Data as of Sep 19, 2026 · Based on 32 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 75% of answers
Named in 72% of answers
Named in 59% of answers
Named in 50% of answers
Yes. The clearest matches are: - **Umami** — cookieless/no personal-data collection, with **custom events, funnels, UTM/campaign tracking, and attribution**. It can also be self-hosted. [Umami](https://umami.is/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) [Umami Docs](https://docs.umami.is/docs/about?utm_source=chatgpt.com) -…
Yes. The clearest matches are:
For your exact requirements, Umami and Plausible are the most straightforward fits.
Finding a web analytics platform that balances advanced marketing features (**funnels**, **custom events** , and **campaign/UTM attribution** ) with strict privacy standards (**cookieless** operation and **no raw personal identifiers/PII** ) requires looking at modern product-led and privacy-first analytics tools.…
Finding a web analytics platform that balances advanced marketing features (funnels, custom events , and campaign/UTM attribution ) with strict privacy standards (cookieless operation and no raw personal identifiers/PII ) requires looking at modern product-led and privacy-first analytics tools. Traditional choices like Google Analytics require persistent cookies or explicit consent for full user-journey stitching, but several purpose-built platforms thread this needle.
The following platforms support these advanced capabilities while operating cookieless and avoiding the collection of raw, trackable personal identifiers:
If you'd like to narrow this down, let me know:
**Plausible Analytics and Matomo (configured in cookieless/privacy mode) are the leading cookieless web analytics platforms that support funnels, custom events, and UTM campaign attribution without storing raw personal identifiers or cookies** **.** [](https://plausible.io/docs/funnel-analysis)…
Plausible Analytics and Matomo (configured in cookieless/privacy mode) are the leading cookieless web analytics platforms that support funnels, custom events, and UTM campaign attribution without storing raw personal identifiers or cookies .
Privacy-focused, cookieless web analytics accomplish this by processing lightweight, anonymized aggregate metrics or temporary cryptographic hashes (salted daily) rather than tracking persistent cross-site individual IDs.
| Platform | Cookieless / Privacy Approach | Custom Events | Funnel Analysis | Campaign Attribution (UTM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plausible Analytics | Zero cookies, IP addresses are hashed and discarded instantly on the server. | Fully supported (goal/event conversions). | Supported (sequential and strict-order linear funnels). | Fully supported via UTM parameters filtered against custom events. |
| Matomo (Cookieless Mode) | Configurable to drop cookies entirely and anonymize IPs (anonymizeIP). | Fully supported (custom event tracking). | Premium/Paid Funnels plugin available. | Fully supported via standard UTM/campaign parameters. |
| Simple Analytics | 100% cookieless, privacy-first, no IP storage. | Supported (event tracking). | Limited/Basic goal flows. | Supported via UTM tag aggregation. |
| Fathom Analytics | Cookieless options available, hashed ephemeral sessions. | Fully supported (with revenue/values). | Not natively built as a multi-step funnel builder (relies on event filtering). | Fully supported via UTM filtering. |
utm_source, utm_medium , and utm_campaign query tags directly to the aggregated event counters rather than matching a user ID across multiple ad networks.If you want to narrow down the choice, let me know:
Yes. If by **“without collecting raw personal identifiers”** you mean no stored IP addresses, names, emails, advertising IDs, or persistent cross-site identifiers, there are several good options—but they differ substantially in funnel depth and attribution. Platform | Cookieless | Custom events | Funnels | Campaign…
Yes. If by “without collecting raw personal identifiers” you mean no stored IP addresses, names, emails, advertising IDs, or persistent cross-site identifiers, there are several good options—but they differ substantially in funnel depth and attribution.
| Platform | Cookieless | Custom events | Funnels | Campaign attribution | Raw identifiers stored?* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pirsch | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ Multi-step | ✅ UTM/referrer | No raw IP; short-lived anonymous hashing |
| Matomo | ✅ configurable | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Can be configured to anonymize IPs |
| Umami | ✅ | ✅ | ◐ Limited/basic | ✅ UTM/referrer | Designed around anonymized identifiers |
| Plausible | ✅ | ✅ | ❌/limited | ✅ UTM/referrer | No persistent personal identifier |
| Fathom | ✅ | ✅ | ❌/limited | ✅ UTM/referrer | No raw IP stored |
| Simple Analytics | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ Referrer/UTM | No personal data |
*The exact privacy characteristics depend on configuration and what you put into event properties.
1. Pirsch — probably the closest match to your requirements.
Pirsch explicitly says it doesn't store IP addresses, names, emails, or other PII. It supports custom events, UTM campaign tracking, conversion goals, segmentation, and multi-step funnels. Its visitor counting uses a one-way hash and the resulting session expires after 24 hours.
2. Matomo — best if you need a more complete analytics suite.
Matomo can run cookieless and lets you configure IP masking and retention. It supports detailed events, funnels, e-commerce, custom reports and other advanced analytics. The trade-off is considerably more configuration than something like Pirsch or Plausible.
3. Umami — good self-hosted/open-source choice.
Umami is particularly attractive if your requirement is “analytics data should stay under our control.” It supports custom events and campaign/UTM data while being designed as a privacy-focused, cookieless analytics system. Funnel capabilities are less mature than Pirsch/Matomo.
4. Plausible — excellent for marketing analytics, but not deep funnels.
Plausible is a very good choice if your funnel requirement is relatively simple—e.g. campaign → landing page → goal conversion. It supports custom events and campaign attribution while avoiding cookies and persistent visitor tracking. It isn't really a replacement for a full product-analytics funnel engine.
5. Fathom — similar philosophy to Plausible.
Fathom is cookieless and privacy-oriented, with events/goals and campaign/referrer reporting, but it intentionally doesn't provide the depth of multi-step behavioral analysis you'd get from Matomo or a dedicated product analytics platform.
Cookieless doesn't automatically mean “no personal data.” A platform can avoid cookies while still collecting IP addresses, persistent IDs, or highly identifying event properties. Conversely, an analytics system can use a short-lived pseudonymous hash while discarding the underlying IP. That's why I'd evaluate the data model, not just the “cookieless” checkbox.
For your exact combination of requirements—cookieless + custom events + multi-step funnels + UTM attribution + no stored raw identifiers—I'd start with Pirsch, then evaluate Matomo configured for strict anonymization, and consider Umami if self-hosting is important. Pirsch is unusually explicit about all four requirements.
If you tell me whether this is for a marketing website, SaaS product, or e-commerce site, I can narrow this to the 2–3 best choices and compare their visitor identification, IP handling, retention, attribution model, and self-hosting options.
If you need **funnels + custom events + campaign attribution** while avoiding **raw personal identifiers** (email, IP storage, device IDs, advertising IDs, cross-site profiles), you’ll want something beyond a basic pageview counter. The strongest fits are privacy-first analytics products that use aggregated,…
If you need funnels + custom events + campaign attribution while avoiding raw personal identifiers (email, IP storage, device IDs, advertising IDs, cross-site profiles), you’ll want something beyond a basic pageview counter. The strongest fits are privacy-first analytics products that use aggregated, anonymized, or rotating identifiers rather than cookies and persistent user profiles.
| Platform | Funnels | Custom events | Campaign attribution (UTM/referrer) | Raw personal identifiers avoided? | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plausible Analytics | Yes (goals/funnels depending on setup) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Strong privacy reputation; better for marketing analytics than deep product analytics. Pug |
| Fathom Analytics | Limited conversion tracking | Yes | Yes | Yes | Simple privacy-first marketing analytics; less focused on complex funnels. Pug |
| Umami | Basic goals/events | Yes | Yes | Yes | Open-source/self-hosted; good if you want data ownership. Pug |
| Mnemar | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Self-hosted cookieless analytics with funnels/goals and no stored IP addresses. Mnemar |
| Wazlytics | Yes | Yes | Yes (UTMs/campaigns) | Yes | Explicitly targets cookieless goals, events, funnels, and campaigns. Wazlytics |
| Flowsery | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Focuses on campaigns, revenue attribution, funnels, and events without cookies or personal IDs. Flowsery |
| PureStats | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Tracks UTM campaigns, custom events, goals, funnels, and conversion attribution with privacy controls. PureStats |
| Mrkr | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes (cookieless mode) | More conversion/revenue oriented; attributes signups and sales to campaigns. Mrkr |
| GhostlyX | Yes | Yes | Limited/varies | Yes | Cookieless funnels based on events/pageviews without personal data. GhostlyX |
Best fits:
Best fits:
Consider:
“Cookieless” does not always mean “no identifiers.” Check whether the vendor:
For a strict privacy requirement, look for language like:
If you need GA4-style funnels and attribution but with a privacy-first architecture, I’d narrow the list to Flowsery, Mnemar, Mrkr, PureStats, and Plausible depending on whether you prioritize product analytics depth, self-hosting, or marketing simplicity.
Finding a web analytics platform that balances advanced marketing features (**funnels, custom events, and campaign attribution** ) with strict privacy (**cookieless and no raw personal identifiers/PII** ) narrows the field considerably. Traditional tools like `Google Analytics or Mixpanel` rely heavily on persistent…
Finding a web analytics platform that balances advanced marketing features (funnels, custom events, and campaign attribution ) with strict privacy (cookieless and no raw personal identifiers/PII ) narrows the field considerably. Traditional tools like Google Analytics or Mixpanel rely heavily on persistent identifiers, while ultra-minimalist privacy tools (like Plausible or Simple Analytics) often skip funnels and multi-touch attribution to maintain that simplicity.
The platforms that successfully bridge this gap rely on aggregate tracking, randomized/rotating daily hashes, or first-party anonymous session state rather than tracking individuals across the web:
(Note: Popular privacy tools like Fathom Analytics support custom events and UTM/campaign tracking, but they historically lack native multi-step funnel analysis, making Umami and Usermaven better direct fits for your exact criteria.)
If you'd like, let me know:
I can help you narrow down the final choice.
Yes. If by **“without collecting raw personal identifiers”** you mean no stored IP addresses, email addresses, names, advertising IDs, persistent cookies, or fingerprinting, there are several good options. Platform | Cookies / raw identifiers | Custom events | Funnels | Campaign attribution | Best fit --- | --- | ---…
Yes. If by “without collecting raw personal identifiers” you mean no stored IP addresses, email addresses, names, advertising IDs, persistent cookies, or fingerprinting, there are several good options.
| Platform | Cookies / raw identifiers | Custom events | Funnels | Campaign attribution | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plausible Analytics | No cookies; raw IP/UA aren't stored | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ UTM/referrer/campaign | Best overall |
| Simple Analytics | No cookies, IPs, visitor IDs or fingerprinting | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ UTM/referrer | Strongest minimization |
| Fathom Analytics | Cookieless, privacy-focused | ✅ | ✅/conversion analysis | ✅ UTM/referrer | Simple marketing analytics |
Plausible is particularly good if you need funnels + custom-event properties + campaign segmentation while remaining genuinely cookieless. Its funnel system can use custom-event goals, and funnels can be filtered by marketing campaign, referral source, landing page, device, or location.
It doesn't store raw IP addresses or User-Agent strings. Instead, it uses them transiently to create a daily-changing anonymous identifier, with the underlying values discarded.
One important caveat: don't send PII as custom-event properties. Plausible explicitly prohibits things such as email addresses, names, phone numbers, advertising IDs, and pseudonymous cookie IDs.
Simple Analytics goes even further: it says it doesn't collect or store IP addresses, doesn't use cookies, local storage, fingerprinting, visitor IDs, or cross-site tracking.
It supports custom events and multi-step funnels, and it records UTM parameters and referrers for campaign/source reporting.
The trade-off is important: it deliberately doesn't provide user-level attribution or cross-session tracking. Its attribution is aggregate rather than “this particular anonymous person eventually converted.”
The key distinction is that cookieless doesn't necessarily mean identifier-free. Plausible, for example, temporarily derives an anonymous daily identifier to calculate unique visitors, whereas Simple Analytics explicitly avoids generating visitor identifiers and treats events independently.
If your requirement is specifically “funnel users through several events and attribute conversions to UTM campaigns, but never create a persistent identifier for an individual,” Plausible is probably the strongest match.
It doesn't store raw IP addresses or User-Agent strings. Instead, it uses them transiently to create a daily-changing anonymous identifier, with the underlying values discarded.
One important caveat: don't send PII as custom-event properties. Plausible explicitly prohibits things such as email addresses, names, phone numbers, advertising IDs, and pseudonymous cookie IDs.
Simple Analytics goes even further: it says it doesn't collect or store IP addresses, doesn't use cookies, local storage, fingerprinting, visitor IDs, or cross-site tracking.
It supports custom events and multi-step funnels, and it records UTM parameters and referrers for campaign/source reporting.
The trade-off is important: it deliberately doesn't provide user-level attribution or cross-session tracking. Its attribution is aggregate rather than “this particular anonymous person eventually converted.”
Finding a web analytics platform that balances **funnels**, **custom events** , and **campaign (UTM) attribution** *without* using cookies or storing raw personal identifiers (like unhashed IP addresses or persistent cross-site IDs) requires looking at privacy-first, aggregate-oriented product analytics. Traditional…
Finding a web analytics platform that balances funnels, custom events , and campaign (UTM) attribution without using cookies or storing raw personal identifiers (like unhashed IP addresses or persistent cross-site IDs) requires looking at privacy-first, aggregate-oriented product analytics. Traditional enterprise tools force a compromise, but several modern platforms handle this natively.
Comparison of Core Capabilities
| Platform | Cookieless / No Raw PII | Custom Events | Funnel Analysis | Campaign / UTM Attribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swetrix | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Matomo (Cookieless mode) | Yes | Yes | Yes (via plugin) | Yes |
| Seline | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Plausible / Fathom (For context) | Yes | Yes | No / Limited | Basic UTM only |
If you'd like to narrow this down, let me know:
Several privacy-first, cookieless web analytics platforms successfully support **funnels**, **custom events** , and **campaign attribution (UTMs)** without relying on cookies, persistent device fingerprints, or raw personal identifiers (PII).[](https://blog.usermetric.io/cookieless-web-analytics/)…
Several privacy-first, cookieless web analytics platforms successfully support funnels, custom events , and campaign attribution (UTMs) without relying on cookies, persistent device fingerprints, or raw personal identifiers (PII).
Because these tools avoid persistent individual tracking, attribution is handled via anonymous last-click/session-based modeling rather than cross-day user stitching.
If you'd like to narrow this down, let me know:
Yes. If by **“without collecting raw personal identifiers”** you mean no stored email addresses, names, raw IPs, persistent cookie IDs, etc., there are several good options. The important distinction is that **cookieless ≠ necessarily identifier-free**: some platforms use short-lived, hashed signals to distinguish…
Yes. If by “without collecting raw personal identifiers” you mean no stored email addresses, names, raw IPs, persistent cookie IDs, etc., there are several good options. The important distinction is that cookieless ≠ necessarily identifier-free: some platforms use short-lived, hashed signals to distinguish visits.
| Platform | Cookieless | Custom events | Funnels | Campaign/UTM attribution | Raw personal identifiers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plausible | Yes | Yes | Yes* | Yes | No stored IPs / no persistent IDs |
| Matomo | Yes, configurable | Yes | Yes | Yes | Configurable; strongest controls when properly configured |
| Umami | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No cookies; self-hostable |
| Fathom | Yes | Yes | Limited | Yes | No names/emails; uses anonymized/hashed signals |
| Simple Analytics | Yes | Yes | More limited | Yes | Very privacy-maximal |
| Open Analytics | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes, including revenue attribution | Designed around anonymous/cookieless tracking |
*Plausible's funnel capabilities depend on the current plan/features.
1. Plausible — best overall for a conventional marketing website
Plausible is probably the cleanest fit if you want campaign attribution + custom events + funnels without moving toward user-level tracking. It is cookieless and doesn't store IP addresses, instead aggregating visits using privacy-preserving mechanisms. It supports goals/events and UTM campaign reporting.
2. Matomo — best if you need sophisticated analytics
Matomo is the more powerful option. It supports events, conversions, funnels, campaign/referrer tracking, segmentation and ecommerce, while allowing cookieless tracking and extensive anonymization. You can self-host it if keeping analytics data under your control is important.
The catch is that Matomo is more configurable—and therefore easier to configure incorrectly from a privacy perspective.
3. Umami — best open-source/lightweight option
Umami is attractive if you want cookieless analytics, custom events, goals/funnels and campaign data, particularly if you're comfortable self-hosting. It gives you more control over where the analytics data lives than most SaaS products.
4. Fathom — best for simplicity
Fathom Analytics is deliberately aggregate-oriented. It supports custom events/goals and campaign/referral attribution, but it isn't designed for detailed individual visitor journeys or sophisticated multi-touch attribution. Its tracking is cookieless and it doesn't retain names or email addresses.
5. Simple Analytics — best if privacy is the overriding constraint
Simple Analytics goes particularly far on minimizing data collection. It explicitly positions itself as collecting no personal data, while providing events/goals and campaign information. The tradeoff is shallower attribution and funnel analysis.
Open Analytics is worth looking at if your definition of attribution means “which campaign ultimately generated revenue?” rather than merely “where did this visit come from?” Its current positioning combines cookieless analytics, funnels, events and revenue attribution, including connecting revenue back to acquisition sources.
I'd divide the market into three tiers:
If your requirement is specifically “I need funnels + custom events + UTM/source attribution, but I absolutely don't want a persistent user identifier or raw IP address stored,” I'd start with Plausible, Umami, and Simple Analytics, then consider Matomo if you need substantially deeper funnel/ecommerce analysis.
If you tell me whether this is for a marketing site, SaaS product, or ecommerce site, I can narrow this to the 2–3 best choices and compare exactly how each handles IP addresses, visitor IDs, event properties, UTM persistence, and attribution across a funnel.
1. Plausible — best overall for a conventional marketing website
Plausible is probably the cleanest fit if you want campaign attribution + custom events + funnels without moving toward user-level tracking. It is cookieless and doesn't store IP addresses, instead aggregating visits using privacy-preserving mechanisms. It supports goals/events and UTM campaign reporting.
2. Matomo — best if you need sophisticated analytics
Matomo is the more powerful option. It supports events, conversions, funnels, campaign/referrer tracking, segmentation and ecommerce, while allowing cookieless tracking and extensive anonymization. You can self-host it if keeping analytics data under your control is important.
The catch is that Matomo is more configurable—and therefore easier to configure incorrectly from a privacy perspective.
3. Umami — best open-source/lightweight option
Umami is attractive if you want cookieless analytics, custom events, goals/funnels and campaign data, particularly if you're comfortable self-hosting. It gives you more control over where the analytics data lives than most SaaS products.
4. Fathom — best for simplicity
Fathom Analytics is deliberately aggregate-oriented. It supports custom events/goals and campaign/referral attribution, but it isn't designed for detailed individual visitor journeys or sophisticated multi-touch attribution. Its tracking is cookieless and it doesn't retain names or email addresses.
5. Simple Analytics — best if privacy is the overriding constraint
Simple Analytics goes particularly far on minimizing data collection. It explicitly positions itself as collecting no personal data, while providing events/goals and campaign information. The tradeoff is shallower attribution and funnel analysis.
Open Analytics is worth looking at if your definition of attribution means “which campaign ultimately generated revenue?” rather than merely “where did this visit come from?” Its current positioning combines cookieless analytics, funnels, events and revenue attribution, including connecting revenue back to acquisition sources.
I'd divide the market into three tiers: