Granola holds a narrow lead over Jamie for desktop note-taking that discards raw audio after transcription. Buyers prioritize solutions that retain only structured notes and summary text without holding recording files.
For your requirements, I’d prioritize an AI meeting notetaker that processes meetings into transcripts and summaries without retaining the original audio, and that can demonstrate GDPR compliance through its data-processing terms—not just claim to be “privacy-friendly.”
One important distinction: GDPR compliance does not automatically mean audio is deleted after processing. Some tools retain recordings by default, while others offer configurable retention or transcription-only workflows.
I’d evaluate each option against these four requirements:
GDPR: A clear Data Processing Agreement (DPA), defined legal basis and subprocessors, and appropriate international data-transfer safeguards.
No audio retention: Explicit confirmation that audio is deleted immediately after processing, including temporary storage and backups where applicable.
Transcript privacy: Control over how long transcripts, summaries, and meeting metadata are retained.
AI training: Your meeting content is not used to train AI models without your authorization.
Jamie says it deletes audio after transcription, supports GDPR compliance, offers a DPA, and keeps data storage and processing in Europe. It also says meeting content is not used for AI training.
Best if you want a conventional meeting assistant without a bot joining your call.
2. Granola — best for simple, bot-free note-taking
Granola transcribes meetings from your device and says raw audio is deleted immediately after transcription. It states that it is GDPR-compliant and offers a DPA. Business plans include configurable transcript retention and workspace-level controls.
Best if you want polished notes and summaries without a meeting bot.
3. Beaver AI — best for no-audio-storage architecture
Beaver says its notetaker for Google Meet, Microsoft Teams and Zoom captures text without recording audio. Its separate Magic Whiteboard product streams audio for live transcription and immediately discards it. It also advertises configurable retention, no AI training, and an on-premises option.
Best if eliminating persistent audio files is your highest priority. Confirm the DPA and hosting arrangements for your chosen deployment.
4. Private Notetaker — best for keeping everything on your computer
This Mac and Windows app says transcription and summarization run locally, with no cloud processing and no audio sent to its servers. That reduces exposure to third-party processors. However, the vendor explicitly says it does not hold GDPR certifications, so you should assess your own compliance obligations rather than assume the software guarantees compliance.
Best for highly confidential meetings where local-only processing is acceptable.
Granola : Works by capturing device audio locally, transcribing it, and then discarding the audio file with no long-term recording stored. It is GDPR and UK GDPR compliant, does not use third-party data for model training, and operates bot-free.[]()
Yes. Based on the current privacy documentation I found, Jamie is probably the closest match to your requirements.
My top picks
Tool
GDPR
Audio after transcription
EU data residency
My take
Jamie
✅ GDPR compliant
Deleted immediately after transcription
✅ EEA/Switzerland/UK
Best overall match
Granola
✅ GDPR compliant
Deleted immediately
Not as strong a residency guarantee
Excellent privacy-focused alternative
Krisp
✅ GDPR compliant
Immediately deleted in Transcribe Only mode
Not necessarily EU-only
Good if you also want meeting audio/voice tools
Sally AI
✅ GDPR compliant
Temporary audio artifacts deleted after processing
✅ Germany
Strong enterprise/EU option
Jamie is especially compelling: its current security documentation says it is GDPR compliant, keeps storage and processing within the EEA/Switzerland/UK, doesn't store meeting audio, and deletes the audio immediately after transcription. It also has ISO 27001 certification and a DPA.
Granola is another excellent choice. It captures audio locally, transcribes it in real time, and deletes the raw audio immediately afterward. Granola explicitly states that it is GDPR compliant and offers a DPA.
Krisp meets the requirement specifically when using its Transcribe Only mode: its documentation says audio sent to its servers for transcription is immediately deleted after processing. It also states that Meeting Notes are GDPR compliant. However, other Krisp recording modes can retain recordings, so configuration matters.
Sally AI is particularly interesting if you're looking for a more European enterprise setup. It's hosted in Germany, offers a GDPR Art. 28 DPA, and says temporary raw audio-processing artifacts are automatically deleted after processing unless you explicitly configure audio storage.
What I'd choose
For the strictest interpretation of your requirements: Jamie.
The combination of:
GDPR compliance
EU/EEA data residency
audio deleted immediately after transcription
no AI training on your data
ISO 27001
DPA
no meeting bot joining the call
makes it unusually well aligned with a privacy-sensitive deployment.
One caveat: GDPR compliance doesn't mean you can record meetings without participant notice/consent. Jamie itself notes that the organization/user remains responsible for informing participants and obtaining consent where required.
If you tell me whether this is for personal use, a small business, or an enterprise/legal/healthcare environment, I can also compare Jamie vs. Granola vs. Krisp vs. Sally on pricing, Teams/Zoom/Google Meet support, EU hosting, DPA, subprocessors, and retention controls.
