Data as of Aug 16, 2026 · Based on 324 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Brands already showing up
This promptYour brand can be here too.
Yes. If the goal is earned coverage in tech publications, I’d hire for actual reporter access + relevant story judgment, not simply a big agency name.
The strongest agencies should be able to demonstrate:
Recent placements in your exact category.
Ask for 5–10 examples from the last 12 months involving companies similar to yours, with the actual articles—not just logos on a website. One useful 2026 guide specifically recommends asking which journalists they've actually placed clients with recently, rather than accepting vague claims about "relationships."
Named journalist relationships.
Ask: "Which reporters at TechCrunch, VentureBeat, The Information, Axios, Forbes, etc. would you consider relevant to us, and what have you worked with them on?"
You're looking for people who know the reporter's beat and preferences—not a giant database of media contacts.
A senior person who will actually work on your account.
In PR, the salesperson may be impressive while the day-to-day account team is junior. Ask who will personally pitch reporters and whether you can meet that person before signing.
Ability to create a newsworthy angle.
This is critical. Even excellent journalist relationships won't manufacture a story that isn't interesting. TechCrunch's own guidance emphasizes that relationships help get a pitch considered, but newsworthiness and matching the story to the right reporter determine whether it gets covered.
No promises of guaranteed coverage.
A serious agency should not say, "We guarantee TechCrunch." An experienced PR executive interviewed by TechCrunch specifically warned founders away from agencies making those kinds of promises.
For B2B software/SaaS, some firms worth interviewing in 2026 include:
A recent 2026 industry comparison also specifically identifies Crackle PR, Walker Sands, Highwire, BLASTmedia, Bospar and Inkhouse as firms worth shortlisting for different B2B-tech situations.
I wouldn't choose among them based on rankings, though. Your category and the specific reporters they can credibly reach matter much more.
I'd send each agency the same brief:
We're a [category] software company targeting [customer]. We're looking for earned coverage in [5–10 publications]. Show us the 5 most relevant pieces of coverage you've generated for companies like ours in the past 12 months, the reporters who wrote them, and explain what the news angle was.
Then ask:
That last question is particularly revealing. A good agency should be able to explain how it will change the story, target different publications, develop executives as sources, generate proprietary data/research, or create a better news hook rather than simply sending more pitches.
Don't hire an agency because it says "We know journalists at TechCrunch."
Hire the agency that says something like:
"Your product isn't a TechCrunch story yet. But your proprietary data on X could become one. We'd approach Reporter A because she covers X, while Reporter B isn't a fit. We'd give A an early briefing, offer an exclusive if appropriate, and have your CEO available for interview."
That's much closer to how successful tech PR actually works. Journalists themselves emphasize targeted pitches, relationships and genuine news hooks—and warn against blasting multiple reporters at the same publication.
If you tell me what your software does, your target customers, funding/stage, and the publications you'd most like to appear in, I can research and give you a shortlist of ~5 PR agencies that specifically have relevant journalist relationships and recent placements in your niche.
Yes. The key is not to hire the agency with the biggest “media contact list.” You want a firm that can demonstrate recent, relevant relationships with the journalists who actually cover your category—and, just as importantly, can develop a story those journalists would want to run.
Current industry guidance is remarkably consistent on this point: ask for specific journalists, recent placements, and the actual people who will work on your account, rather than relying on a big-name client roster.
1. Define your target publications first.
Make a list of perhaps 15–30 outlets divided into:
Don't assume you need TechCrunch. A story in the publication your ideal customers read may be much more valuable.
2. Shortlist 5–8 agencies that specialize in your category.
Search specifically for things like:
“B2B SaaS PR agency cybersecurity”
rather than simply “best PR agencies.”
You want agencies that understand your technology well enough that you don't have to spend months teaching them what your product does. Technical expertise and relevant journalist relationships are particularly important in B2B technology.
3. Give each agency the same brief.
Tell them:
Then ask:
“Give us the 5–10 stories you would pitch, the publications/reporters you'd target for each, and why you think they'd care.”
This is one of the best tests of an agency. A genuine PR professional should be able to turn your product into several journalist-relevant narratives, rather than simply saying “we'll issue a press release.”
This is where I'd be quite aggressive.
