Data as of Sep 14, 2026 · Based on 336 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
For straightforward team availability and workload visualization, Float is a preferred choice due to its intuitive, visual, drag-and-drop scheduling interface, especially popular in professional services and agencies. If you need resource management integrated into a larger project management ecosystem, platforms like
Asana,
Wrike, and provide robust workload views and tracking to monitor team capacity and balance assignments across projects.
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 69% of answers
Best for visual scheduling and immediate team availability tracking. Its simple drag-and-drop interface makes it ideal for professional services firms needing lightweight, efficient capacity planning.
Named in 63% of answers
Named in 61% of answers
Named in 59% of answers
If your main job is **“Who is available, who is overloaded, and when can I put someone on a project?”**, I’d focus on dedicated resource-management tools rather than general PM software. ### My shortlist Tool | Best fit | Availability & workload | Forecasting | Ease of use
If your main job is “Who is available, who is overloaded, and when can I put someone on a project?”, I’d focus on dedicated resource-management tools rather than general PM software.
| Tool | Best fit | Availability & workload | Forecasting | Ease of use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Float | Most PMs / delivery teams | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Runn | Technical/project-heavy teams | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Resource Guru | Simple resource scheduling | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Smartsheet Resource Management | Larger organizations | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Asana | Teams already using Asana | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
For the specific requirement you described, Float would be my first product to evaluate.
Its Schedule gives a PM a live visual view of people, projects, availability, and workload. It also accounts for people's available working hours and flags capacity conflicts, so you can see whether assigning another 20 hours to someone will overload them.
The particularly useful PM workflow is:
Projects → people → planned hours → availability → workload → conflicts
That is more directly focused on resource planning than tools where workload is primarily derived from task lists.
I'd look closely at Runn if you need more sophisticated capacity planning.
It provides real-time views of availability, workload and utilization, plus scenario planning—so you can ask things like “What happens to our capacity if we start this new project next month?”
Runn is particularly interesting if you manage multiple projects simultaneously and need to forecast several weeks/months ahead, rather than simply scheduling today's work.
If you want something very straightforward, Resource Guru is worth considering. Its core model is a centralized schedule showing people, projects, availability and leave, with utilization/heatmap views for identifying overloaded resources.
One important distinction: workload management ≠ resource management. A tool can show that Alice has 12 tasks while still failing to tell you that she has only 24 hours available next week. For a Project Manager, I'd prioritize hour-based capacity, time off/holidays, cross-project allocation, utilization, and future availability.
If you tell me your team size, whether you're managing internal employees or billable/client projects, and what PM tool you currently use (Jira, MS Project, Monday, Asana, Smartsheet, etc.), I can narrow this to the 2–3 tools that fit your workflow and compare their pricing/features.
Its Schedule gives a PM a live visual view of people, projects, availability, and workload. It also accounts for people's available working hours and flags capacity conflicts, so you can see whether assigning another 20 hours to someone will overload them.
The particularly useful PM workflow is:
Projects → people → planned hours → availability → workload → conflicts
That is more directly focused on resource planning than tools where workload is primarily derived from task lists.
I'd look closely at Runn if you need more sophisticated capacity planning.
It provides real-time views of availability, workload and utilization, plus scenario planning—so you can ask things like “What happens to our capacity if we start this new project next month?”
Runn is particularly interesting if you manage multiple projects simultaneously and need to forecast several weeks/months ahead, rather than simply scheduling today's work.
If you want something very straightforward, Resource Guru is worth considering. Its core model is a centralized schedule showing people, projects, availability and leave, with utilization/heatmap views for identifying overloaded resources.
When it comes to seeing team availability, capacity, and workload at a glance, the "best" software depends heavily on your team's size and workflow complexity. Dedicated resource planning tools often outperform standard project management software because they focus entirely on utilization rather than task-level…
When it comes to seeing team availability, capacity, and workload at a glance, the "best" software depends heavily on your team's size and workflow complexity. Dedicated resource planning tools often outperform standard project management software because they focus entirely on utilization rather than task-level micro-management.
The top-rated resource management tools for tracking team availability and workload include:
To help narrow down the ideal platform for your team, tell me:
The "best" resource management software depends on whether you need a **dedicated capacity planner** or an **all-in-one project management platform** with built-in workload views. Top tools are categorized below by how they handle team availability and workload visibility: ### 1. Best Dedicated Resource & Capacity…
The "best" resource management software depends on whether you need a dedicated capacity planner or an all-in-one project management platform with built-in workload views.
Top tools are categorized below by how they handle team availability and workload visibility:
If your primary pain point is deep, granular control over time, scheduling, and preventing burnout without the noise of heavy task management:
If you want team availability integrated directly into your task lists, boards, and project timelines rather than using a separate tool:
If you'd like to narrow this down, tell me:
I can give you a tailored recommendation.
If your main goal is **“I’m a Project Manager and I need one place to see who is available, who is overloaded, and where I can put new work,”** I’d put **Float** at the top of the list. I researched the current 2026 options, focusing specifically on **team availability, workload/capacity visibility, resource…
If your main goal is “I’m a Project Manager and I need one place to see who is available, who is overloaded, and where I can put new work,” I’d put Float at the top of the list.
I researched the current 2026 options, focusing specifically on team availability, workload/capacity visibility, resource scheduling, and usability for PMs.
| Tool | Best for | Availability & workload | My take |
|---|---|---|---|
| Float | Dedicated resource planning | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best overall for a PM |
| Runn | Capacity forecasting | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best if forecasting is important |
| Resource Guru | Simple resource scheduling | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best for simplicity |
| monday.com | PM + resource management together | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best if you want tasks/projects in the same system |
| Wrike | Larger PM organizations | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Strong, but more complex |
| Smartsheet | PMO/enterprise environments | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Good for structured organizations |
Float is purpose-built around the exact problem you're describing. Its Schedule gives you a live visual view of people, projects, availability, and workload, allowing you to see whether someone has capacity before assigning them more work. It also accounts for things such as working hours and time off.
For a PM, the workflow is essentially:
People → Availability → Current allocations → Remaining capacity → Assign work
That's much closer to a true resource-management tool than a normal task-management application.
I particularly like Float if you:
Float also integrates with tools including Jira, Asana, Monday.com, ClickUp, Wrike, Slack, Google Calendar and Outlook.
I'd choose Runn over Float if your question is less “Who can work on this?” and more:
“Do we have enough capacity to deliver everything we're planning over the next 3–6 months?”
Runn is particularly strong around capacity forecasting, utilization, and confirmed vs. tentative work. Current comparisons also position it as a strong choice when forecasting becomes a major part of resource management.
Resource Guru is a good choice if you don't want a massive PM platform. It's focused on people/resource scheduling, workload, availability, and avoiding conflicts.
I'd pick it if your requirement is basically:
“Give me a really clean calendar showing who is working on what and when.”
It's simpler than some of the broader platforms, while still providing resource-management capabilities.
If you don't want a separate resource-management system, monday.com is worth serious consideration.
Its Workload View lets PMs see each person's assignments and capacity in a visual view, identify over-allocation, and rebalance work. It also connects availability information such as time off and part-time schedules to project timelines.
The tradeoff is that Float is more purpose-built for resource management, whereas monday.com is a broader work-management platform.
For a typical Project Manager:
For a PM responsible for long-range staffing/capacity forecasting:
For a small team that wants something extremely simple:
For a company that wants one platform for projects + tasks + workload:
One important distinction: don't confuse a workload view with true resource management. A good resource-management system should let you answer not only “What tasks does Sarah have?” but also “How many hours of actual capacity does Sarah have, when is she available, what else is she committed to, and can I realistically put another project on her?” Float and Runn are particularly strong for that distinction.
If you tell me your team size, whether you use Jira/Asana/Monday/etc., and whether you manage billable client work, I can narrow this down to the best 2–3 options and compare their pricing/features side-by-side.
**Asana** ** is widely considered the best overall resource planning software** for project managers to track team availability and workloads because it bridges daily task execution with high-level capacity views in a single interface.[](https://asana.com/resources/best-resource-planning-software)…
Asana ** is widely considered the best overall resource planning software** for project managers to track team availability and workloads because it bridges daily task execution with high-level capacity views in a single interface.
Choosing the right tool depends on your team's specific workflow, project complexity, and preference for dedicated scheduling versus all-in-one project management.
| Software | Best For | Standout Capability |
|---|---|---|
| Asana | Overall project and workload alignment | Real-time Workload views with capacity points |
| Float | Agencies and creative teams | Ultra-visual drag-and-drop schedule planner |
| Resource Guru | Simple, dedicated team booking | Fast clash-management and equipment tracking |
| Monday.com | Customizable, visual dashboards | Flexible workload widgets and automations |
| Wrike | Enterprise-grade project execution | Advanced workload balancing alongside Gantt charts |
If you can share how large your team is and whether you prefer an all-in-one project tool or a dedicated scheduling app , I can narrow down the ideal platform for your workflow.
If your main goal as a **Project Manager is to see who is available, who is overloaded, and where you can assign upcoming work**, I’d put **Float** at the top of the list. ### My shortlist Software | Best for | Availability & workload | My take
If your main goal as a Project Manager is to see who is available, who is overloaded, and where you can assign upcoming work, I’d put Float at the top of the list.
| Software | Best for | Availability & workload | My take |
|---|---|---|---|
| Float | Dedicated resource scheduling | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best overall for PMs |
| Runn | Capacity forecasting & scenario planning | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best for forward-looking planning |
| Resource Guru | Simple resource scheduling | ⭐⭐⭐⭐½ | Best for simplicity |
| Smartsheet Resource Management | PMO / portfolio environments | ⭐⭐⭐⭐½ | Best if you're already in Smartsheet |
| Asana | Project management + workload | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best if you don't want a separate resource tool |
| monday.com | Flexible all-in-one work management | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Good general-purpose option |
Float is particularly good when the PM's question is:
"Who can take this work, when are they available, and who is already overloaded?" It provides a visual schedule showing people, projects, allocations, availability, time off, and capacity. It also flags over-allocation and lets you move assignments around via drag-and-drop.
I would choose Float if you have multiple projects sharing the same team and resource management is more important than having another full project-management platform.
Runn is excellent if you're asking more strategic questions:
Its capacity-vs-demand views and forecasting are particularly strong.
I'd pick Runn over Float if you need scenario planning and longer-term capacity forecasting.
Resource Guru is a good choice if you primarily need a shared resource calendar: who's booked, who's available, PTO/leave, and where conflicts exist. It is simpler and more focused than some of the broader platforms.
If your team already lives in Asana, Smartsheet, or another PM platform, I'd first see whether its workload/capacity features are sufficient rather than adding another system.
For example, Asana has workload and capacity views that aggregate work across projects, while Smartsheet has capacity views, allocation heatmaps, and resource-management functionality.
For a typical Project Manager: Float
For a PM/resource manager doing sophisticated forecasting: Runn
For a simple shared availability calendar: Resource Guru
For an enterprise PMO: Smartsheet Resource Management
For project management + resource management in one system: Asana
The most important distinction is whether you need "Who is free right now?" or "Do we have enough capacity to deliver everything we're planning over the next 3–6 months?" Float is excellent at the former; Runn becomes particularly compelling for the latter.
If you tell me your team size, type of projects (IT/software, construction, consulting, marketing, etc.), and what you're using today (Excel, MS Project, Jira, Monday, Asana, etc.), I can narrow this down to the best 2–3 options and compare pricing/features.
If your **main goal as a Project Manager is to quickly see who is available, who is overloaded, and where you can put new work**, I’d put **[float.com](https://www.float.com/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)** at the top of the list. ### My shortlist Software | Best for | Availability & workload | PM features | My take
If your main goal as a Project Manager is to quickly see who is available, who is overloaded, and where you can put new work, I’d put float.com at the top of the list.
| Software | Best for | Availability & workload | PM features | My take |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Float | Dedicated resource planning | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best overall for your specific need |
| Resource Guru | Simple team scheduling | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | Best if you want simplicity |
| Smartsheet | PM + portfolio/resource management | ⭐⭐⭐⭐½ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best if you need broader PM/PMO capabilities |
| Runn | Capacity forecasting | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Excellent for forward-looking staffing |
| monday.com | Flexible work management | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Great if you also want task/project management |
| Kantata | Professional services | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐½ | Powerful, but more enterprise-oriented |
For a PM asking “Who is available next week? Who is at 120%? What happens if I put this project on Jane? Who has capacity in three weeks?”, Float is particularly strong.
Its schedule combines people, projects, availability, time off, and workload in one visual view. It also flags over-capacity situations and lets you adjust allocations as plans change.
I'd choose smartsheet.com if you're looking for something that combines resource management with a broader PM/PMO environment.
Its workload tracking can consolidate assignments across projects, show availability, identify over-allocation, and allow you to rebalance work. Its more advanced Resource Management functionality adds capacity planning, skills-based staffing, time tracking, demand management, and forecasting.
This is probably the better choice if you're managing multiple projects/programs and need executive-level reporting in addition to seeing team capacity.
resourceguruapp.com is worth considering if your requirements are basically:
“Give me a clean calendar showing who's working on what, when they're available, and prevent double-booking.” It's less of an all-in-one PM platform and more focused on resource scheduling—which can actually be an advantage if you already use Jira, Asana, ClickUp, etc. for project execution. Current 2026 comparisons consistently put Resource Guru and Float among the strongest dedicated capacity-management options.
One important distinction: resource management software isn't necessarily the same thing as project management software. If you already have a tool such as Jira, Asana, ClickUp, or Monday for managing tasks, I would strongly consider adding a purpose-built resource planning tool like Float rather than replacing your PM system.
If you tell me (1) team size, (2) whether people work across multiple projects, (3) what PM software you currently use, and (4) whether you need time tracking/billing, I can narrow this down to the best 2–3 options and compare their pricing and exact workload views.
Its schedule combines people, projects, availability, time off, and workload in one visual view. It also flags over-capacity situations and lets you adjust allocations as plans change.
I'd choose smartsheet.com if you're looking for something that combines resource management with a broader PM/PMO environment.
Its workload tracking can consolidate assignments across projects, show availability, identify over-allocation, and allow you to rebalance work. Its more advanced Resource Management functionality adds capacity planning, skills-based staffing, time tracking, demand management, and forecasting.
This is probably the better choice if you're managing multiple projects/programs and need executive-level reporting in addition to seeing team capacity.
resourceguruapp.com is worth considering if your requirements are basically:
“Give me a clean calendar showing who's working on what, when they're available, and prevent double-booking.” It's less of an all-in-one PM platform and more focused on resource scheduling—which can actually be an advantage if you already use Jira, Asana, ClickUp, etc. for project execution. Current 2026 comparisons consistently put Resource Guru and Float among the strongest dedicated capacity-management options.
When looking for the best resource management software to track team availability, capacity, and workload, the "best" choice depends on whether you need a dedicated standalone resourcing tool or an all-in-one project management platform. The top options on the market are categorized below by their primary strengths:…
When looking for the best resource management software to track team availability, capacity, and workload, the "best" choice depends on whether you need a dedicated standalone resourcing tool or an all-in-one project management platform.
The top options on the market are categorized below by their primary strengths:
If you can tell me a bit more about your setup, I can narrow down the recommendation:
Asana
When it comes to seeing team availability, managing capacities, and preventing team burnout, the "best" resource management software depends heavily on your team's size, budget, and workflow style. The top options on the market are categorized below by what they do best: Dedicated & Visual Resource Planning (Best for…
When it comes to seeing team availability, managing capacities, and preventing team burnout, the "best" resource management software depends heavily on your team's size, budget, and workflow style.
The top options on the market are categorized below by what they do best:
Dedicated & Visual Resource Planning (Best for Pure Capacity)
Best All-in-One Project & Workload Management
Best for Agencies and Client Work
If you tell me a bit more about your setup, I can narrow down the exact recommendation:
If your main goal as a **Project Manager is to see who is available, who is overloaded, and where you can put the next piece of work**, I’d put **Float** at the top of the list. Current 2026 comparisons consistently put Float, Resource Guru, and Runn among the strongest dedicated resource-management options.…
If your main goal as a Project Manager is to see who is available, who is overloaded, and where you can put the next piece of work, I’d put Float at the top of the list.
Current 2026 comparisons consistently put Float, Resource Guru, and Runn among the strongest dedicated resource-management options.
| Software | Best for | Availability & workload | Forecasting | PM-friendly |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Float | ⭐ Best overall | Excellent | Very good | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Runn | Capacity forecasting | Excellent | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Resource Guru | Simple scheduling | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Good | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Smartsheet | Enterprise / portfolio PM | Very good | Very good | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Asana | PM + workload in one tool | Very good | Good | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Kantata | Large professional-services orgs | Excellent | Excellent | ⭐⭐⭐ |
Float is particularly good if you want a visual resource calendar where you can immediately answer:
Its schedule combines team availability, projects, assignments, capacity, and time off in one visual view. It also supports drag-and-drop scheduling, capacity bars, overbooking warnings, utilization reporting, and time tracking.
Why I'd choose it for a PM: It's purpose-built for the question PMs constantly need to answer: "Who can actually do this work, and when?"
Runn is stronger than Float when you need to look months into the future and model staffing scenarios.
For example:
"If Project A slips by three weeks and Project B starts in October, do we have enough developers?" Runn has capacity/utilization views, placeholders for future demand, skills/roles, forecasting, and planned-vs-actual reporting.
I'd choose Runn over Float if you're managing a portfolio where resource forecasting and "what-if" scenarios are a major part of your job.
Resource Guru is excellent if you don't want a complicated system. It gives you a centralized schedule, availability, leave management, utilization/heatmap views, and scheduling across projects.
I'd pick it for a small-to-medium team where the primary need is scheduling people and seeing conflicts, rather than sophisticated forecasting.
One important distinction: resource management software is different from project management software. Jira, Asana, Monday, etc. can tell you what work exists and who's assigned to it, while a dedicated resource-management tool is much better at answering "Does this person actually have capacity to take this work?"
If you tell me your team size, whether you're managing software/IT, construction, marketing, professional services, etc., and what PM tool you currently use (Jira, MS Project, Smartsheet, Monday, Asana, etc.), I can narrow this to the best 2–3 choices and compare pricing/features.
For example:
"If Project A slips by three weeks and Project B starts in October, do we have enough developers?" Runn has capacity/utilization views, placeholders for future demand, skills/roles, forecasting, and planned-vs-actual reporting.
I'd choose Runn over Float if you're managing a portfolio where resource forecasting and "what-if" scenarios are a major part of your job.
Resource Guru is excellent if you don't want a complicated system. It gives you a centralized schedule, availability, leave management, utilization/heatmap views, and scheduling across projects.
I'd pick it for a small-to-medium team where the primary need is scheduling people and seeing conflicts, rather than sophisticated forecasting.
One important distinction: resource management software is different from project management software. Jira, Asana, Monday, etc. can tell you what work exists and who's assigned to it, while a dedicated resource-management tool is much better at answering "Does this person actually have capacity to take this work?"
If you tell me your team size, whether you're managing software/IT, construction, marketing, professional services, etc., and what PM tool you currently use (Jira, MS Project, Smartsheet, Monday, Asana, etc.), I can narrow this to the best 2–3 choices and compare pricing/features.