Data as of Sep 9, 2026 · Based on 341 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Dental hygienists seeking effective yet gentle ultrasonic scaling have several top-tier options. The EMS Piezon Master 700 is favored for its comfort-focused, no-pain technology, while the 
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 37% of answers
Named in 36% of answers
Named in 31% of answers
Named in 29% of answers
Source | Citation share |
|---|---|
Top 10 Dental Ultrasonic Scaler In Dentistry | Shinoda Dentalhttps://shinodadental.com/top-dental-ultrasonic-scaler/ | 5.8% |
Ultrasonic Scaling for Dental Hygienists | Dentsply Sirona USAhttps://www.dentsplysirona.com/en-us/discover/discover-by-category/preventive/ultrasonic-scaling-for-dental-hygienists.html | 3.8% |
 What is the best ultrasonic scaler on the market? Easy… - Dentistry.co.ukhttps://dentistry.co.uk/2019/08/30/best-ultrasonic-scaler-market-easy/ | 3.7% |
 Advances in Ultrasonics - Dimensions of Dental Hygienehttps://dimensionsofdentalhygiene.com/article/advances-in-ultrasonics/ | 3.2% |
 Dental Scaling Instruments: Types, Uses & Tips | Hayes - Hayes Handpiece Bloghttps://hayeshandpiece.com/dental-resources/post/scaling-instruments-in-dentistry | 2.7% |
 Best Ultrasonic Dental Scalers 2026https://www.dentalrave.com/best-ultrasonic-dental-scaler-the-ultimate-at-home-ultrasonic-tooth-cleaner-for-professional-level-dental-care/ | 2.6% |
 Ultrasonic Scalers | MORITAhttps://www.morita.com/anz/en/products/handpieces-and-instruments/scalers/ultrasonic-scalers/ | 2.3% |
 A Comprehensive Review on Ultrasonic Scaling for Dental Hygienists - Today's RDHhttps://www.todaysrdh.com/a-comprehensive-review-on-ultrasonic-scaling-for-dental-hygienists/ | 2.1% |
Test Drive: Don’t Overlook This Feature-Packed Dental Ultrasonic Scalerhttps://www.dentalproductsreport.com/view/don-t-overlook-this-feature-packed-dental-ultrasonic-scaler | 1.9% |
5 Ways Cavitron Ultrasound Dental Scaling is Better | Stephen Petingehttps://www.petingedental.com/five-reasons-why-cavitron-ultrasound-dental-scaling-can-work-better-for-you/ | 1.8% |
When balancing **clinical efficiency** with **patient comfort** , finding the right ultrasonic scaler comes down to matching the technology type (Magnetostrictive vs. Piezoelectric) and pairing it with the proper insert/tip. Gentleness on the patient relies heavily on `linear or controlled strokes, reduced…
When balancing clinical efficiency with patient comfort , finding the right ultrasonic scaler comes down to matching the technology type (Magnetostrictive vs. Piezoelectric) and pairing it with the proper insert/tip. Gentleness on the patient relies heavily on linear or controlled strokes, reduced heat/vibration "chatter," and slim subgingival access.
Top ultrasonic scaler systems and setups favored by dental hygienists for high efficacy and gentle patient experience include:
If you want to narrow this down, let me know:
For a **dental hygienist who wants strong calculus removal but a gentle patient experience**, the “best” ultrasonic scaler depends on your patient mix (heavy calculus vs. perio maintenance vs. sensitive patients), your preferred ergonomics, and whether you like magnetostrictive or piezo technology. These are the…
For a dental hygienist who wants strong calculus removal but a gentle patient experience, the “best” ultrasonic scaler depends on your patient mix (heavy calculus vs. perio maintenance vs. sensitive patients), your preferred ergonomics, and whether you like magnetostrictive or piezo technology. These are the systems that are most often considered top-tier clinically.
Best for: General practice, heavy calculus, SRP, high-volume hygiene schedules
Strengths
Patient comfort advantages
Considerations
The Cavitron line remains one of the most widely used ultrasonic scaler families among hygienists, and the Cavitron 300 received the highest percentage of votes in the 2025 Dentaltown power scaler survey.
