | Canadian businesses | Explicitly structures its service around GEO for ChatGPT/Claude/Perplexity/Gemini plus AEO for Google AI Overviews. parachutedesign.ca |
| Net Site Marketing | B2B / e-commerce | Reports a 2026 case where ChatGPT cited pages increased 214.5%, alongside gains in Gemini and Google AI visibility. agencies.semrush.com |
| Azuro Digital | Canadian SMB/mid-market | Toronto-based and specifically offers AI-search/LLM optimization alongside technical SEO and web work. agencies.semrush.com |
I'd particularly investigate Parachute Design, Net Site Marketing, Azuro Digital, and SeoLogist. Current Canadian agency listings show a growing number of firms claiming LLM/GEO expertise, but there's a big difference between adding “LLM optimization” to an SEO services page and having demonstrated AI-citation results.
The key question I'd ask any firm:
“Show me three clients where you measured AI visibility before and after, across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, and show me the actual queries and citations.”
That's a much better filter than asking whether they “do GEO.” Current industry reviews specifically emphasize multi-LLM tracking, citation outcomes, structured content, entity signals, and measurable before/after results.
If you tell me what industry you're in, your approximate budget, and whether you're targeting Canada, the U.S., or globally, I can narrow this to the 5 firms I'd actually interview, including pricing and evidence of results.
If by “optimizing for large language models” you mean Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)—improving the odds that a company, product, or expert is mentioned, recommended, and cited in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google’s AI results—the market is still young, but a few firms stand out.
| Firm | Best fit | Why consider them |
|---|---|---|
| Directive | Enterprise B2B / SaaS | Strong combination of technical SEO, content, and enterprise GEO. It is repeatedly identified as an enterprise-focused GEO provider. thedigitalelevator.comwww.sourceadvisory.ai |
| Animalz | Content-heavy B2B brands | Particularly strong when the problem is authoritative content and topical expertise that LLMs can retrieve and cite. thedigitalelevator.comwww.miniloop.ai |
| Omniscient Digital | B2B SaaS | Content strategy + organic search + AI visibility; a good choice if you want GEO integrated with an existing content engine. thedigitalelevator.comwww.miniloop.ai |
| iPullRank | Technically complex enterprises | Stronger choice for large, complicated sites where technical SEO, information architecture, entities, and structured data matter. thedigitalelevator.com |
| Skale | SaaS / tech companies | More specialized around AI-search growth for SaaS and technology companies. thedigitalelevator.comwww.sourceadvisory.ai |
| Siege Media | Enterprise content | Particularly attractive if the core problem is creating authoritative, linkable/citable content at scale. thedigitalelevator.com |
| Go Fish Digital | Data-driven programs | Worth considering when you want GEO tied closely to measurement, experimentation, and analytics. thedigitalelevator.com |
There are also GEO-native specialists emerging. For example, Source Advisory positions itself as a pure-play GEO firm rather than an SEO agency that has simply added GEO to its menu.
I'd separate firms that do the optimization from software that measures LLM visibility.
For measurement, names that come up repeatedly include Profound, Peec AI, and Otterly.AI. These platforms monitor things such as mention/share-of-voice, citations, competitors, and which sources LLMs rely on.
My practical shortlist would be:
One caveat: GEO is not simply “SEO for ChatGPT.” The better programs work on entity authority, structured data, authoritative third-party references, content architecture, and measuring actual citations/mentions across multiple models. Current industry comparisons specifically emphasize citation-source visibility and measurement rather than simply producing more AI-friendly content.
If you tell me what you're optimizing (a company, website, personal brand, product, or content library) and roughly your budget, I can narrow this to the 3 firms I'd actually interview and explain what each should charge.
Optimizing for large language models—often referred to as LLMO (Large Language Model Optimization), GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) , or AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) —focuses on ensuring your brand is found, understood, and cited by AI models (like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity) rather than just ranking as a blue link on traditional search engine pages.
Top agencies and optimization firms leading this transition specialize in different pillars of AI visibility:
If you'd like to narrow this down, please share:
I can recommend the most relevant partner profile for your specific stage.
Onely
onely.com
When looking at firms that excel at optimizing for Large Language Models (LLMs) —often referred to under the umbrella of LLMO (Large Language Model Optimization), GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) , or AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) —the industry has shifted rapidly from traditional keyword SEO to entity authority, semantic structuring, and multi-source AI citations.
Top-tier firms leading this space approach optimization by ensuring models like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity actively reference, cite, and recommend a brand.
