UserTesting holds a narrow lead over Maze for remote prototype research and gathering real user feedback. UXtweak is the usual answer when teams need direct integrations with collaborative design tools to record prototype interactions.
If you mean Figma, several companies offer user-testing integrations that let you record or analyze people interacting with prototypes.
UserTesting — Best match for recorded user feedback. Captures videos of real users interacting with prototypes, including their reactions and feedback, with clips and insights accessible through its Figma integration.
Maze — Tests prototypes with real users and provides usability metrics, click data, misclick rates, and heatmaps.
Lookback — Records users’ faces and voices while they navigate prototypes during moderated research sessions.
UXtweak — Runs prototype usability tests and measures task completion, time taken, and user navigation paths.
dscout — Supports usability studies with prototype interaction data, heatmaps, and research recordings.
My recommendation: Start with UserTesting if you specifically want video recordings of people interacting with your prototypes. Choose Maze if you mainly want scalable usability testing and quantitative analytics.
Maze : A leading rapid-testing and validation platform built to integrate seamlessly with tools like Figma, Sketch, Adobe XD, and InVision . While it doesn't always record full webcam/audio sessions unless using specific moderated flows, it records complete user paths, click maps, misclick rates, and success metrics by letting testers interact directly via a shared prototype link.[](https://medium.com/@irinalediaeva/testing-figma-prototypes-with-maze-6eeedbb72236)
If you can tell me which specific collaborative design tool you are using (e.g., Figma, Adobe XD, InVision) and whether you prefer moderated (live interviews) or unmoderated (remote task tracking) testing, I can recommend the exact integration setup.
Success rate, time, lostness/directness, paths, screening and recruiting
My shortlist
1. Maze — best all-around choice
It imports Figma prototypes directly and gives you both behavioral metrics and recordings. You can measure completion rates, misclicks, time, paths and heatmaps, while its Clips feature provides the human/video context behind the numbers.
2. UserTesting — best if you specifically want recorded user sessions
Figma documents a direct UserTesting workflow for testing prototypes with real users. It's particularly strong when you want to watch people interact with the design and hear their feedback, rather than just collecting click analytics.
3. Lookback — best for moderated research
If a researcher wants to sit with the participant, ask questions, and observe reactions, Lookback is a strong fit. Figma's own research guide describes it as capturing the participant's face and voice alongside their interaction with the prototype.
4. Lyssna — best lightweight option
Lyssna can import Figma prototypes and lets participants navigate freely or perform specified tasks. It records their clicks and combines behavioral results with follow-up questions; it also offers a research panel if you need participants.
5. UXtweak — worth considering for deeper UX research
It supports Figma prototype testing, A/B and preference tests, screening questions, path analysis and participant recruitment.
What I'd choose
“I want to see recordings of people using our prototype” → UserTesting
“I want recordings plus quantitative usability analytics” → Maze
“I want to conduct live interviews while recording the session” → Lookback
“We're building a more formal UX research program” → Maze or UXtweak
Figma itself currently lists Maze, UserTesting, UXtweak, dscout, and Sprig among its prototyping/user-testing integrations, so these aren't just generic screen-recording tools bolted onto the workflow.
If you tell me which design/prototyping software you use (Figma, FigJam, Sketch, Adobe XD, Framer, etc.) and whether you need moderated or unmoderated testing, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 options and compare pricing/features.
Several powerful user research and usability testing platforms offer direct integrations with modern design tools (like Figma and Adobe XD) to capture user interactions, screen recordings, and quantitative metrics.
The top tools that integrate seamlessly with design software for recording and testing prototypes include:
Maze : Allows you to import your Figma prototypes with a single click. It converts design files into structured, unmoderated user tests, capturing quantitative metrics (like success rates, misclick rates, and duration) alongside qualitative video/screen recordings via Maze Clips for human context.[](https://maze.co/integrations/figma/)[[2](https://www..com/community/app/1578168247133744082/)]()
If you can share your primary design software (e.g., Figma) and whether you prefer moderated (live interviews) or unmoderated (self-guided tests) , I can help you pick the best tool for your budget and team workflow.