Best for: Maintenance patients, anxious patients, perio patients, implant maintenance
Strengths
Patient comfort advantages
Considerations
A clinical study comparing devices with piezo scaling and air-polishing functions found both EMS Prophylaxis Master and a comparable device effective, with high comfort ratings; EMS showed higher ultrasonic handpiece comfort among operators in that study.
Best for: Periodontal maintenance, root surfaces, clinicians who prefer delicate tactile control
Strengths
Patient comfort advantages
Considerations
Best for: Private practices wanting reliability without a premium price
Strengths
Considerations
| Your priority | Best match |
|---|---|
| One scaler that handles almost everything | Cavitron 300 |
| Most gentle sensation for patients | EMS PIEZON / AIRFLOW Prophylaxis Master |
| Periodontal maintenance and finesse | ACTEON Newtron |
| Best value | Parkell TurboSensor |
| Implant/perio-focused practice | EMS PIEZON system |
A premium scaler will still feel uncomfortable if the setup is wrong. For a gentler experience, look for:
For many hygienists, the ideal setup is actually a combination: a Cavitron 300 for heavy calculus days and a piezo system such as EMS PIEZON or ACTEON Newtron for sensitive patients and maintenance care.
I can also compare Cavitron 300 vs EMS PIEZON vs ACTEON Newtron specifically from a hygienist’s perspective (noise, hand fatigue, inserts, perio use, and patient comfort).
For many hygienists, the ideal setup is actually a combination: a Cavitron 300 for heavy calculus days and a piezo system such as EMS PIEZON or ACTEON Newtron for sensitive patients and maintenance care.
When balancing high efficiency in calculus removal with a gentle, comfortable experience for patients, the choice often comes down to the **technology type** (Magnetostrictive vs. Piezoelectric) and specific ergonomic/water-flow…
When balancing high efficiency in calculus removal with a gentle, comfortable experience for patients, the choice often comes down to the technology type (Magnetostrictive vs. Piezoelectric) and specific ergonomic/water-flow controls.
Top Ultrasonic Scaler Options
Key Tips for a "Gentle" Patient Experience
Regardless of the unit you choose, patient comfort relies heavily on technique and insert selection:
If you'd like to narrow this down, let me know:
If your priority is **effective calculus removal while keeping patients as comfortable as possible**, I’d focus less on the brand alone and more on the **ultrasonic technology, tip selection, power control, water delivery, and ergonomics**. Current evidence actually suggests there isn't a universal winner between…
If your priority is effective calculus removal while keeping patients as comfortable as possible, I’d focus less on the brand alone and more on the ultrasonic technology, tip selection, power control, water delivery, and ergonomics.
Current evidence actually suggests there isn't a universal winner between piezoelectric and magnetostrictive scalers. One clinical study found fewer patient complaints with a Cavitron magnetostrictive unit, while other research has found advantages for piezoelectric systems in reducing pain, noise, and vibration.
| Scaler | Technology | Best for | My take |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cavitron 300 | Magnetostrictive | All-around hygiene, heavy calculus, SRP | ⭐ Best overall workhorse |
| EMS Piezon / Prophylaxis Master | Piezoelectric | Sensitive patients, perio maintenance, precision | ⭐ Best comfort-focused choice |
| ACTEON Newtron | Piezoelectric | Fine periodontal work & controlled scaling | ⭐ Best for precision |
| NSK Varios | Piezoelectric | Everyday hygiene, ergonomics | ⭐ Excellent alternative |
| Woodpecker U-6 | Piezoelectric | Budget-conscious practice/backup | ⭐ Best value |
For a hygienist who wants one scaler that can handle almost everything, I'd put the Cavitron 300 at the top.
The big advantage is its magnetostrictive technology and extensive insert selection, making it particularly useful when you're moving between light deposits, moderate/heavy calculus, and periodontal debridement. Dentsply also emphasizes low-pressure instrumentation and ergonomic features.
Interestingly, a study of 82 patients found the magnetostrictive Cavitron generated significantly fewer complaints concerning pain, discomfort, vibration, noise and hyperesthesia than the piezoelectric units tested.
I'd choose this if: you're doing a lot of general hygiene and SRP and want maximum versatility.
EMS is particularly interesting if you frequently see hypersensitive patients, anxious patients, periodontal-maintenance patients, or patients who dislike the sensation of traditional ultrasonics.
The piezoelectric movement is very controlled, and EMS has built much of its Piezon/GBT system around controlled, minimally traumatic instrumentation.
A recent randomized clinical study comparing EMS Prophylaxis Master with another periodontal-treatment system found good patient and operator comfort with both, with the EMS ultrasonic handpiece receiving particularly favorable operator comfort ratings.
I'd choose this if: you're willing to pay more for a premium system and patient experience is a major priority.
ACTEON's Newtron systems are worth considering if you like the feel of a piezo with precise power control.
I'd particularly consider it for a hygienist who does a lot of periodontal maintenance and wants to be very deliberate about power levels and tip selection.
NSK's Varios line is another strong choice if you want a compact piezoelectric system with good ergonomics and controlled instrumentation.
It's particularly attractive if you're already comfortable working with piezo tips and want something that feels smooth rather than aggressive.
At roughly $300 in the current shopping results, the U-6 is dramatically less expensive than premium systems while still offering piezoelectric scaling and controlled power output.
I would consider it for a private practice, second operatory, or backup unit, but if you're buying your primary scaler specifically around patient comfort and you're able to spend more, I'd lean toward EMS, Cavitron, ACTEON, or NSK.
The scaler itself isn't necessarily what makes scaling gentle. Tip selection, power, adaptation, water flow, and technique have enormous influence on comfort.
For example, piezo tips should be used primarily with the lateral surfaces against the tooth and with very little angulation; exceeding roughly 5° can produce undesirable vibration/noise.
For a comfort-oriented hygiene setup, I'd prioritize:
If I were equipping a hygiene operatory today:
1. EMS Piezon — if patient comfort and finesse are the highest priorities. 2. Cavitron 300 — if you want the best all-around workhorse and excellent calculus-removal capability. 3. ACTEON Newtron — if you want precision and control. 4. NSK Varios — excellent ergonomic piezo alternative. 5. Woodpecker U-6 — best budget/backup option.
One important caveat: I wouldn't automatically assume piezo = gentler. The clinical evidence is mixed, and the patient's experience can change substantially depending on the tip, site, power, water temperature, and technique.
If you tell me your budget (e.g. under $1,000 / $2,000 / $5,000+) and whether you primarily do prophy, perio maintenance, or SRP, I can narrow this down to the 2–3 specific units I'd actually buy, including current prices and tip/insert options.
EMS is particularly interesting if you frequently see hypersensitive patients, anxious patients, periodontal-maintenance patients, or patients who dislike the sensation of traditional ultrasonics.
The piezoelectric movement is very controlled, and EMS has built much of its Piezon/GBT system around controlled, minimally traumatic instrumentation.
A recent randomized clinical study comparing EMS Prophylaxis Master with another periodontal-treatment system found good patient and operator comfort with both, with the EMS ultrasonic handpiece receiving particularly favorable operator comfort ratings.
I'd choose this if: you're willing to pay more for a premium system and patient experience is a major priority.
ACTEON's Newtron systems are worth considering if you like the feel of a piezo with precise power control.
I'd particularly consider it for a hygienist who does a lot of periodontal maintenance and wants to be very deliberate about power levels and tip selection.
NSK's Varios line is another strong choice if you want a compact piezoelectric system with good ergonomics and controlled instrumentation.
It's particularly attractive if you're already comfortable working with piezo tips and want something that feels smooth rather than aggressive.
At roughly $300 in the current shopping results, the U-6 is dramatically less expensive than premium systems while still offering piezoelectric scaling and controlled power output.
I would consider it for a private practice, second operatory, or backup unit, but if you're buying your primary scaler specifically around patient comfort and you're able to spend more, I'd lean toward EMS, Cavitron, ACTEON, or NSK.
The scaler itself isn't necessarily what makes scaling gentle. Tip selection, power, adaptation, water flow, and technique have enormous influence on comfort.
For example, piezo tips should be used primarily with the lateral surfaces against the tooth and with very little angulation; exceeding roughly 5° can produce undesirable vibration/noise.
For a comfort-oriented hygiene setup, I'd prioritize:
For a **dental hygienist who wants strong calculus removal while keeping patients comfortable**, I would focus less on “most powerful” and more on **tip selection, ergonomics, power control, water delivery, and tactile feedback**. Both magnetostrictive and piezoelectric scalers can be very comfortable when used…
For a dental hygienist who wants strong calculus removal while keeping patients comfortable, I would focus less on “most powerful” and more on tip selection, ergonomics, power control, water delivery, and tactile feedback. Both magnetostrictive and piezoelectric scalers can be very comfortable when used correctly; studies have shown mixed results depending on the device, tip design, and technique.
| Scaler | Technology | Best use | Why it stands out |
|---|---|---|---|
| EMS PIEZON / AIRFLOW® Prophylaxis Master | Piezoelectric | Sensitive patients, perio maintenance, biofilm-focused care | Very controlled tip movement, excellent tactile feel, and a strong reputation for gentle instrumentation |
| Dentsply Sirona Cavitron 300 | Magnetostrictive | Everyday hygiene, heavier calculus, SRP | Excellent efficiency, huge insert ecosystem, familiar to many hygienists |
| NSK Varios 970 | Piezoelectric | General hygiene + perio | Smooth operation, ergonomic handpiece, good precision |
| ACTEON Newtron series | Piezoelectric | Periodontal therapy and precision scaling | Good power modulation and fine control |
| Parkell TurboSensor | Magnetostrictive | Private practices wanting value | Reliable performance with a simpler setup |
Best choice if your patient population includes:
The advantage is not simply “piezo is gentler.” The combination of linear tip motion, fine inserts, controlled power, and good tactile feedback allows very light instrumentation.
If you need one scaler that can handle almost anything:
The Cavitron ecosystem is hard to beat for insert availability and versatility. The Cavitron 300 also emphasizes clinician ergonomics with features such as the rotating Steri-Mate 360 handpiece.
A good choice for a hygienist who wants:
Technique has a major effect on comfort: correct tip adaptation, avoiding excessive lateral pressure, proper power selection, and adequate irrigation are key regardless of scaler type.
If you tell me your setting (private practice, perio office, corporate dental, or school clinic) and whether you mainly do prophy, perio maintenance, or SRP, I can narrow it down further.
For a dental hygienist, striking the right balance between high-performance calculus removal and gentle patient comfort usually comes down to two things: **the core technology of the unit (Magnetostrictive vs. Piezoelectric)** and **the choice of the insert/tip**. Gentleness on patients depends heavily on smooth water…
For a dental hygienist, striking the right balance between high-performance calculus removal and gentle patient comfort usually comes down to two things: the core technology of the unit (Magnetostrictive vs. Piezoelectric) and the choice of the insert/tip.
Gentleness on patients depends heavily on smooth water control (reducing heat and aggressive vibration shock) and slim-profile subgingival access.
Top Ultrasonic Scaler Systems
Add to list
Add to list
Add to list
The Real Secret to "Gentle" Scaling: Insert Tips
Even the best machine will feel harsh if you use a heavy power-line tip on a sensitive root surface. To maximize patient comfort:
Are you currently set up for Magnetostrictive (Cavitron-style) or Piezoelectric units in your operatories, and do you need recommendations tailored specifically for heavy calculus vs. fine periodontal maintenance?
When choosing an ultrasonic scaler that balances **high clinical efficiency** with **maximum patient comfort** (gentleness, minimal heat, and reduced sensitivity), dental hygienists generally weigh the differences between **Magnetostrictive** and **Piezoelectric**…
When choosing an ultrasonic scaler that balances high clinical efficiency with maximum patient comfort (gentleness, minimal heat, and reduced sensitivity), dental hygienists generally weigh the differences between Magnetostrictive and Piezoelectric technologies.
Top-performing, industry-standard ultrasonic scalers favored by dental hygienists for combining power with patient-gentle features include:
The [Dentsply Cavitron Plus Go to product viewer dialog for this item. ](https://www.amtouch.com/shop-by-category/equipment/dentsply-cavitron-plus-ultrasonic-scaler-with-tap/) remains a gold standard in North American hygiene operatories.
Acteon’s Newtron line is widely celebrated by hygienists who prefer piezo technology for subgingival scaling.
A robust tabletop unit that gives offices flexibility without complicating the workflow.[1]
Known heavily for integrating guided biofilm therapy (GBT), EMS/Hu-Friedy units approach scaling with a prophylaxis-first mindset.
Tips for Maximizing Gentleness (Regardless of the Unit)
Are you looking to replace an existing unit that connects directly to a dental chair delivery system (integrated) or do you need a freestanding tabletop unit ? Let me know, and I can narrow down the ideal model and budget fit.
If your priority is **excellent calculus removal without making patients dread ultrasonic scaling**, I’d focus on **piezoelectric units with fine tips, good power control, and—ideally—temperature-controlled/warm irrigation**. The evidence is somewhat mixed: some studies find piezoelectric units more comfortable, while…
If your priority is excellent calculus removal without making patients dread ultrasonic scaling, I’d focus on piezoelectric units with fine tips, good power control, and—ideally—temperature-controlled/warm irrigation.
The evidence is somewhat mixed: some studies find piezoelectric units more comfortable, while others find patients prefer magnetostrictive Cavitron systems. Technique, tip selection, power, irrigation, and the treatment site can matter as much as the scaler itself.
Why I'd put it first: EMS has specifically designed its PIEZON NO PAIN system around gentle, controlled ultrasonic scaling. It uses linear piezoelectric oscillation, intelligent power feedback, and adjustable water temperature up to 40°C.
Best for:
A randomized clinical trial found that a piezo scaler with warm irrigation produced significantly less pain/discomfort, noise, and vibration than a magnetostrictive Cavitron when room-temperature water was used with the Cavitron.
My take: If you're buying one premium system specifically for patient comfort, EMS is probably where I'd start.
Dentsply Sirona's Cavitron is the classic magnetostrictive option and remains an excellent choice for a busy hygiene practice.
Why choose it:
Interestingly, the research isn't unanimous about which technology is gentler. One study found patients reported less discomfort, vibration, and hyperesthesia with Cavitron than with piezoelectric scalers, while another randomized trial found the opposite when warm-water piezo was compared with Cavitron.
So I wouldn't dismiss Cavitron if you already have excellent technique with it.
My take: If you want maximum versatility and efficient calculus removal, Cavitron is still one of the safest choices.
If you're doing a lot of periodontal maintenance and want an integrated system, the EMS Prophylaxis Master is worth serious consideration. A recent randomized clinical trial found both EMS Prophylaxis Master and Mectron Combi Touch provided effective periodontal treatment, with particularly favorable ultrasonic-handpiece comfort reported for the EMS system.
This is especially attractive if you also want air polishing + ultrasonic scaling in one workflow.
The U-6 is a piezoelectric scaler with intelligent power output, and it's considerably less expensive than many premium systems.
I'd consider it if you're:
That said, for a primary clinical unit where patient comfort is the overriding criterion, I'd spend more for EMS if the budget allows.
| Piezoelectric | Magnetostrictive --- | --- | --- Patient comfort | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Calculus removal | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Fine subgingival work | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Heavy calculus | ⭐⭐⭐⭐½ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Heat management | Easier | More demanding Tip movement | Linear | Elliptical Water requirements | Lower | Higher Best use | Precision + comfort | Power + versatility
The important caveat is that there isn't a universal "gentlest" technology. Clinical studies have produced conflicting results, and a 2024 study explicitly concluded that the evidence doesn't establish one technology as universally more comfortable.
For a sensitive patient, I'd prioritize these features:
A recent RDH clinical overview also emphasizes that frequency, amplitude, tip angulation, water flow, and technique all influence safety, efficiency, and patient comfort.
If I were equipping a hygiene operatory today:
🥇 Best for gentle + premium: EMS PIEZON / PIEZON NO PAIN 🥈 Best proven workhorse: Dentsply Sirona Cavitron 🥉 Best integrated perio/air-polishing system: EMS Prophylaxis Master 💰 Best budget/value piezo: Woodpecker U-6
If you tell me your budget (e.g. under $1,000, $2–3k, or $5k+) and whether you're primarily doing prophy, perio maintenance, or SRP, I can narrow it down to 3 specific units and compare handpiece feel, tips/inserts, power control, water temperature, ergonomics, and approximate current pricing.
That said, for a primary clinical unit where patient comfort is the overriding criterion, I'd spend more for EMS if the budget allows.
| Piezoelectric | Magnetostrictive --- | --- | --- Patient comfort | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Calculus removal | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Fine subgingival work | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Heavy calculus | ⭐⭐⭐⭐½ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Heat management | Easier | More demanding Tip movement | Linear | Elliptical Water requirements | Lower | Higher Best use | Precision + comfort | Power + versatility
The important caveat is that there isn't a universal "gentlest" technology. Clinical studies have produced conflicting results, and a 2024 study explicitly concluded that the evidence doesn't establish one technology as universally more comfortable.
For a sensitive patient, I'd prioritize these features:
When evaluating ultrasonic scalers as a dental hygienist, the balance between **clinical efficiency** (removing tenacious calculus and biofilm quickly) and **patient comfort** (minimizing heat, excessive water spray, noise, and tactile sensitivity) largely comes down to choosing between **Magnetostrictive** and…
When evaluating ultrasonic scalers as a dental hygienist, the balance between clinical efficiency (removing tenacious calculus and biofilm quickly) and patient comfort (minimizing heat, excessive water spray, noise, and tactile sensitivity) largely comes down to choosing between Magnetostrictive and Piezoelectric technologies, or choosing hybrid air-polishing systems. [1][2]
The top-rated ultrasonic scalers known for being powerful yet gentle on patients are organized below by category:
Magnetostrictive units use stacked metal strips that vibrate in an elliptical pattern . This means all sides of the insert can be adapted to the tooth, making them deeply intuitive and efficient for heavy-to-moderate deposits.
Piezo units use ceramic crystals that expand and contract, creating a precise, linear (back-and-forth) motion . Because only the lateral sides of the tip are active, they produce virtually no lateral-wall hammering against the tooth, making them inherently gentler on sensitive enamel and exposed dentin, with zero handpiece overheating. [1][2]
Summary Checklist: Piezo vs. Magnetostrictive for "Gentle" Scaling
If you'd like to narrow this down, let me know:
For a dental hygienist who wants **strong calculus removal with a comfortable patient experience**, the “best” ultrasonic scaler depends on your typical patients (perio vs. prophy-heavy), your technique, and whether you prefer **magnetostrictive** or **piezoelectric** technology. Both can be excellent and gentle when…
For a dental hygienist who wants strong calculus removal with a comfortable patient experience, the “best” ultrasonic scaler depends on your typical patients (perio vs. prophy-heavy), your technique, and whether you prefer magnetostrictive or piezoelectric technology. Both can be excellent and gentle when used with the right tip, power setting, and adaptation.
| Scaler | Technology | Best for | Why hygienists like it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dentsply Sirona Cavitron 300 | Magnetostrictive | Heavy calculus, general hygiene, SRP | Excellent power, broad insert selection, familiar “workhorse” feel; often preferred in busy hygiene departments. Dentaltown Dentsply Sirona |
| EMS Piezon systems | Piezoelectric | Sensitive patients, periodontal maintenance, biofilm-focused care | Smooth linear vibration, excellent tactile feedback, and a reputation for comfort when used correctly. Registered Dental Hygienists |
| ACTEON Newtron | Piezoelectric | Perio, implants, precision scaling | Automatic power regulation and fine control can help avoid excessive force. Registered Dental Hygienists |
| NSK Varios series | Piezoelectric | Everyday hygiene + comfort-focused practices | Ergonomic handpiece and smooth operation make it appealing for clinicians who prioritize patient comfort. Dentist Decoded |
| Parkell TurboSensor | Magnetostrictive | Private practice, value + performance | Known as a reliable alternative to larger systems. Dentaltown |
Cavitron 300
EMS Piezon
Piezo systems are not automatically more comfortable for every patient, though; studies and clinician experience show comfort depends heavily on technique and settings.
ACTEON Newtron
A “gentle” scaler usually comes down to:
The clinician’s technique and insert selection will usually influence patient comfort more than choosing piezo versus magnetostrictive alone.
