Data as of Sep 18, 2026 · Based on 28 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 54% of answers
Named in 50% of answers
Named in 39% of answers
Named in 39% of answers
If by **“fully customize”** you mean *your own checkout page/layout and branding, while the gateway-hosted fields or client-side encryption keep raw card data off your servers*, there are several strong options. Provider | Custom checkout UI | Card data off your server | PCI burden | Notes --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
If by “fully customize” you mean your own checkout page/layout and branding, while the gateway-hosted fields or client-side encryption keep raw card data off your servers, there are several strong options.
| Provider | Custom checkout UI | Card data off your server | PCI burden | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braintree | Very high via Hosted Fields | Yes — card fields are hosted in iframes | Typically SAQ A | Particularly straightforward if you want complete control over HTML/CSS/UX. PayPal Developer PayPal Developer |
| Adyen | Very high via Components / custom card integration | Yes — Components or client-side encrypted card data | Requires PCI assessment/SAQ; exact scope depends on integration | Good fit for sophisticated global payment flows. Adyen explicitly supports building your own UI with client-side encryption. Adyen Docs Adyen Docs |
| Nuvei | Very high via Web SDK / Nuvei Fields | Yes — Nuvei-hosted fields collect the sensitive data | SAQ A with Nuvei Fields | Explicitly designed for merchants wanting their own UX while Nuvei handles PCI. Nuvei Documentation Nuvei Documentation |
| Checkout.com | High via Flow/Web Components; API offers deeper control | Payment interfaces handle card-data collection | Reduces PCI exposure | Flow lets you customize fonts, colors, borders, prompts and the payment experience while maintaining compliance features. Checkout.com Checkout.com |
| Checkout.com Hosted Payment Page | Moderate | Yes | PCI handled by Checkout.com | More branded/hosted than truly bespoke, but useful if minimizing compliance/development work is the priority. Checkout.com |
For your requirement, I'd specifically look for hosted fields / secure iframe fields / client-side encryption, rather than simply a “white-label hosted checkout.”
The ideal architecture looks roughly like:
Your checkout UI
│
├── Your CSS/layout/buttons/UX
│
└── Gateway-hosted card fields
│
▼
Payment provider
│
▼
Token / nonce
│
▼
Your backend
Your application receives a token/nonce rather than the PAN/CVV, so your backend doesn't have to handle raw card numbers. Braintree is especially explicit about this model: its Hosted Fields render sensitive inputs in iframes, send the data directly to Braintree, and return a one-time payment-method nonce.
One important caveat: “offloading PCI” doesn't mean your company has zero PCI obligations. The exact SAQ and responsibilities depend on how the integration is implemented. For example, Adyen states that its own custom card integration still requires a PCI assessment and SAQ A, while Nuvei documents SAQ A for its hosted-field approaches.
If you tell me your country/regions, expected monthly volume, payment methods (cards only vs. Apple Pay/Google Pay/ACH/etc.), and whether this is SaaS/marketplace/e-commerce, I can narrow this to the providers whose white-label model and PCI architecture best fit.
Your checkout UI
│
├── Your CSS/layout/buttons/UX
│
└── Gateway-hosted card fields
│
▼
Payment provider
│
▼
Token / nonce
│
▼
Your backend
Your application receives a token/nonce rather than the PAN/CVV, so your backend doesn't have to handle raw card numbers. Braintree is especially explicit about this model: its Hosted Fields render sensitive inputs in iframes, send the data directly to Braintree, and return a one-time payment-method nonce.
To fully customize the checkout UI while completely offloading the security burden of sensitive cardholder data (PCI DSS scope reduction), you need providers that support **Hosted Fields** (secure, isolated iFrames injected into your own input elements) or **fully brandable Hosted Payment Pages (HPF)** with custom CSS…
To fully customize the checkout UI while completely offloading the security burden of sensitive cardholder data (PCI DSS scope reduction), you need providers that support Hosted Fields (secure, isolated iFrames injected into your own input elements) or fully brandable Hosted Payment Pages (HPF) with custom CSS injection.
The industry standard white-label and developer-first gateway providers that achieve this balance are outlined below:
To help narrow down the ideal provider, could you share:
To fully customize your checkout UI while entirely offloading the burden of sensitive card data (keeping you at the lowest PCI compliance level, **SAQ A** ), you need providers that support **Hosted Fields** (secure, highly stylable individual iFrames injected into your DOM) or flexible **Client-Side Tokenization…
To fully customize your checkout UI while entirely offloading the burden of sensitive card data (keeping you at the lowest PCI compliance level, SAQ A ), you need providers that support Hosted Fields (secure, highly stylable individual iFrames injected into your DOM) or flexible Client-Side Tokenization SDKs.
If you are specifically looking for white-label gateway infrastructure (where you can brand the entire merchant/reseller experience or deeply embed the UI under your own domain), several leading providers excel at this balance:
@://checkout.com and flexible Session APIs. This allows you to inject deeply integrated payment components right onto your domain with full layout and theme control.To achieve this UI/security split, these providers use Hosted Fields instead of traditional full-page redirects or heavy backend API posts.
tok_12345).If you'd like to narrow this down, please let me know:
If your goal is **a fully branded checkout experience while avoiding direct handling of card numbers (PAN), CVV, and other sensitive cardholder data**, you generally want a provider that offers one of these architectures: 1. **Hosted Fields / Secure Elements** — best balance of UX control and PCI scope reduction -…
If your goal is a fully branded checkout experience while avoiding direct handling of card numbers (PAN), CVV, and other sensitive cardholder data, you generally want a provider that offers one of these architectures:
| Provider | Custom checkout approach | Security model | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Braintree | Hosted Fields, custom UI styling | Card fields rendered in secure components; raw card data bypasses your servers | SaaS, marketplaces, custom web/mobile checkout |
| BlueSnap | Hosted Payment Fields | Secure iframes tokenize card data while you control checkout design | Global merchants, subscriptions, platforms |
| Global Payments | Hosted Fields | Customizable payment fields inside your checkout | Enterprise merchants and ISVs |
| Worldpay | Hosted Payment Pages / hosted options | Provider-hosted payment collection with reduced PCI scope | Enterprises wanting lower implementation effort |
| Fluid Pay | Private-label gateway + hosted payment flows | PCI DSS Level 1 infrastructure with white-label branding options | ISOs, ISVs, payment resellers |
| Corefy | White-label checkout and hosted fields | Gateway-side processing of sensitive payment data | Payment orchestration platforms |
| Stripe | Elements, Checkout, Payment Element | Secure components tokenize payment details before they reach your servers | Developer-first SaaS and marketplaces |
Look specifically for:
Avoid integrations where your backend receives raw card details unless you are prepared for a much larger PCI DSS burden.
For a SaaS platform or marketplace:
Your checkout UI
|
| (secure iframe / hosted field)
v
Payment provider
|
| token only
v
Your backend
|
v
Charge / refund / subscription APIs
This gives you:
One important distinction: "white-label" does not always mean "fully customizable checkout." Some providers let you put your logo/colors on a hosted page, while others let you build the entire checkout and only outsource the sensitive card fields. The latter is usually what teams mean when they want a custom UX without taking on PCI risk.
If you are building a SaaS product, marketplace, or payment platform for other merchants, the shortlist changes significantly.
One important distinction: "white-label" does not always mean "fully customizable checkout." Some providers let you put your logo/colors on a hosted page, while others let you build the entire checkout and only outsource the sensitive card fields. The latter is usually what teams mean when they want a custom UX without taking on PCI risk.
Yes. Achieving **full UI customization** while **offloading the PCI security burden** relies on a technical architecture called **Hosted Fields** or **Isolated SDK Components** (using secure iframes injected into your custom DOM). Raw cardholder data (PAN, CVV) is captured directly inside secure, cross-origin iframes…
Yes. Achieving full UI customization while offloading the PCI security burden relies on a technical architecture called Hosted Fields or Isolated SDK Components (using secure iframes injected into your custom DOM).
Raw cardholder data (PAN, CVV) is captured directly inside secure, cross-origin iframes managed by the gateway, meaning the sensitive data never touches, passes through, or is stored on your application servers . This drops your compliance posture down to a minimal Self-Assessment Questionnaire (typically SAQ A or SAQ A-EP, depending on how the form is hosted).
The top white-label and embedded payment infrastructure providers that balance deep UI flexibility with complete security offloading include:
Note on Compliance: While these tools isolate your servers from raw card data, modern PCI DSS standards (like PCI DSS 4.0) still require you to maintain basic script integrity and security controls (such as monitoring third-party scripts loaded on your payment page).
To help narrow down the ideal provider, could you share:
Yes. The key distinction is **“fully custom UI + hosted/embedded secure card fields”** rather than a traditional hosted checkout page. The latter limits branding; the former lets you own essentially the entire checkout while the provider captures/tokenizes the sensitive card data. ### Strong candidates Provider |…
Yes. The key distinction is “fully custom UI + hosted/embedded secure card fields” rather than a traditional hosted checkout page. The latter limits branding; the former lets you own essentially the entire checkout while the provider captures/tokenizes the sensitive card data.
| Provider | Custom UI | Card data bypasses your server? | PCI burden | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stripe — Elements | Excellent | Yes | SAQ A with the appropriate Elements integration | General-purpose, developer-friendly |
| Spreedly — Hosted Fields | Excellent | Yes, secure iframes → Spreedly vault | Designed to minimize PCI scope | True white-label / multi-gateway platforms |
| Braintree — Hosted Fields | Excellent | Yes | SAQ A | Custom branded web checkout |
| BlueSnap — Hosted Payment Fields | Excellent | Yes, fields → BlueSnap token | SAQ A | Custom checkout + global payments |
| Adyen — Components / encrypted card data | Excellent | Card details can be encrypted client-side | Depends on implementation | Enterprise/global platforms |
Stripe Elements lets you construct a checkout that looks like your product, rather than Stripe's hosted checkout. You can control layout, CSS, typography, colors, and the surrounding checkout experience. Stripe hosts the sensitive card-entry components, so card data doesn't touch your servers; Stripe documents Elements as eligible for SAQ A when integrated appropriately.
Good choice if: you want maximum developer simplicity and don't need the underlying payment gateway to be replaceable.
Spreedly is particularly interesting if by white-label you mean your customers should never know which underlying gateway is processing the transaction.
Its Headless/Hosted Fields integration puts the sensitive card-number and CVV fields in secure iframes while you control the surrounding HTML, layout, branding and checkout flow. The resulting payment method is tokenized and can then be used against supported gateways.
That makes the architecture roughly:
Your UI → Spreedly secure fields → Spreedly token → your backend → selected gateway
rather than:
Your UI → raw card number → your backend
Spreedly also supports multiple underlying payment gateways, which is a major advantage if you're building a platform rather than simply accepting payments for your own company.
Braintree's Hosted Fields is another very clean match. You retain control of the checkout's look and feel while Braintree renders secure iframes for the sensitive fields. The raw payment information goes directly from the browser to Braintree, and your server receives a nonce instead. Braintree specifically says this approach can keep you eligible for SAQ A.
BlueSnap explicitly positions Hosted Payment Fields for exactly this scenario: custom checkout + API integration + minimal PCI scope. Its sensitive card fields are iframes, and BlueSnap converts the submitted card information into a token that you use through its API. It states that this approach qualifies for SAQ A.
This is worth considering if you want something closer to a conventional payment gateway rather than a payment-orchestration layer.
Adyen gives you several levels of control. Its Components let you assemble your own checkout from individual payment-method components, while its more advanced API-only integration allows you to build your own UI. For cards, Adyen provides client-side mechanisms for encrypting card details before they're sent to your backend.
Be careful here: Adyen's API-only/custom-UI approach does not automatically mean SAQ A. Your exact implementation determines PCI scope. Adyen's Hosted Checkout, by contrast, is explicitly designed for minimal PCI requirements, but gives you less UI control.
If your requirements are specifically:
“Our checkout must look 100% like our product, while our servers must never receive raw card numbers, and we want to minimize PCI obligations.” I'd investigate these in this order:
One important caveat: “offloading the security burden” doesn't mean zero security or zero PCI responsibility. Even with SAQ A, you still have obligations around your website, integration, scripts, access controls, and PCI validation. For example, Stripe explicitly distinguishes Elements/Checkout (SAQ A) from sending raw card numbers through your own server (SAQ D).