Ask each agency:
“Name 10 journalists who currently cover our category. For each one, tell us what they've written about recently and which of our proposed stories you would pitch them.”
Then:
“Which of those journalists have you actually placed stories with in the last 12 months?”
And finally:
“Can you show us the resulting articles?”
Don't accept:
“We have relationships with TechCrunch.”
TechCrunch isn't a relationship. A relationship is an agency person who knows a particular reporter, understands that reporter's beat, knows what they tend to cover, and has successfully brought them relevant stories.
Some current PR-industry guidance recommends essentially this exact test—asking agencies to identify specific journalists and describe recent interactions rather than merely naming publications.
I'd want at least 3–5 recent examples that resemble your situation.
For each, ask:
This distinguishes “we got our client mentioned because they raised $100M” from “we created a compelling story and persuaded a journalist to cover an otherwise unknown company.”
That's an extremely important distinction.
There's a subtle trap here.
A good agency can't simply call in favors with journalists indefinitely. Journalists need stories their readers care about. One industry guide makes this point particularly well: PR isn't fundamentally about having a “black book” of journalists; it's about having newsworthy stories and knowing how to tell them.
So I'd weight your evaluation roughly like this:
| Factor | Weight |
|---|---|
| Relevant journalist relationships + actual placements | 30% |
| Ability to develop compelling stories | 25% |
| Expertise in your technology/category | 15% |
| Quality/seniority of the actual account team | 15% |
| Measurement/reporting | 10% |
| Price | 5% |
Ask:
“Who exactly will be doing our day-to-day media outreach?”
Then have that person join the pitch.
You don't want the agency's founder or senior VP dazzling you during the sales process and then handing your account to someone you've never met. That's a known problem in agency selection.
🚩 “We guarantee X articles.”
Earned media doesn't work like buying ad inventory.
🚩 Huge media-contact database as the primary selling point.
A database isn't a relationship.
🚩 Lots of impressive logos but no relevant examples.
🚩 Case studies dominated by funding announcements.
🚩 “We'll send a press release to 500 journalists.”
🚩 No opinion about your story after hearing your pitch.
🚩 Junior team sells you, junior team disappears, different junior team gets assigned.
🚩 They can't name specific reporters.
🚩 They measure success primarily in “impressions” or number of pitches sent.
Instead, you want an agency that says something like:
“Your product itself isn't news. But your customers have reduced X by 40%, and you have data from 200 companies showing Y. That's the story. We'd approach these six reporters differently because each covers a different angle.”
That's the conversation I'd want.
Before signing a long retainer, I'd ask the finalists for a 60–90 minute strategy session. Give them your product and traction, and ask them to develop:
That last question is surprisingly valuable. A good PR firm should be willing to tell you “don't pitch that.”
If you tell me what your software does, who buys it, your approximate company stage/traction, and which publications you're hoping to get into, I can also help you identify the type of PR agency you should hire and what specific journalist beats/publications you should ask candidates to demonstrate relationships with.
Hiring a PR agency with strong media relationships in the tech sector requires a targeted approach. Tech journalism is fast-paced, highly specialized, and driven by credibility.
Before searching for an agency, clarify what you want to achieve and ensure your product is newsworthy.
Don't just ask if they know tech reporters; verify the quality and relevance of their contacts.
Look for agencies that explicitly specialize in B2B SaaS, consumer tech, deep tech, or whatever niche your software occupies.
When interviewing agencies, put them through a practical evaluation:
Tech PR contracts typically run on a monthly retainer model.
If you'd like to narrow this down, tell me:
Hiring a tech PR agency with genuine media relationships requires a targeted approach. Many agencies claim they "know everyone," but you need to vet them to ensure they actually have the active journalist connections to move the needle for your software.
Here is a step-by-step framework to find, evaluate, and hire the right PR partner:
If you'd like to narrow this down, tell me:
Yes. The key is not to hire an agency because it claims to have a big “media list.” You want an agency that can demonstrate recent, relevant relationships with the specific journalists who cover your category.
Here’s how I’d approach it.
Make a target list of ~15–30 outlets, divided into:
Then identify ~2–5 journalists at each outlet who have actually written about your category recently.
