Data as of Jul 25, 2026 · Based on 285 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
To secure manufacturing environments with legacy systems without causing production downtime, use specialized tools that favor passive monitoring or surgical endpoint protection. Nozomi Networks and
Dragos are the primary recommendations for passive network traffic analysis to avoid interfering with fragile industrial controllers. For older, unpatchable workstations that cannot run modern security software,
provides adaptive protection like application whitelisting and virtual patching.
Brands AI recommends here
Best for passive, non-intrusive network visibility in legacy OT environments. It uses deep packet inspection to monitor assets without active polling, preventing potential crashes of sensitive industrial controllers.
Best for protecting legacy workstations running outdated operating systems like Windows XP or 7. Its lockdown technology and virtual patching provide security without the performance impact of traditional antivirus.
Securing legacy operational technology (OT) and industrial control systems (ICS) without risking unplanned downtime requires a non-disruptive, passive-first approach . Because older programmable logic controllers (PLCs) and vintage operating systems (like Windows XP or early embedded kernels) can crash under active vulnerability scans or heavy endpoint agents, the strategy relies on listening to traffic rather than touching the machinery.
Top Non-Disruptive OT/ICS Security Tools
The following platforms specialize in passive monitoring via SPAN ports/TAPs, behavioral baselining, and wrapping security around legacy hardware:
Top MSSPs for Managed OT/ICS Security
If internal engineering and plant teams lack the bandwidth to monitor industrial SOC alerts 24/7, specialized Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs) can bridge the IT/OT gap safely:
Key Non-Disruptive Implementation Rules
If you'd like to narrow this down, please share:
Yes. For a manufacturer with legacy PLCs, HMIs, SCADA/DCS, and equipment that cannot tolerate agents, active scans, or downtime, I’d prioritize passive/agentless OT monitoring first, then put an OT-capable MSSP around it.
| Option | Best fit | Why it works for legacy production |
|---|---|---|
| Claroty | Broad OT/XIoT visibility | Passive monitoring generates no additional traffic and doesn't interact with assets, making it particularly suitable for fragile OT. claroty.com |
| Nozomi Networks | Manufacturing-heavy environments | Passive network sensors, OT protocol awareness, asset inventory and behavioral detection; also supports on-prem deployments for environments that can't send data to cloud. www.nozominetworks.com |
| Dragos | Highest OT/ICS specialization | Passive-first ICS monitoring plus deep industrial protocol expertise. Its OT Watch Complete adds 24/7 monitoring, tuning, threat hunting and vulnerability management as a managed service. www.dragos.com |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT | Microsoft/Sentinel shops | Agentless network monitoring, on-prem/cloud/hybrid deployment, and integration with Sentinel and existing SOC tooling. Microsoft explicitly supports fully on-premises operation for air-gapped environments. www.nozominetworks.comlearn.microsoft.comclaroty.com |
| Tenable OT Security | IT/OT exposure-management consolidation | Attractive when you want OT asset/risk information tied into a broader Tenable vulnerability-management program. |
| Forescout | Large heterogeneous estates | Worth evaluating where you need broad device visibility across IT, OT and IoT rather than an exclusively ICS-focused platform. |
Optiv is particularly relevant for a manufacturer. Its OT practice covers advisory, deployment and ongoing operation, including OT alert triage, technology management and an OT SOC. It explicitly emphasizes maintaining facility uptime and safety.
IBM is another strong enterprise-scale option. IBM offers OT monitoring, threat detection, IR, segmentation and remote-access security, and importantly has MSSP relationships with both Claroty and Nozomi.
Quorum Cyber is interesting if you're Microsoft-centric. Its Clarity OT service provides 24×7 OT/ICS monitoring using Defender for IoT and Sentinel, while also accepting telemetry from Claroty, Nozomi, Armis and Dragos. Its response model explicitly puts plant safety/change-control ahead of disruptive containment.
Accenture makes sense for very large manufacturers undergoing broader plant modernization. Its manufacturing/Siemens work includes managed security services for OT devices and critical manufacturing systems.
I'd structure the architecture like this:
PLC/DCS/SCADA → passive OT sensors → OT security platform → MSSP/SOC → IT SIEM/SOAR
The important distinction is that the MSSP should monitor and investigate without automatically pushing IT-style remediation into the plant.
For example:
That approach is much safer than dropping an endpoint agent or vulnerability scanner onto decades-old controllers. Passive monitoring is specifically designed for this constraint; Claroty, Dragos, Nozomi and Microsoft all describe agentless/passive approaches for OT environments.
