Which whistleblower platforms support multilingual web phone text and in-person intake while protecting reporter anonymity?

The clearest matches I found are:

• WhistleB (NAVEX) — web, mobile, phone/IVR, and in-person meetings; 60+ web/mobile languages and 40 IVR languages. Supports anonymous reporting and anonymized voice, with secure two-way follow-up.
• Convercent — web, telephone, SMS, and “open-door/proxy” intake (e.g., a manager records an in-person report). Its call centers support 300+ languages and web intake 54. Anonymous follow-up is supported.
• EQS Integrity Line — secure web, phone, and mobile reporting in 80+ languages, with machine translation and anonymous reporting capabilities.
• NAVEX EthicsPoint — anonymous web/phone reporting, multilingual reporting/translation, and 24/7 access; in-person intake can be incorporated into its case-management process, though it is less explicitly an in-person channel than WhistleB.

If all four modes—web + phone + text + genuinely in-person—are mandatory, Convercent is the closest documented match; WhistleB is particularly strong for formal oral/in-person reporting and anonymity.

Modern enterprise whistleblower and ethics compliance platforms increasingly blend omnichannel intake (web, phone, text/SMS, and in-person/walk-in logs) with deep localization and strict reporter anonymity safeguards.

To protect anonymity while bridging language and channel gaps, these platforms utilize unique tracking IDs, decoupled metadata, and encrypted two-way messaging. Leading platforms supporting this comprehensive mix include:

• NAVEX (EthicsPoint): The gold standard in enterprise compliance, NAVEX One EthicsPoint offers 24/7 multi-channel intake spanning web, mobile, and live-operator phone lines. It supports extensive multilingual reporting with automated and human translation options, allows anonymous or named submissions via secure case keys, and accommodates administrative logging for in-person or mail-in reports to keep all data in a single system of record.
• Mitratech (Syntrio / Lighthouse Services): Provides an integrated ethics platform featuring 24/7 live-operator phone intake, mobile portals, QR-code/text-accessible mechanisms, and web intake. It translates reports across 100+ languages with side-by-side AI translations for investigators, maintains strict separation of data to exclude implicated parties from case access, and handles multi-channel centralization (including offline or in-person reports keyed in by compliance officers).
• Whispli: Highly favored for user-friendly, secure, and modern employee engagement. Whispli supports web, mobile, SMS/text-like messaging, and dedicated hotline voice features. It features automated voice-distortion for audio messages (allowing users to speak rather than type while keeping identities masked), AI-driven transcriptions, support for over 70 languages, and custom workflows that also permit compliance teams to manually log or ingest in-person reports into the anonymous tracking ledger.
• Safecall: Operates globally with a heavy focus on linguistic fidelity, supporting over 175 languages and dialects. Safecall provides live 24/7/365 telephone interpretation alongside an online portal supporting 60+ written languages. While phone and web are primary, their backend case management structure allows organizations to centralize notes and records from in-person or physical intake channels while maintaining secure, anonymous two-way dialogue with the reporter.

Key Anonymity & Compliance Safeguards to Look For:

• Decoupled Metadata: Web and text portals should strip IP addresses, device IDs, and EXIF data upon submission.
• Voice Distortion / Masking: For phone or audio-recording intake (like Whispli or Notified), look for systems that alter vocal profiles or use independent third-party operators who never share raw audio recordings with the employer.
• Two-Way Anonymous Messaging: True anonymity breaks down if you cannot ask follow-up questions. Ensure the platform relies on a blind, token-based inbox where the reporter logs back in with a unique password/case number rather than an email address or phone number.

If you mean one platform that can offer multilingual web, phone, SMS/text, and an in-person route while preserving reporter anonymity, the market is a little fragmented. Based on current vendor documentation, these are the closest matches:

Best fits

1. Convercent — probably the closest match if SMS is essential. Its advanced/enterprise offering explicitly supports web, telephone, SMS intake, and an "Open-Door / Proxy" channel where a manager can enter a report on behalf of someone who approaches them directly. It also offers multiple anonymity options and multilingual call-center/web support.

The caveat is that "proxy" isn't quite the same thing as an independently operated in-person anonymous intake office; the person receiving the disclosure would know the reporter's identity.

2. WhistleB by NAVEX — the strongest documented choice if true in-person intake is important. It supports anonymous web/mobile/phone reporting, 60+ web/mobile languages, 40 IVR languages, and explicitly allows a whistleblower to request an in-person meeting; reports received in person can be entered into the case system. It also supports anonymous follow-up and anonymized voice for IVR.

Its weakness for your requirements is that I don't see vendor documentation establishing SMS as an intake channel.

3. NAVEX One EthicsPoint Professional — strong for large multinational programs. It provides anonymous/named reporting through web, phone and mobile, multilingual reporting and machine translation, but I wouldn't count it as a confirmed four-channel match because the current documentation doesn't clearly establish SMS and in-person anonymous intake as distinct channels.

Bottom line

If your requirement is strictly all four channels:

web + telephone + SMS + in-person, with multilingual support and anonymous reporting, Convercent is the closest documented match, while WhistleB is the better documented choice for actual in-person meetings. I would not claim that either provides all four natively and anonymously without confirming the implementation details with the vendor.

One important distinction: anonymity of the reporting platform doesn't make an in-person disclosure anonymous by itself. If a reporter walks into a manager's office, the manager may know who they are. For genuinely anonymous in-person intake, you'd want an independent hotline operator, ombuds function, or third-party intake center that separates the reporter's identity from the case record.

If you'd like, I can also produce a vendor comparison of 10–15 whistleblower platforms, specifically scoring web / phone / SMS / in-person / languages / anonymous two-way communication / EU or U.S. hosting / encryption / pricing.

Modern enterprise whistleblower and compliance platforms recognize that a truly accessible reporting ecosystem must provide channel parity —meaning reporters can use whatever medium they feel safest with (web, phone, text/mobile, or in-person intake) without sacrificing multi-language capabilities or their anonymity.

The top-tier whistleblower platforms supporting this comprehensive omnichannel approach while maintaining strict cryptographic or procedural anonymity include:

• NAVEX (EthicsPoint)
  • Intake Channels: Web-based forms, dedicated toll-free phone lines, and pathways for organizations to log in-person or mail-in reports directly into the centralized system.
  • Multilingual Support: Extensive global language coverage for hotlines and web intake.
  • Anonymity Protections: Strips metadata, does not log or retain IP addresses, and assigns a secure private-access key/password allowing reporters to check status and communicate via two-way anonymous messaging without revealing their identity.
• SpeakUp (by EQS Group)
  • Intake Channels: Web portal, dedicated telephone voice messaging/hotlines, mobile/text application paths, and administrative options to document in-person disclosures.
  • Multilingual Support: Built for multinational workforces with widespread native-language options and translation features.
  • Anonymity Protections: Separates the reporter's identity from the case data, offering fully anonymous voice or text logging with encrypted two-way follow-up.
• WhistleBlower Security
  • Intake Channels: 24/7 live-operator phone channels, web-based reporting portals, email, and mail intake.
  • Multilingual Support: Toll-free live answer hotlines with direct support in primary languages plus professional interpretation services covering over 150 languages.
  • Anonymity Protections: Explicitly architected to omit IP address collection, caller ID capture, and voice-printing metadata, supplemented by secure two-way anonymous dialogue.
• FaceUp
  • Intake Channels: Web forms, mobile-optimized portals, dedicated hotline integrations, and options for compliance officers to manually intake or transcribe in-person face-to-face meetings securely.
  • Multilingual Support: Built-in AI and manual translation engines that allow real-time two-way translation between the investigator and a reporter using distinct regional languages.
  • Anonymity Protections: Provides metadata-free secure forms and encrypted anonymous chat threads so neither party has to compromise their identity.
• Mitratech (Hotline/Ethical Reporting Solutions)
  • Intake Channels: 24/7 live-operator phone lines, web reporting, mobile portals, and QR-code intake designed for physical/front-line shop floors.
  • Multilingual Support: Instant AI-powered side-by-side translation supporting over 100 languages.
  • Anonymity Protections: Complete segregation of reporter identity (if they elect anonymity), encrypted two-way anonymous messaging, and automatic role-based access restrictions that block anyone named in a disclosure from viewing the file.

Key Considerations for In-Person & Phone Anonymity

When evaluating these platforms for in-person and phone channels, true anonymity relies as much on operational protocol as software architecture:

1. Phone/Voice: Look for vendors that provide native voice-distortion features or independent third-party call centers bound by strict confidentiality agreements so that live operators do not record or pass identifying metadata downstream.
2. In-Person: Software cannot automatically anonymize an in-person face-to-face conversation. Protecting anonymity here relies on the intake officer manually filing the report into the platform's secure, anonymized case-management queue on behalf of the reporter rather than writing down identifying markers.

