Data as of Sep 9, 2026 · Based on 52 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 79% of answers
Named in 77% of answers
Named in 42% of answers
Named in 35% of answers
When managing alumni relations and advancement across **multi-campus university systems** , standard single-campus batch scripts often fail due to fragmented database schemas, conflicting ID structures, and decentralized registrar data. The top alumni CRM vendors capable of handling robust Student Information System…
When managing alumni relations and advancement across multi-campus university systems , standard single-campus batch scripts often fail due to fragmented database schemas, conflicting ID structures, and decentralized registrar data.
The top alumni CRM vendors capable of handling robust Student Information System (SIS) integrations and scaled nightly data syncs across complex multi-campus environments include:
Slate Advancement ) have scaled rapidly into multi-campus ecosystems. It handles granular data partitioning, allowing distinct campuses to maintain siloed security views while rolling data up to a unified system-wide advancement office.If you'd like to narrow this down, let me know:
I can help recommend the most seamless architecture for your setup.
If by **alumni CRM** you mean a platform that can ingest constituent/student data from an SIS across a multi-campus institution—and reliably refresh it overnight—I’d shortlist these: Vendor | SIS / CRM integration strength | Nightly / scheduled sync | Multi-campus fit | My take --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
If by alumni CRM you mean a platform that can ingest constituent/student data from an SIS across a multi-campus institution—and reliably refresh it overnight—I’d shortlist these:
| Vendor | SIS / CRM integration strength | Nightly / scheduled sync | Multi-campus fit | My take |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almabase | Strong with Salesforce, Blackbaud CRM/Raiser’s Edge and other advancement systems; API/webhook support | Yes—scheduled/automated sync is supported | Strong | Best fit if alumni engagement + advancement is the priority |
| Ellucian CRM / Advancement ecosystem | Excellent if you're on Banner/Colleague; Ellucian has native SIS/CRM connectors | Yes, with configurable integration workflows | Excellent | Strongest choice when the SIS is Ellucian |
| Anthology / CampusNexus CRM | Deep Anthology Student ↔ CampusNexus integration, including student, enrollment, applicant and campus data | Yes, through its connector architecture | Strong | Particularly compelling for Anthology Student environments |
| Salesforce + higher-ed/alumni solution | Very broad SIS integration options—Banner, Colleague, PeopleSoft, Workday, etc., often through middleware | Yes, including scheduled/batch and API-based sync | Excellent | Best for institutions wanting a highly configurable enterprise architecture |
| Graduway / PeopleGrove / Hivebrite | Generally good CRM/API integrations, but SIS depth varies more by implementation | Usually, via integrations/middleware | Good | Worth evaluating for engagement/community features, but I'd scrutinize the SIS layer |
1. Almabase — probably the first vendor I'd demo for a traditional university advancement/alumni use case. It explicitly supports CRM synchronization and describes keeping constituent data updated across systems. Its Salesforce integration, for example, supports configurable synchronization and daily reporting.
Its advantage is that it isn't trying to replace your institutional SIS/advancement CRM; it sits on top of those systems for alumni engagement, events, giving and communications. Almabase also describes deeper bidirectional integrations with Blackbaud CRM and Raiser’s Edge NXT.
2. Ellucian — if your campuses run Banner or Colleague, this deserves especially close attention. Ellucian's ecosystem is built around integrating its SIS products with other campus applications, and its Marketplace explicitly provides connectors for Banner and Colleague.
For a multi-campus environment, the big question isn't merely "does it integrate with Banner?" but whether it can handle multiple Banner instances/campuses, campus identifiers, deduplication and common constituent IDs without creating separate silos.
3. Anthology/CampusNexus — another particularly strong SIS-native option. Its Connector integrates Anthology Student with CampusNexus CRM and supports operational data such as students, addresses, applicants and enrollments, plus reference data including campuses, programs, enrollment statuses and other institutional attributes.
If your requirement literally means:
SIS → alumni CRM every night, across 5–20 campuses, with automated additions/updates/deletions I'd evaluate the integration architecture, not just the alumni CRM product.
For example, IData offers packaged, automated bidirectional Banner/Colleague connectors for advancement/alumni systems, with validation, error handling, monitoring and support for custom data. IData Inc. That's potentially more important than whether an alumni vendor advertises a generic "SIS integration."
Similarly, Constituo demonstrates an integration layer connecting Ellucian Student/Banner/Colleague to multiple CRMs—including Salesforce and Raiser’s Edge NXT—and describes extracting/loading data between the systems.
