Data as of Sep 19, 2026 · Based on 285 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Retrofitting cement plants for carbon capture is a specialized field involving several prominent providers. Companies like Carbon Clean and
SLB Capturi offer modular capture systems designed for easier integration. Others, such as
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, , and Chart Industries, supply large-scale capture and recovery processes. Additionally, engineering firms like Kiewit, Worley, and Ramboll support the technical execution, design, and deployment of these systems.
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 75% of answers
Best for facility retrofits requiring space-saving, modular capture technology. Their CycloneCC systems are specifically designed for easier deployment at existing industrial sites like cement plants.
Named in 51% of answers
Named in 50% of answers
Named in 38% of answers
Several companies provide—or are developing—carbon-capture systems specifically suited to **retrofitting existing cement plants**. The main approaches differ substantially: Provider | Technology | Retrofit suitability | Cement examples/status --- | --- | --- | ---
Several companies provide—or are developing—carbon-capture systems specifically suited to retrofitting existing cement plants. The main approaches differ substantially:
| Provider | Technology | Retrofit suitability | Cement examples/status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calix / LEILAC | Direct separation via indirectly heated calciner | Very high — modular replacement/addition around the calciner | LEILAC-1 at Heidelberg Materials' Lixhe plant; LEILAC-2 is designed as a larger retrofit module at Ennigerloh, Germany Heidelberg Materials Leilac |
| thyssenkrupp Polysius / thyssenkrupp Uhde / Calvion | Amine post-combustion capture and Pure Oxyfuel | High, particularly amine systems for existing plants | Working with Holcim and TU Berlin on an amine system designed to retrofit existing cement plants; Pure Oxyfuel is being demonstrated at industrial scale Thyssenkrupp Thyssenkrupp Polysius |
| Heidelberg Materials + technology partners | Amine capture, oxyfuel, direct separation | High, depending on process | Brevik CCS in Norway is already operating at industrial scale and was integrated into an operating cement plant without stopping production Heidelberg Materials Heidelberg Materials |
| Svante | Solid-sorbent post-combustion capture | Potentially high | Modular adsorption technology aimed at industrial point sources, including cement; typically installed downstream of the existing process |
| Carbon Clean | Modular amine-based post-combustion capture | High | Compact modular systems intended for industrial facilities, including hard-to-abate sectors such as cement |
| Aker Solutions | Amine-based post-combustion capture / CCS engineering | High | Provides capture technology and engineering for industrial CO₂ sources, with cement among potential applications |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) | Advanced amine solvent capture | High | Its post-combustion capture technology can be applied to existing flue-gas systems, although cement integration is project-specific |
If your question is specifically "Who can add carbon capture to an existing cement plant without fundamentally rebuilding the kiln?", I'd pay particular attention to LEILAC/Calix and post-combustion amine systems.
LEILAC is unusual because it doesn't capture CO₂ by treating a large volume of dilute kiln exhaust. Its indirectly heated calciner separates the CO₂ released during limestone calcination, producing a relatively pure CO₂ stream. Calix explicitly describes the system as modular and designed for retrofit into operating cement and lime plants with minimal downtime.
Amine capture, by contrast, is installed downstream of the existing process and separates CO₂ from flue gas. This makes it conceptually attractive for a conventional cement plant where retaining the existing kiln/calciner is important. thyssenkrupp's current work with Holcim and TU Berlin is specifically investigating an amine system that can be retrofitted to an existing cement plant without major changes to production.
There is also now real operating evidence rather than just pilot testing: Heidelberg Materials' Brevik plant in Norway has an industrial-scale capture facility integrated into the existing cement plant and captures about 400,000 tonnes of CO₂/year.
If you're evaluating this for an actual plant, I can also give you a vendor-by-vendor comparison of capture rate, energy penalty, estimated $/tonne CO₂, retrofit complexity, technology maturity (TRL), and typical cement-plant configuration.
Calvion
Retrofitting cement plants with carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is a major focus for clean-tech providers and engineering firms working alongside heavy building material manufacturers. Because cement production creates both combustion and unavoidable process emissions (from the calcination of…
Retrofitting cement plants with carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is a major focus for clean-tech providers and engineering firms working alongside heavy building material manufacturers. Because cement production creates both combustion and unavoidable process emissions (from the calcination of limestone), specialized capture approaches are required.
Key providers and technology developers supplying or piloting carbon capture solutions for cement plant retrofits include:
CapsolEoP ) designed for heavy industries like cement, featuring strong heat recovery integration tailored to large point sources.Major cement producers—such as Heidelberg Materials (with industrial-scale projects like Brevik in Norway) and CEMEX —frequently partner with these specialized tech providers and secure government grants to validate retrofits on live kilns.
Are you looking into solutions for a specific geographic region , or do you need details on a particular capture method (like cryogenic vs. amine-based solvents)?
Yes. There are several companies developing **carbon-capture systems specifically suited to retrofitting existing cement plants**. The leading options differ substantially in how they capture CO₂. Provider | Technology | Retrofit fit | Example --- | --- | --- | ---
Yes. There are several companies developing carbon-capture systems specifically suited to retrofitting existing cement plants. The leading options differ substantially in how they capture CO₂.
| Provider | Technology | Retrofit fit | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leilac | Direct separation / indirectly heated calciner | Very strong | LEILAC-2 at Heidelberg Materials' Ennigerloh plant |
| SLB Capturi | Amine-based post-combustion capture | Strong | Brevik CCS, Norway |
| Calix | Direct separation / electric or indirectly heated calcination | Strong | Technology underlying LEILAC |
| Svante | Solid-sorbent post-combustion capture | Potentially strong | Modular capture systems for industrial flue gas |
| Aker Carbon Capture | Amine-based post-combustion capture | Strong | Modular/containerized capture systems |
| Carbon Clean | Solvent-based post-combustion capture | Strong | Compact modular capture technology |
1. Leilac / Calix — direct separation
This is arguably the most interesting technology if you're specifically looking at retrofitting a conventional cement plant. Instead of capturing CO₂ from a dilute kiln exhaust stream, Leilac modifies the calcination step so that the CO₂ released from limestone is separated as a relatively pure stream.
Leilac explicitly describes its system as modular and designed for retrofit integration into existing cement plants with minimal disruption. Its LEILAC-2 demonstration is designed for approximately 100,000 tonnes of CO₂/year.
2. SLB Capturi — conventional post-combustion capture
This approach leaves the cement kiln largely intact and installs a capture plant downstream of the kiln. The technology uses an amine solvent to remove CO₂ from the flue gas.
The best real-world reference is Brevik CCS in Norway, developed by SLB Capturi with Heidelberg Materials. It is designed to capture approximately 400,000 tonnes of CO₂/year, roughly half of the cement plant's emissions.
This is particularly relevant if you want a solution that can be added to an existing kiln without replacing the calciner.
Svante uses structured solid sorbents and is pursuing applications in cement and other hard-to-abate industries. Its modular approach is attractive where space and retrofit complexity are important.
Aker Carbon Capture and Carbon Clean are also relevant for conventional post-combustion capture. Their basic proposition is similar: retain the existing cement-production process and add a CO₂ separation system to the exhaust-gas train.
One important distinction is that "retrofit" can mean two very different things:
For a brownfield cement plant, I'd put Leilac/Calix and SLB Capturi at the top of the initial technology-screening list, because they have particularly relevant cement-specific demonstration projects. Heidelberg Materials itself says it is evaluating multiple approaches, including amine post-combustion, oxyfuel and direct separation.
If you tell me the approximate size of the cement plant (e.g. 1 Mt/yr clinker), country, and whether you want 90%, 50%, or maximum CO₂ capture, I can narrow this to the 3–5 vendors most likely to be commercially suitable and compare CAPEX, energy penalty, capture rate, retrofit complexity, and technology maturity.
Leilac explicitly describes its system as modular and designed for retrofit integration into existing cement plants with minimal disruption. Its LEILAC-2 demonstration is designed for approximately 100,000 tonnes of CO₂/year.
