What is the reputation of Peñafiel regarding its bottling practices and environmental sustainability?

Peñafiel’s reputation is mixed: it has a significant past quality-control controversy, while its parent company, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP), has made measurable progress on packaging and water stewardship. I would not characterize Peñafiel as either a sustainability leader or as a brand with a generally poor environmental record.

Bottling and quality-control reputation

The biggest reputational issue is the 2019 arsenic incident. KDP voluntarily withdrew all U.S. unflavored Peñafiel mineral spring water after independent testing found arsenic above the FDA bottled-water limit of 10 ppb. The FDA says that recall was subsequently completed and terminated.

KDP's own water-security disclosure provides some important context: the company said arsenic occurs naturally in some Mexican aquifers and that levels can vary over time. After elevated levels were detected, KDP suspended production at all Peñafiel facilities, installed enhanced filtration, and reported that subsequent production met regulatory requirements.

So, regarding bottling practices, the fairest assessment is:

• A serious historical blemish: the 2019 withdrawal raises legitimate questions about source-water monitoring and quality assurance.
• Not evidence of an ongoing violation: the FDA recall is closed, and KDP says it responded with additional filtration and monitoring.
• The issue was specifically the unflavored mineral water, rather than evidence that every Peñafiel beverage or every Mexican Peñafiel facility was unsafe.

Environmental sustainability

Here the picture is considerably more positive, although there are caveats.

Packaging: KDP says Peñafiel single-serve bottles contain at least 30% recycled PET (rPET) as of its current reporting. www.keurigdrpepper.com KDP also reported that Peñafiel was among its brands using recycled PET in its 2023 sustainability reporting.

Interestingly, Peñafiel has a potentially better environmental option in Mexico: KDP reports that its Tehuacán plant has more than 70 years of experience with refillable glass bottles, and that beverage volume in this reusable format increased 90% over the preceding five years. www.keurigdrpepper.com Reuse can be substantially preferable to single-use PET when collection, washing, transport distances and bottle-return rates make the system efficient.

Water stewardship: KDP now has a formal water strategy covering efficiency, replenishment and water access. In 2025 it reported 17 water-replenishment projects in California, Texas, Florida and Mexico and 3,283 megaliters of water-related benefit in high-water-stress areas. Its stated ambition is to achieve a positive water impact by 2050.

There is also a longer history of environmental work associated with Grupo Peñafiel, including reforestation and water-conservation/agricultural projects around Tehuacán.

Overall assessment

One important distinction: KDP's corporate sustainability figures shouldn't automatically be interpreted as Peñafiel-specific performance. Some of the company's water, climate and packaging numbers cover its entire portfolio. KDP's 2025 report, for example, says 96% of its packaging was designed to be recyclable or compostable and that virgin plastic use had fallen 21% from 2019—but those are company-wide figures.

Bottom line: If you're evaluating Peñafiel as a bottled-water brand, its 2019 arsenic recall is the most important negative signal about its bottling reputation. Since then, the parent company has demonstrated corrective action and has made credible progress on recycled PET, refillable bottles and water stewardship. I'd describe its current reputation as “recovered from a serious quality-control incident, with improving but imperfect sustainability practices,” rather than either “unsafe” or “green.”

Peñafiel—a popular Mexican mineral water and beverage brand owned by Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) —has a reputation that has faced significant scrutiny regarding its product safety and bottling practices, though it is less frequently targeted for standalone local environmental sustainability protests compared to massive global giants like Nestlé.

1. Bottling Practices & Safety Controversy (The Arsenic Issue)

Peñafiel’s reputation took a major hit in 2019 following a high-profile quality control controversy:

• The 2019 Arsenic Discovery: Independent tests by Consumer Reports and a report by the California-based non-profit Center for Environmental Health revealed that unflavored Peñafiel mineral spring water contained levels of arsenic exceeding the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) bottled water standard of 10 parts per billion (ppb), hitting around 16 ppb.
• Market Withdrawal: Facing lawsuits and mounting public pressure, Keurig Dr Pepper issued a voluntary market withdrawal for unflavored Peñafiel products in the U.S. and temporarily halted production at its plant in Mexico.
• Company Response: KDP stated that arsenic occurs naturally in the volcanic aquifers from which mineral water is drawn and that levels can fluctuate. The company subsequently installed enhanced filtration systems at its production facilities to bring the water safely below regulatory limits, claiming later batches complied fully with standards. Nonetheless, the incident left a lasting blemish on consumer trust regarding the brand’s routine testing and bottling quality assurance.

