We need risk scoring for facilities based on location, weather, crime, and operational data. What companies offer this?
Data as of Sep 21, 2026 · Based on 52 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Data as of Sep 21, 2026 · Based on 52 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Evaluating facility and asset risk across a combination of location, weather, crime, and operational metrics typically requires **Location Risk Intelligence** or **Geospatial Risk Platforms**. Companies providing robust data, scoring, and analytics platforms to handle these multi-layered risk assessments include: -…
Evaluating facility and asset risk across a combination of location, weather, crime, and operational metrics typically requires Location Risk Intelligence or Geospatial Risk Platforms.
Companies providing robust data, scoring, and analytics platforms to handle these multi-layered risk assessments include:
To help narrow down which provider fits best, could you tell me:
Yes. There are several vendors in this space, but they tend to fall into **facility/location risk intelligence**, **supply-chain risk**, and **enterprise operational risk** categories. Company | Location / weather | Crime / security | Operational data | Scoring | Best fit --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
Yes. There are several vendors in this space, but they tend to fall into facility/location risk intelligence, supply-chain risk, and enterprise operational risk categories.
| Company | Location / weather | Crime / security | Operational data | Scoring | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everstream Analytics | Strong | Some geopolitical/security factors | Strong | Yes | Facility/supplier risk and supply-chain resilience |
| One Concern | Very strong | Limited | Strong | Yes | Physical climate + business interruption |
| Riskonnect | Via integrations/data sources | Via risk/threat modules | Very strong | Yes | Enterprise operational/ERM platform |
| Jupiter Intelligence | Very strong | Limited | Some | Yes | Climate/physical-risk scoring |
| Moody's | Strong | Strong | Strong | Yes | Enterprise/financial risk |
| Verisk | Very strong | Strong | Strong | Yes | Insurance/property/location risk |
| Precisely | Strong geospatial/location data | Data-dependent | Strong | Can build | Location intelligence/data infrastructure |
Everstream Analytics is probably one of the closest matches if you're talking about scoring individual facilities. Its Risk Assessment product provides location-based strategic risk scores, combining 40+ external risk factors, and it can blend external intelligence with a customer's internal operational data. Its models include weather/natural disasters, political violence and operational risks.
One Concern is particularly interesting if the objective is "How much could this facility be disrupted?" rather than simply "How risky is this location?" It provides location-level Business Interruption Risk Scores, expected downtime statistics, and resilience scores, incorporating physical hazards and infrastructure dependencies.
Riskonnect is more of an enterprise risk-management system. It can consolidate risk, incident, safety, claims, business-continuity and operational data and provide analytics across an organization.
Facility Risk Score = f(location + weather/climate + crime/security + facility characteristics + operational history + dependencies) I'd look particularly closely at Everstream + One Concern + Verisk/Jupiter, because they approach the problem from somewhat different directions. Everstream is particularly strong on operational/supply-chain context, while One Concern is particularly focused on physical disruption and downtime. Everstream also explicitly offers climate risk projections for facilities, including flood, cyclone, heat, fire weather, drought and precipitation.
If you tell me what type of facilities you're scoring (manufacturing plants, warehouses, retail locations, data centers, hospitals, etc.), I can narrow this to the 5–8 most relevant vendors and compare their actual data inputs, APIs, scoring methodology, and approximate enterprise pricing model.
Yes. There’s a fairly mature market here, but the vendors tend to specialize in different pieces of the problem. ### Strong candidates - **Ontic** — probably one of the closest fits for **corporate security/facility risk**. Its platform combines location-based crime intelligence, severe weather, incidents, and…
Yes. There’s a fairly mature market here, but the vendors tend to specialize in different pieces of the problem.
There is also AdvanceWork, whose AW Risk Score is explicitly designed around the problem you described: it produces a real-time 0–100 score combining crime, incidents, civil unrest, protective intelligence, weather and operational disruptions, weighted by location and mission.
| If your priority is… | Vendors I'd investigate first |
|---|---|
| Corporate security / GSOC facility risk | Ontic, AdvanceWork, Securitas |
| Physical-security facility scoring | Circadian Risk, Secuiera |
| Weather + natural hazards + infrastructure | Athenium, Verisk |
| Global location/security risk | S&P Global |
| Facility + supply-chain + environmental data fusion | Spatial Risk Systems |
| Building a proprietary scoring model via data/API | Verisk, Athenium, SRS |
The interesting distinction is whether you want to buy the score or buy the ingredients. Ontic/AdvanceWork/Circadian are closer to "give my security team a facility risk score and tell them why it changed." Verisk/Athenium/SRS are closer to "give us high-quality location, hazard, weather and facility data so we can build our own scoring model."