If I were narrowing it to three for a manufacturing RFP:
Dragos for deepest ICS expertise, Claroty or Nozomi for broad passive OT visibility, and Microsoft Defender for IoT + an OT-specialist MSSP if you already run a substantial Microsoft/Sentinel environment.
The most important RFP question isn't “Can you detect an attack?” It's “Show us exactly what happens when you detect one on a production PLC at 2 a.m.—what actions are automatic, what requires plant approval, and how do you guarantee you won't disrupt the process?”
Yes. For a manufacturer with legacy PLCs, HMIs, SCADA, and other fragile OT, I’d prioritize vendors that can monitor passively/agentlessly and keep enforcement out of the production path.
| Vendor / approach | Best fit | Production-disruption profile |
|---|---|---|
| Dragos | Deep ICS threat detection, threat hunting, managed monitoring | Excellent — passive-first network monitoring; Dragos explicitly positions its collection as non-disruptive. www.dragos.comwww.dragos.com |
| Claroty | Asset inventory, vulnerability/risk management, network monitoring, remote access | Excellent — passive monitoring generates no additional traffic and doesn't interact with OT assets. claroty.com |
| Nozomi Networks | Manufacturing-focused visibility, asset inventory, anomaly/threat detection | Excellent — purpose-built for production environments and continuous monitoring. www.nozominetworks.com |
| **Microsoft Defender for IoT | Good if you're already heavily invested in Microsoft/Sentinel | Very good — agentless, network-layer monitoring supports legacy devices without installing agents. learn.microsoft.com |
| Armis | Broad OT/IoT asset visibility and enterprise-wide exposure management | Good, particularly when you want OT plus IoT/medical/enterprise assets in one platform |
| Forescout | Network/device visibility and segmentation across heterogeneous environments | Good, particularly for large multi-vendor estates |
Dragos is particularly interesting because it combines the OT platform with an actual managed service. Its OT Watch Complete offering includes 24/7 monitoring, alert triage, platform tuning, asset visibility, vulnerability management, threat hunting and access to OT specialists. It can also work alongside an existing SOC/MSSP rather than replacing it.
That distinction matters: a generic MSSP may be excellent at SIEM/EDR but still generate poor OT alerts because it doesn't understand PLC protocols, engineering workstations, process changes, or what constitutes dangerous behavior in a control system.
I'd use a "visibility first, enforcement later" architecture:
1. Passive OT sensors → 2. OT-specific detection/asset inventory → 3. SOC/MSSP monitoring → 4. Controlled segmentation/remediation
For example:
PLC/HMI/SCADA → SPAN/TAP → Dragos / Claroty / Nozomi sensor → SIEM/SOC
This lets you inventory devices and communications without putting an agent on a PLC or actively probing it. Claroty specifically notes that passive monitoring creates no additional traffic; Dragos similarly describes passive-first collection for legacy devices and proprietary ICS protocols.
I'd be cautious about deploying active vulnerability scanners, endpoint agents, inline IPS, or automated blocking directly in an old control network until the controls/engineering team has validated them. Legacy Windows HMIs and old PLCs are precisely where an otherwise reasonable IT security mechanism can become an availability problem.
If I were evaluating three vendors for a manufacturing RFP, I'd start with:
Then I'd consider Microsoft Defender for IoT if your organization already has a substantial Microsoft/Sentinel SOC and wants to consolidate.
The key RFP requirement I'd put in bold is: “Must support passive/agentless monitoring of production OT with no active probing or traffic injection unless explicitly approved by OT engineering.”
If you tell me roughly how many plants, whether you're Siemens/Rockwell/mixed, and whether you already have an MSSP/SIEM such as Sentinel, Splunk, or QRadar, I can narrow this to a 3–5 vendor shortlist and explain which architecture is least disruptive.
Securing legacy OT/ICS environments without risking production downtime requires a "do no harm" philosophy . Traditional IT security strategies—like active network vulnerability scans, aggressive intrusion testing, or forced automated patching—will routinely crash fragile legacy PLCs, corrupt proprietary ladder logic, or halt manufacturing lines.
To protect unpatchable 20-to-30-year-old control systems safely, industry leaders rely on purely passive monitoring, non-intrusive network overlays, and specialized OT-certified Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs).
Top OT-Native Security Tools for Legacy Systems
The standard approach for legacy gear relies on passive Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) via SPAN ports or network TAPs. These tools listen to traffic invisibly without injecting a single packet into your production line.
Leading MSSPs for Industrial Cyber Defense
Outsourcing OT monitoring is challenging because a standard IT-focused SOC will misinterpret routine PLC programming changes or firmware queries as anomalies, or worse, execute a disruptive containment playbook. You need an MSSP with an OT-aware 24/7 SOC.
Key Non-Disruptive Deployment Best Practices
If you'd like to narrow this down, tell me:
For a manufacturer with legacy PLCs, SCADA, DCS, and safety systems, the vendors that fit best are usually those that use passive monitoring, asset discovery, and OT-aware detection rather than agents, active scans, or inline blocking that could interrupt production.
A practical shortlist:
| MSSP / Platform | Best fit | Why it works well in legacy OT |
|---|---|---|
| Dragos | Large manufacturers, critical infrastructure, mature OT programs | Uses passive OT network monitoring, ICS protocol awareness, threat hunting, and managed monitoring options designed around operational continuity. www.dragos.comwww.dragos.com |
| Claroty | Multi-site manufacturing, medical devices, industrial enterprises | Strong asset visibility and cyber-physical system protection, with broad industrial protocol coverage and focus on keeping operations uninterrupted. www.dragos.comclaroty.comwww.dragos.com |
| Nozomi Networks | Plants needing OT asset inventory and continuous monitoring | Provides passive OT/IoT visibility, vulnerability context, and deployment options including cloud and on-prem management. www.nozominetworks.comwww.dragos.comwww.dragos.com |
| Forescout Technologies | Enterprises wanting IT/OT asset visibility convergence | Often used where OT discovery needs to integrate with broader enterprise security workflows. www.nozominetworks.com |
| Tenable | Vulnerability management programs spanning IT and OT | Useful when manufacturers already use Tenable for enterprise exposure management, though OT validation and safety processes matter. www.nozominetworks.com |
Look for providers offering:
Passive deployment
OT SOC monitoring
Manufacturing-specific playbooks
Change-control alignment
A low-disruption rollout often looks like:
Phase 1 — Visibility
Phase 2 — Monitoring
Phase 3 — Hardening
Phase 4 — Response readiness
For a typical manufacturer with aging equipment, I would usually start with a passive OT visibility platform (Dragos, Claroty, or Nozomi) plus an MSSP that has actual ICS analysts, rather than trying to extend a normal IT MDR service into the plant.
If you share your environment (e.g., automotive, food & beverage, chemicals, discrete manufacturing; Rockwell vs Siemens vs Schneider; number of plants; existing SIEM/MDR), I can narrow this to a more realistic shortlist.
Securing legacy manufacturing environments where downtime equals financial loss requires a "do no harm" philosophy . Traditional IT active vulnerability scanners or intrusive agents will crash fragile Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) or disrupt the deterministic timing of industrial control loops.
To protect legacy OT/ICS without stopping production, security relies heavily on passive monitoring (via optical TAPs or SPAN ports), OT-native behavioral baselining , and specialized Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs) who speak industrial protocols.
Top OT-Native Tools for Non-Disruptive Visibility & Detection
These platforms use passive Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) to read traffic without injecting packets into legacy networks, giving you an immediate asset inventory and anomaly detection safely:
Leading MSSPs for Industrial Cyber Defense
Outsourcing OT monitoring requires an MSSP with a dedicated industrial incident response practice—standard IT-centric SOCs often lack the context to safely triage an alert on a factory floor.
To help narrow down which tool or partner fits your plant floor, tell me:
Securing legacy manufacturing environments (brownfield OT/ICS) without causing production downtime hinges on passive monitoring and non-intrusive compensating controls . Because traditional IT active scanning or heavy endpoint agents can crash fragile or unpatchable PLCs, the tools and MSSPs you select must be OT-native.
Leading Tools for Non-Disruptive OT Visibility & Protection
Top MSSPs & Managed Services for OT/ICS Security
Outsourcing to an IT-only MSSP can backfire because a standard IT Security Operations Center (SOC) might misinterpret routine PLC polling or firmware handshakes as anomalous attacks. Look for providers with dedicated OT-certified SOCs:
Best Practices to Prevent Disruption
If you'd like to narrow this down, please share:
For manufacturers with legacy OT/ICS environments, the key is choosing providers and tools that are designed around availability first. Traditional IT security approaches (active vulnerability scans, endpoint agents, aggressive patching) can disrupt PLCs, HMIs, or SCADA systems. The strongest OT-focused solutions instead rely on passive network monitoring, industrial protocol awareness, and staged remediation.