2. Environmental Sustainability Reputation

Peñafiel itself doesn't typically headline independent environmental scandals regarding localized water depletion or drought mismanagement (unlike water extraction controversies seen in regions managed by other multinationals). Instead, its environmental footprint is tied closely to the broader corporate policies of its parent company, Keurig Dr Pepper:

• Plastics and Packaging: Like most carbonated beverage and bottled water brands, Peñafiel relies heavily on single-use PET plastic bottles. While KDP promotes the recyclability of its packaging and adherence to industry standards, the broader bottled water and single-use beverage industry faces continuous consumer and activist criticism over plastic waste and carbon footprints.
• Corporate Scrutiny: KDP as a whole has faced regulatory and public pressure regarding sustainability claims—such as scrutiny over the recyclability designations of its single-serve pods—which indirectly shapes the consumer perception of how transparent and eco-conscious the parent corporation operates across its entire brand portfolio.

Would you like to explore how other imported mineral water brands compare in terms of heavy metal testing, or look into Keurig Dr Pepper's broader corporate ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) targets?

Peñafiel—a historic mineral water and beverage brand originating in Mexico and owned by Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) —has a reputation that is deeply tied to the traditional natural springs of Tehuacán, but it has also faced serious scrutiny regarding quality control and broad environmental concerns intrinsic to the bottled water industry.

1. Bottling Practices & Quality Controversies

• The Arsenic Crisis (2019): Peñafiel’s reputation for bottling practices took a major hit following investigations by *Consumer Reports * and the U.S. nonprofit Center for Environmental Health . Testing revealed that unflavored Peñafiel mineral spring water imported from Mexico contained levels of arsenic exceeding the FDA's bottled water safety limits.
• Corporate Response and Remediation: Facing lawsuits and public pressure, Keurig Dr Pepper temporarily halted production at the primary plant in Mexico and initiated a voluntary market withdrawal of unflavored Peñafiel products . KDP stated that arsenic naturally occurs in the volcanic aquifers used for mineral water , but acknowledged that their outgoing levels violated standards . They subsequently installed enhanced filtration systems , claiming later production returned to compliance with federal guidelines.
• General Processing: Historically, the water is drawn from deep regional springs, subjected to sediment filtration, treated with UV light, and carbonated . While standard for the commercial beverage sector, the 2019 lapse severely damaged consumer trust regarding their rigorousness in batch testing and heavy metal monitoring.

2. Environmental Sustainability

• Corporate ESG Framework: As a brand under Keurig Dr Pepper, Peñafiel benefits from (and is held to) KDP's broader corporate responsibility and environmental sustainability goals. These targets traditionally focus on water-use efficiency in manufacturing, reducing wastewater discharge, and lightweighting plastic packaging to use less PET.
• The Footprint of Bottled Mineral Water: Like most mass-distributed bottled water brands, Peñafiel faces inherent criticisms tied to single-use plastics (PET bottles) and their lifecycle carbon footprint . Transporting heavy, liquid-filled glass and plastic containers across international borders (from Mexico to U.S. markets) adds a significant transport-related greenhouse gas overhead.
• Local Aquifer Pressures: Tehuacán, Puebla—the iconic historic region where Peñafiel and competing brands bottle mineral water—has long faced severe regional water management and scarcity challenges . Large-scale commercial extraction by beverage giants in water-stressed Mexican regions frequently attracts criticism from local communities and environmental advocates concerned about groundwater depletion.

Would you like to explore Keurig Dr Pepper's broader corporate sustainability scorecard or look into how Peñafiel compares to other regional mineral waters like Topo Chico?

If you mean Peñafiel, the Mexican bottled-water/soft-drink brand owned by Keurig Dr Pepper, its reputation is mixed but improving. There are credible sustainability efforts around packaging, water use, and waste, but the brand also has a significant historical quality-control issue that matters when assessing its bottling practices.

Bottling practices and quality

The biggest blemish is the 2019 U.S. recall/withdrawal of Peñafiel unflavored mineral spring water. Independent testing commissioned by Keurig Dr Pepper found arsenic above the FDA's 10-ppb bottled-water standard. The affected 600-mL and 1.5-L products were in PET bottles. KDP subsequently improved filtration at the Peñafiel-producing facilities, and the FDA records that the recall has been completed.

That episode doesn't necessarily mean Peñafiel's current water is unsafe, but it does show that the company's monitoring/filtration controls had a serious failure in the past. If you're evaluating the brand specifically for trustworthiness of bottling, I'd regard this as an important negative historical mark rather than evidence of a continuing problem.

Peñafiel also uses different packaging systems. Its Mexican operations have maintained returnable glass bottles where collection, sanitization, and refilling infrastructure exists. At its Tehuacán plant, the company says it has more than 70 years of experience with returnable glass, and production of beverages in reusable formats increased substantially over the preceding five years.

Environmental sustainability

Here the picture is considerably more positive.

• PET: Peñafiel is part of KDP's efforts to increase recycled PET and reduce virgin plastic. KDP's corporate report specifically identifies Peñafiel among brands using PET packaging and describes broader efforts to incorporate recycled PET and optimize packaging materials.
• Returnable glass: This is arguably one of Peñafiel's strongest sustainability practices, because reuse can avoid the need to manufacture a new container for every serving when an effective collection/refilling system is available.
• Waste: Peñafiel has been working toward Zero Waste to Landfill. Reporting on its Tehuacán operation says that in 2024, more than 98% of waste was managed through reuse/recycling, with only about 0.5% going to landfill; the company also reported using recycled resin in PET bottles.
• Water and ecosystems: The company reports programs for reducing water consumption, treating/reusing water, restoring ecosystems, and reforestation. Its 2025 sustainability reporting highlighted water efficiency, waste reduction and ecosystem restoration.
• External recognition: Grupo Peñafiel has repeatedly received Mexico's Distintivo ESR social-responsibility recognition, with its environmental initiatives including wastewater treatment, water reuse, PET recycling and emissions reduction. This is useful corroboration, although it shouldn't be treated as independent proof that its environmental impact is low.

Overall assessment

I'd characterize Peñafiel as an established beverage company making meaningful progress on sustainability, rather than an environmental leader with an unblemished record.

Bottling/quality: 🟡 Mixed — the 2019 arsenic incident is a serious historical concern, although corrective filtration measures were implemented and the recall was closed.

Packaging sustainability: 🟢 Relatively good — particularly its returnable-glass program and increasing attention to recycled PET and material reduction.

Waste management: 🟢 Strong progress — especially at Tehuacán, where landfill diversion has reportedly become very high.

Overall environmental credibility: 🟡🟢 Generally positive, with caveats — there are measurable initiatives and reported results, but much of the sustainability information comes from Peñafiel/KDP itself or outlets reporting company-provided figures. I wouldn't equate those claims with a fully independent lifecycle assessment.

One important distinction: using PET—even recycled PET—still has a substantially different environmental profile from avoiding single-use bottled water altogether. So if your question is whether Peñafiel is better than other bottled-water brands, I'd say it has some above-average packaging practices; if the question is whether Peñafiel bottled water is environmentally sustainable compared with tap water in a reusable bottle, the answer is generally no.

Peñafiel has a mixed reputation: its bottling practices have had a notable quality-control controversy, while its environmental profile has improved under parent company Keurig Dr Pepper, but it is still fundamentally a single-use PET bottled-water brand, which limits how “sustainable” it can reasonably be called.

Bottling and quality reputation

The biggest issue is the 2019 arsenic incident. Keurig Dr Pepper voluntarily withdrew Peñafiel unflavored mineral water from the U.S. after independent testing found arsenic above the FDA's 10-ppb bottled-water standard. The affected products were 600-mL and 1.5-L PET bottles, and the FDA says the recall was subsequently completed and terminated.

There is an important nuance: Mexican consumer-protection agency Profeco tested Peñafiel around the same time and found 0.004–0.005 mg/L (4–5 ppb), below Mexico's 10-ppb limit. Profeco concluded the tested product did not pose a health risk and reported that Peñafiel was increasing sampling frequency and improving filtration systems at its Tehuacán and Tlajomulco plants.

So I wouldn't characterize Peñafiel as having a reputation for generally poor bottling hygiene. Rather, it has a significant historical quality-control blemish, involving inconsistent arsenic results between markets/testing regimes. That episode is worth considering if you're evaluating the brand's quality assurance.