Leading Firms in LLM & AI Search Optimization
What Separates the Best from Rebranded SEO Agencies
The firms genuinely succeeding at LLMO don't just recycle old keyword stuffing or backlink strategies. They focus on:
If you're evaluating a partner for your own brand, let me know:
I can help you narrow down which specific methodology or firm type fits your growth stage.
If by “optimizing for large language models” you mean getting a company, product, or content cited/recommended in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Google AI Overviews, the field is usually called Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), Answer Engine Optimization (AEO), or LLM Optimization (LLMO).
As of 2026, I’d put these firms on a serious shortlist:
| Firm | Particularly strong for | My take |
|---|---|---|
| iPullRank | Technical SEO + complex sites + AI search | Best technical/enterprise choice |
| Siege Media | Content + authority + B2B GEO | Best content-led option |
| Omniscient Digital | B2B SaaS/content strategy | Strong SaaS specialist |
| Directive | Enterprise B2B | Good for larger marketing organizations |
| Animalz | High-quality B2B content | Excellent if content is the bottleneck |
| Skale | SaaS/tech growth | Good growth-oriented option |
| Go Fish Digital | Data-driven SEO/GEO | Strong analytics orientation |
| Graphite | Full-service GEO | Worth considering for broader programs |
These names recur across multiple 2026 agency evaluations; notably, Digital Elevator's May 2026 review identifies iPullRank for complex websites, Siege Media for enterprise content, Directive for enterprise B2B, Animalz for content-driven GEO, Skale for SaaS, and Go Fish Digital for data-driven GEO. thedigitalelevator.com Clutch's July 2026 rankings also put established SEO firms such as WebFX prominently among U.S. GEO providers.
I wouldn't choose a firm simply because it has rebranded its SEO offering as “GEO.” The underlying science is still unsettled. A July 2026 survey of the research literature found that evidence for durable, cross-platform improvements in organic discoverability is still limited, with considerable run-to-run variability in LLM outputs. arxiv.org Community discussions likewise warn that many agencies are essentially traditional SEO firms with “GEO” added to the pitch.
I'd therefore require a prospective firm to demonstrate:
If you tell me whether you're optimizing a company/brand, an e-commerce product, a SaaS site, or individual content, I can narrow this to the 3 firms I'd actually interview and compare their approaches, pricing, and evidence of results.
Optimizing for large language models—often referred to as LLM Optimization (LLMO), Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) , or Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) —involves positioning a brand so that AI engines (like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Microsoft Copilot) recognize, trust, and cite your business.
Because the landscape is new, many traditional SEO agencies have simply rebranded. However, a select group of firms stands out for deep technical execution, semantic information architecture, and digital PR strategies that actually influence AI training data and real-time retrieval.
Leading firms specializing in LLM and AI-search visibility include:
If you're looking to evaluate an agency for your own brand, tell me:
I can help you narrow down which operational focus you need most.
If you're asking about firms that specialize in helping companies become more visible and accurately represented in AI assistants like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity, the category is commonly called Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), Answer Engine Optimization (AEO), or LLM optimization (LLMO).
There isn't yet a universally accepted "Gartner Magic Quadrant" for this space, but several firms have established strong reputations or clear specialization:
| Firm | Best for | Notable strengths |
|---|---|---|
| Siege Media | Content-heavy brands | Original research, editorial content, digital PR, assets that attract citations. topgeoagencies.com |
| iPullRank | Enterprise technical SEO | Entity optimization, semantic search, knowledge graphs, large websites. topgeoagencies.com |
| Go Fish Digital | Mid-market & enterprise | Combines technical SEO, PR, and AI visibility strategies. thedigitalelevator.com |
| Animalz | SaaS & B2B | High-authority content designed to earn citations. thedigitalelevator.com |
| Directive | Enterprise B2B | Revenue-focused SEO plus emerging GEO capabilities. thedigitalelevator.com |
| Intero Digital | Large content libraries | Technical optimization and content restructuring. thedigitalelevator.com |
Several newer firms focus almost exclusively on AI search optimization rather than traditional SEO:
It's also worth distinguishing agencies from software platforms. Many organizations hire an agency while using software to measure progress.
Some notable platforms include:
These platforms monitor how often brands appear in AI-generated answers and identify opportunities to improve citations and discoverability.
A few points are worth keeping in mind when evaluating vendors:
If you're choosing a partner, it helps to narrow the field by your situation. The best fit for a B2B SaaS company, an e-commerce retailer, a local business, or a publisher can be quite different.
xAI
x.ai