If you tell me whether you're building (a) your own SaaS checkout, (b) a marketplace/platform where your customers use your checkout, or (c) a payment gateway/reseller product, I can narrow this to the 2–3 providers whose white-label, tokenization, sub-merchant, and PCI models fit best.
Stripe Elements lets you construct a checkout that looks like your product, rather than Stripe's hosted checkout. You can control layout, CSS, typography, colors, and the surrounding checkout experience. Stripe hosts the sensitive card-entry components, so card data doesn't touch your servers; Stripe documents Elements as eligible for SAQ A when integrated appropriately.
Good choice if: you want maximum developer simplicity and don't need the underlying payment gateway to be replaceable.
Spreedly is particularly interesting if by white-label you mean your customers should never know which underlying gateway is processing the transaction.
Its Headless/Hosted Fields integration puts the sensitive card-number and CVV fields in secure iframes while you control the surrounding HTML, layout, branding and checkout flow. The resulting payment method is tokenized and can then be used against supported gateways.
That makes the architecture roughly:
Your UI → Spreedly secure fields → Spreedly token → your backend → selected gateway
rather than:
Your UI → raw card number → your backend
Spreedly also supports multiple underlying payment gateways, which is a major advantage if you're building a platform rather than simply accepting payments for your own company.
Braintree's Hosted Fields is another very clean match. You retain control of the checkout's look and feel while Braintree renders secure iframes for the sensitive fields. The raw payment information goes directly from the browser to Braintree, and your server receives a nonce instead. Braintree specifically says this approach can keep you eligible for SAQ A.
BlueSnap explicitly positions Hosted Payment Fields for exactly this scenario: custom checkout + API integration + minimal PCI scope. Its sensitive card fields are iframes, and BlueSnap converts the submitted card information into a token that you use through its API. It states that this approach qualifies for SAQ A.
This is worth considering if you want something closer to a conventional payment gateway rather than a payment-orchestration layer.
Adyen gives you several levels of control. Its Components let you assemble your own checkout from individual payment-method components, while its more advanced API-only integration allows you to build your own UI. For cards, Adyen provides client-side mechanisms for encrypting card details before they're sent to your backend.
Be careful here: Adyen's API-only/custom-UI approach does not automatically mean SAQ A. Your exact implementation determines PCI scope. Adyen's Hosted Checkout, by contrast, is explicitly designed for minimal PCI requirements, but gives you less UI control.
Yes. The key architecture to look for is **headless/custom checkout + hosted card fields or client-side tokenization**: your application controls the checkout experience, while the provider's secure iframe/SDK captures PAN/CVV and returns a token. That substantially reduces your PCI scope, although it does **not**…
Yes. The key architecture to look for is headless/custom checkout + hosted card fields or client-side tokenization: your application controls the checkout experience, while the provider's secure iframe/SDK captures PAN/CVV and returns a token. That substantially reduces your PCI scope, although it does not mean you have zero PCI responsibilities.
| Provider | UI control | Sensitive card data | PCI approach | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primer | Very high | Hosted inputs/iframes | PCI-L1 tokenization | Best for truly headless, branded checkout |
| Braintree | Very high | Hosted Fields | Typically SAQ A | Excellent if cards + PayPal are important |
| Adyen | High with custom Components | Provider-hosted card components | Reduced PCI scope with hosted components | Enterprise/global payments |
| Spreedly | High | Hosted/tokenized payment data | Designed to offload PCI scope | Multi-gateway/orchestration use cases |
Primer explicitly offers Headless Checkout, where you provide the UI while Primer captures sensitive card information through hosted inputs. Its documentation says the card inputs communicate directly with Primer's PCI Level 1 tokenization service, converting sensitive data into a payment-method token.
This is particularly attractive if by "fully customize" you mean:
Primer also describes its standard Checkout as supporting full component customization while handling security/compliance and hosted inputs.
Verdict: ⭐ Best overall for a modern white-label/headless checkout.
Braintree's Hosted Fields is almost exactly the pattern you're describing. You build the checkout UI yourself, while Braintree renders the sensitive card inputs in iframes. The card information goes directly to Braintree rather than your server, and Braintree returns a one-time-use payment-method nonce.
Braintree specifically says its custom Hosted Fields integration lets you create your own payment form, customize its behavior and appearance, and typically qualify for SAQ A.