If you're evaluating this for a new product/platform, I can also map out the 10–15 most relevant vendors, their APIs/data feeds, scoring methodology, geographic coverage, and likely pricing model in a competitive landscape.
When building or buying a multi-variable risk-scoring matrix for facilities (incorporating geographic location, weather/climate perils, local crime, and operational factors), solutions typically fall into three distinct software and data categories: **Location & Property Risk Data Providers**, **Critical Event &…
When building or buying a multi-variable risk-scoring matrix for facilities (incorporating geographic location, weather/climate perils, local crime, and operational factors), solutions typically fall into three distinct software and data categories: Location & Property Risk Data Providers, Critical Event & Travel/Site Intelligence Platforms , and Physical Security & Compliance Assessment Tools.
These platforms ingest massive geospatial, meteorological, and crime datasets to output address- or coordinate-level risk scores.
These systems focus on real-time operational threat intelligence, monitoring active weather disruptions, civil unrest, and crime relative to static facility locations.
If your goal is a structured, repeatable framework or questionnaire-driven internal scoring methodology (such as Threat-Vulnerability-Risk Assessments or operational site audits):
Are you looking to integrate these scores via API into an internal dashboard , or do you need a turnkey SaaS interface where your team can manually audit and manage facility remediation?
Yes. If by **facility risk scoring** you mean a normalized score for each site that combines **geospatial/location risk + weather/natural hazards + crime/security + your own operational data**, there are several credible vendors, but they approach it differently. ### Strongest fits -…
Yes. If by facility risk scoring you mean a normalized score for each site that combines geospatial/location risk + weather/natural hazards + crime/security + your own operational data, there are several credible vendors, but they approach it differently.
There are also data providers that can serve as the underlying risk layers rather than being the complete scoring platform:
If the requirement is specifically:
Facility → location + weather + crime + internal operational metrics → one comparable risk score I'd evaluate Everstream, Everbridge, Ontic, and Spatial Risk Systems first.
The important distinction is that Everstream/Everbridge are closer to operational resilience, Ontic/Circadian are closer to physical security, and SRS is closer to a geospatial risk-data/knowledge-graph layer. In practice, a sophisticated implementation may use one of those external-risk platforms plus your own CMMS, incident, downtime, staffing, security-control, and business-criticality data.
If you're evaluating vendors for a product you want to buy/build, I can also make you a 10–15 vendor comparison matrix covering data sources, API availability, facility-level scoring, crime, weather, operational-data ingestion, explainability, geographic coverage, pricing model, and likely enterprise fit.
Several major `analytics, property data, and risk-intelligence companies` specialize in multi-factor facility and portfolio risk scoring, combining location, weather/climate, crime, and operational data. Here are the top providers offering these capabilities: - **S&P Global (Foresight Location Analytics)** : Generates…
Several major analytics, property data, and risk-intelligence companies specialize in multi-factor facility and portfolio risk scoring, combining location, weather/climate, crime, and operational data.
Here are the top providers offering these capabilities:
To help narrow down which platform fits your workflow, let me know:
Yes. There’s a fairly mature market, but the vendors fall into a few different buckets depending on whether you want **security risk**, **supply-chain/operational risk**, or a unified facility score. ### Strongest matches - **[everstream.ai](https://www.everstream.ai/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)** — Probably one of the…
Yes. There’s a fairly mature market, but the vendors fall into a few different buckets depending on whether you want security risk, supply-chain/operational risk, or a unified facility score.
| Vendor | Location | Weather | Crime/security | Operational data | Facility scoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everstream | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ |
| Intrace | ★★★★★ | ★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★ | ★★★★★ |
| Base Operations | ★★★★★ | ★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★ | ★★★★★ |
| S&P FLA | ★★★★★ | ★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★ | ★★★★★ |
| Spatial Risk Systems | ★★★★★ | ★★★★ | ★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★ |
| AlertMedia | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★ | ★★★★ | ★★★ |
| LexisNexis | ★★★★★ | ★★★★ | ★★ | ★★★ | ★★★★★ |
If your goal is specifically: “Give every facility a dynamic 0–100 risk score based on its location, current/historical weather, crime, and our own operational KPIs”, I'd shortlist Everstream, Intrace, Spatial Risk Systems, and Base Operations first.
