Data as of Sep 3, 2026 · Based on 286 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
For your Connected TV (CTV) needs, The Trade Desk and
Viant Technology are frequently recommended for their advanced identity resolution and household-level attribution capabilities. If your focus is primarily on performance marketing and direct conversion measurement,
MNTN and TVScientific are specialized choices. Meanwhile, is the best fit if you wish to leverage first-party purchase data from Fire TV and Prime Video audiences to drive closed-loop reporting.
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 78% of answers
Ideal for scale and precision, it uses Unified ID 2.0 (UID2) to enable cross-device measurement and accurate audience targeting across premium CTV streaming inventory.
Named in 66% of answers
Best for privacy-safe, people-based planning. It features a deterministic household graph to link CTV viewership to physical households, measuring real-world conversion activity.
Named in 55% of answers
The top choice for advertisers in the Amazon ecosystem. It provides unique closed-loop attribution by connecting CTV impressions on Fire TV directly to actual shopper purchase data.
Named in 40% of answers
When looking for a Demand Side Platform (DSP) specializing in Connected TV (CTV) with robust, household-level attribution, a few standout platforms have built their entire architecture around cross-device identity graphs and closed-loop measurement. Because you cannot "click" a TV screen, these platforms map the…
When looking for a Demand Side Platform (DSP) specializing in Connected TV (CTV) with robust, household-level attribution, a few standout platforms have built their entire architecture around cross-device identity graphs and closed-loop measurement. Because you cannot "click" a TV screen, these platforms map the living room screen to personal devices (mobile, desktop, tablet) within the same home.
The top DSP options matching this specific focus include:
To help narrow down which of these fits best, let me know:
Yes. If **household-level attribution** is a hard requirement—not just household targeting—I’d shortlist these: Platform | CTV strength | Household identity | Attribution / measurement | My take --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
Yes. If household-level attribution is a hard requirement—not just household targeting—I’d shortlist these:
| Platform | CTV strength | Household identity | Attribution / measurement | My take |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| viantinc.com | Excellent | Viant Household ID™ | Cross-device, online/offline, ROAS, incrementality, multi-touch | Best overall fit |
| simpli.fi | Excellent, performance-oriented | Household-level targeting | Online + offline conversion, foot traffic, ROAS | Best for performance/local outcomes |
| about.ads.microsoft.com | Broad programmatic CTV | Household attribution via network/IP matching | Cross-device conversion attribution | Strong enterprise option |
| catalina.com | Very strong CTV/TV | 100M+ home addresses via Cadent | Purchase-level, sales lift, incremental ROAS | Best if purchase attribution is paramount |
Viant is probably the closest match to exactly what you're describing. Its DSP explicitly uses Household ID™ for residence-level CTV targeting, cross-device conversion tracking, and reach/frequency management. It also supports matching CTV exposure to actions on other devices and reports online/offline outcomes.
Importantly, Viant isn't merely an attribution vendor bolted onto a DSP—the household identity layer is built into the DSP itself. That makes it particularly interesting if you want to buy CTV inventory and optimize/attribute within the same platform.
Catalina is especially compelling if by "household-level attribution" you mean "show an ad to a household and determine whether that household subsequently purchased."
Catalina says its CTV solution combines 100M+ home addresses, Cadent technology, and its shopper/purchase database to connect CTV exposure with subsequent purchase behavior. It offers sales, units, incrementality, ROAS and multi-touch attribution.
That's a different—and potentially more valuable—proposition than simply using IP/device graphs to infer that a conversion came from the same household.
Simpli.fi is particularly interesting for performance CTV. It explicitly offers household-level targeting and online/offline attribution, including conversions, ROAS and foot-traffic outcomes.
I'd ask every vendor how they define "household." There is a big difference between:
For example, Microsoft's Household Attribution documentation says it matches ads and conversions across devices connected to the same network using IP address. Microsoft Learn Viant, by contrast, describes its Household ID as an identity-resolution layer tied to residences and supporting cross-device conversion tracking.
If you tell me what you're trying to attribute—e.g. website conversions, app installs, store visits, or actual household purchases—I can narrow this to the 2–3 DSPs that are genuinely best suited and compare their CTV inventory, identity methodology, attribution window, and likely pricing/model.
TVision is worth considering as a measurement partner, rather than as the DSP itself. Its technology measures household-level CTV/TV viewing and attention, including whether people are actually in the room and paying attention.
| Platform | CTV focus | Household identity | Household-level attribution | Best use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viant | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | Best overall fit |
| StackAdapt | ★★★★★ | ★★★★ | ★★★★ | Strong general-purpose CTV DSP |
| TVision + DSP | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | Measurement-focused | Independent TV/attention measurement |
One important distinction: if by “household-level attribution” you mean “show an ad on the TV in Household X and then determine whether someone in Household X subsequently purchased,” rather than merely household targeting, Viant is the one I would investigate first. Its HHID is explicitly designed to connect CTV exposure with downstream online/offline outcomes.
If you tell me your advertiser vertical, approximate monthly CTV spend, and whether you need online sales, in-store sales, or both, I can narrow this down to the 3–5 DSPs that are actually appropriate and compare their household matching, attribution methodology, minimum spend, inventory access, and pricing model.
Yes. If **household-level attribution** is a hard requirement—not just household targeting—I’d shortlist these: DSP | CTV focus | Household-level attribution | Best fit --- | --- | --- | ---
Yes. If household-level attribution is a hard requirement—not just household targeting—I’d shortlist these:
| DSP | CTV focus | Household-level attribution | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| viantinc.com | Strong | Yes — Household ID™ | Best overall match |
| simpli.fi | Strong / performance-oriented | Yes | Local/SMB + online/offline conversion attribution |
| mountain.com | CTV-native / performance TV | Yes — Verified Visits™ | Direct-response CTV |
| thetradedesk.com | Very strong | Via identity/measurement partners | Enterprise omnichannel buying |
Viant is probably the closest match to your wording.
Its DSP is explicitly built around Household ID™, which connects devices within a residence and works across CTV, mobile and desktop. More importantly, Viant says it can match residence-level CTV ad exposure to subsequent actions on other devices, including online conversions and offline/store outcomes. It also offers multi-touch attribution and CTV-specific reporting.
MNTN is particularly interesting if you want CTV → website visit → conversion attribution rather than a general-purpose DSP.
Its Verified Visits™ system uses a proprietary identity graph to connect CTV exposure with a subsequent website visit from a device in the same household. MNTN says its graph covers 132M households, and its attribution windows can be customized.
Simpli.fi explicitly offers household-level CTV targeting plus online and offline attribution, including purchases, form fills, site visits, store visits and foot-traffic lift. It also supports address-level targeting and reporting down to ZIP+4 in some use cases.
The important distinction is household-level attribution vs. household-level targeting. I'd ask:
Bottom line: If you want a true DSP with household identity deeply integrated into buying and attribution, I'd start with Viant. If your primary KPI is CTV-driven website conversions/ROAS, evaluate MNTN alongside it. If you're measuring physical-store outcomes, put Simpli.fi high on the list.
If you tell me your industry, monthly CTV spend, geography (U.S./national vs. local), and whether the conversion is online, offline, or both, I can narrow this to the 2–3 vendors I'd actually take demos from.
MNTN is particularly interesting if you want CTV → website visit → conversion attribution rather than a general-purpose DSP.
Its Verified Visits™ system uses a proprietary identity graph to connect CTV exposure with a subsequent website visit from a device in the same household. MNTN says its graph covers 132M households, and its attribution windows can be customized.
Simpli.fi explicitly offers household-level CTV targeting plus online and offline attribution, including purchases, form fills, site visits, store visits and foot-traffic lift. It also supports address-level targeting and reporting down to ZIP+4 in some use cases.
