I need a custody solution for digital assets that supports staking for proof-of-stake networks.

Anchorage Digital Bank, BitGo, and Fireblocks (integrated with staking providers) are top qualified custody solutions that secure digital assets while enabling native staking participation for proof-of-stake (PoS) networks.

When looking for an enterprise or institutional-grade custody solution that supports proof-of-stake networks, you need platforms that separate key management from the validation process to prevent slashing risks and asset rehypothecation.

• Anchorage Digital Bank : Operates as a federally chartered digital asset bank offering segregated, qualified custody where assets are never pooled or rehypothecated while earning staking rewards through vetted or self-run validators.
• BitGo : Provides regulated qualified cold storage custody combined with institutional governance controls, allowing secure protocol delegation and direct staking from segregated wallets.
• Fireblocks : Utilizes Multi-Party Computation (MPC) technology rather than single private keys, integrating directly with top staking infrastructure partners (like Figment or Kiln) so you can stake major networks directly from your MPC wallet workspace.
• Cobo : Delivers a comprehensive digital asset custody and-wallet platform supporting institutional staking risk-mitigation, multi-layered approvals, and diverse PoS token delegations.

To help narrow down the best option, please tell me:

• Are you looking for an institutional/corporate custodian or an individual self-custody setup?
• Which specific proof-of-stake networks (e.g., Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos) do you plan to stake?

If you’re looking for institutional-grade custody where assets can remain in custody while being staked on proof-of-stake networks, I’d shortlist these four:

My preference

1. Anchorage Digital — probably the cleanest fit if your primary requirement is qualified custody + staking. Its staking product keeps assets in segregated wallets rather than pooling them, and it currently advertises staking across 20+ networks including Ethereum, Solana, Hyperliquid and Avalanche.

2. Coinbase Prime — particularly attractive if you also need trading, financing and institutional execution. Coinbase says staking can be done from segregated Prime Vault wallets, and its current supported staking assets include ETH, SOL, AVAX, ADA, ATOM, DOT, NEAR, SUI and others. Availability varies by the custody entity and jurisdiction.

3. BitGo — a strong choice if you need broad jurisdictional coverage and custody/staking flexibility. BitGo supports staking directly from qualified custody, and its regulated entities include European, Singaporean and MENA operations with staking capabilities.

4. Fireblocks — best if you care about control over the staking architecture and validator selection. Its platform allows staking directly from existing vaults, with policy approvals and multiple institutional staking providers such as Figment, Kiln, Galaxy and others. Fireblocks Trust separately provides qualified custody.

What I would require in an RFP

Don't evaluate these simply on advertised staking APY. I'd require each provider to answer:

• Which exact PoS networks are supported?
• Can assets be staked without leaving qualified/segregated custody?
• Who controls the validator keys?
• Who bears slashing risk, and is there contractual coverage?
• Can you select your own validator or staking provider?
• What are unstaking/withdrawal timelines?
• Are staking rewards automatically compounded?
• How are rewards and principal represented on statements for audit/tax purposes?
• Is custody bankruptcy remote and legally segregated?
• Which legal entity actually provides custody in your jurisdiction?
• Can you maintain separate policies for unstaked vs. staked assets?
• Does the provider support governance, restaking and liquid staking, or only native staking?

One particularly important distinction is that Fireblocks and Figment can provide infrastructure without taking custody, whereas Anchorage, Coinbase Custody and BitGo can provide the actual regulated custody layer. Fireblocks also now has its own qualified-custody offering through Fireblocks Trust.

If you give me the networks you need (e.g. ETH/SOL/ADA/DOT/ATOM), your jurisdiction, approximate AUM, and whether you specifically require qualified custody, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 solutions and compare their custody, staking, slashing, fees, and regulatory setup.

3. BitGo — a strong choice if you need broad jurisdictional coverage and custody/staking flexibility. BitGo supports staking directly from qualified custody, and its regulated entities include European, Singaporean and MENA operations with staking capabilities.

4. Fireblocks — best if you care about control over the staking architecture and validator selection. Its platform allows staking directly from existing vaults, with policy approvals and multiple institutional staking providers such as Figment, Kiln, Galaxy and others. Fireblocks Trust separately provides qualified custody.

What I would require in an RFP

Don't evaluate these simply on advertised staking APY. I'd require each provider to answer:

When looking for a digital asset custody solution that supports proof-of-stake (PoS) networks and staking, your choice will depend heavily on whether you need an institutional-grade qualified custodian or a self-hosted/developer-focused infrastructure approach.

Top options on the market span different operational models:

1. Fireblocks
   • Best fit: Fintechs, funds, and enterprises looking for robust infrastructure.
   • Model: Non-custodial Multi-Party Computation (MPC) technology platform.
   • Staking support: Deep native and third-party staking integrations for major proof-of-stake networks (Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos, etc.) with customizable policy engines and governance workflows.
   • Learn more: Check out enterprise infrastructure details on Fireblocks.
2. Anchorage Digital Bank
   • Best fit: US institutions requiring direct regulatory oversight.
   • Model: Federally chartered crypto-native digital asset bank (OCC-regulated).
   • Staking support: Fully integrated custodial staking allowing clients to earn rewards directly from cold/warm storage without moving assets out of custody control.
   • Learn more: Review institutional offerings at Anchorage Digital.
3. Fidelity Digital Assets
   • Best fit: Traditional financial institutions and corporate treasuries wanting a familiar TradFi brand.
   • Model: Enterprise-grade cold storage and trading platform.
   • Staking support: Offers secure institutional custody alongside tailored digital asset services.
   • Learn more: Explore institutional services at Fidelity Digital Assets.
4. Zodia Custody
   • Best fit: Global institutions prioritizing bank-grade compliance (especially under EU/UK frameworks).
   • Model: Institutional crypto custodian backed by standard financial institutions.
   • Staking support: Offers compliant, risk-managed institutional staking integrated seamlessly into the custody workflow.
   • Learn more: Read more on Zodia Custody.

To help narrow down the ideal provider, tell me:

• Are you looking for an institutional qualified custodian or an MPC/self-managed infrastructure tool?
• Which specific proof-of-stake networks do you plan on staking (e.g., Ethereum, Solana, Polygon)?
• What is your estimated AUM (Assets Under Management)?

If you’re looking for institutional-grade custody plus native Proof-of-Stake staking, I’d shortlist these:

• Anchorage Digital — Particularly strong if regulated custody is the priority. It offers staking from segregated custody, with assets kept in the client’s own segregated wallets rather than pooled, and supports 20+ networks including Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche and others.
• BitGo — Strong combination of qualified custody and managed staking. It supports staking from regulated custody, validator selection, reporting, and institutional controls; BitGo says its staking model can use segregated assets and no pooling for certain products.
• Kraken Custody — Offers regulated custody with segregated, bankruptcy-remote assets and the ability to stake directly from custody. It also provides role-based permissions and policy controls.
• Sygnum — A regulated-bank model where assets remain in custody while participating in PoS networks; staking rewards are credited to the account. Particularly worth considering if you want a banking-oriented custody relationship.
• Ripple Custody — More infrastructure/API-oriented. Its Figment integration supports institutional staking for networks including Ethereum and Solana within the custody workflow.

My starting shortlist

If this is for a fund, family office, treasury, or other institution, I'd start with Anchorage Digital vs. BitGo.

The important diligence point is not simply whether a provider “offers staking.” You should establish whether the exact network you need uses segregated custody, delegated staking, pooled/omnibus staking, or a separate staking wallet, who controls the validator keys, and who bears slashing, validator downtime, smart-contract and counterparty risk. PoS staking can introduce custody risks that ordinary cold storage doesn't have.

If you tell me which networks you need to stake (e.g., ETH, SOL, ATOM, ADA, AVAX) and whether this is for a US institution/fund or an individual, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 solutions and compare custody structure, staking mechanics, fees, insurance, regulatory status, and supported assets.

Yes. If you’re looking for institutional-grade custody plus native proof-of-stake staking, I’d shortlist these four:

My recommendation

If regulated custody is the primary requirement, I'd start with Anchorage Digital and Coinbase Prime.

• Anchorage is particularly compelling if you want a custody-first model: assets remain in segregated custody while staking, and it supports validator selection—including using your own validator.
• Coinbase Prime is attractive if you also want trading, financing, governance and staking integrated into one institutional platform. It currently lists staking support across a broad set of PoS assets.
• Fireblocks is especially interesting if you're building a treasury, fund, exchange, or customer-facing platform and need granular approval policies/API infrastructure rather than simply outsourcing custody.
• BitGo deserves a serious look if staking flexibility, qualified custody, cold storage and validator options are important.

The key issue isn't just whether a provider offers staking. Before selecting one, I'd compare (1) the exact networks you need, (2) whether assets remain in segregated/qualified custody while staked, (3) slashing protection, (4) validator selection, (5) unbonding/withdrawal mechanics, (6) insurance, (7) regulatory status of the actual contracting entity, and (8) fees/reward-sharing.

If you tell me which PoS networks you need (e.g. ETH, SOL, ATOM, ADA, DOT, AVAX) and whether this is for a fund, corporate treasury, exchange, or family office, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 solutions and compare them in detail.

When looking for an institutional-grade or advanced digital asset custody solution that seamlessly integrates Proof-of-Stake (PoS) staking, several industry-leading platforms stand out. They balance cryptographic security (such as MPC or hardware-isolated cold storage) with native on-chain reward generation.

Top solutions equipped with robust custody and integrated staking infrastructures include:

• Coinbase Prime Custody — A leading institutional platform providing integrated cold/warm storage security alongside native staking workflows for major PoS assets (such as ETH, SOL, ADA, and AVAX). It allows you to manage delegations and view granular reward reporting directly inside the Prime UI or via API.
• Fireblocks — Utilizes cutting-edge Multi-Party Computation (MPC) rather than traditional single-signature or rigid multi-sig setups. Fireblocks offers programmatic, policy-driven staking via integrations with top-tier validator infrastructure (like P2P.org), allowing assets to earn yield while remaining protected inside your designated custody vaults.
• Anchorage Digital — Noteworthy as a federally chartered crypto-native digital asset bank (holding an OCC charter in the U.S.). It provides a qualified custody environment where governance, trading, and native protocol staking are natively bound into a single operational framework without shifting custody control.
• BitGo — Renowned for multi-sig wallet governance, institutional policy controls, and segregated custody. BitGo features structured delegation workflows that enable secure direct protocol staking while satisfying rigorous compliance, accounting, and audit criteria.

To help narrow down the ideal platform for your organization, let me know:

• Which specific Proof-of-Stake networks/tokens you plan to stake
• Whether you require a U.S. federally regulated bank charter or operate in an international jurisdiction
• Your preference between MPC (Multi-Party Computation) or hardware-isolated cold storage

Finding a secure digital asset custody solution that seamlessly integrates proof-of-stake (PoS) rewards depends heavily on your specific operational model—whether you need a fully managed qualified custodian, a self-hosted MPC technology stack, or a federally chartered crypto bank.

Top-tier institutional custody providers that feature robust, integrated staking infrastructure include:

• Coinbase Prime Custody : A leading choice for a unified platform combining qualified custodian services, deep trading liquidity, and native institutional staking for major PoS networks.
• Fireblocks : Best if you prefer a self-managed infrastructure using multi-party computation (MPC) technology, offering secure off-exchange and direct protocol staking without moving assets out of your governance workflow.
• Anchorage Digital : A federally chartered digital asset bank providing regulated custody with native governance, institutional participation, and rewards collection for proof-of-stake assets.
• BitGo : Renowned for extensive multi-sig and MPC security frameworks, qualified cold storage, and comprehensive asset coverage alongside built-in staking capabilities.
• Fidelity Digital Assets : The preferred, highly trusted institutional option for traditional financial institutions looking for enterprise-grade security and dedicated digital asset servicing.
• Zodia Custody : A strong internationally-focused institutional custodian providing non-co-mingled, segregated wallets with automated reward tracking tailored specifically for proof-of-stake protocols.

To help narrow down the best fit, let me know:

• Which proof-of-stake networks (e.g., Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos) you need to stake.
• Whether you prefer a fully managed qualified custodian or an MPC self-infrastructure model.
• Your estimated portfolio size or volume.

If you’re looking for institutional-grade custody that also lets you stake Proof-of-Stake (PoS) assets, I’d shortlist these three:

• Anchorage Digital — My strongest choice if regulated U.S. custody + staking is the priority. Anchorage Digital Bank is a federally chartered crypto bank and SEC-qualified custodian, and it supports staking directly from custody. Its asset registry lets you check custody/staking support on a network-by-network basis.
• Coinbase Prime — Best if you want custody + staking + trading/financing in one platform. Coinbase Custody Trust Company is a qualified custodian, and Prime supports staking for networks including Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche, Cardano, Cosmos, Polkadot, Sui, and others. Availability varies by custodial entity and jurisdiction.
• BitGo — Strong option if you want custody flexibility and broad staking infrastructure. BitGo supports staking from regulated qualified custody as well as self-custody, with segregated assets and institutional reporting.

What I'd choose

The important distinction is that “supports staking” isn't enough. For institutional custody, I'd evaluate whether the provider offers segregated custody, qualified-custodian status, validator/delegation controls, slashing protection, withdrawal/unbonding procedures, governance participation, insurance, and clear treatment of staking rewards.

If you tell me which networks you need to stake (e.g. ETH, SOL, ADA, AVAX, DOT, ATOM, SUI) and whether this is for a fund, corporate treasury, ETF, or individual, I can narrow this to the best 1–2 solutions and compare fees, regulatory structure, staking mechanics, and supported networks.

If you need institutional custody plus native proof-of-stake staking, I’d shortlist these:

• Anchorage Digital — Strong choice if regulated/qualified custody is the priority. It keeps staked assets in segregated wallets, supports 20+ networks, and offers validator selection or the ability to run your own validator.
• Fireblocks — Best fit if you want programmable custody/infrastructure and sophisticated staking operations. Staking operates through the same vaults and policy controls used for custody, with multiple validator providers. It currently advertises staking across ETH, SOL, POL and Cosmos ecosystem assets.
• Coinbase Prime — Attractive if you want custody, trading and staking integrated together. Coinbase says staking can occur without removing assets from Vault storage and lists a broad set of supported PoS assets.
• BitGo — Worth considering for institutional custody combined with staking. It supports delegation from qualified custody, segregated/non-pooled staking, and multiple validator arrangements.

My recommendation

If you're a fund, RIA, family office, corporate treasury, or other institution, I'd start with Anchorage Digital vs. Fireblocks:

Fireblocks Trust specifically combines qualified custody with staking and integrates providers such as Figment and Kiln. Fireblocks Anchorage, meanwhile, emphasizes federally regulated custody, segregated wallets, and staking without moving assets out of custody.

The biggest thing I'd evaluate isn't the headline staking APY. For institutional custody, check: legal custody status in your jurisdiction, asset segregation/bankruptcy treatment, whether staking keys remain under the custodian's control, slashing liability, validator selection, unstaking/withdrawal procedures, reward accounting, and exactly which networks/assets you need.

If you tell me (1) the assets/networks you need to stake (e.g. ETH, SOL, ADA, ATOM), (2) approximate AUM, and (3) whether you need qualified custody in the U.S., I can narrow this to the best 2–3 solutions and compare their custody/staking architecture.

When looking for an institutional-grade or advanced custody solution that supports native or secure staking for Proof-of-Stake (PoS) networks, you need a platform that balances cryptographic security (such as Multi-Party Computation or cold storage) with seamless validator participation and compliance.

Top-tier solutions supporting secure asset custody and integrated staking include:

• Coinbase Prime : Ideal if you need a fully regulated US-based qualified custodian with an all-in-one prime brokerage framework. It offers robust native staking capabilities for major PoS networks (like ETH, SOL, ADA) directly out of your custody account with integrated reporting and tax compliance.
• Fireblocks : A premier enterprise MPC (Multi-Party Computation) platform rather than a standalone traditional custodian. Fireblocks lets you self-custody or co-manage keys while plugging directly into institutional staking providers, decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, and validator networks via secure policy engines.
• BitGo : A veteran regulated qualified custodian that provides robust cold storage and hot wallet tech alongside institutional-grade staking. BitGo emphasizes segregated asset structures and compliance-ready reporting for reward tracking and slashing protection.
• Cobo : A comprehensive digital asset custody wallet platform tailored for institutions. It combines MPC and custodial wallets with versatile staking support across a wide breadth of emerging and major PoS tokens.

To help narrow down the ideal provider for your specific setup, could you tell me:

• Are you looking for a fully regulated qualified custodian or a self-managed MPC technology platform?
• Which specific Proof-of-Stake networks do you plan on staking?
• What is your approximate portfolio scale or asset volume?