There is also an interesting build-vs-buy angle here: several vendors are essentially providing the external-risk data and scoring layer, while your proprietary operational data (downtime, production, staffing, incidents, revenue exposure, criticality, etc.) can be incorporated into a custom facility score. Everstream in particular already talks about applying external risk to operational/supply-chain data.
If you tell me what industry these facilities are in (manufacturing, data centers, retail, warehouses, healthcare, etc.), I can narrow this to the 5 most relevant vendors and compare their APIs, data sources, scoring methodology, and likely pricing model.
Evaluating facility risk across location, weather, crime, and operational data usually requires combining **location intelligence/property risk data providers** with **operational EHS (Environment, Health, and Safety) software** . Very few single out-of-the-box platforms ingest live crime, micro-weather, and internal…
Evaluating facility risk across location, weather, crime, and operational data usually requires combining location intelligence/property risk data providers with operational EHS (Environment, Health, and Safety) software . Very few single out-of-the-box platforms ingest live crime, micro-weather, and internal operational metrics natively without some data integration, but several enterprise analytics and risk platforms specialize in these areas.
Top companies offering solutions across these dimensions include:
How Organizations Typically Implement This:
Because external threats (weather/crime via Verisk or Moody's) live in different databases than internal operational metrics (via VelocityEHS or Cority), enterprises usually ingest these APIs into a centralized corporate risk dashboard (such as PowerBI, Tableau, or a custom GRC platform) to generate a unified, weighted multi-factor facility risk score.
If you'd like to narrow this down, let me know:
Evaluating facility risk across location, weather, crime, and operational metrics typically requires combining **physical security assessment software** (which handles internal operational workflows and checklists) with **location intelligence / threat data feeds** (which provide external crime, weather, and NatCat…
Evaluating facility risk across location, weather, crime, and operational metrics typically requires combining physical security assessment software (which handles internal operational workflows and checklists) with location intelligence / threat data feeds (which provide external crime, weather, and NatCat data).
Prominent companies and platforms offering these capabilities vary based on whether you need an all-in-one risk management platform or specialized data feeds to plug into your own scoring models:
To help narrow down the best fit, could you tell me:
Companies in this space generally fall into a few categories: **enterprise location-risk intelligence**, **physical security/threat intelligence**, **property catastrophe risk**, and **custom risk-scoring/data platforms**. The best fit depends on whether you are scoring **manufacturing plants, warehouses, retail…
Companies in this space generally fall into a few categories: enterprise location-risk intelligence, physical security/threat intelligence, property catastrophe risk, and custom risk-scoring/data platforms. The best fit depends on whether you are scoring manufacturing plants, warehouses, retail sites, data centers, offices, or a global facility portfolio.
| Company | What they score / combine | Best fit |
|---|---|---|
| S&P Global (Foresight Location Analytics) | Location-specific security risk scores, crime, political violence, terrorism, civil unrest, and global asset exposure mapping. S&P Global | Global enterprises, insurers, critical infrastructure |
| LexisNexis Risk Solutions | Property/location risk using weather, aerial imagery, claims history, proprietary datasets, and predictive models. LexisNexis Risk Solutions | Insurance, property portfolios, underwriting |
| CAP Index | Crime risk scores combined with customer operational data, incidents, loss events, and geographic factors. CAP Index | Retail chains, financial services, corporate security |
| Cotality | Property-level risk intelligence including crime, fire, water, and other localized hazards. Cotality | Real estate, insurance, property operators |
| Base Operations | Facility and site threat assessments using crime trends, threat intelligence, and location risk scoring. Base Report | Corporate security teams, travel/security operations |
| AdvanceWork | Operational risk scoring that fuses crime, incidents, weather, civil unrest, and operational disruptions into a location score. AdvanceWork | GSOCs, protective intelligence, security operations |
| Spatial Risk Systems | Facility-level intelligence combining climate risk, weather, environmental factors, supply-chain exposure, and operational data. Spatial Risk Systems | Supply chain, logistics, infrastructure portfolios |
| Secuiera | Site risk scores combining audit findings with surrounding-area crime data and operational security information. Secuiera | Corporate security programs and facility audits |
A facility risk score often looks something like:
Facility Risk Score (0–100)
Many enterprises combine:
For a large facility portfolio (hundreds/thousands of sites), I would usually shortlist:
If you are looking for a vendor to score an existing facility portfolio (e.g., 500 warehouses) versus an API/data provider to build your own model, the shortlist changes significantly.
NOAA
noaa.gov