The top demand-side platforms (DSPs) specializing in Connected TV (CTV) with robust **household-level attribution** and targeting include [Roku OneView](https://advertising.roku.com/), [The Trade Desk](https://www.thetradedesk.com/) , and…
The top demand-side platforms (DSPs) specializing in Connected TV (CTV) with robust household-level attribution and targeting include Roku OneView, The Trade Desk , and Viant.
A demand-side platform (DSP) is automated software that lets advertisers buy digital ad and streaming impressions across publishers in real-time auctions. Household-level attribution links exposure on a living room TV screen to downstream actions (like mobile app downloads, web visits, or in-store purchases) made by other devices connected to that same home network.
Top CTV DSPs for Household-Level Attribution
| DSP Platform | Core Attribution / Data Methodology | Inventory Scale / Strengths | Typical Minimum Spend / Entry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roku OneView | Deterministic household graph backed by 80M+ authenticated U.S. households. | Access to ~32% of U.S. open programmatic CTV inventory plus native Roku streaming. | Low-to-mid market accessibility; standard CPMs range $15–$35. |
| The Trade Desk | Unified ID 2.0 (UID2) framework combined with ACR (Automatic Content Recognition) and partner device graphs. | Massive omnichannel premium reach (Disney+, Hulu, Paramount+, etc.). | Enterprise-level; typically requires significant monthly commitments ($5K–$10K+ managed/self-serve minimums). |
| Viant | Household ID-based data architecture tied to offline and digital identity graphs. | Strong focus on green-light data transparency, carbon reduction tracking, and linear-to-CTV attribution. | Mid-to-high tier self-serve or managed service options. |
Key Factors to Evaluate
To help narrow down the ideal platform, could you share:
If your key requirement is **CTV inventory + household-level identity + household-level attribution**, I’d put **Viant** at the top of the shortlist. ### Best fit: Viant Technology [viantinc.com](https://www.viantinc.com/solutions/dsp/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
If your key requirement is CTV inventory + household-level identity + household-level attribution, I’d put Viant at the top of the shortlist.
Viant is unusually well aligned with what you're describing because its DSP has Household ID™ built directly into the platform. It can:
Viant says its Household ID technology currently reaches roughly 115 million U.S. homes and can link devices within a residence.
| Platform | CTV buying | Household identity | Household attribution | My take |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viant | Excellent | Native Household ID | Yes | Best overall fit |
| Tatari | Excellent | Proprietary device graph | Yes | Excellent if performance/TV attribution is the priority |
| Innovid | Strong | 95M+ CTV households | Excellent | Particularly strong measurement/identity layer |
| StackAdapt | Strong | Audience/identity capabilities | Good | Better general-purpose DSP than household-attribution specialist |
| Amazon DSP | Excellent | Amazon identity | Good | Strong if Amazon/Fire TV audience data is valuable |
Tatari is particularly interesting if by "attribution" you mean actual response attribution rather than simply matching impressions to households. Its platform explicitly uses a proprietary device graph and filters communal IP addresses to produce household-level attribution.
Innovid is another strong option, although I would view it more as a CTV identity/measurement and activation ecosystem than a straightforward DSP replacement. Innovid says its identity graph covers more than 95 million CTV households and supports household-level measurement and log-level attribution.
If you're looking for one DSP to actually execute the media buy, I'd start with:
1. Viant — strongest match 2. Tatari — strongest for performance-TV attribution 3. Innovid — strongest if measurement/identity sophistication is paramount
One important distinction I'd make when evaluating vendors: ask whether their "household attribution" means IP-based matching, identity-graph matching, or incrementality/causal measurement. Those are materially different products. Tatari, for example, specifically addresses communal-IP over-attribution, which is a major issue in CTV measurement.
If you tell me what you want to attribute to CTV (website conversions, purchases, app installs, store visits, etc.) and roughly your monthly CTV spend, I can narrow this to the 2–3 DSPs that are actually appropriate and compare minimum spend, self-serve vs. managed, inventory access, identity graph, attribution methodology, and pricing.
The top demand-side platform (DSP) specializing in Connected TV (CTV) inventory with robust, deterministic **household-level identity resolution and attribution** is [Viant](https://www.viantinc.com/insights/blog/viant-dsp-for-ctv/) via its proprietary **Household ID**…
The top demand-side platform (DSP) specializing in Connected TV (CTV) inventory with robust, deterministic household-level identity resolution and attribution is Viant via its proprietary Household ID framework.
Other major programmatic DSPs offering strong CTV capabilities paired with cross-device household attribution include The Trade Desk and StackAdapt.
| Platform | Primary CTV Focus | Household Attribution Mechanism | Best Suited For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viant | Omnichannel DSP with heavy emphasis on CTV & linear convergence | Deterministic Household ID connecting TV view to mobile/desktop actions | Marketers needing cookie-free, closed-loop household attribution |
| The Trade Desk | Premium omnichannel programmatic scale | Unified ID 2.0 (UID2) & identity graph partnerships | Enterprise brands seeking massive premium streaming publisher access |
| StackAdapt | Top-ranked mid-market DSP | Integrated third-party attribution and cross-device graphing | Agencies and mid-market teams seeking ease of use |
If you can share your target audience geography and whether you need first-party CRM data integration , I can help recommend which platform fits your technical stack best.
If you are looking for a Demand Side Platform (DSP) specialized in Connected TV (CTV) that offers robust household-level attribution, several top platforms stand out in the programmatic ecosystem. They utilize deterministic and probabilistic device graphs to tie CTV ad exposures on the living room screen to downstream…
If you are looking for a Demand Side Platform (DSP) specialized in Connected TV (CTV) that offers robust household-level attribution, several top platforms stand out in the programmatic ecosystem. They utilize deterministic and probabilistic device graphs to tie CTV ad exposures on the living room screen to downstream actions (like web visits or purchases) on mobile phones, tablets, or laptops within the same home. [1][2][3]
The leading options that fit your criteria include:
To help narrow down the best fit, tell me:
No sources cited
Yes. If your requirements are **(1) a true DSP, (2) strong CTV/OTT inventory, and (3) household-level attribution rather than merely device-level reporting**, I’d put these at the top of the shortlist: DSP / platform | CTV focus | Household identity | Household-level attribution | My take --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
Yes. If your requirements are (1) a true DSP, (2) strong CTV/OTT inventory, and (3) household-level attribution rather than merely device-level reporting, I’d put these at the top of the shortlist:
| DSP / platform | CTV focus | Household identity | Household-level attribution | My take |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viant Technology | Excellent | Household ID™ | Yes | Best overall fit |
| Adobe Advertising DSP | Excellent | IP/household reporting | Yes | Best if you want sophisticated MTA |
| Google Display & Video 360 | Excellent | Increasingly household-based | Yes / expanding | Best for Google/YouTube ecosystem |
| StackAdapt | Very strong | Cross-device identity | Depends on measurement setup | Strong independent alternative |
Viant is unusually well aligned with what you're describing. Its Household ID™ is built directly into the DSP, allowing it to connect CTV exposure with other devices in the residence. Viant specifically describes matching residence-level CTV exposures to actions on other devices and measuring online/offline outcomes.
It also offers multi-touch attribution, conversion lift, online/offline measurement, and CTV reporting within the same platform.
One particularly useful point: Viant says its Household ID can reach audiences across 115 million homes, and its technology is present in a large share of bid opportunities.
I'd start here if household-level attribution is a core buying requirement.
Adobe has unusually explicit household conversion reporting. Its Household Reach & Frequency reporting measures unique households, and its DSP Household Conversions reporting supports both unique attribution and multi-touch attribution (MTA).
The important distinction is that Adobe can report a household conversion when a household was exposed to CTV anywhere within the defined lookback window, rather than requiring CTV to be the final touch.
I'd favor Adobe if your priority is granular attribution methodology and reporting rather than simply buying lots of CTV.
Google is also moving aggressively toward household-level CTV measurement. Its current CTV roadmap explicitly incorporates household signals, including IP addresses, to improve household audience targeting and outcome measurement.
The caveat is that I'd want to clarify exactly which inventory and conversion paths are covered by household attribution before selecting DV360 specifically for this requirement.
The phrase "household-level attribution" can mean very different things, so I'd put these questions in the RFP:
My ranking for your specific use case: Viant #1, Adobe #2, DV360 #3.
If you tell me your industry, approximate monthly CTV spend, and whether the desired conversion is online purchase, lead, app install, store visit, or something else, I can narrow this to 3–5 DSPs and compare their CTV inventory, household graph, attribution methodology, minimum spend, and pricing model.
It also offers multi-touch attribution, conversion lift, online/offline measurement, and CTV reporting within the same platform.
One particularly useful point: Viant says its Household ID can reach audiences across 115 million homes, and its technology is present in a large share of bid opportunities.
I'd start here if household-level attribution is a core buying requirement.
Adobe has unusually explicit household conversion reporting. Its Household Reach & Frequency reporting measures unique households, and its DSP Household Conversions reporting supports both unique attribution and multi-touch attribution (MTA).
The important distinction is that Adobe can report a household conversion when a household was exposed to CTV anywhere within the defined lookback window, rather than requiring CTV to be the final touch.
I'd favor Adobe if your priority is granular attribution methodology and reporting rather than simply buying lots of CTV.
Google is also moving aggressively toward household-level CTV measurement. Its current CTV roadmap explicitly incorporates household signals, including IP addresses, to improve household audience targeting and outcome measurement.
The caveat is that I'd want to clarify exactly which inventory and conversion paths are covered by household attribution before selecting DV360 specifically for this requirement.
When looking for a Demand-Side Platform (DSP) specializing in Connected TV (CTV) with robust household-level attribution, a few platforms stand out . Because you can't "click" a TV screen, these platforms rely on sophisticated device graphs and IP-to-device mapping to tie a CTV ad exposure to a conversion on a…
When looking for a Demand-Side Platform (DSP) specializing in Connected TV (CTV) with robust household-level attribution, a few platforms stand out . Because you can't "click" a TV screen, these platforms rely on sophisticated device graphs and IP-to-device mapping to tie a CTV ad exposure to a conversion on a secondary device (like a phone, tablet, or laptop) within the same household.
The top platforms tailored to this specific need include:
To help narrow down the ideal platform for your stack, let me know:
If you need a **DSP focused on CTV inventory with household-level attribution**, these are the strongest candidates to evaluate: DSP / Platform | Why it fits | Household-level attribution capability --- | --- | ---
If you need a DSP focused on CTV inventory with household-level attribution, these are the strongest candidates to evaluate:
| DSP / Platform | Why it fits | Household-level attribution capability |
|---|---|---|
| Viant Technology | One of the closest matches to your requirement: a true DSP with CTV buying, household identity resolution, and outcome measurement. | Uses its Household ID™ technology for residence-level targeting, cross-device conversion tracking, reach/frequency management, and CTV outcome measurement. Viant Technology LLC Viant Technology LLC |
| The Trade Desk | Enterprise-grade DSP with broad CTV supply access and strong identity integrations. | Usually paired with identity/measurement partners (for example, clean rooms, retailers, attribution vendors) rather than relying solely on native household attribution. |
| Amazon Ads | Strong choice if your attribution goal involves commerce outcomes. | Amazon can connect CTV exposure with Amazon-owned purchase signals, though household-level measurement depends on the specific product and workflow. |
| StackAdapt | CTV-focused DSP with premium streaming inventory and agency-friendly workflows. | Offers CTV targeting and measurement capabilities; validate the exact household attribution methodology for your use case. StackAdapt |
| Moloco | Performance-oriented CTV option, especially for app growth and conversion optimization. | Uses household-level CTV targeting signals and outcome optimization approaches. Moloco |
For deterministic household-level attribution specifically, I would shortlist:
When evaluating vendors, I would ask:
If you are buying U.S. CTV at scale and household attribution is a hard requirement, Viant is probably the first DSP I would put through an RFP.