Data as of Oct 8, 2026Based on 173 AI responses
Reviewed by Dimitry Apollonsky ·
Lux Capital holds a narrow lead over DCVC, with recommendations centering on frontier science, defense, and advanced hardware. For startups seeking patient capital with extended research cycles, DCVC is the usual answer.
Rank and Mentioned in · since Jul 6
| #30d | Brand | Recommended for | Mentioned in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 No change | frontier science, defense tech, robotics, and advanced hardware | frontier science, defense tech, robotics, and advanced hardware | 57% |
| 2 No change | capital-intensive deep tech requiring patient capital and long horizons | capital-intensive deep tech requiring patient capital and long horizons | 55% |
| 3 No change | contrarian, high-risk bets bridging space, defense, and frontier technology | contrarian, high-risk bets bridging space, defense, and frontier technology | 38% |
| =4 | hands-on accelerator programs and engineering support for science-driven startups | hands-on accelerator programs and engineering support for science-driven startups | 28% |
| =4 | early-stage hardware prototyping, robotics, and operational manufacturing setup | early-stage hardware prototyping, robotics, and operational manufacturing setup | 28% |
| 6 | dedicated space domain investing across orbital infrastructure and Earth observation | dedicated space domain investing across orbital infrastructure and Earth observation | 26% |
| 7 | early-stage investments in satellite communications, GPS, and space economy foundations | early-stage investments in satellite communications, GPS, and space economy foundations | 25% |
| =8 | aerospace and space tech startups seeking corporate industry validation | aerospace and space tech startups seeking corporate industry validation | 23% |
| =8 | full-stack physical industries, supply chain automation, and advanced manufacturing | full-stack physical industries, supply chain automation, and advanced manufacturing | 23% |
| 10 | technically ambitious, high-risk research bets in hard science and climate | technically ambitious, high-risk research bets in hard science and climate | 22% |
| =11 | 21% | ||
| =11 | 21% | ||
| 13 | 20% | ||
| =14 | 18% | ||
| =14 | 18% | ||
| =16 | 17% | ||
| =16 | 17% | ||
| =16 | 17% | ||
| =16 | 17% | ||
| 20 | 16% | ||
| 21 | 13% | ||
| =22 | 11% | ||
| =22 | 11% | ||
| =22 | 11% | ||
| 25 | 10% |
What’s changing · since July
Since July, SOSVrising has become regularly named for seed hardware manufacturing questions while Prime Movers Labrising also gained visibility. Founders Fundfalling has become less common across deep tech discussions.
Weeks of Sep 21 – Oct 4, 2026
Widest split: DCVC, 63% on ChatGPT Search and 47% on Google AI Mode.
| Brand | ChatGPT Search | Google AI Mode | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lux Capital | 54% | 60% | |
| DCVC | 63% | 47% | |
| Founders Fund | 39% | 37% | |
| SOSV | 25% | 31% |
29% of citations point at the ranked brands’ own sites. openvc.app, rho.co, linkedin.com are the most-cited sites outside the ranked brands’ own domains.
Market map
Mentioned in · since Jul 6
Leading brands by topic