Data as of Sep 18, 2026 · Based on 32 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 28% of answers
Named in 25% of answers
Named in 22% of answers
Named in 22% of answers
If by “disclose” you mean **the manufacturer publicly shows the collagen source, a meaningful amino-acid profile, and actual third-party heavy-metal results—not merely “third-party tested” marketing**, the field gets pretty small. ### Strongest matches I found Product | Peptide source disclosed | Amino-acid profile |…
If by “disclose” you mean the manufacturer publicly shows the collagen source, a meaningful amino-acid profile, and actual third-party heavy-metal results—not merely “third-party tested” marketing, the field gets pretty small.
| Product | Peptide source disclosed | Amino-acid profile | Actual heavy-metal results | Third-party testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NorCal Organic Collagen Peptides | Yes — bovine, grass-fed Brazilian cattle | Yes, detailed profile | Yes — As, Cd, Pb, Hg with numerical results | Yes, independent labs |
| Perfect Supplements Perfect Hydrolyzed Collagen | Yes — Brazilian grass-fed/grass-pastured bovine | Partial/public nutrition data; not as complete as NorCal | Yes — actual lab certificates for As, Cd, Pb, Hg | Yes, Advanced Laboratories |
| Yonder Flavorless Collagen | Yes — bovine | I found less complete amino-acid disclosure | Yes — lot-specific As, Cd, Pb, Hg results | Yes, Light Labs, ISO 17025 |
| FullWell Unflavored Collagen Peptides | Yes — Type I & III bovine hide | Yes — says 19 amino acids | Testing is disclosed, including every-lot heavy-metal testing, but I did not find the actual numerical metal results on the product page | Yes, independent third party |
NorCal Organic is the clearest match to all three criteria. Its page gives an amino-acid table—including glycine, proline, hydroxyproline, alanine, arginine, etc.—and publishes independent-lab heavy-metal results. The displayed results are extremely low: arsenic <0.01 µg, cadmium <0.005 µg, lead <0.01 µg and total mercury <0.01 µg for the tested sample.
Perfect Supplements is also unusually transparent about heavy metals. Its certificates identify the product and lot and report arsenic, cadmium, mercury and lead using ICP-MS USP <730>. For example, one 2025 chocolate-collagen lot reported 0.016 ppm arsenic, 0.136 ppm cadmium, <0.001 ppm mercury and 0.021 ppm lead. Perfect Supplements Its product page also documents third-party batch certification and the bovine source.
Yonder publishes lot-by-lot testing through Light Labs, an ISO-17025-accredited laboratory, specifically for lead, cadmium, arsenic and mercury, in addition to glyphosate/AMPA. Yonder I would put it slightly below NorCal for your particular criterion because the publicly presented amino-acid disclosure isn't as complete.
FullWell specifies Type I/III hydrolyzed bovine-hide collagen and says its product supplies 19 naturally occurring amino acids. It also says every production lot receives independent testing for harmful contaminants including heavy metals. FullWell The distinction is that “tested” is easier to verify than seeing the actual metal numbers, so I wouldn't put it in the same transparency category as NorCal.
A third-party certification isn't necessarily the same thing as publicly disclosing the laboratory's numerical results. For example, ConsumerLab independently tests collagen for collagen content and, where applicable, lead, cadmium, arsenic and mercury, but much of its detailed product-level data sits behind its subscription service.
So, if your standard is:
then NorCal Organic is the cleanest publicly documented match I found. Perfect Supplements is another strong candidate, particularly if the heavy-metal COAs are your priority.
If you want, I can also make a shortlist of 5–10 collagen powders meeting those five criteria, with the actual Pb/Cd/As/Hg numbers, collagen source, molecular weight, and price per 10 g of collagen.
Yonder publishes lot-by-lot testing through Light Labs, an ISO-17025-accredited laboratory, specifically for lead, cadmium, arsenic and mercury, in addition to glyphosate/AMPA. Yonder I would put it slightly below NorCal for your particular criterion because the publicly presented amino-acid disclosure isn't as complete.
FullWell specifies Type I/III hydrolyzed bovine-hide collagen and says its product supplies 19 naturally occurring amino acids. It also says every production lot receives independent testing for harmful contaminants including heavy metals. fullwellfertility.com The distinction is that “tested” is easier to verify than seeing the actual metal numbers, so I wouldn't put it in the same transparency category as NorCal.
A third-party certification isn't necessarily the same thing as publicly disclosing the laboratory's numerical results. For example, ConsumerLab independently tests collagen for collagen content and, where applicable, lead, cadmium, arsenic and mercury, but much of its detailed product-level data sits behind its subscription service.
