ChatGPT SearchSep 29, 2026
If you mean you’re evaluating whether replacing general liability (CGL) with errors & omissions (E&O) is appropriate, the key point is: E&O generally complements rather than replaces general liability.
- E&O / professional liability covers claims alleging that your professional services, advice, recommendations, or work contained an error, omission, negligence, or similar professional failure.
- General liability primarily addresses third-party bodily injury, property damage, and personal/advertising injury arising from business operations. Professional errors are generally outside its core coverage.
- E&O policies are often claims-made, so the policy's retroactive/prior-acts provisions, continuity of coverage, and tail/extended-reporting options deserve particular attention when switching policies.
- If you're eliminating the general-liability policy entirely, check whether you're still exposed to premises, bodily-injury, property-damage, advertising-injury, product, auto, cyber, or other risks that E&O won't necessarily cover.
Before making the switch, I'd compare the old and new policies side-by-side for: limits, deductible/retention, covered professional services, exclusions, prior acts/retroactive date, defense-cost treatment, contractual liability, subcontractor coverage, cyber/privacy exclusions, and any insurance requirements in your customer contracts.
If you tell me what your business does and what the old/new policy limits and exclusions are, I can help you assess the coverage gap.