Environmental sustainability

Here the picture is somewhat more positive.

Keurig Dr Pepper currently says that Peñafiel single-serve bottles contain at least 30% recycled PET (rPET). That's a meaningful improvement over bottles made entirely from virgin plastic. KDP also reports broader efforts to reduce virgin plastic, increase recycled content, and design packaging for a circular economy.

KDP also has a formal water-stewardship program, including water-efficiency measures and a stated aspiration to achieve positive water impact by 2050. www.keurigdrpepper.com Its latest 2025 Impact Report, released in June 2026, continues to report progress on climate, water, packaging and circularity.

However, 30% recycled PET doesn't make the product environmentally benign. A Peñafiel single-serve bottle still requires plastic production, transportation, refrigeration/display in many cases, and eventual collection and recycling. And the environmental benefit of rPET depends heavily on what happens to the bottle after use. In other words, Peñafiel is making progress on the packaging footprint, but it hasn't eliminated the fundamental environmental burden of disposable bottled water.

Bottom line

I'd rate its reputation roughly this way:

One other point in Peñafiel's favor is that the brand's mineral water genuinely originates from the Tehuacán region of Mexico, rather than being ordinary municipal water simply marketed as mineral water.

My overall take: If you're choosing Peñafiel specifically because you want an environmentally responsible bottled-water brand, I wouldn't put it in the top tier. Its move to 30% rPET is a legitimate improvement, but reusable/refillable water is environmentally preferable to single-use Peñafiel bottles regardless of their recycled content. If your concern is whether the bottling itself is trustworthy, the 2019 arsenic episode deserves attention, but the available evidence doesn't support saying that Peñafiel routinely sells unsafe water.

Peñafiel's official site
Keurig Dr Pepper's Packaging & Circular Economy program
FDA's Peñafiel recall notice 

Peñafiel—a ubiquitous Mexican mineral spring water and beverage brand owned by Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) —has a reputation shaped heavily by a major public health controversy regarding its bottling practices, alongside broader industry scrutiny typical of large-scale commercial water extraction.

1. Bottling Practices and the Arsenic Controversy

Peñafiel’s reputation for quality control took a significant hit following a high-profile safety crisis:

• The 2019 Arsenic Scandal: Investigations by Consumer Reports and the California-based nonprofit Center for Environmental Health (CEH) revealed that unflavored Peñafiel mineral water (imported from Mexico and sold in major U.S. retailers like Walmart and Target) contained elevated levels of arsenic—surpassing the FDA’s standard limit of 10 ppb for bottled water.
• Company Response and Market Withdrawal: Keurig Dr Pepper initially paused production at the Mexican bottling plant in April 2019, and subsequently issued a voluntary market withdrawal for unflavored Peñafiel products in June 2019. KDP stated that arsenic occurs naturally in the earth's aquifers and announced the installation of enhanced filtration systems at its facilities to bring production back within regulatory guidelines.
• Consumer Trust Impact: While the company mitigated regulatory fallout by addressing the filtration breakdown, the incident left a lasting blemish on the brand's reputation for pristine, natural spring sourcing, triggering class-action lawsuits and placing consumer trust under pressure.

2. Environmental Sustainability Reputation

As a brand nested under Keurig Dr Pepper, Peñafiel does not typically publish independent, standalone environmental reports; rather, its environmental footprint is evaluated through KDP’s corporate ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) framework.

• General Industry Criticisms: Like most bottled water and carbonated beverage lines sourced from natural springs, Peñafiel faces routine macroeconomic criticism inherent to the bottled-water industry. This includes concerns over single-use plastic waste (PET bottles), the carbon footprint of international transport and distribution, and the heavy mineral extraction demands placed on local Mexican watersheds.
• Corporate Accountability: KDP overall has pledged standard corporate sustainability commitments—such as packaging redesigns, lightweighting PET bottles to reduce plastic usage, and water efficiency targets across manufacturing plants—though independent ESG watchers generally note that large beverage conglomerates face an uphill battle meeting rigorous circular economy metrics.

Would you like to explore Keurig Dr Pepper’s corporate sustainability progress or look into how other Mexican mineral water brands compare regarding environmental accountability?

Peñafiel’s reputation is mixed: its environmental practices have improved, but its history of bottling-quality problems and continued reliance on single-use PET mean I wouldn’t characterize it as an especially sustainability-leading bottled-water brand.

Bottling practices

The biggest reputational issue was 2019, when Peñafiel’s unflavored mineral water was voluntarily withdrawn in the U.S. after independent testing commissioned by its owner, Keurig Dr Pepper, found arsenic above the FDA’s 10-ppb bottled-water standard. The FDA records that the affected products were in 600 mL and 1.5 L PET bottles. Keurig Dr Pepper subsequently installed enhanced filtration at the producing facilities and said newly produced water was within regulatory limits.

That episode is important because it wasn't simply a packaging complaint—it raised questions about quality control and monitoring of the water before bottling. The recall was completed and terminated by the FDA, so it should be viewed as a historical incident rather than evidence that current Peñafiel water is unsafe.

Environmental sustainability

There are some meaningful positives:

• Recycled PET: Keurig Dr Pepper currently says Peñafiel single-serve bottles contain at least 30% recycled PET (rPET).
• Lighter bottles: In Mexico, GEPP—the PepsiCo bottling company that produces/distributes Peñafiel—reports reducing the average weight of its bottles by more than 9% from 2017–2025, avoiding more than 330,000 tonnes of plastic resin over that period.
• Recycling and emissions: GEPP reports that more than 30% of the resin in its bottles was recycled in 2025, along with a reported 30%+ reduction in its Scope 1 and 2 carbon footprint relative to its 2023 baseline.

The caveat is that rPET and lightweighting don't make bottled water environmentally benign. Peñafiel is still primarily sold in disposable plastic bottles, so there are impacts from producing the PET, transporting bottled water, and ultimately recovering or disposing of the bottles. The sustainability improvements are therefore best understood as reductions in the footprint of a single-use packaging model, rather than a transition away from that model.

Bottom line

I'd rate Peñafiel's reputation roughly as:

So if you're deciding whether Peñafiel is a responsible bottled-water choice, I'd say it's better than its older reputation suggests on packaging sustainability, but I wouldn't consider it a particularly environmentally sustainable product compared with tap water, refillable bottles, or genuinely reusable water systems. The 2019 quality incident also deserves consideration when evaluating the brand's overall bottling reputation.

Peñafiel—a well-known Mexican brand of mineral spring water and carbonated beverages owned by Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP)—has a reputation shaped by a major quality control controversy alongside the typical environmental criticisms facing the broader bottled-water and beverage industry.

Bottling Practices and Quality Controversy

• High Arsenic Incident (2019): Peñafiel's bottling and quality reputation took a significant hit following investigations by Consumer Reports and the Center for Environmental Health . Testing revealed that unflavored Peñafiel mineral spring water imported from Mexico contained arsenic levels exceeding the FDA’s bottled water standards of 10 parts per billion (ppb).
• Market Withdrawal and Response: KDP briefly halted production at the affected Mexican plant, addressed consumer and legal pressure, and initiated a voluntary market withdrawal of the unflavored products. The company also reported installing enhanced filtration systems to bring future production well within regulatory limits. While the immediate crisis was managed through filtration upgrades and compliance, the event left a permanent mark on consumer trust regarding initial source purity and foreign quality oversight.

Environmental Sustainability

• General Industry Pressures: Like most major single-use bottled water and soft drink brands, Peñafiel is scrutinized for its reliance on plastic packaging (PET bottles) and the carbon footprint associated with extracting, processing, and shipping a heavy mineral-rich liquid internationally.
• Corporate Parent Goals: Peñafiel's environmental profile is largely tethered to Keurig Dr Pepper’s corporate responsibility frameworks. KDP sets enterprise-wide sustainability targets regarding water stewardship, waste reduction, and recyclable packaging across its diverse portfolio. However, independent environmental watchdogs frequently point out that large beverage corporations face continuous challenges meeting aggressive carbon and plastic-reduction milestones.
• Water Extraction Concerns: Operating in water-intensive sectors in regions like Mexico—where local water scarcity and stress are prominent issues—places pressure on brands like Peñafiel regarding responsible aquifer management, though specific localized community protests against Peñafiel's extraction are less publicized compared to giant conglomerates like Nestlé.

Would you like to explore Keurig Dr Pepper's broader corporate ESG performance , or are you looking into the safety standards and regulations of imported mineral waters in general?

Peñafiel—a iconic Mexican mineral water brand owned by Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) —has a complex reputation regarding its bottling practices, largely shaped by major product safety controversies rather than distinct, standalone standout campaigns in environmental sustainability.

Bottling Practices and Safety Controversies

• The 2019 Arsenic Crisis: Peñafiel’s reputation for bottling practices took a massive hit following investigations by Consumer Reports and the non-profit Center for Environmental Health . Testing revealed that unflavored Peñafiel mineral spring water (imported from Mexico) contained levels of arsenic averaging around 17 to 18.1 parts per billion (ppb), exceeding the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) limit of 10 ppb for bottled mineral water.
• Market Withdrawal and Response: KDP initially defended its testing levels, but subsequently suspended production at its Mexican bottling plant for two weeks and enacted a voluntary market withdrawal of unflavored products. KDP announced the installation of enhanced filtration systems at the production facilities to bring arsenic levels down well within regulatory frameworks.
• Trust and Quality Perception: Because natural mineral waters draw directly from deep regional aquifers (such as those near volcanoes in Mexico), trace minerals like arsenic can occasionally breach local geological thresholds if proper industrial filtration isn't tightly maintained. The 2019 incident left a lasting blemish on consumer trust regarding how closely the brand monitored its raw source water prior to bottling.

Peñafiel's reputation is mixed. It remains a well-known and popular mineral water brand in Mexico, but its image—especially in the U.S.—was significantly affected by a 2019 arsenic contamination controversy. On environmental sustainability, the company has not been at the center of as many high-profile water-use controversies as some other bottled-water brands in Mexico, but it also is not widely regarded as an industry leader in sustainability.

Bottling practices

The 2019 arsenic controversy remains the defining reputational issue.

• Consumer Reports found arsenic levels averaging about 18 parts per billion (ppb) in samples of Peñafiel mineral water sold in the U.S., above the FDA limit of 10 ppb.
• After conducting its own testing, owner Keurig Dr Pepper confirmed elevated arsenic levels (around 17 ppb) and voluntarily withdrew unflavored Peñafiel mineral water from the U.S. market in June 2019 while upgrading filtration systems.
• The company stated that improved filtration brought subsequent production into compliance with U.S. standards.

There was also conflicting regulatory messaging.

• Mexico's consumer protection agency, Profeco, tested Peñafiel sold in Mexico and reported arsenic levels of approximately 0.004–0.005 mg/L (4–5 ppb), below the Mexican regulatory limit of 0.01 mg/L (10 ppb). It concluded the tested product met the applicable standard and did not pose a health risk.
• The differing findings likely reflected differences in:
  • batches tested,
  • timing,
  • products destined for different markets,
  • and/or changes after filtration improvements.

Current reputation

Today, most observers view the arsenic issue as a resolved quality-control failure rather than evidence of ongoing contamination. However, the incident is still frequently cited when discussing the brand's quality assurance and regulatory oversight.

Environmental sustainability

Here the picture is more nuanced.

Strengths

• Following the arsenic issue, the company invested in enhanced water filtration and increased monitoring of mineral water quality.
• There is no comparable history of repeated nationwide recalls or chronic contamination allegations since 2019 in the available public record.

Limitations

Peñafiel is not especially recognized for environmental leadership. Compared with brands that publish extensive sustainability reporting around water stewardship, recycled plastics, or science-based climate targets, Peñafiel has maintained a relatively modest public profile.

Groundwater concerns

Peñafiel operates in Mexico, where groundwater sustainability is a broader societal issue because many aquifers are under stress from agricultural, industrial, and municipal extraction. Researchers have documented widespread overexploitation of groundwater in parts of the country.

However, it's important to distinguish between:

• general concerns about bottled-water extraction in Mexico, and
• documented controversies involving Peñafiel specifically.

Unlike some other bottlers that have become focal points of local protests over groundwater extraction, Peñafiel has not been as prominently associated with sustained, high-profile environmental campaigns over water depletion.

Overall reputation

If you separate the two issues:

In short, Peñafiel's reputation is shaped much more by the 2019 arsenic contamination episode than by environmental sustainability. On sustainability, the brand is generally viewed as neither an industry standout nor a frequent target of environmental criticism relative to other bottled-water companies operating in Mexico.