This is important because journalist beats change frequently. Tools such as Muck Rack maintain journalist profiles and recent coverage specifically for this kind of research.
Don't search for just "best PR agencies."
Search for things like:
“B2B SaaS PR agency cybersecurity”
“developer tools PR agency”
“AI startup PR agency”
“enterprise software technology PR agency”
You want an agency where your product is already inside the reporters' coverage universe.
PRSA's agency directory is also useful for building an initial candidate list; it lets you filter agencies by industry, capabilities, size and client experience and contact firms directly.
I'd literally ask:
“Which 10 journalists would you pitch for us, and what have they written recently that makes you think they'd care about our story?”
This is much better than:
“Which media relationships do you have?”
A good agency should be able to give you specific reporters + specific recent articles + a reason for the match.
Then ask:
“Which of those journalists have you gotten coverage from in the last 12 months?”
You're looking for recent working relationships, not relationships from five years ago.
One recent tech-PR guide makes essentially this distinction: ask for specific journalists and recent client placements rather than accepting vague claims about “relationships.”
Ask each agency for:
The journalist + article combination is especially valuable.
For example, this is weak:
“We have strong relationships at TechCrunch.”
This is strong:
“We represented a developer-tools company last year and secured this TechCrunch story with Reporter X. Here's the article, and here's another story we secured with Reporter Y six months later.”
This is my favorite test.
Give each finalist a one-page description of your software and ask:
“Come to the next meeting with your proposed media angle and the 10 reporters you'd target.”
Don't ask them to do a huge free strategy project. But 30 minutes of thinking is reasonable.
You'll quickly see who understands your story.
A great PR agency doesn't just know reporters. It knows what reporters want to write about.
An agency having access to Muck Rack, Cision, etc. doesn't mean it has journalist relationships.
Those databases are excellent for identifying journalists and researching their beats, but they're tools. Muck Rack itself describes its product as helping PR teams find relevant journalists, understand their coverage and manage relationships.
So I'd explicitly ask:
“Of the journalists you're proposing, which ones have your team personally worked with, and what was the most recent interaction?”
That's a much harder question to bluff.
I'd avoid a contract where success means:
“We will conduct outreach to 100 journalists.”
That's an activity, not an outcome.
Instead, establish KPIs around things like:
And make sure they distinguish earned coverage from contributed articles, syndication, sponsored content and press-release distribution.
I'd score each agency roughly like this:
| Factor | Weight |
|---|---|
| Relevant journalist relationships | 30% |
| Recent coverage for similar companies | 25% |
| Understanding of your product/story | 20% |
| Quality of target publications | 10% |
| Senior people actually working on your account | 10% |
| Price | 5% |
I'd actually give price the lowest weighting. A mediocre PR firm that gets zero meaningful coverage is much more expensive than a good firm that costs 30–50% more.
Don't make “TechCrunch coverage” the entire objective.
A good agency should tell you if TechCrunch is not the best first target. Depending on your software, a highly respected niche publication read by your actual buyers can be substantially more valuable than a big general-tech article.
The ideal agency will say something like:
“We'll eventually go after TechCrunch, but your strongest initial story is X, and the reporters covering Y at these five publications are much more likely to care.”
That is the kind of PR agency I'd hire.
If you tell me what your software does, who buys it, your company stage/size, and roughly what you want to spend per month, I can also research and give you a shortlist of 5–10 specific tech PR agencies, including the publications they've recently landed for comparable software companies.
Hiring a tech PR agency that actually moves the needle requires looking past glossy sales decks and testing for real, active media traction . Many agencies claim deep connections with tech journalists, but execution separates the top performers from the rest.
The evaluation and hiring process requires specific, targeted steps:
To help narrow down the right agencies or approach:
Hiring a PR agency for tech coverage is less about finding a firm that says “we know journalists” and more about finding a team that can turn your software into a story a journalist would actually want to cover. The strongest agencies usually have both category expertise and active relationships with the specific reporters who cover your market.
A practical process:
Before talking to agencies, decide:
A cybersecurity startup trying to reach CISOs needs a different PR agency than a consumer AI app trying to get mainstream tech attention.
Look for agencies that already represent companies similar to yours. Ask for:
A common mistake is hiring a famous agency after a great pitch meeting, then discovering the senior person who sold you is not the person doing the work.