So, if your standard is:
Finding collagen powder brands that **fully disclose both heavy-metal results and specific amino-acid profiles** publicly via third-party testing is surprisingly challenging. Most major brands display standard nutritional panels (listing general protein content per serving) or mention "third-party tested" in marketing…
Finding collagen powder brands that fully disclose both heavy-metal results and specific amino-acid profiles publicly via third-party testing is surprisingly challenging. Most major brands display standard nutritional panels (listing general protein content per serving) or mention "third-party tested" in marketing copy, but treat exact lot-by-lot heavy-metal ppm (parts per million/micrograms) and full amino-acid breakdown as proprietary or only available upon direct customer request via a Certificate of Analysis (COA).
However, a select few brands stand out for transparency, independent facility certifications, or readily available analytical data:
Note on Amino-Acid Profiles: Collagen naturally features a very consistent, predictable characteristic profile dominated by Glycine, Proline, and Hydroxyproline (and a complete absence of Tryptophan). Because this foundational chain rarely deviates wildly between hydrolyzed bovine/marine sources, most brands print the generalized typical amino-acid breakdown right on the label or product FAQ rather than commissioning a brand-new costly ICP-MS/amino assay for every single production run.
If you have a specific brand in mind that you're currently looking at, let me know and I can help you dig into whether they provide public COAs or if you need to contact their customer support team for a batch sheet.
If by **“disclose peptide source amino-acid profile and heavy-metal results”** you mean *the brand publicly identifies the collagen source and publishes an amino-acid breakdown plus actual third-party heavy-metal results*, the strongest matches I found are: Product | Peptide source | Amino-acid disclosure |…
If by “disclose peptide source amino-acid profile and heavy-metal results” you mean the brand publicly identifies the collagen source and publishes an amino-acid breakdown plus actual third-party heavy-metal results, the strongest matches I found are:
| Product | Peptide source | Amino-acid disclosure | Heavy-metal results | My take |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NorCal Organic Collagen Peptides | Grass-fed Brazilian bovine | Full profile; e.g. glycine 5,000 mg, proline 2,900 mg/serving, plus individual amino acids | Actual results published: As <0.01 µg, Cd <0.005 µg, Pb <0.01 µg, Hg <0.01 µg | Best overall match |
| NorCal Organic Marine Collagen | Wild Norwegian cod | Full profile; glycine 3,800 mg, proline 1,000 mg/serving, etc. | Same published independent panel: As <0.01, Cd <0.005, Pb <0.01, Hg <0.01 µg | Best marine option |
| Perfect Supplements Perfect Hydrolyzed Collagen | Brazilian grass-fed/pastured bovine | Source is clearly disclosed, but I found less complete public amino-acid quantification than NorCal | Yes, third-party ICP-MS results published; one report showed Hg <0.011, Pb 0.319, As 0.132, Cd 0.011 µg/11 g | Good transparency, but amino-acid disclosure is weaker |
NorCal is particularly compelling because its product page puts the amino-acid table and independent heavy-metal results together, rather than merely saying “third-party tested.” It also explicitly says the testing is performed by independent third-party labs.
For its marine version, the same level of disclosure is available, including the Norwegian cod source and quantified amino acids plus arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury results.
Perfect Supplements also publishes genuine lab data rather than just a “tested” claim. Its posted report uses ICP-MS/USP <730> and gives numerical results for all four major heavy metals. However, its public material is better on contaminants than on a complete amino-acid profile.
A few popular products have excellent testing transparency but don't meet your entire criterion based on what I could verify:
Bottom line: If your priority is maximum publicly verifiable transparency, I'd start with NorCal Organic Collagen Peptides. It is the clearest match I found for source → amino-acid quantities → actual third-party heavy-metal numbers.
If you'd like, I can also make a top-10 comparison of collagen powders ranked specifically by transparency, including lab name, ISO 17025 accreditation, amino-acid profile, heavy metals (Pb/As/Cd/Hg), collagen source/country, molecular weight, and price per 10 g.
A few popular products have excellent testing transparency but don't meet your entire criterion based on what I could verify:
Finding a collagen powder that publicly discloses *both* a complete amino-acid profile and lot-specific heavy-metal testing is surprisingly difficult. Most major commercial brands rely on general third-party certifications (like NSF, Informed-Choice, or Paleo/Keto badges) which verify manufacturing standards or…
Finding a collagen powder that publicly discloses both a complete amino-acid profile and lot-specific heavy-metal testing is surprisingly difficult. Most major commercial brands rely on general third-party certifications (like NSF, Informed-Choice, or Paleo/Keto badges) which verify manufacturing standards or absence of banned substances, but they rarely publish the actual analytical chemistry or heavy-metal numbers on-label or online without a direct customer support request.
However, a select few brands and specific manufacturing approaches stand out for transparency:
When you request or check a lab report for collagen peptides, verify these structural parameters:
If you have a specific brand or product in mind , I can help you figure out how to contact their QA department or evaluate their label claims for safety.
If by “disclose” you mean **(1) identify the collagen source, (2) publish an amino-acid profile, and (3) make actual heavy-metal testing/results available—not merely say “third-party tested”**, the strongest matches I found are: - **Momentous Collagen Peptides — best match.** It is bovine collagen, and Momentous…
If by “disclose” you mean (1) identify the collagen source, (2) publish an amino-acid profile, and (3) make actual heavy-metal testing/results available—not merely say “third-party tested”, the strongest matches I found are:
| Product | Source disclosed | Amino profile | 3rd-party certification/testing | Public heavy-metal results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Momentous Collagen Peptides | Yes — bovine | Yes, quantitative | Yes — NSF | Yes / batch COAs |
| Legion Collagen+ | Yes — grass-fed bovine | Yes | Yes, independent lab | COA available |
| Vital Proteins Collagen Peptides | Yes — bovine | Yes, quantitative | Yes — NSF on qualifying versions | Testing disclosed, but public batch results less transparent |
Bottom line: If your priority is verifiable transparency rather than just a certification logo, Momentous is the clearest choice. The important distinction is that NSF certification tells you independent testing occurs, while a publicly available, lot-specific COA lets you actually inspect the contaminant results. Momentous provides both layers.
If you want, I can also compare 5–10 collagen powders specifically by the actual lead/arsenic/cadmium/mercury numbers, rather than by marketing/testing claims.
Finding specific collagen brands that make *all three* data points publicly transparent—third-party testing, complete amino acid profiles, and specific heavy-metal testing results—can be tricky because many supplement companies only disclose generic purity claims rather than batch-specific heavy metal numbers or full…
Finding specific collagen brands that make all three data points publicly transparent—third-party testing, complete amino acid profiles, and specific heavy-metal testing results—can be tricky because many supplement companies only disclose generic purity claims rather than batch-specific heavy metal numbers or full amino acid breakdowns.
Brands like Chief Nutrition explicitly outline their comprehensive amino-acid breakdown alongside independent testing assurances for heavy metals and pesticides.[1]
When shopping or vetting brands for this level of extreme transparency, look for the following practices:
Would you like me to help you contact a specific collagen brand's customer support to request their current batch Certificate of Analysis, or help you evaluate the amino acid profile of a brand you already own?
Finding a collagen powder that publicly discloses *both* a complete amino-acid profile and specific heavy-metal testing results is surprisingly difficult. Most mainstream brands note that they are "third-party tested" or "manufactured in a cGMP facility," but they treat exact heavy-metal laboratory assays or full…
Finding a collagen powder that publicly discloses both a complete amino-acid profile and specific heavy-metal testing results is surprisingly difficult. Most mainstream brands note that they are "third-party tested" or "manufactured in a cGMP facility," but they treat exact heavy-metal laboratory assays or full amino acid breakdowns as proprietary or only share them upon direct customer request via a Certificate of Analysis (COA).
However, a few brands and testing transparency standards stand out:
Note on Industry Standard: Because collagen is a homogeneous protein derived from animal hides/bones, individual amino acid profiles (high in glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline) remain relatively uniform across hydrolyzed bovine sources, which is why most companies point to general nutritional panels rather than printing full amino-acid chromatography results on retail tubs. If absolute zero-tolerance heavy metal numbers are required for a specific batch, buying from brands that willingly email a lot-specific COA upon request (like Codeage or Sports Research) is usually the most reliable route.
If you'd like, I can help you:
Let me know how you'd like to proceed!
If by “disclose” you mean **the brand publicly shows both (1) the collagen’s animal source plus a meaningful amino-acid profile and (2) actual third-party heavy-metal results**, rather than merely saying “third-party tested,” the strongest matches I found are: Product | Peptide source disclosed | Amino-acid profile |…
If by “disclose” you mean the brand publicly shows both (1) the collagen’s animal source plus a meaningful amino-acid profile and (2) actual third-party heavy-metal results, rather than merely saying “third-party tested,” the strongest matches I found are:
| Product | Peptide source disclosed | Amino-acid profile | Heavy-metal results | My take |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anea Nutrition Collagen Peptides | Bovine | Yes—18 amino acids, with mg/serving | Yes—batch COA + separate heavy-metal analysis | Best overall match |
| NorCal Organic Collagen Peptides | Bovine | Yes—18 amino acids | Yes—As, Cd, Pb, Hg with actual results | Excellent transparency |
| NorCal Organic Marine Collagen | Wild-caught Norwegian cod | Yes—18 amino acids | Yes—independent-lab heavy-metal testing | Best marine option |
| Love Life Supplements BODYBALANCE Collagen | Collagen source disclosed on product documentation | Full profile confirmed by Eurofins | Yes—Pb, Cd, Hg, As, Ni | Strongest independent lab documentation |
| Double Wood Collagen Peptides | Hydrolyzed bovine | Not seeing a full amino-acid profile disclosed | Yes—actual As/Cd/Pb/Hg results | Good testing, doesn't fully meet your amino-profile criterion |
| Vital Proteins Collagen Peptides | Bovine | Typical amino-acid profile appears on labeling | NSF Certified for Sport | Strong certification, but less transparent public metal-result disclosure |
1. Anea Nutrition Collagen Peptides This is unusually transparent: its product page gives a complete amino-acid profile—for example, glycine 4,934 mg, proline 2,861 mg, hydroxyproline included—and says every batch has a Certificate of Analysis, with a separate heavy-metals analysis. It is also Informed Choice certified.
2. NorCal Organic Collagen Peptides This is probably the clearest public-data option I found. It lists the amino acids quantitatively and gives actual independent-lab results for arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury—not merely “passes heavy-metal testing.” For example, its published results show arsenic <0.01 mcg, cadmium <0.005 mcg, lead <0.01 mcg and mercury <0.01 mcg per stated serving. It explicitly says all testing was performed by independent third-party labs.
For marine collagen, NorCal's version specifies wild-caught Norwegian cod collagen peptides and similarly publishes the amino-acid profile and independent heavy-metal testing.
NSF/Informed Choice certification ≠ publicly disclosed heavy-metal numbers. For example, NSF currently lists Vital Proteins Collagen Peptides as a Certified for Sport powder, which is meaningful third-party quality assurance. NSF Sport NSF Sport But if your specific criterion is “show me the actual Pb/Cd/Hg/As results,” I'd favor Anea or NorCal over relying on certification alone.
If you want, I can also make a shortlist of 5–10 collagen powders ranked specifically by transparency, including source (bovine/marine), glycine/proline/hydroxyproline, lead/arsenic/cadmium/mercury levels, lab accreditation, and price per 10 g of collagen.
I looked for collagen powders that meet **all three** criteria: 1. **Third-party testing** (not just “GMP made” or “quality tested”) 2. **Published peptide source** (for example, bovine hide, fish, eggshell membrane)
I looked for collagen powders that meet all three criteria:
The list is shorter than many consumers expect because most brands disclose only one side: either an amino profile or a contaminant test.
| Product/brand | Peptide source disclosure | Amino-acid profile disclosed? | Heavy-metal results disclosed? | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Great Lakes Wellness Collagen Peptides | Bovine collagen peptides (grass-fed bovine hide) and marine collagen options | Yes — publishes amounts for glycine, proline, hydroxyproline, alanine, lysine, etc. | Yes — states independent third-party testing; heavy-metal testing is part of its safety testing program | One of the clearest amino-profile disclosures. Great Lakes Wellness International Great Lakes Wellness |
| NorCal Organic Collagen Peptides | Bovine collagen peptides | Yes — publishes a full amino-acid panel | Yes — publishes independent lab heavy-metal results for arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury | Provides numerical heavy-metal results rather than only “passed.” NorCal Organic |
| Double Wood Supplements Hydrolyzed Collagen Peptides | Hydrolyzed bovine collagen peptides | Partial (collagen peptide content disclosed; not a full amino-acid breakdown found in the source reviewed) | Yes — publishes lot testing with arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury results | Strong COA transparency for contaminants, but amino profile disclosure is less complete. Double Wood Supplements |
| Ancient Nutrition Multi Collagen Protein | Multiple sources including bovine hide, fish collagen, eggshell membrane, chicken bone broth (depending on formula) | Source reviewed confirms COAs and sourcing disclosure; a complete amino-acid panel was not confirmed in the material I found | Yes — provides COAs and states finished products are tested for lead, cadmium, arsenic, and mercury | Good source transparency, but verify the exact product COA. Ancient Nutrition Ancient Nutrition Ancient Nutrition |
A strong collagen COA should ideally show:
One caution: a brand saying “third-party tested” does not necessarily mean it publishes the actual results. Many only provide a statement of testing rather than a certificate or numerical data.
If you want, I can also narrow this to the cleanest collagen powders with the lowest disclosed heavy-metal levels or marine-only vs bovine-only options.
Finding a collagen powder that publicly discloses *both* a complete amino-acid profile and specific heavy-metal test results (via lot-specific Certificates of Analysis or direct lab disclosures) narrows the field significantly, as most major brands rely solely on general third-party certifications (like NSF, Informed…
Finding a collagen powder that publicly discloses both a complete amino-acid profile and specific heavy-metal test results (via lot-specific Certificates of Analysis or direct lab disclosures) narrows the field significantly, as most major brands rely solely on general third-party certifications (like NSF, Informed Choice, or Paleo/Keto certs) without posting actual contaminant numbers or breakdown sheets.
The market transparency breakdown for this specific combination reveals:
If you'd like, I can:
Let me know how you'd like to proceed!