Specialized IP and Technology Law Firms | Parse

Specialized IP and Technology Law Firms in AI answers

Data as of Oct 13, 2026Based on 322 AI responsesReviewed by Dimitry Apollonsky

AI summary

Kirkland & Ellis holds a narrow lead over Cooley LLP across tech and intellectual property matters, frequently recommended for open-source defense and complex litigation. For copyright issues around artificial intelligence models and training data, Cooley LLP is the usual answer.

Most-mentioned brands

Rank and Mentioned in · since Jul 5

#	Brand	Recommended for	Mentioned in
1	Kirkland & Ellis 35% open-source software licensing disputes and high-stakes intellectual property litigation	open-source software licensing disputes and high-stakes intellectual property litigation	35%
2	Cooley LLP 30% defending artificial intelligence companies against copyright infringement and training data claims	defending artificial intelligence companies against copyright infringement and training data claims	30%
3	Latham & Watkins 26% multidisciplinary artificial intelligence compliance, regulatory counsel, and commercial licensing strategy	multidisciplinary artificial intelligence compliance, regulatory counsel, and commercial licensing strategy	26%
4	Fish & Richardson 25% defending SaaS companies against cloud infrastructure patent infringement claims	defending SaaS companies against cloud infrastructure patent infringement claims	25%
5	Skadden 22% corporate defense against hostile takeover bids and high-stakes governance fights	corporate defense against hostile takeover bids and high-stakes governance fights	22%
6	Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP 21% overcoming Alice 101 patent eligibility rejections and dedicated artificial intelligence patent protection	overcoming Alice 101 patent eligibility rejections and dedicated artificial intelligence patent protection	21%
7	Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 21% patent eligibility disputes and high-stakes intellectual property litigation defense	patent eligibility disputes and high-stakes intellectual property litigation defense	21%
8	DisputeSoft 14% software analysis and expert witness testimony for software patent litigation	software analysis and expert witness testimony for software patent litigation	14%
9	Morrison & Foerster 14% advising technology companies on intellectual property protection for fine-tuned artificial intelligence models	advising technology companies on intellectual property protection for fine-tuned artificial intelligence models	14%
10	Fenwick 14% intellectual property enforcement disputes and transactions for emerging technology platforms	intellectual property enforcement disputes and transactions for emerging technology platforms	14%
11	Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz 13%		13%
12	Barr Group 13%		13%
13	Eurekasoft 12%		12%
14	Sidespin Group 12%		12%
15	Pillsbury Law 11%		11%
16	Sidley Austin 11%		11%
17	Knobbe Martens 10%		10%
18	Orrick 10%		10%
19	Sullivan & Cromwell 10%		10%
20	Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati 9%		9%
21	Gibson Dunn 9%		9%
22	Quandary Peak Research 8%		8%
23	WilmerHale 7%		7%
24	Cyberonix Experts 7%		7%
25	SEAK 6%		6%
26	Baker Botts 6%		6%
27	DLA Piper 6%		6%
28	Kronenberger Rosenfeld LLP 6%		6%
29	Paul Hastings 6%		6%
30	Software Freedom Law Center 5%		5%
31	Perkins Coie 5%		5%
32	Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP 5%		5%
33	Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP 5%		5%
34	Goodwin 4%		4%
35	Cahn Litigation Services 4%		4%
36	Squire Patton Boggs 4%		4%
37	Software Analysis Group 4%		4%
38	Hamilton Brook Smith & Reynolds 3%		3%
39	Sterne Kessler 3%		3%
40	JurisPro 3%		3%
41	Luminary Experts 3%		3%
42	Sheppard Mullin 3%		3%
43	BakerHostetler 3%		3%
44	Holland & Knight 3%		3%
45	IMS Legal 3%		3%
46	MooreFry 3%		3%
47	Staas & Halsey LLP 3%		3%
48	Robins Kaplan LLP 3%		3%
49	Shartsis Friese 3%		3%
50	ALM Experts 2%		2%
51	Ironwood Experts 2%		2%
52	Expert Institute 2%		2%
53	Cravath, Swaine & Moore 2%		2%
54	Traverse Legal 2%		2%
55	Brooks Kushman 2%		2%
56	Davis Polk & Wardwell 2%		2%
57	Lumenci 2%		2%
58	Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP 2%		2%
59	GTC Law Group 2%		2%
60	Wolf Greenfield 2%		2%
61	Marshall IP 2%		2%
62	Caldwell Cassady & Curry 2%		2%
63	Richards, Layton & Finger 2%		2%
64	Bosch Intellectual Property and Software Consulting 2%		2%
65	Greenberg Traurig 2%		2%
66	McCoy Russell LLP 2%		2%
67	Thompson Coburn 2%		2%
68	Katten 2%		2%
69	Morgan Lewis 2%		2%
70	Sage Patent Group 2%		2%
71	Ropes & Gray 2%		2%
72	Proskauer 2%		2%
73	Foley & Lardner LLP 2%		2%
74	Duane Morris 2%		2%
75	Alston & Bird 2%		2%
76	Jenner & Block 2%		2%
77	Thomas Consulting Services 2%		2%
78	Juristat 1%		1%
79	WitnessLens 1%		1%
80	Quarles & Brady LLP 1%		1%
81	GLG 1%		1%
82	LexisNexis 1%		1%
83	Patexia 1%		1%
84	Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP 1%		1%
85	Lambert Shortell & Connaughton 1%		1%
86	Irell & Manella LLP 1%		1%
87	CoffyLaw, LLC 1%		1%
88	Founders Legal 1%		1%
89	Dykema 1%		1%
90	Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP 1%		1%
91	McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP 1%		1%
92	SLW Intellectual Property 1%		1%
93	Baker McKenzie 1%		1%
94	Adibi IP 1%		1%
95	Robinson Bradshaw 1%		1%
96	Crimson Insights 1%		1%
97	Forensis Group 1%		1%
98	Stranch, Jennings & Garvey, PLLC 1%		1%
99	Gish PLLC 1%		1%
100	Haynes and Boone 1%		1%

Recommendations by AI engine

ChatGPT SearchGoogle AI Mode

Widest split: Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, 33% on ChatGPT Search and 10% on Google AI Mode.

Mentioned in on each AI engine, by brand
Brand	ChatGPT Search	Google AI Mode
Kirkland & Ellis	37%	32%
Cooley LLP	29%	31%
Latham & Watkins	23%	28%
Fish & Richardson	20%	29%
Skadden	21%	23%
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP	33%	10%
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP	23%	19%
DisputeSoft	14%	14%
Morrison & Foerster	18%	10%
Fenwick	19%	9%

Specialized IP and Technology Law Firms in AI answers

Most-mentioned brands

Latest insights

Recommendations by AI engine

Questions by topic2

Sources AI cites5

See where your brand stands in this ranking

See where your brand stands in this ranking

Questions by topic2