Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 700 AI responses · See how Parse measures this
AI Design-to-Code Generators
Parse
https://parse.gl
Figma has surged to the top of AI-powered design-to-code conversations, now appearing in 60% of responses. This rise from 23% to 60% of mentions between October and March coincides with a significant decline for early leader , which fell from its #1 position.
| # | Brand | What AI says | Mention rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Increasingly cited as the central hub for AI-driven design and code generation. | 58% | |
| 2 | An AI-native code editor often cited for its understanding of design context. | 31% | |
| 3 | Frequently recommended for 'vibe coding,' converting emotion into visually appealing UI. | 29% | |
| 4 | 29% | ||
| 5 | The leading | 23% | |
| 6 | 16% | ||
| 7 | 16% | ||
| 8 | 11% | ||
| 9 | 11% | ||
| 10 | 9% | ||
| 11 | 9% | ||
| 12 | 9% | ||
| 13 | 9% | ||
| 14 | 9% | ||
| 15 | 8% | ||
| 16 | 8% | ||
| 17 | 7% | ||
| 18 | 7% | ||
| 19 | 6% | ||
| 20 | 5% | ||
| 21 | 4% | ||
| 22 | 4% | ||
| 23 | 4% | ||
| 24 | 4% | ||
| 25 | 4% |
Who wins on each AI
The same market, seen by two models.
Sources AI cited
figma.com is the page AI reaches for most here, cited in 48% of analyzed answers.
Surged from 23% to 60% mention share between October and March.
“A design tool that integrates with converters” → “An AI-powered hub for prompt-to-UI and code generation via 'Figma Make'”
Climbed from appearing in 5% of responses to 17% by March.
Fell from the top spot (55% mention share) in October to 24% by March.
| Brand | ChatGPT Search | Google AI Mode | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28% | 47% | ||
| 33% | 9% | ||
| 26% | 38% | ||
| 15% | 36% | ||
| 26% | 24% |
The two models disagree most about v0 (ChatGPT #1, Google #16) and Tokens Studio (ChatGPT #14, Google #4).
Figma has surged to the top of AI-powered design-to-code conversations, now appearing in 60% of responses. This rise from 23% to 60% of mentions between October and March coincides with a significant decline for early leader Anima, which fell from its #1 position.
Across 700 AI responses, Figma is mentioned most, named in 58% of them, followed by Cursor (31%) and Lovable (29%).
Parse measures each brand's mention rate — the share of answers naming it — across 700 AI responses to this market's buyer questions. Answers are collected daily and the ranking is published weekly.
Brands enter the ranking when AI answers mention them. Parse collects answers daily and publishes the re-measured set weekly, so new brands appear as AI starts recommending them.
Early responses centered on Anima, but
Locofy and
Builder.io quickly became the dominant recommendations. By early 2026, AI-centric tools like Meku.dev also gained traction, framing the problem around generating full app structures, not just components.
Brands mentioned
Early responses centered on Anima, but
Locofy and
Builder.io quickly became the dominant recommendations. By early 2026, AI-centric tools like Meku.dev also gained traction, framing the problem around generating full app structures, not just components.
Locofy has been the most consistent top answer for generating components from designs. While
and are also frequently cited, the focus shifted over time to include a wider range of AI tools that handle both files and static screenshots.
Brands mentioned
Locofy has been the most consistent top answer for generating components from designs. While
Builder.io and
Anima are also frequently cited, the focus shifted over time to include a wider range of AI tools that handle both
Figma files and static screenshots.