Do not ask:
“Do you have relationships with TechCrunch reporters?”
Almost every agency will say yes.
Ask instead:
“Which five reporters would you approach for our product, and why?”
Good answers sound like:
Weak answers sound like:
Agencies with real relationships should be able to discuss specific reporters, beats, and recent interactions.
Before signing, give finalists a short brief:
Ask them to return:
This reveals far more than a sales presentation.
✅ They challenge your positioning
A good PR firm may tell you: “Your product launch is not the story; the market shift behind it is.”
✅ They understand your technology
They can explain your product simply without making inaccurate claims.
✅ They know your niche
A general “tech PR” firm may not understand your buyers.
✅ They measure outcomes
Useful metrics include:
🚩 Guaranteed coverage
No legitimate PR agency can guarantee a journalist will write about you.
🚩 “We’ll get you in TechCrunch/Wired/Forbes” as the main pitch
Coverage depends on timing, relevance, competition, and editorial interest.
🚩 Press-release distribution as the strategy
Sending announcements broadly is rarely enough.
🚩 No named examples
If they cannot show comparable wins, be cautious.
Many tech PR firms work on:
For an early-stage software company, a 3–6 month engagement is often enough to evaluate fit.
Good sources:
The best signal is often: “Who got this company into the publications we want to be in?”
A useful final question to ask every agency:
“If you had to get us one meaningful article in the next 90 days, what would the story be, and who would write it?”
Their answer will tell you whether they understand your market.
Hiring a tech PR agency is less about finding a firm that says it has “media relationships” and more about verifying that the specific people who will work on your account have earned trust with the journalists you care about.
A practical process:
Tech PR can mean very different things:
Agencies that are great at one may be weak at another.
Start with agencies that focus heavily on technology rather than general PR. Examples often cited in technology PR rankings include firms such as The Hoffman Agency, PAN, Method Communications, SourceCode Communications, and Bospar. www.pragencyranking.com Other lists focus on startup/B2B technology specialists and emphasize matching agency expertise to company stage and market.
Look for:
A small, senior boutique may outperform a large agency if you mainly need relationships with a handful of reporters.
During agency calls, ask:
“Which reporters would you pitch for us, and why?”
Good answers:
Weak answers:
Many agencies sell you with senior executives and then assign junior staff.
Ask:
Ask:
“Show us three companies similar to us where you created earned media.”
Look for:
A TechCrunch mention that produced no business impact may be less valuable than 20 niche articles that created pipeline.
Instead of immediately signing a 12-month contract, consider:
30–60 day strategy sprint
Then decide whether to continue.
Budgets vary widely, but tech PR retainers commonly range from boutique monthly engagements to much larger enterprise programs. Some industry guides cite senior boutique B2B tech retainers in the low five figures per month and larger network agencies significantly higher.
The cheapest agency is often expensive if they cannot get journalist attention.
PR agencies cannot manufacture news forever. Before hiring, have at least one strong hook:
Examples:
A good PR firm will often spend as much time sharpening the story as pitching it.
You can copy/paste these:
If you share your software category (AI/SaaS/dev tools/etc.), company stage, target publications, and budget range, I can suggest what type of PR firm you should look for and how to evaluate candidates.
Hiring a PR agency with genuine, active relationships in the tech sector requires looking past slick sales pitches and "logo walls" of past clients . Many agencies claim to "know tech journalists," but few have the daily working rapport needed to secure tier-1 or influential vertical coverage.
A structured, step-by-step approach ensures you find and hire a firm that can actually deliver media placements for your software.
Before talking to agencies, make sure you have a compelling angle. Tech journalists don't cover software just because it exists; they cover:
When interviewing agencies, move past general capabilities and ask direct questions about their media access:
If you'd like, let me know:
I can help you pinpoint what specific story angles will appeal most to tech reporters or how to structure your initial outreach to agencies.
Hiring a tech PR agency to secure software features requires vetting firms for active niche relationships, proven tier-one media placements, and modern search/AI discoverability expertise . Tech PR retainers typically range from $5,000 to $25,000+ per month depending on startup or enterprise scope.
If you'd like, let me know:
I can help tailor a list of specific agency types or questions for your pitch calls.