Parse
Work with usPricing
Sign inCheck your brand
Research/The most-cited domains in AI answers

The most-cited domains in AI answers

When an AI answer engine cites a source, it is choosing whose words to stand behind. A cut of the top 100 source domains shows that choice landing on a handful of community platforms far more than on any newsroom or brand site.

By Dimitry Apollonsky · April 28, 2026 · 8 min read

Exhibit 1
Citation share by source category
  • Community and social44.8%
  • News and publishers18.0%
  • Knowledge and research10.6%
  • Commerce and app stores8.6%
  • Other8.2%
  • Finance and legal4.9%
  • Software and reviews4.9%
Navy = Community and social · grey = the other rows. Citation share by source category across the top 100 domains. Community platforms carry more than the next two categories combined.
▸Contents
  • Citations concentrate on a small set of domains
  • YouTube is the single most-cited source
  • Reddit is a close second, and reaches the most brands
  • The top of the list is dominated by platforms, not publishers
  • Community and social platforms outweigh every other category
  • Community platforms out-cite publishers two and a half to one
  • Wikipedia leads the knowledge sources
  • The full leaderboard: top 12 source domains
  • Reach and depth are different measures
  • The drop from first to hundredth is steep
  • Commerce and app stores edge out software review sites
  • How to read this for your own brand
  • How we measured this
  • Get the data
  • Sources
  • Related research
Contents
  • Citations concentrate on a small set of domains
  • YouTube is the single most-cited source
  • Reddit is a close second, and reaches the most brands
  • The top of the list is dominated by platforms, not publishers
  • Community and social platforms outweigh every other category
  • Community platforms out-cite publishers two and a half to one
  • Wikipedia leads the knowledge sources
  • The full leaderboard: top 12 source domains
  • Reach and depth are different measures
  • The drop from first to hundredth is steep
  • Commerce and app stores edge out software review sites
  • How to read this for your own brand
  • How we measured this
  • Get the data
  • Sources
  • Related research

We measured 358,431 citations across the top 100 source domains from a public index snapshot of AI answer citations dated April 21, 2026, on ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode.

32.3%
of citations go to just 2 domains
YouTube and Reddit
58.7%
of citations go to the top 10 domains
44.8%
of citations go to community and social platforms
60,164
citations to the single most-cited domain
YouTube

Citations concentrate on a small set of domains

Every time an AI answer engine cites a source, it is deciding whose page is trustworthy enough to repeat. Add those decisions up and a clear order appears, with most citations going to the very top.

Inside the top 100 source domains, the two most-cited sites alone carry 32.3% of all citations, and the top 10 carry 58.7%. The long list of sites below them splits what is left.

32.3%
Citations to the top 2 domains
58.7%
Citations to the top 10 domains
100
Source domains in this cut

Takeaway

Two domains out of a hundred account for nearly a third of citations. A few sources take most of the visibility.

YouTube is the single most-cited source

The most-cited domain is not a newsroom or an encyclopedia. It is YouTube logoYouTube, with 60,164 citations across the window, appearing in 9,370 different prompts. AI engines reach for video pages as evidence more than any other source.

60,164
citations to YouTube, the #1 source
appearing in 9,370 different prompts

Reddit is a close second, and reaches the most brands

Reddit logoReddit ranks second with 55,505 citations, just behind YouTube logoYouTube. But it appears in more prompts than any other domain, 11,622, and touches 74,716 different brands. When AI wants a human take, it reads the forum.

55,505
Citations to Reddit
11,622
Different prompts it appears in
74,716
Different brands it touches

The top of the list is dominated by platforms, not publishers

Ranking the ten most-cited domains by citation volume, user-generated platforms and a single encyclopedia lead. The first traditional newsroom, Forbes, sits in fourth, and it is the only pure publisher in the top ten.

Exhibit 2
  • youtube.com faviconyoutube.com60,164
  • reddit.com faviconreddit.com55,505
  • en.wikipedia.org faviconen.wikipedia.org24,875
  • forbes.com faviconforbes.com14,881
  • medium.com faviconmedium.com12,944
  • linkedin.com faviconlinkedin.com11,290
  • facebook.com faviconfacebook.com10,189
  • amazon.com faviconamazon.com7,739
  • nerdwallet.com faviconnerdwallet.com6,515
  • alibaba.com faviconalibaba.com6,463
Navy = youtube.com · grey = the other rows. Top 10 source domains by citations in the window.

Community and social platforms outweigh every other category

Group the top 100 domains by what they are and one category is far larger than the rest. Community and social platforms, the forums, video sites, and networks where ordinary people post, carry 44.8% of all citations in the cut.

That is more than the next two categories, news and publishers (18.0%) and knowledge and research (10.6%), combined.

Exhibit 3
  • Community and social44.8%
  • News and publishers18.0%
  • Knowledge and research10.6%
  • Commerce and app stores8.6%
  • Other8.2%
  • Finance and legal4.9%
  • Software and reviews4.9%
Navy = Community and social · grey = the other rows. Citation share by source category across the top 100 domains.

Takeaway

AI answers lean on what people say in public more than on what publishers write about them.

Community platforms out-cite publishers two and a half to one

Eight community and social domains carry 160,630 citations between them. Thirty-one news and publisher domains, nearly four times as many sites, share 64,599. Per domain, the gap is even wider.

160,630
Citations to 8 community domains
44.8% of the cut
64,599
Citations to 31 publisher domains
18.0% of the cut
2.5×
Community citations vs publisher citations

Wikipedia leads the knowledge sources

Below the platforms sits a smaller group of reference and research sites. Wikipedia leads it with 24,875 citations, third overall. The ten knowledge and research domains together account for 10.6% of citations, steady but well behind the community platforms.

24,875
citations to Wikipedia, the top knowledge source
10.6% of citations go to the knowledge and research category

The full leaderboard: top 12 source domains

The ranked table shows each leading domain with its citation count, the number of different prompts it appears in, and the number of different brands it touches. Sort by any column to see how reach and depth differ.

Top 12 source domains by citations. Click a column to sort.
youtube.com faviconyoutube.comCommunity60,1649,37050,747
reddit.com faviconreddit.comCommunity55,50511,62274,716
en.wikipedia.org faviconen.wikipedia.orgKnowledge24,8755,71142,208
forbes.com faviconforbes.comNews14,8813,75622,145
medium.com faviconmedium.comCommunity12,9443,31719,962
linkedin.com faviconlinkedin.comSocial11,2903,98525,664
facebook.com faviconfacebook.comSocial10,1893,62922,110
amazon.com faviconamazon.comCommerce7,7391,64611,102
nerdwallet.com faviconnerdwallet.comFinance6,5159704,506
alibaba.com faviconalibaba.comCommerce6,4631,83311,340
techradar.com favicontechradar.comNews5,1251,7199,478
apps.apple.com faviconapps.apple.comApp store4,8237326,640

Reach and depth are different measures

Citation volume measures how often a domain is quoted. Brand reach measures how many different brands it touches. Reddit logoReddit reaches more brands than YouTube logoYouTube even though it trails on raw citations, while a finance site like NerdWallet logoNerdWallet is cited often but across a narrow set of brands.

Exhibit 4
  • reddit.com faviconreddit.com74,716
  • youtube.com faviconyoutube.com50,747
  • en.wikipedia.org faviconen.wikipedia.org42,208
  • linkedin.com faviconlinkedin.com25,664
  • forbes.com faviconforbes.com22,145
  • nerdwallet.com faviconnerdwallet.com4,506
Navy = reddit.com · grey = the other rows. Different brands touched by selected top domains.

The drop from first to hundredth is steep

The most-cited domain carries 60,164 citations. The hundredth, Ramp logoRamp, carries 837. That is a roughly 72-to-1 gap inside a list that already excludes the millions of domains cited less often than the top 100. Visibility drops off quickly below the top ranks.

60,164
Citations at rank 1
youtube.com
837
Citations at rank 100
ramp.com
72×
Gap from rank 1 to rank 100

Commerce and app stores edge out software review sites

Below the big platforms, the categories sit close together. Ten commerce and app-store domains carry 8.6% of citations, ahead of the fourteen software and review domains at 4.9%. Marketplaces where buyers transact get cited more than the directories built to Compare logoCompare products.

Exhibit 5
  • Commerce and app stores8.6%
  • Other8.2%
  • Finance and legal4.9%
  • Software and reviews4.9%
Navy = Commerce and app stores · grey = the other rows. Lower-tier source categories by citation share.

How to read this for your own brand

Find the main sources for your category. If your buyers ask the kind of question that pulls community answers, your presence on the forum or video platform matters more than a press hit.

Do not focus only on the very top. The two leading domains are general-purpose. The source that decides your category is more often a mid-list domain that AI trusts for your specific questions.

A citation comes before a recommendation. AI recommends brands it can find evidence for. The domains it cites are where that evidence lives.

How we measured this

We took the top 100 source domains by citation count from a public-index snapshot of AI answer citations across ChatGPT logoChatGPT Search and Google logoGoogle AI Mode, dated April 21, 2026. For each domain we counted total citations, the number of different prompts it appeared in, and the number of different brands it was associated with, then hand-labeled each domain into a source category.

Shares are computed within this top-100 cut, not across the whole web, so they describe how citations concentrate among the most-cited sources rather than across all citations everywhere. A citation records that an engine pointed to a page, not whether it agreed with it or disputed it. Figures describe an observed sample from the two engines we measured, not Perplexity, Gemini, or Copilot.

Get the data

Dataset CSVThe ranked top 100 source domains behind every figure in this report.

Sources

  1. User-generated platforms dominate AI answer citations, Semrush · accessed 2026-04-28
  2. AI answer engines cite community sites and encyclopedias over publishers, Search Engine Land · accessed 2026-04-28

Related research

YouTube vs Reddit: which source AI cites most
YouTube ranks first among cited source domains, but only 8.4% ahead of Reddit, and Reddit reaches more distinct questions. A look at the top seven.
What pages AI cites most: best-of listicles dominate
Domain studies tell you AI loves Reddit, YouTube, and Wikipedia. The page level shows what it actually pulls from them: six in ten of AI's most-cited pages are “Best X” listicles.
The subreddits that move AI's brand recommendations
AI leans on Reddit to decide which brands to name, but the communities doing the work are not the giant general subs. By brand-recommendation weight, r/devops leads and r/technology ranks #819.
Do AI engines cite their own websites?
Google's does, on most answers. Google AI Mode cited a Google-owned page on 15,833 of 18,304 matched prompts, or 86.50%. ChatGPT Search cited one on 2,014, or 11.00%.
Does AI cite the same website more than once?
In nearly six in ten answers with at least two cited pages. AI cited multiple pages from the same website in 251,446 of 423,921 such answers, or 59.31%.
Does AI prefer pages with the current year in the title?
Yes, heavily. Pages titled 2026 drew 980,656 of 1,204,884 citation links to pages with a year in the title, or 81.39%, and 56.04% of cited answers cited at least one 2026-titled page.

About this research

Dimitry Apollonsky

Founder, Parse

I built Parse to track where AI answers really come from: the sources they cite and the brands they name. DM me on LinkedIn to talk shop.

See which sources AI reads when it answers about you.

Run a free check against live AI answers — no account needed.

Parse

Parse indexes AI recommendations so brands know where they stand.

Products

  • Brands
  • Markets
  • Integrations
  • Work with us
  • Pricing
  • MCP

Resources

  • Research
  • Methodology
  • Blog

© 2026 Parse. All rights reserved.

LegalPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service