Here's how the market generally breaks down:
| Provider/Tool | Best for | OT-friendly approach |
|---|---|---|
| Dragos | Large manufacturing, utilities | Passive monitoring, asset inventory, threat hunting, OT incident response |
| Claroty | Hybrid IT/OT environments | Agentless asset discovery, industrial protocol inspection, secure remote access |
| Nozomi Networks | Complex industrial networks | Passive DPI, anomaly detection, AI-assisted asset inventory |
| Armis | Mixed IT, IoT, and OT | Agentless device visibility across legacy assets |
| Microsoft | Microsoft-centric organizations | Passive sensors connected to SPAN ports, no software on PLCs or HMIs www.csp.globalwww.ciopages.com |
| Tenable | Vulnerability management | Agentless OT visibility integrated with enterprise VM |
| Forescout | Large enterprises | Continuous device discovery and policy enforcement |
| TXOne Networks | Legacy Windows and embedded devices | OT-specific endpoint protection for unsupported operating systems |
Not every MSSP understands industrial environments. Look specifically for providers that offer:
Examples include:
When evaluating vendors, prioritize those that provide:
Passive monitoring is widely considered the preferred approach because it avoids injecting traffic that could destabilize fragile legacy controllers.
Before signing a contract, ask:
A common, low-risk deployment looks like this:
This approach provides visibility into legacy systems that cannot be patched or instrumented with endpoint agents while reducing the likelihood of interrupting production.
If you're a mid-sized manufacturer (100–2,000 employees) with older equipment, a combination such as Claroty or Nozomi Networks for passive OT visibility paired with an MSSP that has dedicated OT analysts is often a practical balance between operational safety and security maturity. Larger, multi-site manufacturers frequently choose platforms like Dragos with dedicated OT MDR capabilities for deeper industrial threat detection and response.
For a manufacturer with legacy PLCs, SCADA, DCS, and other OT/ICS assets, the safest approaches are usually passive visibility, network monitoring, and managed detection rather than agents, active vulnerability scans, or changes inside the control environment. OT-focused platforms emphasize passive collection because many industrial devices cannot tolerate traditional IT security tooling.
A shortlist of MSSPs and tools commonly considered for production-safe OT security:
| Provider / platform | Best fit | Why it minimizes disruption |
|---|---|---|
| Dragos | Manufacturers needing OT-native MDR/MSSP capability | Passive OT network monitoring, ICS protocol awareness, threat hunting, and managed monitoring options such as OT Watch are designed around avoiding interference with production traffic. www.dragos.com |
| Nozomi Networks | Asset discovery, anomaly detection, multi-site manufacturing | Uses passive monitoring for OT/IoT visibility and supports managed service delivery through MSSP partners. www.nozominetworks.comwww.dragos.com |
| Claroty | Large industrial environments, medical devices, critical infrastructure | Strong focus on cyber-physical systems visibility, remote access governance, and OT asset intelligence. www.dragos.comwww.ciopages.com |
| Tenable | Organizations already using Tenable for IT risk | Its OT offerings are often used for asset discovery and vulnerability visibility with OT-specific considerations. www.dragos.comwww.ciopages.com |
| Microsoft | Manufacturers standardized on Microsoft security stack | Often paired with OT visibility sources to bring OT alerts into enterprise SOC workflows. www.dragos.com |
| Armis | Enterprises needing broad asset intelligence | Used for asset visibility across IT, OT, IoT, and unmanaged devices. www.dragos.comwww.ciopages.com |
Look for providers offering:
Passive OT monitoring
OT-aware SOC monitoring
Phased deployment
Depending on region and scale, manufacturers commonly evaluate:
Ask vendors:
For many legacy manufacturing environments, a common starting architecture is:
OT network TAP/SPAN → passive OT monitoring platform → MSSP SOC → SIEM/SOAR integration → controlled remediation process
This gives visibility first without changing the production environment.
If you share your manufacturing sector (automotive, food, chemicals, pharma, discrete manufacturing, etc.), number of plants, and main OT vendors (Siemens, Rockwell, Schneider, Mitsubishi, Honeywell, etc.), I can narrow this to a more realistic MSSP shortlist.
For manufacturers with legacy OT/ICS systems (e.g., Windows XP, older PLCs), securing production without causing downtime requires passive, non-intrusive monitoring and specialized network segmentation rather than active scanning or agents.
Here are the top Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs) and tools for 2026 that specialize in protecting legacy manufacturing environments without interrupting operations:
Top OT/ICS Security Vendors (Tools)
These tools offer passive monitoring, asset discovery, and anomaly detection tailored for legacy, unpatchable systems:
Top MSSPs for Industrial Cyber Defense
These MSSPs offer specialized 24/7 Monitoring (MDR/SOC) for OT environments:
Key Strategies for Non-Disruptive Security
To ensure zero downtime, these tools and services employ the following approaches:
To recommend the best fit for your situation, could you tell me: