Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 692 AI responses · Shares cover the last 30 days · See how Parse measures this
Security Orchestration and Response Platforms
Parse
https://parse.gl
Palo Alto Networks maintains its leadership in AI recommendations for security orchestration, primarily through its Cortex XSOAR platform. However, a clear split has emerged: dedicated AIOps platforms like
BigPanda are increasingly favored for network event correlation, while no-code specialists like and challenge established leaders on user-friendliness for SOAR.
| # | Brand | What AI says | Mention rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 39% | ||
| 2 | 31% | ||
| 3 | Growing recommendation for its no-code, flexible automation, especially for smaller teams. | 29% | |
| 4 | 28% | ||
| 5 | Praised for an intuitive, low-code interface simplifying playbook creation for SOC teams. | 28% | |
| 6 | Frequently suggested for NOCs as a comprehensive monitoring tool with event correlation. | 24% | |
| 7 | Emerged as a top recommendation for NOCs, specializing in AI-driven event correlation. | 22% | |
| 8 | Gaining traction as an AI-powered monitoring platform for filtering false alerts. | 22% | |
| 9 | 17% | ||
| 10 | 14% | ||
| 11 | 13% | ||
| 12 | 11% | ||
| 13 | 11% | ||
| 14 | 9% | ||
| 15 | 9% | ||
| 16 | 8% | ||
| 17 | 8% | ||
| 18 | 8% | ||
| 19 | 6% | ||
| 20 | 6% | ||
| 21 | 5% | ||
| 22 | 5% | ||
| 23 | 5% | ||
| 24 | 5% | ||
| 25 | 5% |
Who wins on each AI
The same market, seen by two models.
Sources AI cited
exabeam.com is the page AI reaches for most here, cited in 44% of analyzed answers.
Dropped from rank #3 to #11 as responses increasingly favored specialized AIOps platforms.
Climbed from #7 to #4 in overall rank between Oct 2025 and Mar 2026, praised for its no-code approach.
“A primary SIEM recommendation for event correlation.” → “A comprehensive monitoring tool mentioned alongside specialist AIOps platforms.”
Emerged from no mentions in October 2025 to being a top-cited AIOps platform by March 2026.
Fell from rank #6 to #14 despite its InsightConnect product being cited for ease of use.
| Brand | ChatGPT Search | Google AI Mode | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 53% | 9% | ||
| 16% | 36% | ||
| 42% | 36% | ||
| 42% | 33% | ||
| 27% | 29% |
The two models disagree most about Microsoft Sentinel (ChatGPT #1, Google #19) and Swimlane (ChatGPT #5, Google #17).
Across 692 AI responses, Palo Alto Networks is mentioned most, named in 39% of them, followed by IBM (31%) and Tines (29%).
Parse measures each brand's mention rate — the share of answers naming it — across 692 AI responses to this market's buyer questions over the last 30 days. Answers are collected daily and the ranking is re-measured on the same 30-day window.
Brands enter the ranking when AI answers mention them. Parse collects answers daily and publishes the re-measured set weekly, so new brands appear as AI starts recommending them.
AI responses have shifted from recommending general-purpose SIEMs like IBM QRadar to prioritizing dedicated AIOps platforms for NOC event correlation. Since late 2025, both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews consistently frame
BigPanda,
Moogsoft, and
as the best choices for reducing alert noise with machine learning.
AI responses have shifted from recommending general-purpose SIEMs like IBM QRadar to prioritizing dedicated AIOps platforms for NOC event correlation. Since late 2025, both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews consistently frame
BigPanda,
Moogsoft, and as the best choices for reducing alert noise with machine learning.
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR consistently leads recommendations for its visual playbook editor, but its dominance is being challenged by platforms focused on ease of use. Throughout the analysis window, tools emphasizing simpler workflows, such as ('no-code') and ('low-code'), have gained significant traction as more user-friendly alternatives, especially on ChatGPT.
Brands mentioned
Brands mentioned
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR consistently leads recommendations for its visual playbook editor, but its dominance is being challenged by platforms focused on ease of use. Throughout the analysis window, tools emphasizing simpler workflows, such as
Tines ('no-code') and
Swimlane ('low-code'), have gained significant traction as more user-friendly alternatives, especially on ChatGPT.