Identity provider integrated PAM

If you already use an Identity Provider (IdP) for SSO, several vendors offer Privileged Access Management (PAM) tools that integrate with your existing identity platform to secure administrator access, manage privileged credentials, and control access to critical systems.

Top PAM vendors to consider

• 

1. Okta Privileged Access

(Best if you use Okta)

Extends Okta's identity platform to privileged infrastructure access, including servers, service accounts, secrets, access requests, and approvals. Supports SSO and identity/group provisioning through Okta.

Official resource:Okta Privileged Access

help.okta.comwww.okta.com

---

• 

2. CyberArk

A mature enterprise PAM solution for privileged credential vaulting, password rotation, session monitoring, and controlled administrative access. Worth evaluating for complex hybrid or enterprise environments.

Official resource:CyberArk

learn.microsoft.comwww.ciopages.comwww.ciopages.comlearn.microsoft.com

---

• 

3. BeyondTrust

Offers privileged password management and endpoint privilege controls, with options for managing remote administrator access and limiting excessive privileges. Supports integrations within broader identity security architectures.

Official resource:BeyondTrust

learn.microsoft.comwww.beyondtrust.com

---

• 

4. Delinea

Provides centralized privileged credential management, access controls, and session oversight. A strong candidate for organizations wanting enterprise PAM capabilities across on-premises and cloud environments.

Official resource:Delinea

learn.microsoft.comwww.ciopages.comwww.ciopages.comlearn.microsoft.com

---

• 

5. Teleport

Focuses on secure access to infrastructure such as SSH servers, Kubernetes clusters, databases, and internal applications, using identity-based access policies. Particularly relevant for cloud-native and engineering teams.

Official resource:Teleport

www.ciopages.comwww.ciopages.com

How to choose

Microsoft also offers Microsoft Entra Privileged Identity Management (PIM) if your environment is Microsoft-centric. It provides just-in-time elevation and time-limited assignments for supported Microsoft Entra, Azure, and related roles; it is not a complete replacement for every traditional PAM capability.learn.microsoft.com+3

One important question

Which identity provider do you currently use?

Your current identity provider

Okta

Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD)

Google Cloud Identity

Ping Identity

Other / custom SAML or OIDC provider

---

What admin access do you need to protect?

Windows/Linux servers and domain administrators

AWS, Azure, or GCP administrators

Database and application administrators

Local admin rights on employee endpoints

All of the above

---

Preferred deployment

Cloud or hybrid

On-premises

No preference

[Compare compatible PAM solutions]

With those details, I can narrow the list to vendors that fit your existing IdP and administrator-access requirements, rather than simply listing PAM products.

There isn’t one universally “best” PAM solution—the right choice depends heavily on whether your critical infrastructure is primarily cloud, on-prem, hybrid, Windows/Linux, network devices, databases, or Kubernetes.

For a typical enterprise critical-infrastructure environment, I’d evaluate these architectures:

Microsoft's current guidance explicitly describes PIM as providing time- and approval-based privileged activation, access reviews, notifications and audit history for Entra/Azure resources.Microsoft Learn+1

For critical infrastructure, I'd generally look for these capabilities rather than choosing purely by vendor:

• Just-in-time / just-enough access — eliminate standing administrative privileges wherever practical.
• Credential vaulting and automatic rotation — especially for service accounts, local administrator accounts, SSH keys and other non-human credentials.
• Privileged session monitoring/recording — particularly for SSH, RDP, network-device and database administration.
• Strong authentication and approval workflows for sensitive operations.
• Centralized audit trails that cannot easily be altered by the administrator being monitored.
• Coverage beyond the identity provider — Linux/Unix, Windows, network devices, databases, Kubernetes, cloud consoles and legacy systems.
• Integration with your SIEM/SOC so privileged activity can be correlated with other security events.
• Break-glass access with unusually strong controls and continuous monitoring.
• Separation of duties between requesting, approving and performing privileged operations.

A particularly important distinction is that Entra PIM is excellent for Microsoft identity/Azure role governance but isn't by itself a complete traditional PAM replacement for a heterogeneous infrastructure estate. Microsoft's own documentation describes dedicated PAM integrations with CyberArk, BeyondTrust and Delinea, including credential vaulting and session monitoring.Microsoft Learn

A practical architecture

For a large hybrid environment, I'd consider:

Entra ID/PIM → identity and JIT authorization Dedicated PAM → credentials, sessions and infrastructure access PAWs → hardened administrative endpoints SIEM/EDR → continuous monitoring and detection

Microsoft's current privileged-access architecture similarly emphasizes privileged identities, hardened privileged-access workstations, policy enforcement and continuous monitoring rather than relying on a single product.Microsoft Learn+1

If you tell me (1) cloud/on-prem/hybrid, (2) approximate number of privileged users, (3) AWS/Azure/GCP, (4) Windows/Linux/network devices, and (5) compliance requirements such as NERC CIP, PCI DSS, ISO 27001 or SOC 2, I can give you a feature-by-feature comparison of CyberArk vs BeyondTrust vs Delinea vs Entra PIM tailored to your environment.

There is no single "best" Privileged Access Management (PAM) solution for every organization, as the right choice depends heavily on your infrastructure architecture (cloud-native vs. legacy on-premise), team size, and specific security workflows. However, the market is led by several powerhouse solutions recognized as enterprise standards.gartner.com

The top solutions categorized by their core strengths include:

• CyberArk
  • Best for: Large enterprises requiring maximum security depth, comprehensive audit trails, and end-to-end identity security.
  • Key Strengths: Industry-leading threat analytics, robust credential vaulting, massive scalability across complex hybrid environments, and advanced adaptive MFA.
  • Considerations: Can be complex to deploy and comes with a steeper learning curve and higher total cost of ownership.securden.com
• BeyondTrust
  • Best for: Unified vulnerability management, endpoint privilege elevation, and secure remote vendor access.
  • Key Strengths: Combines Password Safe, Endpoint Privilege Management, and Privileged Remote Access into an integrated suite with great user visibility and session monitoring.
  • Considerations: Modular licensing can become fragmented depending on which specific components you enable.securden.com+1
• Delinea (Secret Server)
  • Best for: Organizations looking for intuitive, vault-centric PAM that is faster and easier to deploy than traditional enterprise giants.
  • Key Strengths: Highly user-friendly interface, strong password discovery, robust workflow access controls, and seamless Active Directory integration.
  • Considerations: Advanced governance features require careful scaling and configuration.gartner.com+1
• StrongDM
  • Best for: Modern, cloud-heavy, and DevOps-driven engineering teams.
  • Key Strengths: Acts as an "identity firewall" managing access to databases, Kubernetes, and servers in real-time with zero-trust JIT (Just-In-Time) access and granular live session recording.
  • Considerations: Less focused on traditional workstation/endpoint privilege management compared to legacy enterprise tools.securden.com
• HashiCorp Vault
  • Best for: Developer and engineering workflows requiring dynamic secrets management and API-driven infrastructure.
  • Key Strengths: Excellent for managing application secrets, dynamic encryption, and high-availability clustering in cloud-native environments.
  • Considerations: Not a traditional out-of-the-box human session monitoring tool; requires custom implementation for standard administrative audits.securden.com

To help narrow down the ideal platform for your team, let me know:

• Is your infrastructure primarily cloud-native, on-premise, or a hybrid mix?
• Do you need to manage access mostly for human users (IT/DevOps staff) or non-human/machine identities (APIs, AI agents)?
• What is your team size and desired deployment timeframe?

A good approach is to treat server and database credentials as managed secrets, not as documents that happen to contain passwords. NIST emphasizes lifecycle management and protection of key/secret material, while CISA recommends centralized privileged-access management, least privilege, MFA, logging, and time-limited administrative access.NIST+2

Recommended setup

• Use a dedicated secrets/PAM platform. Store administrator passwords, database credentials, API keys, SSH keys, and other secrets in an encrypted vault rather than spreadsheets, shared drives, email, or Teams/Slack messages.
• Give people individual identities. Don't have five administrators share server-admin unless the system genuinely requires it. Each administrator should authenticate with their own account so actions can be attributed to a person.
• Require phishing-resistant MFA for privileged access where practical. CISA specifically recommends strong MFA for sensitive administrative access.CISA
• Separate normal and privileged accounts. For example, jane.smith for email/ordinary work and a separate privileged identity for server administration.
• Implement RBAC and least privilege. Database developers shouldn't automatically have production DBA privileges; a help-desk administrator shouldn't automatically have domain-admin access. CISA recommends RBAC and periodic removal/review of unnecessary accounts.CISA
• Use just-in-time access for high-risk privileges. Instead of giving someone permanent production-admin rights, have them request access for a defined period and automatically revoke it afterward. CISA specifically recommends time-based/JIT privileged access.CISA
• Prefer credential brokering over revealing passwords. For especially sensitive systems, the PAM system can establish the SSH/RDP/database session without showing the underlying password to the administrator. CISA's PAM guidance describes this model.CISA
• Rotate credentials automatically. Particularly important for shared/service accounts. Rotate after personnel changes, suspected compromise, and—where practical—after privileged use. Some PAM systems can automate this.
• Log everything important. Record who requested access, who approved it, which resource was accessed, when, for how long, and what privileged session occurred. Protect the logs from alteration and monitor for unusual activity.
• Have an emergency/break-glass process. Keep a small number of emergency credentials available, heavily restrict them, alert whenever they're used, and change them after use. CISA recommends local/emergency accounts be restricted and their passwords changed after each use.CISA
• Back up the vault securely. A credential-management system becomes critical infrastructure itself. Have encrypted, tested backups and a documented recovery procedure. NIST treats secure storage, distribution, use, and destruction as part of the credential/key lifecycle.NIST Publications

A practical organizational model

You could structure access roughly like this:

The key is that the vault controls the credential, while your identity system controls the person.

What I'd avoid

• A shared Excel/Google Sheet containing all passwords.
• Passwords stored in browser notes or personal password managers.
• Sending credentials through email or chat.
• One permanent domain-admin account used by everyone.
• Giving developers production database passwords when an application/service identity would suffice.
• Keeping old credentials active indefinitely.
• Relying on password rotation alone without MFA, access control, and auditing.

For a small-to-medium IT department, a sensible target architecture is SSO/identity provider → MFA → PAM/secrets vault → time-limited access → server/database → centralized audit logs.

If you tell me roughly how many IT staff you have, whether you're primarily Microsoft/Azure, AWS, GCP, Linux, or on-prem, and which databases you use, I can lay out a concrete credential-management architecture and operating procedure for your environment.

For a system-administrator PAM deployment, there isn't one universally best product—the right choice depends heavily on whether you're protecting on-prem infrastructure, cloud environments, endpoints, service accounts, or all of them.

For an enterprise with a substantial hybrid environment, I would put these on the shortlist:

Current PAM guidance increasingly emphasizes eliminating standing privilege, rather than simply putting administrator passwords in a vault.CIOPages+1

What I'd require from the solution

For your stated use case, I'd make these requirements non-negotiable:

• JIT/JEA access — administrators receive elevated privileges only for the task and duration required.
• MFA and strong authentication before privileged access.
• Credential vaulting and automatic rotation for accounts that still require passwords.
• Privileged session recording for SSH, RDP and other administrative sessions.
• Approval workflows for particularly sensitive systems.
• Full audit trail showing who accessed what, when, and what they did.
• Emergency/break-glass access with especially strong monitoring.
• Service-account and machine-identity support, not just human administrators.
• Integration with your IdP/SIEM/ITSM—for example Entra ID, Okta, Splunk, Sentinel, ServiceNow, etc.
• Endpoint privilege management, so administrators don't need permanent local/domain administrator rights.

BeyondTrust, for example, currently combines credential management, privileged session management, secrets, remote access and endpoint privilege management, including JIT privilege and session auditing.BeyondTrust+2

A practical architecture

I wouldn't design this as simply:

Admin → PAM vault → server

I'd aim for:

Admin workstation → MFA/IdP → JIT approval → PAM → target system

with:

• no permanently assigned Domain Admin/root privileges;
• privileged credentials hidden from administrators where possible;
• short-lived access;
• recorded administrative sessions;
• automatic credential rotation;
• separate hardened administrator workstations for the highest-risk operations;
• SIEM alerts for unusual privileged activity.

That architecture is generally more important than which vendor you select.

If you tell me your environment—e.g. Windows/AD + Linux, AWS/Azure/GCP, number of admins, approximate number of servers, and whether you're a small/mid-size company or large enterprise—I can give you a side-by-side CyberArk vs. BeyondTrust vs. Delinea vs. Entra PIM comparison, including deployment complexity and which capabilities you'd actually need.

Choosing the "best" Privileged Access Management (PAM) solution depends heavily on your organization's size, infrastructure complexity, deployment timeline, and budget. According to recent industry analysis and market consensus from sources like Gartner Magic Quadrant and PeerSpot , three major enterprise leaders dominate the space, alongside specialized alternatives.decryptiondigest.com+1

Here is a breakdown of the top PAM solutions mapped to different organizational needs:

• CyberArk — The Enterprise Heavyweight
  • Best for: Large, complex global enterprises needing deep, highly customizable security controls.
  • Pros: Unmatched feature depth, robust threat analytics, extensive vaulting capabilities, and strong compliance tracking.
  • Cons: Longer deployment cycles (often 1–3 months) and a steeper learning curve/higher administrative overhead.tech-insider.org
• BeyondTrust — Best for Session Management & Endpoint Privilege
  • Best for: Organizations prioritizing secure remote vendor access, endpoint privilege management, and rapid auditing.
  • Pros: Excellent session monitoring, streamlined remote support integration, and a faster deployment timeline (typically 2–6 weeks) compared to CyberArk.
  • Cons: Can become expensive as you scale across multi-cloud and hybrid endpoints.tech-insider.org
• Delinea (Secret Server) — Best for Usability & Fast Time-to-Value
  • Best for: Mid-market to enterprise teams looking for an intuitive, vault-centric tool that's easy to deploy.
  • Pros: Highly user-friendly, faster to production value (especially via Secret Server Cloud ), and strong developer-friendly capabilities.
  • Cons: Advanced analytics and complex reporting may require more manual configuration than CyberArk.startwithidentity.com+1
• HashiCorp Vault or Saviynt — Best for Cloud-Native & DevOps
  • Best for: Highly automated, cloud-first environments managing dynamic secrets, APIs, and microservices rather than just human admin sessions.
  • Pros: Native alignment with modern CI/CD pipelines and infrastructure-as-code.
  • Cons: Less optimized for traditional human administrative session recording out of the box.startwithidentity.com
• ManageEngine PAM360 — Best Budget-Conscious / Mid-Market
  • Best for: Organizations needing comprehensive core PAM capabilities without enterprise-tier pricing.
  • Pros: Cost-effective, tight integration with other IT management tools.
  • Cons: Lacks the massive scale and advanced threat intelligence of top-tier leaders.startwithidentity.com

To help narrow down the ideal choice for your team, tell me:

• What is your primary infrastructure environment (On-prem, AWS/Azure multi-cloud, or hybrid)?
• Roughly how many system administrators and service accounts will need coverage?
• Do you prioritize fast deployment or deep enterprise customization?