I'd require vendors to demonstrate these five things rather than accepting "we have an SIS integration":
My initial shortlist would therefore be Almabase, Ellucian, Anthology/CampusNexus, and Salesforce-based implementations, with the final choice heavily dependent on whether your campuses run Banner, Colleague, PeopleSoft, Workday Student, or a mixture.
If you tell me which SIS(es) you have and roughly how many campuses, I can narrow this to 3–4 vendors and compare their actual integration methods, sync frequency, bidirectionality, APIs/middleware, and multi-campus handling.
2. Ellucian — if your campuses run Banner or Colleague, this deserves especially close attention. Ellucian's ecosystem is built around integrating its SIS products with other campus applications, and its Marketplace explicitly provides connectors for Banner and Colleague.
For a multi-campus environment, the big question isn't merely "does it integrate with Banner?" but whether it can handle multiple Banner instances/campuses, campus identifiers, deduplication and common constituent IDs without creating separate silos.
3. Anthology/CampusNexus — another particularly strong SIS-native option. Its Connector integrates Anthology Student with CampusNexus CRM and supports operational data such as students, addresses, applicants and enrollments, plus reference data including campuses, programs, enrollment statuses and other institutional attributes.
If your requirement literally means:
SIS → alumni CRM every night, across 5–20 campuses, with automated additions/updates/deletions I'd evaluate the integration architecture, not just the alumni CRM product.
For example, IData offers packaged, automated bidirectional Banner/Colleague connectors for advancement/alumni systems, with validation, error handling, monitoring and support for custom data. That's potentially more important than whether an alumni vendor advertises a generic "SIS integration."
Similarly, Constituo demonstrates an integration layer connecting Ellucian Student/Banner/Colleague to multiple CRMs—including Salesforce and Raiser’s Edge NXT—and describes extracting/loading data between the systems.
I'd require vendors to demonstrate these five things rather than accepting "we have an SIS integration":
If your priority is **a true alumni/advancement CRM tied to an SIS, with dependable overnight synchronization across multiple campuses**, I’d shortlist these vendors: Vendor | SIS integration strength | Nightly/batch sync | Multi-campus fit | My take --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
If your priority is a true alumni/advancement CRM tied to an SIS, with dependable overnight synchronization across multiple campuses, I’d shortlist these vendors:
| Vendor | SIS integration strength | Nightly/batch sync | Multi-campus fit | My take |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthology / Encompass | Strong | Strong | Strong | Best fit if you already use Anthology |
| Ellucian / CRM Advise or related CRM stack | Very strong | Strong | Very strong | Especially compelling for Ellucian SIS environments |
| Blackbaud / Raiser’s Edge NXT | Strong, but depends on SIS | Strong via APIs/integration layer | Strong | Excellent advancement ecosystem; SIS integration needs closer validation |
| Salesforce + higher-ed alumni solution | Very strong/customizable | Very strong | Excellent | Best flexibility, but generally more implementation work |
| Gravyty / Graduway | More CRM/engagement-oriented | Strong when paired with an underlying CRM | Strong | Better as an alumni engagement layer than as the SIS system-of-record integration |
Anthology's ecosystem is one of the clearest matches if you're looking for scheduled, automated integration rather than a loose API connection.
Anthology's documentation describes Encompass as an alumni/fundraising/engagement platform used by 800+ higher-ed institutions. Its integrations use web services and scheduled Power Automate flows, with configurable field mappings and separate recurrence schedules.
More importantly, Anthology's CRM/SIS connector supports substantial student data—students, addresses, enrollment, applicants, activities, programs, campuses, enrollment status, etc.—and supports bidirectional synchronization for many objects.
Best when: your campuses use Anthology Student/CampusNexus and you want relatively native integration.
Ellucian is worth serious consideration if your SIS environment is Banner or another Ellucian platform.
Its CRM integration architecture is specifically designed to connect CRM and SIS data, including students, applicants, enrollments, activities, programs and student attributes. It also supports institution-defined business rules/workflows rather than forcing everything into a fixed integration model.
For a multi-campus university system, that's an important distinction: I'd evaluate how the vendor handles campus identifiers, organizational hierarchy, record ownership and deduplication—not merely whether an API exists.
Blackbaud's Raiser’s Edge NXT is probably the most established advancement CRM on this list.
The big advantage is its mature API/integration ecosystem. Blackbaud's SKY API explicitly supports synchronization between Raiser’s Edge NXT and external data sources, including incremental retrieval based on last_modified, and Blackbaud documents using integration platforms such as Workato for more complex synchronization.
Blackbaud also has higher-ed customers integrating Raiser’s Edge NXT with other campus systems; for example, Texas Southern University uses it alongside Financial Edge NXT.
Caveat: I wouldn't assume that "Raiser’s Edge integrates with our SIS" means a turnkey, nightly, multi-campus SIS feed. The exact SIS—Banner, Colleague, Workday Student, PeopleSoft, etc.—and the integration middleware matter a lot.
Salesforce is the most flexible option if you have unusual multi-campus requirements.
You can implement scheduled ETL/API synchronization, establish the SIS as the authoritative source for student data, and maintain alumni/advancement information in Salesforce. The tradeoff is that you're generally buying an architecture and implementation project, rather than a turnkey alumni CRM/SIS connector.
I'd favor this route when you need complex rules such as:
Gravyty's Graduway is worth looking at if your definition of "alumni CRM" includes the engagement/community layer rather than the advancement database itself.
Graduway integrates with Raiser’s Edge NXT and Salesforce, allowing alumni engagement information to flow into the institution's primary CRM.
I'd therefore view it as complementary to an SIS + advancement CRM architecture, rather than my first choice for being the central SIS-integrated alumni database.
If I were issuing an RFP, I'd probably put these at the top:
One important distinction: "supports nightly sync" and "supports multi-campus nightly SIS synchronization" are not the same requirement. For an RFP, I'd explicitly require vendors to demonstrate a nightly feed from each campus SIS instance, incremental updates, deletes/withdrawals, duplicate resolution, cross-campus constituent matching, error/retry handling, and an auditable sync log.
If you tell me which SIS you use (e.g., Banner, PeopleSoft, Workday, Colleague, Anthology Student) and roughly how many campuses, I can narrow this to the 3–4 vendors with the strongest fit and compare their actual integration architectures.
Ellucian is worth serious consideration if your SIS environment is Banner or another Ellucian platform.
Its CRM integration architecture is specifically designed to connect CRM and SIS data, including students, applicants, enrollments, activities, programs and student attributes. It also supports institution-defined business rules/workflows rather than forcing everything into a fixed integration model.
For a multi-campus university system, that's an important distinction: I'd evaluate how the vendor handles campus identifiers, organizational hierarchy, record ownership and deduplication—not merely whether an API exists.
Blackbaud's Raiser’s Edge NXT is probably the most established advancement CRM on this list.
The big advantage is its mature API/integration ecosystem. Blackbaud's SKY API explicitly supports synchronization between Raiser’s Edge NXT and external data sources, including incremental retrieval based on last_modified, and Blackbaud documents using integration platforms such as Workato for more complex synchronization.
Blackbaud also has higher-ed customers integrating Raiser’s Edge NXT with other campus systems; for example, Texas Southern University uses it alongside Financial Edge NXT.
Caveat: I wouldn't assume that "Raiser’s Edge integrates with our SIS" means a turnkey, nightly, multi-campus SIS feed. The exact SIS—Banner, Colleague, Workday Student, PeopleSoft, etc.—and the integration middleware matter a lot.
Salesforce is the most flexible option if you have unusual multi-campus requirements.
You can implement scheduled ETL/API synchronization, establish the SIS as the authoritative source for student data, and maintain alumni/advancement information in Salesforce. The tradeoff is that you're generally buying an architecture and implementation project, rather than a turnkey alumni CRM/SIS connector.
I'd favor this route when you need complex rules such as:
When managing alumni relations and advancement across **multiple campuses** , selecting a CRM that handles complex data architectures, cross-campus constituency mapping, and robust SIS (Student Information System) synchronization is critical. Multi-campus systems typically require native handling of shared alumni,…
When managing alumni relations and advancement across multiple campuses , selecting a CRM that handles complex data architectures, cross-campus constituency mapping, and robust SIS (Student Information System) synchronization is critical. Multi-campus systems typically require native handling of shared alumni, distinct college/unit gift crediting, and scheduled batch or API-driven nightly data pipelines.
Top alumni CRM/advancement vendors handling multi-campus SIS integrations and automated data syncs include:
If you'd like to narrow this down, please let me know:
If by **alumni CRM** you mean a platform that needs to sit alongside a university’s SIS/ERP and keep alumni records refreshed automatically across multiple campuses, I’d shortlist these: Vendor | SIS / system integration strength | Recurring sync | Multi-campus fit | My take --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
If by alumni CRM you mean a platform that needs to sit alongside a university’s SIS/ERP and keep alumni records refreshed automatically across multiple campuses, I’d shortlist these:
| Vendor | SIS / system integration strength | Recurring sync | Multi-campus fit | My take |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almabase | Strong with advancement CRMs; particularly Blackbaud Raiser’s Edge NXT | Strong — documented automatic/two-way syncing | Strong | Best fit if your SIS ultimately feeds an advancement CRM such as Raiser’s Edge |
| Gravyty / Graduway | Strong with Raiser’s Edge NXT and Salesforce | Strong for CRM integrations | Strong | Good alumni-community layer, but native SIS/ERP connectivity needs closer validation |
| ToucanTech | Good data-management/migration capabilities; less publicly documented on direct SIS connectors | Potentially strong, but nightly SIS sync should be confirmed in procurement | Strong | Attractive all-in-one alumni/community CRM, especially for institutions wanting less complexity |
| Salesforce Education Cloud + partner integration | Very strong, with broad SIS/ERP integration possibilities | Strong, depending on integration architecture | Excellent | Best enterprise option when IT can support an integration layer |
| Ellucian ecosystem | Excellent if you're already on Banner/Colleague | Strong | Excellent | Worth evaluating when Ellucian is your SIS/ERP backbone |
almabase.com has unusually explicit documentation around automated data synchronization. Its TrueSync integration with Raiser’s Edge NXT supports two-way synchronization and configurable rules for which data moves between systems.
That makes it particularly compelling if your architecture is:
Campus SIS → advancement/CRM → Almabase → alumni engagement
rather than expecting the alumni platform itself to be the institution's SIS integration hub.
I'd be careful about accepting a vendor's phrase “automated sync” as equivalent to “nightly SIS sync.” Those are different requirements.
For an RFP, I'd explicitly ask vendors to demonstrate:
For comparison, Graduway explicitly documents integrations with Raiser’s Edge NXT and Salesforce and says those integrations keep profiles/data synchronized, but public documentation is less compelling on a native, multi-campus nightly SIS pattern.
Bottom line: If nightly multi-campus SIS synchronization is a hard requirement, I'd put Almabase, Salesforce-based architecture, and an Ellucian-centered solution at the top of the technical evaluation, with Graduway and ToucanTech as strong alumni-engagement alternatives whose SIS-sync specifics I'd require vendors to prove in a demo.
If you tell me which SIS you have (Banner, Colleague, PeopleSoft, Workday, Jenzabar, etc.) and whether you have one or multiple SIS instances, I can narrow this to the 3–5 vendors with the strongest documented fit.
rather than expecting the alumni platform itself to be the institution's SIS integration hub.
When managing alumni data and institutional advancement across **multiple campuses** , standard point-to-point integrations often break down under the weight of disparate registrar rules, decentralized data structures, and heavy transaction volumes. Multi-campus systems require robust API frameworks, clear…
When managing alumni data and institutional advancement across multiple campuses , standard point-to-point integrations often break down under the weight of disparate registrar rules, decentralized data structures, and heavy transaction volumes. Multi-campus systems require robust API frameworks, clear constituent-matching logic, and reliable automated batch or incremental syncs (typically running overnight to avoid daytime performance latency).
The primary alumni CRM and advancement vendors equipped to handle complex, multi-campus SIS integrations (such as Ellucian Banner/Colleague, PeopleSoft, or Jenzabar) include the following:
Key Considerations for Multi-Campus Nightly Syncs
When vetting these vendors for a multi-campus environment, evaluate your setup against three critical operational hurdles:
If you'd like to narrow this down, let me know:
I can provide a more tailored vendor comparison or architectural recommendation.
For a **higher-ed alumni CRM** environment with **strong SIS integrations and reliable nightly syncs across multiple campuses**, the strongest candidates tend to be vendors that already operate in complex, multi-campus university ecosystems (multiple SIS instances, shared services, distributed advancement teams). The…
For a higher-ed alumni CRM environment with strong SIS integrations and reliable nightly syncs across multiple campuses, the strongest candidates tend to be vendors that already operate in complex, multi-campus university ecosystems (multiple SIS instances, shared services, distributed advancement teams). The right choice depends heavily on whether you mean alumni advancement CRM (fundraising/engagement) or a broader constituent CRM that includes admissions, student success, and alumni.
| Vendor | SIS integration strengths | Nightly / batch sync fit | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salesforce (with higher-ed solutions such as Education Cloud or Advancement implementations) | Broad integration ecosystem; often connected to Banner, PeopleSoft, Workday Student, and other SIS platforms through middleware/iPaaS | Strong — typically via scheduled ETL, APIs, or integration platforms | Large universities wanting a flexible constituent platform |
| Blackbaud (Raiser’s Edge NXT / CRM ecosystem) | Mature advancement data model; commonly integrated with SIS and institutional data warehouses | Strong — nightly constituent, enrollment, and giving feeds are common | Advancement-focused alumni offices |
| Technolutions (Slate) | Deep higher-ed integrations, especially with SIS environments such as Banner, Colleague, and PeopleSoft; often used as an institutional CRM hub | Strong — scheduled imports/exports and data feeds are common | Institutions consolidating admissions, student, and alumni engagement workflows |
| Ellucian (CRM Advance / Ellucian ecosystem) | Native alignment with Ellucian SIS products; Ellucian provides CRM/SIS connector capabilities for sharing constituent and student lifecycle data | Strong — supports operational and reference data synchronization patterns | Banner/Colleague institutions wanting vendor-aligned architecture |
| Ruffalo Noel Levitz (RNL) | Strong higher-ed advancement and engagement experience; typically connects through institutional data feeds | Strong for scheduled data exchanges | Alumni engagement and annual giving programs |
| Element451 | Stronger in enrollment/student engagement, but can connect into broader institutional ecosystems | Good where CRM feeds are managed through integration layers | Institutions blending recruitment, student success, and engagement |
Anthology Help constituo.madepossiblecreative.com## Vendors I would shortlist for a multi-campus university
Best when you have:
Typical architecture:
Best when:
Best when:
Best when:
Ellucian’s connector approach is designed specifically to synchronize CRM and SIS data, including operational and reference data.
Ask each vendor to demonstrate a real production integration with your SIS, not just a connector list. Common environments include:
EnlitEDU — LioraAI CentrEdu## Questions to ask vendors before selecting one
For a large public university system or multi-campus private university, I would generally start demos with Salesforce, Blackbaud, Technolutions Slate, and Ellucian, then narrow based on whether advancement or enterprise-wide constituent management is the priority.
When managing alumni relations and advancement across **multiple campuses** , data architecture gets complex quickly. You are dealing with decentralized student records, distinct or consolidated institutional identifiers (IDs), and the need for a unified view of alumni affinity. Top alumni CRM (advancement CRM)…
When managing alumni relations and advancement across multiple campuses , data architecture gets complex quickly. You are dealing with decentralized student records, distinct or consolidated institutional identifiers (IDs), and the need for a unified view of alumni affinity.
Top alumni CRM (advancement CRM) vendors approach robust SIS (Student Information System) integrations and multi-campus nightly data synchronization through distinct platform strengths:
Are you currently running a specific SIS platform (like Banner, PeopleSoft, or Colleague) across your campuses, or are the different campuses running completely different SIS environments?
No sources cited
When managing alumni relations and advancement data across **multiple campuses** , higher-ed institutions generally avoid lightweight, siloed tools in favor of enterprise systems capable of heavy data orchestration. For multi-campus setups requiring robust SIS/ERP integrations (such as Ellucian Banner/Colleague or…
When managing alumni relations and advancement data across multiple campuses , higher-ed institutions generally avoid lightweight, siloed tools in favor of enterprise systems capable of heavy data orchestration.
For multi-campus setups requiring robust SIS/ERP integrations (such as Ellucian Banner/Colleague or PeopleSoft) alongside scheduled batch updates (like nightly ETL syncs), a few major vendors and platform architectures stand out:
To help narrow down the best fit, could you share:
If by **alumni CRM** you mean a platform that can keep alumni/constituent records aligned with one or more campus SIS instances—especially Banner, Colleague, PeopleSoft, Jenzabar, etc.—I’d shortlist these: Vendor/platform | SIS integration strength | Nightly/batch sync fit | Multi-campus fit | Best use case --- | ---…
If by alumni CRM you mean a platform that can keep alumni/constituent records aligned with one or more campus SIS instances—especially Banner, Colleague, PeopleSoft, Jenzabar, etc.—I’d shortlist these:
| Vendor/platform | SIS integration strength | Nightly/batch sync fit | Multi-campus fit | Best use case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellucian CRM / Advancement | Excellent, particularly with Ellucian Banner/Colleague | Strong | Strong | Institutions already standardized on Ellucian |
| Blackbaud Raiser's Edge NXT | Strong, usually through integration middleware/partners | Strong | Strong | Advancement + alumni fundraising |
| Salesforce Education Cloud | Excellent, but implementation-dependent | Excellent via APIs/integration layer | Excellent | Complex multi-campus constituent ecosystem |
| TargetX / Liaison | Strong | Strong | Strong | Institutions wanting Salesforce-based higher-ed CRM |
| EAB Navigate360 | Strong across the student lifecycle | Strong | Strong | Connecting enrollment, student success and advancement |
| Technolutions Slate | Strong, particularly for admissions/student data | Strong | Strong | Institutions where alumni data is part of a broader lifecycle CRM |
EAB's current higher-ed CRM comparison specifically identifies Navigate360, Slate, Salesforce Education Cloud, Element451, Ellucian and TargetX among the major platforms, and notes that integration with existing SIS infrastructure is a key evaluation criterion.
1. Ellucian — probably the first vendor I'd investigate if you run Banner/Colleague. Ellucian's Connector explicitly connects its CRM with the SIS at both operational and reference-data levels, supporting synchronization between the two systems. Anthology Help If your campuses already use the Ellucian ecosystem, this is likely the lowest-friction architecture.
2. Salesforce Education Cloud — strongest for a heterogeneous, multi-campus environment. Salesforce is particularly compelling when campuses have different SISs or you need a central constituent model spanning alumni, donors, students and other stakeholders. The tradeoff is that the quality of the nightly sync depends heavily on the integration architecture and implementation partner rather than being entirely "out of the box."
3. Blackbaud — strongest if advancement/alumni is the center of gravity. Blackbaud's higher-ed offering is explicitly oriented around advancement and alumni engagement, with reporting and dashboards that can span departments and campuses. Blackbaud Its ecosystem is particularly mature for fundraising/advancement, though I'd scrutinize the exact SIS synchronization architecture for each campus rather than assuming native nightly replication.
4. TargetX — worth serious consideration for Banner/Colleague/PeopleSoft/Jenzabar environments. TargetX documents bi-directional integrations with Banner, Colleague, PeopleSoft, PowerCampus, Jenzabar, and even homegrown/mainframe systems. It also supports integration with Axiom for data validation and deduplication. Liaison Liaison That's unusually relevant if your "multiple campuses" don't all have identical SIS environments.
I'd separate "vendor supports SIS integration" from "vendor reliably performs a nightly multi-campus sync." Those aren't necessarily the same thing.
For a multi-campus RFP, I'd require each vendor to demonstrate:
A particularly interesting option is Axiom Elite as the integration layer rather than relying exclusively on the CRM's native connectors. Axiom describes its product as bi-directional integration between an SIS and campus-wide third-party systems, including CRMs, with field-level matching, validation and rules-driven processing. Axiom Higher Ed Axiom Higher Ed That can be valuable when a university has Banner at one campus, PeopleSoft at another, and legacy systems elsewhere.
My practical shortlist: Ellucian if you're predominantly Banner/Colleague; Salesforce Education Cloud if you need the most flexible multi-campus architecture; Blackbaud if advancement/alumni fundraising is dominant; and TargetX if you want a higher-ed-specific Salesforce ecosystem with documented connectivity to several major SISs.
If you tell me which SIS each campus uses (e.g., Banner, Colleague, PeopleSoft, Jenzabar) and roughly how many campuses, I can narrow this to the 3 best fits and compare their actual integration/sync architectures.
3. Blackbaud — strongest if advancement/alumni is the center of gravity. Blackbaud's higher-ed offering is explicitly oriented around advancement and alumni engagement, with reporting and dashboards that can span departments and campuses. Blackbaud Its ecosystem is particularly mature for fundraising/advancement, though I'd scrutinize the exact SIS synchronization architecture for each campus rather than assuming native nightly replication.
4. TargetX — worth serious consideration for Banner/Colleague/PeopleSoft/Jenzabar environments. TargetX documents bi-directional integrations with Banner, Colleague, PeopleSoft, PowerCampus, Jenzabar, and even homegrown/mainframe systems. It also supports integration with Axiom for data validation and deduplication. That's unusually relevant if your "multiple campuses" don't all have identical SIS environments.
I'd separate "vendor supports SIS integration" from "vendor reliably performs a nightly multi-campus sync." Those aren't necessarily the same thing.