Global integrated workplace management software

For a global corporate real-estate portfolio + facilities organization, my current recommendation is Planon as the best overall IWMS to shortlist first.

The important caveat: there isn't a universal winner. The best choice depends on whether your priority is CRE/lease strategy, facilities and asset operations, workplace experience, or deep enterprise workflow/IT integration. Gartner describes IWMS as a platform for managing the lifecycle of corporate real-estate assets and optimizing the building portfolio.www.gartner.com

My 2026 shortlist

🥇 1. Planon — my overall pick

Planon's biggest advantage is breadth without forcing you to assemble a collection of point solutions. Its IWMS covers real-estate portfolio and lease management, space/workplace services, asset & maintenance management, energy/sustainability, and project management.planonsoftware.com+2

For a global portfolio, particularly attractive capabilities include:

• Global portfolio and location management
• Lease and transaction management
• Strategic space planning and workplace management
• Facilities and maintenance
• Capital projects
• Energy and sustainability
• IoT/building-system integration
• Portfolio benchmarking and analytics
• ERP/finance/HR integration

Planon specifically positions its product for managing a global real-estate portfolio, including performance and cost at individual locations, while its workplace product incorporates bookings, sensors, building data and operational insights.planonsoftware.com

Why I'd choose it: If your objective is to create a genuine single system of record for global CRE + FM, Planon has one of the strongest functional fits.

Planon IWMS

---

🥈 2. IBM Maximo Real Estate & Facilities

IBM is particularly compelling if facilities operations, assets, maintenance, IoT and enterprise asset management are central to your strategy.

Maximo Real Estate & Facilities is the evolution of TRIRIGA and combines real-estate and facilities data with AI-powered lease abstraction, workflow automation, IoT and analytics.www.ibm.com

Important 2026 consideration: don't start a new evaluation around legacy TRIRIGA. IBM says TRIRIGA ordering ended January 28, 2026, with Maximo Real Estate & Facilities 9.x being the designated upgrade path.www.ibm.com

Best choice when: you already have a substantial IBM Maximo ecosystem or your facilities organization is highly asset/maintenance intensive.

IBM Maximo Real Estate & Facilities

---

🥉 3. Eptura / Archibus

Archibus by Eptura remains a serious contender for large, complicated facilities environments.

Eptura combines Archibus with workplace, asset, visitor and other workplace technologies. Archibus covers maintenance, space planning, asset management, lease/contract management and BIM, with particularly strong positioning around complex environments and government/regulated organizations.eptura.com

I'd put it especially high on the list if you have:

• Very complex facilities
• Significant BIM/CAD requirements
• Government/regulated environments
• Large numbers of assets
• Strong space/facilities requirements

Eptura / Archibus

---

4. MRI Manhattan / MRI IWMS

MRI is particularly interesting if corporate real estate and financial/lease management are at the heart of the program.

MRI Manhattan supports transactions, leasing, lease accounting, space, reservations, utilization, projects, facilities maintenance and sustainability. Crucially for your use case, MRI explicitly supports multi-currency, multi-language and multi-accounting capabilities for global portfolios.www.mrisoftware.com

That makes MRI one of the platforms I'd take very seriously if your CFO/CRE organization cares deeply about:

leases → accounting → portfolio costs → transactions → space → FM

rather than primarily starting from facilities maintenance.

MRI IWMS

---

5. Nuvolo

Nuvolo is compelling when ServiceNow is already a strategic enterprise platform.

Its Connected Workplace offering covers real estate/portfolio, space/workplace, capital projects, asset/maintenance, and sustainability—and is built natively on ServiceNow.www.nuvolo.com

I'd shortlist it if your enterprise already has a mature ServiceNow implementation and wants CRE/FM workflows to become part of that ecosystem.

---

6. ServiceNow Workplace Service Delivery

ServiceNow has become much more interesting for workplace management. Its current Workplace Service Delivery offering includes space management, moves, reservations, visitor management, maintenance, asset management and lease administration.www.nuvolo.com+1

However, for your exact wording—"manage our global real estate portfolio and facilities"—I'd generally put Planon, Maximo, Eptura and MRI ahead of it.

ServiceNow's sweet spot is more enterprise workflow + employee/workplace experience + facilities processes than being the deepest dedicated CRE/IWMS platform.

---

My recommendation by scenario

If I were running your RFP:

• Best overall global IWMS: 🥇 Planon
• Best for asset-heavy FM: IBM Maximo Real Estate & Facilities
• Best for complex facilities/BIM: Eptura Archibus
• Best for CRE + lease/accounting: MRI Manhattan
• Best if ServiceNow is already strategic: Nuvolo
• Best for workplace experience / enterprise workflows: ServiceNow

One particularly important distinction

I'd avoid selecting an IWMS based on a feature checklist alone. For a global implementation, I'd weight the decision roughly like this:

The integration/data model deserves unusually high weighting. Your IWMS ultimately needs to connect ERP/finance, HR, procurement, BMS/IoT, CAD/BIM, occupancy data, service providers and potentially ServiceNow—not simply replace spreadsheets.

Bottom line: If you gave me no other information and asked me to pick one platform for a multinational company managing both corporate real estate and facilities, I'd start the competitive process with Planon, with IBM Maximo REF, Eptura Archibus, and MRI Manhattan as the core alternatives.

If you tell me roughly portfolio size (sq ft / number of sites), countries, owned vs. leased %, number of FM technicians, ERP (SAP/Oracle/etc.), and whether you already use ServiceNow, I can build you a much more useful IWMS RFP scorecard and vendor comparison, including implementation risk, integrations, likely TCO, and which 2–3 vendors I'd actually invite to the final RFP.