The important distinction is that you shouldn't simply put ordinary <input> fields for card numbers on your page and then send them to a Braintree API. For the reduced PCI scope, use their hosted fields.
Verdict: ⭐ Excellent choice, particularly if PayPal/Venmo and cards need to coexist.
Adyen supports highly customized integrations through its payment components. However, there's an important caveat: Adyen's API-only/raw-card-data approach is not what you want if the objective is to offload PCI responsibility. Adyen explicitly says collecting raw card data requires full PCI compliance.
Instead, you'd want its hosted/custom Components approach, where the sensitive fields are handled by Adyen.
Verdict: ⭐ Very good for enterprise/global payments, but make sure you're evaluating the hosted Components architecture rather than raw-card API access.
Spreedly is somewhat different: it's more of a payment orchestration/vaulting layer than a conventional single gateway. Its current tokenization tooling is designed to keep payment data within its secure environment and reduce merchants' PCI burden.
That makes it compelling if your white-label product needs to let merchants connect multiple underlying processors/gateways without redesigning your checkout.
Verdict: ⭐ Worth serious consideration if "white label" also means "one checkout across multiple gateways."
If I were evaluating this specifically for a white-label SaaS/platform, I'd start with:
One important terminology point: "offloading PCI" isn't the same as "offloading security." Your application still has obligations around your integration, JavaScript security, HTTPS, access controls, PCI SAQ/attestation, and potentially your overall checkout page. The major advantage is that your systems don't receive or store the raw card number/CVV.
If you tell me whether this is for a SaaS platform serving multiple merchants, an e-commerce site, or a fintech/payment product, I can narrow this to the 2–3 providers that best support true white-labeling, merchant sub-accounts, split payments, payouts, and fully custom checkout UI.
Braintree specifically says its custom Hosted Fields integration lets you create your own payment form, customize its behavior and appearance, and typically qualify for SAQ A.
The important distinction is that you shouldn't simply put ordinary <input> fields for card numbers on your page and then send them to a Braintree API. For the reduced PCI scope, use their hosted fields.
Verdict: ⭐ Excellent choice, particularly if PayPal/Venmo and cards need to coexist.
Adyen supports highly customized integrations through its payment components. However, there's an important caveat: Adyen's API-only/raw-card-data approach is not what you want if the objective is to offload PCI responsibility. Adyen explicitly says collecting raw card data requires full PCI compliance.
Instead, you'd want its hosted/custom Components approach, where the sensitive fields are handled by Adyen.
Verdict: ⭐ Very good for enterprise/global payments, but make sure you're evaluating the hosted Components architecture rather than raw-card API access.
Spreedly is somewhat different: it's more of a payment orchestration/vaulting layer than a conventional single gateway. Its current tokenization tooling is designed to keep payment data within its secure environment and reduce merchants' PCI burden.
That makes it compelling if your white-label product needs to let merchants connect multiple underlying processors/gateways without redesigning your checkout.
Verdict: ⭐ Worth serious consideration if "white label" also means "one checkout across multiple gateways."
To fully customize your checkout UI while offloading the heavy lifting of PCI DSS compliance and sensitive card data handling, you need a provider that utilizes **secured hosted iframe components** or **client-side tokenization SDKs**. With this architecture, the actual credit card input fields are rendered inside…
To fully customize your checkout UI while offloading the heavy lifting of PCI DSS compliance and sensitive card data handling, you need a provider that utilizes secured hosted iframe components or client-side tokenization SDKs.
With this architecture, the actual credit card input fields are rendered inside secure, provider-managed iframes injected into your DOM. Your servers never see, touch, or process raw cardholder data, keeping your infrastructure out of the heavy PCI compliance scope (typically qualifying for SAQ A or SAQ A-EP depending on how the elements are loaded).
The top white-label and embeddable payment gateway providers supporting this balance of deep UI customization and security offloading include:
If you want to narrow this down, let me know:
If you want a **white-label payment gateway** where the customer sees *your* checkout experience while the provider handles **PCI DSS, card vaulting, tokenization, encryption, and raw card-data processing**, look for providers offering **hosted fields**, **embedded checkout SDKs**, or **white-label hosted payment…
If you want a white-label payment gateway where the customer sees your checkout experience while the provider handles PCI DSS, card vaulting, tokenization, encryption, and raw card-data processing, look for providers offering hosted fields, embedded checkout SDKs, or white-label hosted payment pages.