2. SLB Capturi — conventional post-combustion capture
This approach leaves the cement kiln largely intact and installs a capture plant downstream of the kiln. The technology uses an amine solvent to remove CO₂ from the flue gas.
The best real-world reference is Brevik CCS in Norway, developed by SLB Capturi with Heidelberg Materials. It is designed to capture approximately 400,000 tonnes of CO₂/year, roughly half of the cement plant's emissions.
This is particularly relevant if you want a solution that can be added to an existing kiln without replacing the calciner.
Svante uses structured solid sorbents and is pursuing applications in cement and other hard-to-abate industries. Its modular approach is attractive where space and retrofit complexity are important.
Retrofitting existing cement plants with carbon capture is a major focus for industrial decarbonization, primarily because cement manufacturing creates both *combustion emissions* (from burning fuel to heat the kiln) and unavoidable *process emissions* (from the chemical breakdown of…
Retrofitting existing cement plants with carbon capture is a major focus for industrial decarbonization, primarily because cement manufacturing creates both combustion emissions (from burning fuel to heat the kiln) and unavoidable process emissions (from the chemical breakdown of limestone).
Several key technology providers and engineering firms specialize in carbon capture solutions tailored or adaptable for cement plant retrofits:
Are you looking into a specific region or plant size , or trying to compare amine scrubbing vs. direct separation/calcination methods for a project?
Several companies provide **carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies that can be retrofitted onto existing cement plants**. The right supplier depends on the plant configuration, CO₂ source (kiln exhaust vs. calciner), desired capture rate, and whether the project includes transport and storage.…
Several companies provide carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies that can be retrofitted onto existing cement plants. The right supplier depends on the plant configuration, CO₂ source (kiln exhaust vs. calciner), desired capture rate, and whether the project includes transport and storage. Key providers include:
| Provider | Technology approach | Cement retrofit examples / notes |
|---|---|---|
| Aker Carbon Capture | Amine-based post-combustion capture (modular capture plants such as Just Catch™ and larger custom systems) | Used for cement applications including the Heidelberg Materials Sement Norge AS project, one of the first large-scale cement CCS installations. DOI Brevik CSS |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries | Solvent-based post-combustion capture (KM CDR Process™) | Selected for a FEED study for a retrofit capture facility at Heidelberg Materials’ Mitchell Cement Plant in Indiana, targeting about 2 million tonnes/year of CO₂ capture. netl.doe.gov |
| Air Liquide | Cryogenic and purification-based CO₂ capture solutions | Involved in cement CCUS projects, including technology work around capture and CO₂ purification. The Department of Energy's Energy.gov Holcim |
| Svante | Solid sorbent-based rotary contactor systems | Has been evaluated for cement plant retrofit applications, including DOE-supported projects. The Department of Energy's Energy.gov |
| Membrane Technology and Research (MTR) | Membrane-based CO₂ separation | Studied for retrofit capture at cement facilities such as CEMEX Balcones in DOE-supported work. The Department of Energy's Energy.gov |
| Leilac | Indirectly heated calcination that separates process CO₂ | Designed specifically for cement/lime plants and intended for retrofit integration with existing facilities. Leilac |
| Sustainable Energy Solutions | Cryogenic Carbon Capture™ | Demonstration work with cement partners, including an engineering-scale project at Eagle Materials’ Central Plains Cement Plant. netl.doe.gov |
| Cool Planet Technologies | Membrane-based capture | Developing retrofit capture solutions, including a project with Holcim at the Höver cement works in Germany. Cool Planet Technologies |
Many large cement companies are partnering with technology vendors rather than buying a standalone system. Examples include:
For a brownfield cement plant retrofit today, the most commercially mature suppliers are generally considered to be Aker Carbon Capture, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Air Liquide, and Linde, while Svante, MTR, Leilac, and SES represent important emerging approaches.
Retrofitting existing cement plants with carbon capture is a major focus for industrial decarbonization, as a significant portion of cement emissions come from the chemical limestone calcination process itself, rather than just fuel combustion. Several key technology providers and engineering firms specialize in…
Retrofitting existing cement plants with carbon capture is a major focus for industrial decarbonization, as a significant portion of cement emissions come from the chemical limestone calcination process itself, rather than just fuel combustion.
Several key technology providers and engineering firms specialize in carbon capture solutions tailored or piloted for cement plant retrofits:
If you're looking into a specific project, let me know:
I can narrow down which provider fits those exact specifications.
**Several prominent engineering and clean-tech companies provide carbon capture technologies specifically designed or adapted for retrofitting existing cement plants** **.** Because about 60% of cement emissions come directly from the chemical process of limestone calcination rather than fuel combustion, retrofitting…
Several prominent engineering and clean-tech companies provide carbon capture technologies specifically designed or adapted for retrofitting existing cement plants . Because about 60% of cement emissions come directly from the chemical process of limestone calcination rather than fuel combustion, retrofitting requires specialized post-combustion or direct separation approaches.
Top Technology Providers for Cement Retrofits
If you are looking at a specific plant or region, let me know where the facility is located and I can provide details on local funding, scale, or optimal technology pairings.
Yes. There is now a meaningful group of companies that can provide—or are commercializing—carbon-capture systems suitable for **retrofitting existing cement plants**. The main options differ substantially in how much of the kiln system they require you to modify. Provider | Technology | Retrofit fit | Status /…
Yes. There is now a meaningful group of companies that can provide—or are commercializing—carbon-capture systems suitable for retrofitting existing cement plants. The main options differ substantially in how much of the kiln system they require you to modify.
| Provider | Technology | Retrofit fit | Status / relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aker Carbon Capture | Amine post-combustion capture | High | Modular capture systems; amine capture is among the most mature retrofit approaches |
| Calix | Direct separation / LEILAC | Medium–High | Captures process CO₂ directly during limestone calcination; demonstrated specifically in cement |
| Linde | Oxyfuel and CO₂ processing; HISORP CC | Medium | Offers technologies and engineering for cement decarbonization; oxyfuel retrofits are more complex |
| thyssenkrupp Polysius | Pure oxyfuel | Medium | Developing cement-specific oxyfuel technology; 2026 demonstration facility is operating in Germany |
| Air Liquide | Cryogenic/industrial-gas and carbon-capture technologies | High–Medium | Testing capture technology at Holcim's cement CaptureLab |
| Svante | Solid-sorbent post-combustion capture | High | Modular solid-sorbent approach potentially suited to existing flue-gas systems |
| Carbon Clean | Modular amine capture | High | Compact post-combustion systems aimed at industrial retrofit applications |
The important distinction is post-combustion vs. kiln-integrated capture.
1. Amine/post-combustion capture — easiest retrofit
The capture unit is installed downstream of the kiln/preheater exhaust. You generally don't have to replace the kiln itself, although you need space, electricity/steam, flue-gas conditioning and CO₂ compression.
This is why companies such as Aker Carbon Capture, Carbon Clean and others are particularly interesting for brownfield cement plants. Research comparing retrofit options finds significant retrofit advantages for post-combustion systems.
2. Calix LEILAC/direct separation — potentially very attractive for cement
Calix's technology is different: instead of treating dilute kiln exhaust, it isolates the CO₂ released from limestone during calcination. Heidelberg Materials is scaling the technology at its Ennigerloh cement plant in Germany.
3. Oxyfuel — high capture potential, but a larger kiln modification
Oxygen replaces air in the combustion process, producing a much more CO₂-rich exhaust. thyssenkrupp Polysius is developing a cement-specific Pure Oxyfuel system. A demonstration facility at Heidelberg Materials' Mergelstetten plant was officially inaugurated in July 2026.
If you're evaluating this for an actual existing cement plant, I'd initially divide the market into:
For context, Heidelberg Materials says it is currently working with amine-based post-combustion, oxyfuel and direct-separation approaches, while Holcim's 2026 CaptureLab is specifically designed to allow different capture technology providers to test systems on real cement-plant flue gas.
If you're looking for vendors that can actually bid on a retrofit project today, rather than R&D-stage technologies, I can give you a shortlist of ~10 companies with technology, TRL/commercial status, typical capture rate, energy penalty, retrofit requirements, reference cement plants, and contact/website.
The capture unit is installed downstream of the kiln/preheater exhaust. You generally don't have to replace the kiln itself, although you need space, electricity/steam, flue-gas conditioning and CO₂ compression.
This is why companies such as Aker Carbon Capture, Carbon Clean and others are particularly interesting for brownfield cement plants. Research comparing retrofit options finds significant retrofit advantages for post-combustion systems.
2. Calix LEILAC/direct separation — potentially very attractive for cement
Calix's technology is different: instead of treating dilute kiln exhaust, it isolates the CO₂ released from limestone during calcination. Heidelberg Materials is scaling the technology at its Ennigerloh cement plant in Germany.
3. Oxyfuel — high capture potential, but a larger kiln modification
Oxygen replaces air in the combustion process, producing a much more CO₂-rich exhaust. thyssenkrupp Polysius is developing a cement-specific Pure Oxyfuel system. A demonstration facility at Heidelberg Materials' Mergelstetten plant was officially inaugurated in July 2026.
If you're evaluating this for an actual existing cement plant, I'd initially divide the market into:
Retrofitting cement plants—a notoriously hard-to-abate sector due to process emissions from limestone calcination alongside fuel combustion—involves several specialized engineering firms, technology developers, and industrial gas…
Retrofitting cement plants—a notoriously hard-to-abate sector due to process emissions from limestone calcination alongside fuel combustion—involves several specialized engineering firms, technology developers, and industrial gas providers.
Key technology providers and equipment vendors offering solutions tailored or piloted for cement plant retrofits include:
If you're looking into a specific project, let me know:
Carbon capture retrofits for cement plants are being developed and supplied by a mix of **specialist carbon-capture companies, engineering firms, and cement-equipment suppliers**. The main approaches are **post-combustion capture (amine solvents, membranes, adsorption), oxy-fuel capture, calcium looping, and…
Carbon capture retrofits for cement plants are being developed and supplied by a mix of specialist carbon-capture companies, engineering firms, and cement-equipment suppliers. The main approaches are post-combustion capture (amine solvents, membranes, adsorption), oxy-fuel capture, calcium looping, and direct/indirect calcination capture.
Key technology providers include:
| Provider | Technology approach | Retrofit relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Aker Carbon Capture | Amine-based post-combustion CO₂ capture (modular systems such as Just Catch™) | Designed for industrial emitters including cement; can be installed downstream of existing kilns. DOI |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries | Advanced KM CDR Process™ (amine-based capture) | Selected for cement retrofit projects, including Heidelberg Materials’ Padeswood cement plant in the UK. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. |
| Carbon Clean | Modular amine-based capture (CycloneCC) | Intended for retrofit applications with compact capture equipment. DOI |
| Leilac | Indirectly heated calcination that separates process CO₂ | Specifically designed as a retrofit pathway for cement and lime plants. Leilac Leilac |
| Cool Planet Technologies | Membrane-based CO₂ separation | Developing retrofit membrane capture solutions, including cement plant demonstrations. Cool Planet Technologies |
| CURA Climate | Upstream process modification to capture limestone-derived CO₂ | Aims to retrofit existing cement facilities by addressing process emissions before the kiln system. CURA Climate |
| thyssenkrupp Polysius | Cement plant engineering and carbon-capture integration (including oxy-fuel concepts) | Supplies cement process equipment and integration expertise; involved in cement CCS development programmes. SINTEF |
| Air Liquide | Industrial gas and capture technologies | Participates in cement-sector carbon capture demonstrations. Holcim |
Other important participants:
For an existing cement plant retrofit, the most commercially mature options today are generally:
If you mean suppliers suitable for a specific cement plant (e.g., UK/EU, India, US, or a particular kiln size), the shortlist changes significantly because availability depends on project scale, CO₂ storage access, and local engineering partners.