Yes. If by “in-person intake” you mean a platform that can also accommodate a reporter who tells a manager, HR/ethics officer, or designated intake person face-to-face, the strongest matches I found are:

Best matches

1. SAI360 — probably the closest literal match to your requirements. Its current product documentation explicitly says reporters can use phone, web, mobile, or in-person channels, with anonymous reporting across all channels and multilingual access.

2. Convercent / OneTrust — particularly strong if SMS and face-to-face intake are essential. Convercent documents telephone, web, SMS, and Open-Door/Proxy intake: someone can tell a manager directly and the manager enters the report into the same case-management system. It also advertises multiple anonymity options, 300+ languages for call-center support, and 54 web languages.

3. NAVEX EthicsPoint — a strong enterprise/global option. EthicsPoint supports anonymous web and phone reporting, multilingual reporting, and an open-door submission mechanism where concerns raised through other channels can enter the centralized system. Its current Professional offering supports web, phone and mobile access and anonymous or named reporting.

4. WhistleB by NAVEX — excellent for multilingual anonymous reporting, particularly in Europe. It supports anonymous web/mobile/phone reporting in 60+ languages, secure follow-up, and even voice anonymization for IVR reports. I would not put it ahead of SAI360 or Convercent if formal in-person intake is a hard requirement, because I couldn't verify that feature from its current documentation.

Important distinction about “anonymous”

A platform can technically permit anonymous reporting while an in-person channel cannot inherently guarantee anonymity—if the reporter physically identifies themselves to a manager or investigator, the platform can't make that interaction anonymous. What these systems can do is let the recipient enter the report into the same protected case system, potentially preserving the reporter's anonymity from downstream investigators.

So, for your exact requirement—multilingual + web + phone + text + in-person + anonymous—I'd shortlist SAI360 first and Convercent/OneTrust second, then evaluate NAVEX if you need a particularly mature global compliance ecosystem.

If you tell me whether this is for a corporation, NGO, government agency, university, or independent whistleblower service, I can narrow this to the 3 best platforms and compare anonymity architecture, languages, SMS/WhatsApp, in-person workflows, data residency, and approximate pricing.

Finding a platform that seamlessly covers web, phone, text/SMS, and in-person (walk-up) intake while maintaining multilingual capabilities and strict anonymous two-way communication requires enterprise-grade GRC (Governance, Risk, and Compliance) or specialized whistleblowing software.

Platform capabilities break down across the required intake vectors as follows:

Leading Enterprise Platforms

• • Channels: Web forms, mobile, 24/7 live-operator/AI phone hotlines, and manual logging for in-person/walk-up reports.
  • Multilingual: Extensive global language translation and interpretation services for hotlines and web portals.
  • Anonymity: Industry benchmark for secure, encrypted, metadata-free anonymous coding and two-way messaging. Ideal for large enterprises.
• • Channels: Web, mobile, phone hotlines, and designated in-person/walk-up intake channels.
  • Multilingual: Full multilingual localization for global workforces.
  • Anonymity: Built-in anonymous reporting pathways paired with centralized secure case management audit trails.

Agile / Mid-Market & Specialized Platforms

• • Channels: Secure web/mobile digital intake, integrated multilingual phone hotlines (including AI-driven voice intake in 70+ languages), and data entry support for physical or in-person reports.
  • Multilingual: Exceptional automated and live language coverage with real-time detection.
  • Anonymity: Focuses heavily on secure, anonymous conversational threading so compliance teams can ask follow-up questions without exposing the reporter.
• • Channels: Web, mobile, and connected multilingual hotlines.
  • Multilingual: Robust localization designed for international corporate and educational compliance.
  • Anonymity: Metadata-free reporting with unique case IDs enabling anonymous two-way dialogue.

How In-Person and Text Intake Work Under Anonymity

Achieving true end-to-end anonymity across all four vectors involves specific operational mechanics:

1. Web & Text (SMS): Handled natively via encrypted sessions or token-based portals where the user never provides an email, name, or phone number.
2. Phone: Handled either via live third-party multilingual call centers (where operators transcribe the dialogue and assign an anonymous code) or automated Voice AI that masks voice profiles and auto-translates.
3. In-Person: In-person or "walk-up" reporting cannot be completely system-automated for anonymity at the physical point of contact. Instead, the compliance officer or designated intake manager uses the platform's manual offline intake feature to log the face-to-face conversation into the secure system, issuing the reporter an anonymous platform access key/code so they can track or continue dialogue digitally without exposing their identity further.

Finding a whistleblower platform that covers web, phone, text, and in-person intake while strictly managing multilingual needs and anonymous two-way communication requires enterprise-grade compliance software.

While almost all major platforms support web and phone, true "in-person" intake is usually handled through a hybrid capability—either allowing designated compliance officers to log verbal/walk-in reports directly into the secure system on behalf of an anonymous/pseudonymous party, or integrating specialized mobile/QR code tools.

Top platforms equipped to handle this multi-channel matrix include:

1. NAVEX (EthicsPoint & WhistleB)

• Intake Channels: Web, 24/7 live-agent or automated phone hotlines, mobile, and centralized logging for in-person or mail-in reports.
• Multilingual: Extensive global language support (spanning 60+ to 100+ languages depending on whether you use EthicsPoint or the European-focused WhistleB line).
• Anonymity Protection: Strips metadata, uses secure pseudonymous case codes for two-way anonymous messaging, and strictly limits access permissions to designated investigators.
• Learn more: Explore solutions via NAVEX Whistleblowing Software Solutions.

2. Mitratech (Syntrio / Ethics Hotlines)

• Intake Channels: Web, email, mobile app, QR codes, and 24/7 live/IVR phone hotlines, with back-end consolidation for in-person disclosures.
• Multilingual: Offers intake and document translation across 100+ languages, backed by AI-driven side-by-side translation tools for investigators.
• Anonymity Protection: Employs two-way anonymous communication in the reporter’s native language, automatic conflict-of-interest screening (excluding named targets from case access), and zero IP logging.
• Learn more: Review capabilities at Mitratech Ethics Hotlines.

3. SAI360 (Whistleblower Hotline & Case Management)

• Intake Channels: Multi-channel coverage spanning telephone, web portals, mobile, and direct in-person/walk-in data entry by compliance teams.
• Multilingual: Broad multilingual accessibility designed for international and distributed workforces.
• Anonymity Protection: Complete structural separation of reporter identity metadata from case files, alongside secure anonymous follow-up workflows.
• Learn more: Check details on the SAI360 Whistleblower Software Solution.

Key Features to Verify During Your Evaluation:

• In-Person Intake Flow: Ensure the platform allows an ethics officer to safely input an "in-person/verbal" report into the system manually without compromising the reporter's request for anonymity or breaking audit-trail integrity.
• Multilingual Two-Way Messaging: A weak point for many basic tools is that while intake is translated, follow-up dialogue requires English. Look for systems with built-in translation for the ongoing anonymous chat thread.

If you mean a single whistleblower system that supports multilingual intake across web + phone + text/mobile + an in-person/walk-up option, while allowing anonymous reporting, the strongest matches I found are:

Best matches

1. SAI360 — probably the closest literal match to your requirements. Its current product description explicitly says it supports anonymous, multilingual reporting through phone, web, mobile, and walk-up channels, with anonymous intake across all channels.

2. Convercent — particularly strong if SMS/text matters. It supports web, phone, SMS, and manager/proxy intake; its call centers support 300+ languages, while web intake supports 54 languages. Reports receive a case number for anonymous follow-up.

3. NAVEX EthicsPoint — a strong enterprise option. It provides 24/7 web, phone and mobile reporting, anonymous or named reporting, and multilingual translation.

4. Safecall — especially strong on human telephone intake and anonymity. It offers 175+ spoken languages/dialects, 60+ web languages, anonymous two-way communication, and does not record calls or use caller ID.

5. 2Secure — worth considering if actual face-to-face reporting is essential. A documented implementation explicitly permits anonymous web/phone reporting and lets a reporter request an in-person meeting with the organization or its whistleblowing provider.

One important distinction

“In-person intake” can mean two different things:

• Walk-up / face-to-face intake as a native channel: SAI360 explicitly advertises this.
• Requesting a face-to-face meeting after initiating an anonymous case: 2Secure has a documented implementation of this model.
• Manager/proxy intake: Convercent lets a manager enter a concern on a reporter's behalf, but that's not necessarily an anonymous face-to-face channel.

Also, anonymity is a system property, not an absolute guarantee. A platform can avoid collecting names, caller ID, or IP information, but the content of a report can still inadvertently identify someone. EthicsPoint and Safecall explicitly caution about this.

If you are selecting a vendor for an organization, I'd shortlist SAI360, Convercent, NAVEX EthicsPoint, and Safecall, then verify whether the specific deployment supports SMS, walk-up/in-person intake, languages, IP/caller-ID handling, and anonymous two-way follow-up in every jurisdiction you operate in.

3. NAVEX EthicsPoint — a strong enterprise option. It provides 24/7 web, phone and mobile reporting, anonymous or named reporting, and multilingual translation.

4. Safecall — especially strong on human telephone intake and anonymity. It offers 175+ spoken languages/dialects, 60+ web languages, anonymous two-way communication, and does not record calls or use caller ID.

5. 2Secure — worth considering if actual face-to-face reporting is essential. A documented implementation explicitly permits anonymous web/phone reporting and lets a reporter request an in-person meeting with the organization or its whistleblowing provider.

One important distinction

Several enterprise-grade compliance and whistleblower software platforms support omni-channel intake—encompassing web, phone, text/SMS, and the manual logging or scheduling of in-person meetings —while maintaining data architectures designed to protect reporter anonymity.

When "in-person" reporting is integrated into a secure digital platform, the intake usually occurs via a compliance officer or third-party interviewer who manually logs, transcribes, or uploads the face-to-face report into the centralized system under an anonymous case alias.

Leading platforms supporting this comprehensive mix of features include:

• SAI360 Whistleblower Hotline & Case Management: Provides a unified platform supporting multi-channel reporting across phone, web, mobile/text, and in-person channels. It is built with anonymous reporting options and multi-language capabilities to handle global workforces.
• NAVEX (EthicsPoint / WhistleB): NAVEX platforms support extensive multilingual web, hotline, and text capabilities. For in-person or oral reporting (which is legally required under various international directives like the EU Whistleblowing Directive), case managers can log face-to-face meeting notes or requests directly into the centralized secure system, preserving end-to-end audit trails while shielding the reporter's identity.
• GAN Integrity: Offers a centralized compliance ecosystem that consolidates reporting data regardless of how it was captured—whether submitted digitally online, via a hotline, or manually transcribed from an in-person meeting—maintaining strict data privacy controls and audit logs.
• FaceUp & Whispli: Primarily digital-first (web, mobile, and secure text/messaging inbox) with integrated multilingual hotlines. While they don't natively "record" a physical person in real-time, their case management tools allow compliance teams to securely input and track reports derived from face-to-face/in-person meetings into the same anonymous two-way communication thread.

Key Anonymity Considerations for Multi-Channel Intake

• In-Person & Phone Translation: When live phone or in-person interpretation is used, anonymity relies heavily on the vendor or third-party provider using professionally bound, confidentiality-contracted interpreters rather than internal local staff who might recognize a voice or dialect.
• Digital Metadata: For web and text channels, ensure the platform explicitly strips IP addresses, device identifiers, and metadata to prevent de-anonymization when users submit reports in regional languages or via mobile devices.

If by “web, phone, text, and in-person intake” you mean a system that can accommodate all four routes while preserving reporter anonymity, the strongest current options I found are:

Best matches

1. Whispli — best overall match

Whispli is unusually close to your exact requirements. It supports web, mobile, email, SMS, phone, live chat and hotline reporting, with secure two-way communication and anonymous reporting. Its current Voice AI supports 70+ languages, automatically detects the caller's language, and says it does not collect caller ID.

It also explicitly supports anonymous follow-up: the reporter gets a secure inbox through which they can communicate with investigators without revealing their identity. Whispli says IP addresses are deleted rather than stored.

For in-person reports, its case-management architecture can accommodate reports received outside the digital channels, although this is more of an intake/workflow capability than a Whispli-operated face-to-face hotline.

2. SpeakUp — particularly strong for hybrid programs

SpeakUp supports web, phone and app, with anonymous reporting and multilingual translation. Its current platform advertises 100+ languages across web, phone, app and AI voice-agent channels.

Importantly for your in-person requirement, SpeakUp's pricing documentation explicitly supports “proxy cases (e.g. walk-in, e-mail, letter)”—meaning an administrator can enter a report received face-to-face into the same case system.

3. Whistlelink — good straightforward option

Whistlelink offers web questionnaires, voice messages and an optional traditional phone hotline, with anonymous two-way communication. It supports 50+ languages and explicitly offers anonymous reporting.

It is less explicit than SpeakUp about dedicated in-person intake, so I'd treat that as something to confirm during procurement rather than assume is a native channel.

4. NAVEX EthicsPoint — established enterprise option

NAVEX's EthicsPoint Professional provides web, phone and mobile reporting, anonymous or named reporting, multilingual support and machine translation.

NAVEX itself recognizes in-person reporting as a legitimate channel and describes hybrid programs combining web, phone, in-person and other routes. Navex However, I would verify exactly how your desired face-to-face workflow would be implemented rather than treating “in-person” as a native anonymous channel.

5. EQS Integrity Line — strongest on multilingual/privacy architecture

EQS supports 80+ languages, anonymous reporting and anonymous two-way communication through a secure mailbox. It also supports reports entering the system from external sources, which can accommodate non-digital/in-person reports. EQS Integrity Line EQS Integrity Line EQS emphasizes a “zero-tracking” anonymity architecture, including no IP logging, and encrypted communications.

My shortlist

If all four intake modes are mandatory, I'd shortlist:

1. Whispli — strongest combination of web + phone + SMS/text + multilingual + anonymous follow-up.
2. SpeakUp — strongest documented combination of digital/phone channels plus walk-in/in-person proxy cases.
3. NAVEX EthicsPoint — strongest large-enterprise incumbent, but verify the exact in-person implementation.
4. EQS Integrity Line — particularly attractive where anonymity, European privacy requirements and multilingual operation are priorities.
5. Whistlelink — simpler alternative with strong anonymous web/oral reporting.

One important distinction: “anonymous platform” does not automatically make an in-person disclosure anonymous. If a reporter walks into HR or Compliance and identifies themselves, the platform cannot retroactively make that interaction anonymous. For a genuinely anonymous in-person option, the organization needs a procedure where a trained intake person can enter the disclosure into the platform without recording the reporter's identity, and the platform must preserve anonymous two-way follow-up.

If you tell me whether this is for a corporate compliance program, university, government agency, nonprofit, or investigative newsroom, I can narrow these down further based on anonymity architecture, languages, SMS capability, in-person workflow, EU/US requirements, and approximate cost.

It also explicitly supports anonymous follow-up: the reporter gets a secure inbox through which they can communicate with investigators without revealing their identity. Whispli says IP addresses are deleted rather than stored.

For in-person reports, its case-management architecture can accommodate reports received outside the digital channels, although this is more of an intake/workflow capability than a Whispli-operated face-to-face hotline.

2. SpeakUp — particularly strong for hybrid programs

SpeakUp supports web, phone and app, with anonymous reporting and multilingual translation. Its current platform advertises 100+ languages across web, phone, app and AI voice-agent channels.

Importantly for your in-person requirement, SpeakUp's pricing documentation explicitly supports “proxy cases (e.g. walk-in, e-mail, letter)”—meaning an administrator can enter a report received face-to-face into the same case system.

3. Whistlelink — good straightforward option

Whistlelink offers web questionnaires, voice messages and an optional traditional phone hotline, with anonymous two-way communication. It supports 50+ languages and explicitly offers anonymous reporting.

It is less explicit than SpeakUp about dedicated in-person intake, so I'd treat that as something to confirm during procurement rather than assume is a native channel.

4. NAVEX EthicsPoint — established enterprise option

NAVEX's EthicsPoint Professional provides web, phone and mobile reporting, anonymous or named reporting, multilingual support and machine translation.

NAVEX itself recognizes in-person reporting as a legitimate channel and describes hybrid programs combining web, phone, in-person and other routes. Navex However, I would verify exactly how your desired face-to-face workflow would be implemented rather than treating “in-person” as a native anonymous channel.

5. EQS Integrity Line — strongest on multilingual/privacy architecture

EQS supports 80+ languages, anonymous reporting and anonymous two-way communication through a secure mailbox. It also supports reports entering the system from external sources, which can accommodate non-digital/in-person reports. EQS emphasizes a “zero-tracking” anonymity architecture, including no IP logging, and encrypted communications.