The key distinction:
| Provider | Custom UI capability | Security offload model | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stripe | Very high via Elements, Checkout customization, Payment Element | Card data captured in Stripe-controlled components; tokenization keeps raw PAN off your servers | SaaS, marketplaces, modern apps |
| Adyen | High via Drop-in and Components | PCI-compliant hosted components, tokenization, global acquiring | Enterprise/global merchants |
| Braintree | High via Hosted Fields | Secure hosted fields tokenize card data before it reaches your backend | Custom checkout experiences |
| Checkout.com | High via Frames and APIs | Hosted card fields + tokenization | Enterprise fintech/e-commerce |
| Global Payments | High via Hosted Fields | Customizable hosted fields rendered securely and tokenized; designed to reduce PCI scope | ISVs and enterprise platforms Global Payments Global Payments |
| Fluid Pay | White-label gateway branding, merchant-facing customization | Provider-hosted PCI Level 1 infrastructure | ISOs, payment resellers, embedded payments Fluid Pay® |
| Corefy | White-label merchant portal and checkout customization | Hosted fields keep sensitive payment data inside its PCI environment | Payment platforms and aggregators Corefy |
| NXI | Hosted or embedded checkout | Embedded checkout keeps card data off your servers while inheriting provider PCI controls | Global/high-risk payment platforms NXI |
A common choice for SaaS and platforms.
You build:
Stripe handles:
Good when you want a highly custom frontend without touching card numbers.
Strong for international businesses.
Advantages:
Good for marketplaces and companies operating across multiple countries.
Good middle ground:
Useful if you need PayPal ecosystem support.
Designed specifically around customizable payment forms:
If you are building a payments product, not just accepting payments, look at:
These are closer to “we want to become a payment provider/reseller” rather than “we need checkout for our app.”
The ideal setup is:
Your frontend
|
| (your UI + your branding)
|
Secure card iframe / hosted field
|
| (card number never touches your servers)
|
Gateway tokenization service
|
Payment processor / networks
Your application stores:
✅ Payment token ✅ Customer ID ✅ Last four digits ✅ Card brand ✅ Transaction references
Your application does not store:
❌ PAN/card number ❌ CVV ❌ Magnetic stripe data
For most SaaS companies building a custom checkout, I would shortlist Stripe, Adyen, Braintree, or Checkout.com. For a company trying to launch a branded payment gateway product, I would look more closely at Fluid Pay, Corefy, and similar white-label gateway platforms.
Your frontend
|
| (your UI + your branding)
|
Secure card iframe / hosted field
|
| (card number never touches your servers)
|
Gateway tokenization service
|
Payment processor / networks
Your application stores:
✅ Payment token ✅ Customer ID ✅ Last four digits ✅ Card brand ✅ Transaction references
Your application does not store:
❌ PAN/card number ❌ CVV ❌ Magnetic stripe data
For most SaaS companies building a custom checkout, I would shortlist Stripe, Adyen, Braintree, or Checkout.com. For a company trying to launch a branded payment gateway product, I would look more closely at Fluid Pay, Corefy, and similar white-label gateway platforms.
To fully customize your checkout UI while offloading the heavy burden of PCI DSS security compliance, you need a provider that supports **client-side tokenization via iframe components or modular UI elements** (such as [Stripe Elements](https://stripe.com/guides/pci-compliance) or hosted…
To fully customize your checkout UI while offloading the heavy burden of PCI DSS security compliance, you need a provider that supports client-side tokenization via iframe components or modular UI elements (such as Stripe Elements or hosted fields).
In these architectures, the sensitive credit card fields are rendered inside secure, cross-origin iframes hosted directly by the payment gateway. Your application styles the outer wrapper and fields to match your exact design system, but the raw card data goes straight to the gateway’s Level 1 PCI-certified vault, keeping your servers entirely out of the PCI scope (typically qualifying you for PCI SAQ A).
Top providers offering this precise balance of UI customization and security offloading include:
If you'd like, let me know:
I can narrow down which provider fits your specific scaling and pricing needs.