Data as of Sep 9, 2026 · Based on 350 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Twingate is the best fit if you want a quick, identity-first replacement for VPNs that grants per-resource access and is easy to deploy for small-to-mid teams. For large enterprises, consider
Zscaler or Palo Alto Prisma Access;
Cloudflare suits very fast cloud-native rollouts; choose if identity/SSO/MFA is your primary control layer.
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 79% of answers
Best for small-to-mid organizations that need fast, identity-first per-resource access without VPN tunnels; evidence cites ease of deployment and granular access—may be less tailored for very large enterprise scale.
Named in 51% of answers
Best for large enterprises needing a cloud-native broker for secure access to private apps with strong analytics, SSL inspection and policy enforcement; tradeoff: enterprise complexity and heavier platform scope.
Named in 37% of answers
Named in 33% of answers
The **[Cloudflare One](https://www.cloudflare.com/zero-trust)** platform and **Twingate** are the best solutions for zero-trust network access (ZTNA) without a traditional VPN.[](https://veza.com/blog/best-zero-trust-providers/)…
The Cloudflare One platform and Twingate are the best solutions for zero-trust network access (ZTNA) without a traditional VPN.
Zero-Trust Network Access (ZTNA) replaces legacy VPNs by granting explicit, least-privileged, context-aware access to specific applications rather than trusting the entire underlying network.
| Provider | Best For | Core Advantage | Deployment Style |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cloudflare | Fast edge rollout | Massive global edge network | Client or Clientless |
| Twingate | Simple architecture | No network changes needed | Lightweight Client |
| Zscaler | Enterprise scale | App-to-user microsegmentation | Client-based |
Would you like to explore how to migrate from a legacy VPN to one of these tools, or do you need recommendations based on your current infrastructure (AWS, on-premise, Azure)?
If you mean **enterprise remote access that replaces a traditional VPN**, the best choice depends on your environment. Modern **Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)** solutions grant access to specific applications based on identity, device posture, and context instead of putting a user onto the whole network. [Expert…
If you mean enterprise remote access that replaces a traditional VPN, the best choice depends on your environment. Modern Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) solutions grant access to specific applications based on identity, device posture, and context instead of putting a user onto the whole network.
| Solution | Best for | Strengths |
|---|---|---|
| Zscaler Private Access | Large enterprises | Mature ZTNA, strong app segmentation, global scale, replaces broad VPN access |
| Cloudflare Access | SaaS/web apps, lean IT teams | Fast rollout, browser-based access options, strong developer experience |
| Twingate | SMBs and mid-market | Simple VPN replacement, good user experience, easy deployment |
| Microsoft | Microsoft 365 / Entra ID shops | Identity-first access integrated with Microsoft identity controls |
| Palo Alto Networks | Existing Palo Alto customers | Strong SASE stack, security inspection, enterprise policy control |
| Tailscale | Developers, small teams | Easy deployment, WireGuard-based, identity-driven ACLs |
Expert Insights PeerSpot## My shortlist by scenario
A real ZTNA product should have:
Avoid products that simply create a new always-on tunnel and then give users broad LAN access—that is usually a VPN with different branding rather than true zero trust.
If you tell me your size (e.g., 10 users vs 10,000), cloud stack (AWS/Azure/on-prem), and what you need access to (web apps, SSH, RDP, databases, file shares), I can narrow it to 2–3 choices.
If you mean **secure access to internal apps/resources without putting users on a traditional VPN**, I’d shortlist these: Option | Best for | Why --- | --- | ---
If you mean secure access to internal apps/resources without putting users on a traditional VPN, I’d shortlist these:
| Option | Best for | Why |
|---|---|---|
| cloudflare.com | SMBs, web apps, mixed environments | Excellent identity-aware proxy; policies can use identity and device posture. Cloudflare Docs Cloudflare Docs |
| zscaler.com | Enterprise | Probably the strongest pure VPN replacement: users connect to specific applications, not the corporate network, reducing lateral movement. Zscaler Zscaler Help Center |
| tailscale.com | Small teams / infrastructure / homelabs | Very easy encrypted connectivity with identity-based access controls; simpler operationally than enterprise ZTNA. |
| cloud.google.com | Google-centric enterprises | Strong BeyondCorp/identity-centric architecture, especially if you're already deep into Google Cloud/Workspace. |
For most organizations: Cloudflare Zero Trust. It's particularly attractive when your users primarily need access to HTTP/HTTPS applications, admin panels, internal tools, or SaaS. Cloudflare Access sits in front of the application and evaluates each request against identity/device/policy signals.
For a large enterprise replacing an existing VPN: I'd lean Zscaler Private Access. It is purpose-built around user-to-application segmentation, so an authenticated employee doesn't automatically get network-level access to everything around the target application.
One important distinction: "VPN-less" doesn't necessarily mean "no encrypted tunnel." ZTNA solutions may still establish encrypted connections; what they eliminate is the traditional model of giving a remote device broad network access.
If you tell me what you're trying to access (RDP/SSH, internal web apps, file shares, databases, Kubernetes, etc.) and roughly how many users, I can recommend the best architecture and products for your case.
The **best Zero-Trust Network Access (ZTNA) solutions** to securely connect users to private applications without a traditional VPN are **Zscaler Private Access (ZPA)** for large enterprises, **Cloudflare Access** for fast edge deployment, and **Twingate** for lightweight, developer-friendly setups . These solutions…
The best Zero-Trust Network Access (ZTNA) solutions to securely connect users to private applications without a traditional VPN are Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) for large enterprises, Cloudflare Access for fast edge deployment, and Twingate for lightweight, developer-friendly setups . These solutions replace broad, insecure network-level access with granular, per-session, identity-aware application security.
Top Zero-Trust Access Solutions
| Vendor | Best For | Key Advantage | Deployment Style |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zscaler Private Access | Large Enterprises & SASE | Full cloud-native proxying; completely hides internal apps | Agent or Clientless |
| Cloudflare Access | Rapid Rollout & Web Apps | Massive global edge network; robust free tier for small teams | Clientless option available |
| Twingate | Mid-Market & DevOps | Fast implementation; split tunneling with minimal latency | Lightweight Smart Client |
| Tailscale | Developers & Homelabs | Peer-to-peer overlay network based on WireGuard protocol | Device Agent required |
| NordLayer | SMBs | Affordable, centralized management with plug-and-play setup | Simple App Client |
Why Move Beyond Traditional VPNs
Real-World Perspectives
“Palo Alto's platform is solid if you're already in their ecosystem, and Twingate has been great for quick rollout without touching network architecture. Both handle scaling and user access well.”
“ZTNA focuses on precise app access... Users pass identity checks for each session. That approach sees weird access attempts and blocks them fast. ZTNA also verifies device health, so no outdated systems sneak in.”
To help narrow down the ideal platform, please share:
The **best Zero-Trust Network Access (ZTNA) solutions** to securely connect users to private applications without a traditional VPN are **Zscaler Private Access (ZPA)** for large enterprises, **Cloudflare Access** for fast edge deployment, and **Twingate** for lightweight, developer-friendly setups . These solutions…
The best Zero-Trust Network Access (ZTNA) solutions to securely connect users to private applications without a traditional VPN are Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) for large enterprises, Cloudflare Access for fast edge deployment, and Twingate for lightweight, developer-friendly setups . These solutions replace broad, insecure network-level access with granular, per-session, identity-aware application security.
Top Zero-Trust Access Solutions
| Vendor | Best For | Key Advantage | Deployment Style |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zscaler Private Access | Large Enterprises & SASE | Full cloud-native proxying; completely hides internal apps | Agent or Clientless |
| Cloudflare Access | Rapid Rollout & Web Apps | Massive global edge network; robust free tier for small teams | Clientless option available |
| Twingate | Mid-Market & DevOps | Fast implementation; split tunneling with minimal latency | Lightweight Smart Client |
| Tailscale | Developers & Homelabs | Peer-to-peer overlay network based on WireGuard protocol | Device Agent required |
| NordLayer | SMBs | Affordable, centralized management with plug-and-play setup | Simple App Client |
Why Move Beyond Traditional VPNs
Real-World Perspectives
“Palo Alto's platform is solid if you're already in their ecosystem, and Twingate has been great for quick rollout without touching network architecture. Both handle scaling and user access well.”
“ZTNA focuses on precise app access... Users pass identity checks for each session. That approach sees weird access attempts and blocks them fast. ZTNA also verifies device health, so no outdated systems sneak in.”
To help narrow down the ideal platform, please share:
If you mean **“secure remote access to internal apps/resources without putting users on a traditional VPN,”** I’d shortlist these: Option | Best for | VPN client? | My take --- | --- | --- | ---
If you mean “secure remote access to internal apps/resources without putting users on a traditional VPN,” I’d shortlist these:
| Option | Best for | VPN client? | My take |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cloudflare Access | Web apps, contractors, simple ZTNA | No for browser-based apps | Best overall for most teams |
| Tailscale | Servers, SSH, databases, Kubernetes, mixed infra | Lightweight client usually | Best for engineering/IT |
| Zscaler Private Access | Large enterprises | Client | Best enterprise ZTNA |
| **Microsoft Entra Private Access | Microsoft 365/Entra-heavy organizations | Client | Best if you're already Microsoft-centric |
For a typical 10–500 person organization: Cloudflare Access + Cloudflare Tunnel.
You put an internal app behind an identity-aware proxy. The user authenticates with your IdP, and policy can evaluate identity, group, device posture, MFA, etc. The internal server makes an outbound Tunnel connection, so you don't need to expose inbound ports.
That gives you:
User → Identity/MFA → Access policy → Specific application
rather than:
User → VPN → Corporate network → Everything
Cloudflare's current documentation explicitly supports per-application policies and describes private-app access as a way to replace broad VPN-level access.
If your main requirement is SSH/RDP/databases/Kubernetes/internal infrastructure, I'd seriously consider Tailscale. It provides identity-based access and encrypted connectivity using WireGuard, without requiring a traditional central VPN gateway.
Rule of thumb:
If you tell me your size, cloud/on-prem setup, and what users need to access (web apps, RDP, SSH, file shares, etc.), I can give you a concrete architecture and recommend the cheapest/best option.
For a typical 10–500 person organization: Cloudflare Access + Cloudflare Tunnel.
You put an internal app behind an identity-aware proxy. The user authenticates with your IdP, and policy can evaluate identity, group, device posture, MFA, etc. The internal server makes an outbound Tunnel connection, so you don't need to expose inbound ports.
That gives you:
User → Identity/MFA → Access policy → Specific application
rather than:
User → VPN → Corporate network → Everything
Cloudflare's current documentation explicitly supports per-application policies and describes private-app access as a way to replace broad VPN-level access.
If your main requirement is SSH/RDP/databases/Kubernetes/internal infrastructure, I'd seriously consider Tailscale. It provides identity-based access and encrypted connectivity using WireGuard, without requiring a traditional central VPN gateway.
If you mean **secure access to internal apps without putting users on a VPN**, the category to look at is **ZTNA (Zero Trust Network Access)**. ### My shortlist - **Best overall enterprise: [zscaler.com](https://www.zscaler.com/products-and-solutions/zscaler-private-access?utm_source=chatgpt.com)** — Strong choice for…
If you mean secure access to internal apps without putting users on a VPN, the category to look at is ZTNA (Zero Trust Network Access).
| Situation | Pick |
|---|---|
| Small/medium company, mostly web apps | Cloudflare Access |
| Enterprise, lots of private apps + complex policies | Zscaler ZPA |
| Contractors / unmanaged devices | Cloudflare Access clientless |
| Need SSH/RDP/private network resources | Zscaler ZPA or Cloudflare with appropriate client/agent |
| Want a true VPN replacement | Zscaler ZPA |
The key architectural difference is: VPN → user gets network access; ZTNA → user gets access to a specific application/resource. That substantially reduces lateral movement if an account or endpoint is compromised.
If you tell me your environment (AWS/Azure/on-prem), number of users, and whether you need web apps, SSH, RDP, or database access, I can recommend the best architecture and 2–3 products to compare.
Moving away from legacy VPNs to a true **Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)** model means granting least-privilege, application-specific access rather than dropping a user onto the corporate network. [1][2] The "best" solution depends heavily on your scale, budget, and whether your infrastructure is cloud-native or…
Moving away from legacy VPNs to a true Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) model means granting least-privilege, application-specific access rather than dropping a user onto the corporate network. [1][2]
The "best" solution depends heavily on your scale, budget, and whether your infrastructure is cloud-native or on-premise.
Top Enterprise & Cloud-Scale Solutions
Lightweight & Developer/SMB-Friendly Solutions
To help narrow down the best fit, tell me:
No sources cited
If you mean **“replace a traditional VPN with identity-based, least-privilege access”**, my shortlist for 2026 is: Product | Best for | Why --- | --- | ---
If you mean “replace a traditional VPN with identity-based, least-privilege access”, my shortlist for 2026 is:
| Product | Best for | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Cloudflare Zero Trust / Access | Best overall for most teams | Fast deployment, strong identity/device policies, clientless browser access, and a free tier for small teams. Cloudflare Cloudflare Docs |
| Twingate | SMB / IT teams replacing a VPN | Very straightforward resource-level access without exposing inbound ports. Expert Insights |
| Tailscale | Developers, servers, homelabs | Excellent for SSH, Kubernetes, infrastructure and private networks; very easy to deploy. |
| **Zscaler Private Access | Large enterprise | Mature ZTNA/SSE platform with deep policy, segmentation and enterprise integrations. Expert Insights |
| Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access | Existing Palo Alto shops | Strong choice if you're already standardized on the Palo Alto security ecosystem. Deepak Gupta |
Cloudflare Zero Trust is probably the best starting point if you want “no VPN, but secure access to internal apps.” You can put applications behind identity-aware policies, require MFA/device checks, and grant access to individual applications rather than an entire network. It also supports clientless access for things like web apps, SSH and RDP.
For a small technical team primarily accessing servers, I'd lean Tailscale or Twingate instead.
The important distinction is that ZTNA isn't simply “a better VPN.” Traditional VPNs commonly establish broad network-level connectivity; ZTNA should make a decision for each user/device/resource request and enforce least privilege. CISA and partner agencies specifically recommend moving toward these more granular approaches rather than relying on broad remote-access deployments.
If you tell me your setup (e.g. 10-person company, 500-person enterprise, homelab, AWS/Azure/on-prem, and whether you need SSH/RDP/web apps), I can narrow it to the best 1–2 options and an architecture.
The best VPN-less Zero-Trust Network Access (ZTNA) solutions utilize identity verification, context, and secure edge tunnels to connect users directly to specific applications rather than putting them on an entire local network.[](https://www.fortinet.com/resources/cyberglossary/ztna-vs-vpn)…
The best VPN-less Zero-Trust Network Access (ZTNA) solutions utilize identity verification, context, and secure edge tunnels to connect users directly to specific applications rather than putting them on an entire local network.
Top VPN-Less Zero Trust Solutions
The ideal platform depends heavily on your organization's size, engineering workflow, and existing software ecosystem:
cloudflared ). It provides a generous free tier for up to 50 users.Comparison of Top Alternatives
| Provider | Best For | Architecture Style | Free Tier Available? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cloudflare Access | Web & Hybrid Apps | Reverse Proxy / Edge Network | Yes (up to 50 users) |
| Twingate | Quick, Low-Overhead Setup | Decoupled Smart Routing | Yes (up to 3 users) |
| Zscaler ZPA | Global Enterprises | Cloud-Native Proxy Architecture | No (Custom Enterprise pricing) |
| Tailscale | Devs & Internal IT Teams | Mesh Overlay / Identity-Based | Yes (Generous personal tier) |
Why Move Away From VPNs?
Traditional VPNs grant broad network layer access. If an attacker steals a single employee's credentials, they can compromise the entire corporate network.
Reddit Community Perspectives
IT professionals frequently praise how ZTNA alters security and speed:
“Honestly the best ones depend on how deep you want to go with integration. Palo Alto's platform is solid if you're already in their ecosystem, and Twingate has been great for quick rollout without touching network architecture.”
“ZTNA focuses on precise app access. It uses zero trust for strong security. Users pass identity checks for each session. That approach sees weird access attempts and blocks them fast. ZTNA also verifies device health, so no outdated systems sneak in.”
To find the best option for your deployment, could you let me know: