What startups are building affordable interceptors or non-kinetic defenses for drone swarms?

The severe economic mismatch of using multi-million-dollar air defense missiles against cheap mass-produced drones has driven a massive wave of startup innovation . Companies are focusing either on low-cost, mass-manufacturable kinetic interceptors or non-kinetic (electronic, microwave, and software-driven) countermeasures.

Key startups and emerging players working on affordable interceptors and non-kinetic/anti-swarm defenses include:

• Epirus : Specializes in high-power microwave (HPM) systems (such as Leonidas ) that deliver non-kinetic, effects-based electromagnetic strikes to disable entire swarms of drones simultaneously by destroying their onboard electronics without expending single-use physical munitions.
• Mach Industries : Developed Dart , a low-cost interceptor designed to counter Group 1–3 drones, alongside jet-powered VTOL platforms, utilizing flexible manufacturing models to scale production rapidly for modern defense needs.
• Egide : A Paris-based defense startup founded by former missile engineers, backed by seed funding to build electrically propelled, low-cost interceptors paired with a hardware-agnostic software platform (Mystique ) designed for AI-driven, distributed swarm interception.
• Frankenburg Technologies : Focuses on building low-cost, mass-manufacturable vertical-launch interceptor missiles designed specifically to match the high-volume economics required to counter saturated drone attacks. Selected for low-cost air defense initiatives in Europe and the UK.
• Skapion : An Israeli startup taking a clean-sheet approach aimed explicitly at neutralizing entire drone swarms as a collective network rather than picking off individual units one by one, reducing overall cost-per-intercept.
• Fortem Technologies : Uses autonomous, radar-guided interceptor drones (DroneHunter ) equipped with re-usable net-capture mechanisms to physically capture and tow away unauthorized or hostile drones safely.
• D-Fend Solutions : Specializes in non-kinetic radio frequency (RF) cyber-takeovers, safely intercepting and taking remote command of unauthorized drones to land or redirect them without damaging surrounding infrastructure.
• Allen Control Systems : Turns conventional guns into automated, computer-vision and AI-driven counter-drone weapon stations capable of physically destroying small drones with high cost-efficiency.

Would you like to explore non-kinetic directed-energy systems (like microwaves/lasers) or narrow down further into low-cost kinetic interceptor missiles?

Yes. If by “affordable” you mean systems designed to improve the cost-per-engagement against massed small UAS—not just conventional air-defense missiles—the startup landscape is getting interesting.

Startups I’d watch

The most interesting categories

1. Cheap interceptor drones — probably the clearest cost-exchange play.
FPF, Perseus and Kaedra are attacking the problem directly: make the defensive aircraft sufficiently cheap and autonomous that you can afford to launch large numbers of them. That's fundamentally different from firing a $100K+ missile at a $5K–$50K drone.

2. One-to-many non-kinetic systems — potentially even better for true swarms.
Epirus is the standout here. A high-power microwave can attack electronics across multiple drones, so the economics aren't necessarily “one defensive round per drone.” Epirus says Leonidas is designed specifically against swarming UAS, including autonomous and fiber-optic-guided systems.

3. Takeover/EW — cheapest when it works, but highly dependent on the target.
D-Fend's approach is especially compelling for airports, bases and other environments where destroying a drone overhead is undesirable. But RF takeover isn't a universal answer: autonomous drones, hardened links, fiber-optic control and preprogrammed systems can reduce its applicability.

One important distinction

I'd separate “cheap per interceptor” from “cheap against a swarm.” A $10K interceptor is a huge improvement over a $100K+ missile, but you're still facing a one-for-one exchange ratio. The really disruptive technologies are those that can produce many effects from one reusable/non-kinetic system—microwave, EW, takeover, or highly automated sensor/C2 networks.

That's why I'd put Epirus, FPF Defense, Perseus Defense, and Kaedra at the top of the “watch closely” list, with D-Fend particularly interesting for non-kinetic applications.

For context, the broader U.S. market is moving rapidly in this direction: the Pentagon is explicitly looking at lower-cost counter-UAS technologies because conventional defenses can be economically overwhelmed by mass drone attacks.

If you're looking at this from an investment/VC perspective, I can also rank ~15 companies by estimated cost-per-kill, swarm scalability, technical maturity, funding/traction, and likely procurement path.

The counter-drone startup landscape has shifted toward one core problem: how to defeat a $500–$20,000 drone without spending a $100,000–$4 million interceptor. That has led to two broad approaches:

• Low-cost kinetic interceptors (drone-on-drone, small missiles, nets, etc.)
• Non-kinetic defenses (electronic warfare, cyber, high-power microwave, protocol disruption, and AI-enabled sensing)

Here's a snapshot of notable companies.

Affordable interceptor startups

Several startups are specifically attacking the cost-exchange problem.

• Singularity Defense is among the best-funded recent entrants. Its stated goal is mass-producible interceptors that cost dramatically less than legacy missile defenses, although detailed specifications remain undisclosed.
• Nordic Air Defence (Sweden) is developing compact autonomous interceptor drones intended to engage Shahed-class and similar UAVs at a fraction of traditional missile costs.
• Skylance is targeting the "last kilometer" with inexpensive kinetic interceptors optimized for FPV drones rather than cruise missiles or aircraft.
• Greenjets is applying electric propulsion to create lower-cost interceptor aircraft suitable for larger production volumes.

Non-kinetic approaches

A separate group argues that simply building cheaper interceptors isn't enough because very large swarms can still exhaust inventories.

Examples include:

• SwarmSense, which focuses on detecting and disrupting autonomous swarm coordination rather than relying solely on RF jamming. Its premise is that future swarms may operate without conventional operator links.
• Companies building distributed autonomy (such as Merlin Defense) seek to let defensive interceptor swarms cooperate without centralized control, improving scalability against many simultaneous threats.

Outside the startup ecosystem, established defense firms are also investing heavily in non-kinetic technologies like high-power microwave systems and reusable non-kinetic effectors, reflecting broader interest in reducing cost per engagement.

Broader industry trend

The industry is converging on layered defense, combining:

• Multi-sensor detection (radar, RF, EO/IR, acoustic)
• AI-based tracking and target assignment
• Electronic warfare where effective
• Low-cost drone interceptors for hard-kill
• Non-kinetic options (such as microwave or cyber/electromagnetic effects) to conserve interceptor inventory

Rather than relying on a single technology, most newer architectures aim to mix these layers so that expensive effectors are reserved for the highest-value threats.

The unsustainable cost asymmetry of firing million-dollar traditional air-defense missiles at cheap uncrewed aerial systems has triggered a massive influx of defense tech startups building low-cost interceptors and specialized counter-swarm systems.

Several notable startups are actively leading this space with distinct low-cost kinetic and non-kinetic approaches:

• Tytan Technologies : Based in Munich and backed by the NATO Innovation Fund, Tytan builds AI-powered, low-cost autonomous interceptor drones (such as the EOS multicopter for short-range and METIS fixed-wing for long-range). Their hardware is designed for rapid mass-production to drastically cut down airspace defense costs.
• Singularity Defense Corp. : Formally launched with a major funding round, Singularity focuses entirely on mass-producing low-cost interceptors designed specifically to break the economic bottleneck of expending high-end munitions on cheap swarming drones.
• Mach Industries : Known for its rapid innovation cycles and flexible manufacturing approach, Mach introduced Dart , a low-cost counter-drone interceptor paired with an internally developed ground-based radar system tailored for Group 1–3 threats.
• Egide : Founded by former MBDA engineers in France, this startup is developing electrically propelled, low-cost interceptors alongside a hardware-agnostic software orchestration platform (Mystique ) aimed at building a scalable, distributed defense architecture against swarms.
• Neros Technologies : Developing the Bandit counter-UAS interceptor drone, Neros focuses on low-cost tactical interceptor options designed to operate tightly integrated at the tactical edge.
• Askari Defense : An Atlanta-based defense startup whose Rift Alpha interceptor targets Group 1 and 2 drones, successfully clearing rigorous U.S. Army soldier exercises and competition finalist stages.
• Perennial Autonomy (Merops) : Backed by prominent tech capital, they developed Merops , a compact, AI-driven interceptor drone system optimized for degraded, heavily jammed environments (like Ukraine and the Middle East) at a fraction of standard missile costs.
• North Vector Dynamics : A Canadian startup backed by major European defense funds, focusing on ultra-lightweight, miniature counter-UAS interceptor missiles like the 3-kilogram CM-70.

Would you like to explore non-kinetic and directed energy approaches (such as high-power microwaves or autonomous gun stations) or focus deeper on low-cost interceptor missiles and drones?

The profound economic mismatch of using multimillion-dollar traditional air defense missiles (1M–$4M per intercept) against low-cost drone swarms (which cost thousands or tens of thousands of dollars) has fueled a massive wave of venture-backed defense tech startups.

Startups tackling affordable kinetic interceptors and non-kinetic counter-swarm defenses utilize automotive-style manufacturing, edge AI, and high-power microwaves.

Low-Cost Kinetic Interceptors (Missiles & Drones)

• Singularity Defense Corp. Emerged from stealth with an 80M Series A round (valuing the LA-based company at 400M). Unlike slow propeller interceptor drones, Singularity is building high-speed, ground-launched missile interceptors designed with automotive-style mass manufacturing principles (borrowing talent from Tesla and Toyota) to bring down fast, low-cost massed munitions and jets.
• Mach Industries Unveiled its Dart low-cost interceptor system explicitly built to target Group 1 through 3 drones, paired with proprietary ground-based radar. Mach focuses on "flexible factory" production models to scale effectors rapidly.
• Tytan Technologies A Munich-based startup backed by the NATO Innovation Fund. Tytan develops AI-supported interceptor drones designed to intercept large numbers of hostile unmanned aircraft at a tiny fraction of conventional missile costs, drawing heavily on operational feedback from Ukraine.
• Flying Wedge Defense Aerospace (FWDA) Based in Bengaluru, India, this startup developed FWD Yama , an AI-enabled swarm interceptor platform engineered for autonomous detection and precision neutralization of incoming kamikaze drone swarms.
• Egide Founded by former MBDA engineers, this European startup is engineering electrically propelled, low-cost interceptors alongside hardware-agnostic AI software (Mystique ) aimed at mass-interception of swarm threats to critical infrastructure.
• North Vector Dynamics A Calgary-based startup that announced its CM-70 counter-UAS interceptor missile—a micro-missile weighing just 3 kg (6.6 lbs) with a 3.5 km range, built specifically to provide a high-volume, low-cost kinetic layer against drone incursions.

Non-Kinetic Defenses & Autonomous Systems

• Epirus Valued in the multi-hundred-million-to-billion range, Epirus specializes in High-Power Microwave (HPM) technology. Their flagship Leonidas system acts as a non-kinetic, software-defined directed-energy solution capable of frying the electronics of multiple drones simultaneously, effectively cutting down a swarm at a safe distance without firing a single physical bullet or missile.
• Allen Control Systems (ACS) Developing automated, AI-directed counter-drone weapon stations. Instead of relying on expensive missiles, ACS uses computer vision and physical gun systems to accurately track and blast high-speed autonomous drone targets with hyper-fast reaction times.
• D-Fend Solutions A market leader in cyber-based, non-kinetic counter-UAS. Rather than physically destroying swarms, D-Fend’s EnforceAir system takes over incoming drone communication protocols, forcing unauthorized drones to safely land or redirect away from protected zones without electronic jamming collateral damage.

Would you like to explore non-kinetic high-power microwave systems in more depth, or are you more interested in the economics and manufacturing scale of micro-missile interceptors?

The biggest trend in counter-drone defense is an effort to reverse the cost equation: instead of firing six- or seven-figure missiles at drones that may cost only hundreds or thousands of dollars, startups are pursuing either:

• Low-cost interceptor drones ("drone-on-drone" defense), or
• Non-kinetic systems that disable or capture drones without explosives (nets, electronic warfare, directed energy, protocol attacks, etc.).

Some of the more notable companies are:

Affordable interceptor startups

The newest wave focuses on making the interceptor itself inexpensive enough that exchanging one defender for one attacking drone is economically acceptable.

Singularity Defense

The company emerged from stealth in 2026 with $80M in funding specifically to build low-cost air-defense interceptors rather than exquisite missile systems. Public statements emphasize dramatically reducing interceptor cost while maintaining enough performance against mass drone attacks.

Greenjets (UK)

Greenjets is pursuing electric and hybrid-electric propulsion for inexpensive interceptor aircraft. The company positions its systems as alternatives to costly missile defenses, especially for defeating inexpensive UAVs.

Anduril

Although generally not considered "low-cost" in the disposable sense, Anduril's vertical-takeoff Roadrunner interceptor is designed to be recoverable when unused, improving engagement economics compared with traditional missiles.

---

Non-kinetic defense startups

These aim to defeat drones without explosive interceptors.

Fortem Technologies

One of the best-known examples.

Its DroneHunter interceptor captures hostile drones with a deployed net under autonomous guidance. This reduces collateral damage while allowing recovery of the target for forensics. In 2026 the company demonstrated autonomous multiple-on-multiple drone interception.

D-Fend Solutions

Uses RF protocol exploitation rather than jamming whenever possible. Instead of simply overwhelming communications, the goal is to assume control or safely land certain classes of drones.

Best suited against commercial and modified commercial UAVs rather than fully autonomous systems.

Dedrone

Dedrone is primarily a software and sensor company. It integrates RF, radar, cameras, and AI classification with multiple effectors, including non-kinetic options like jamming where legally permitted.

Epirus

Instead of firing projectiles, Epirus develops high-power microwave systems capable of disrupting electronics across multiple drones simultaneously, making them attractive against dense swarms.

---

Hybrid approaches

Several companies are building layered systems rather than relying on one defeat mechanism.

Examples include:

• AI sensor fusion
• RF detection
• radar
• electro-optical tracking
• interceptor drones
• electronic warfare
• command-and-control software

The idea is to reserve expensive kinetic interceptors only for threats that cannot be defeated electronically.

---

Larger defense primes also pursuing affordable/non-kinetic systems

Although not startups, several incumbents are pushing the same cost-exchange philosophy.

For example, RTX recently demonstrated a recoverable non-kinetic version of its Coyote interceptor intended specifically for drone swarms. The interceptor can engage, recover, and be reused, improving economics compared with one-shot missiles.

---

Where venture investment is moving

The strongest investment themes over the past 12–24 months include:

• Expendable interceptors costing a few thousand dollars instead of hundreds of thousands.
• Reusable interceptors that can loiter and recover if not used.
• AI-enabled autonomous engagement to reduce operator workload.
• Microwave and RF systems capable of affecting multiple drones simultaneously.
• Layered architectures combining sensors, electronic attack, and inexpensive kinetic effectors.
• Software-defined counter-UAS platforms that can integrate different sensors and effectors as threats evolve.

Overall, there is growing consensus across both startups and established defense firms that cost-per-engagement is now one of the defining metrics for counter-drone systems. Rather than relying solely on increasingly capable missiles, many companies are working toward defenses that are reusable, software-driven, or inexpensive enough to scale against large drone swarms.

Several startups and defense companies are developing affordable, often non-kinetic, solutions to counter drone swarms, with many solutions validated by recent battlefield experiences in Ukraine and the Middle East.

Key startups and companies focusing on this space include:

• Skapion ($36M raised): A D.C.-based startup with R&D in Israel, focusing on a mobile, end-to-end system designed to fire numerous kinetic, non-explosive drone interceptors to take down hundreds of drones at once.
• Egide (€8M seed funding): A Paris-based startup founded by former MBDA engineers, developing low-cost, electrically propelled interceptors and "Mystique," a hardware-agnostic, AI-driven software platform for layered defense.
• Frankenburg Technologies: Manufactures affordable, guided interceptor missiles specifically designed for defeating swarms and other aerial threats.
• Epirus: Develops the Leonidas high-power microwave (HPM) system, which offers a non-kinetic, cost-effective, and scalable solution to disable drone swarms with electromagnetic pulses.
• Fortem Technologies: Known for its DroneHunter , an autonomous, reusable, net-capture interceptor that provides a non-kinetic "soft-kill" option.
• TYTAN Technologies: Builds AI-powered, low-cost interceptor systems (METIS) for layered, mass defense.
• X-Bow Systems: Developing sub-$100,000 drone interceptors to combat the high costs of traditional interceptor missiles.
• Advanced Protection Systems (APS): A Polish firm producing SKYctrl , an autonomous, cost-effective interceptor that uses direct collision to neutralize drones.
• Merops: A newly deployed low-cost interceptor drone (~$14,000 per unit, aiming for $3,000–$5,000) designed for large-scale counter-drone operations.
• Lockheed Martin (MORFIUS): While an established defense firm, its MORFIUS system is a high-speed, tube-launched, reusable interceptor that uses a microwave emitter to neutralize multiple drones in a swarm, returning to base for redeployment.

Common Trends and Approaches:

• Cost-Effectiveness: Startups are prioritizing low-cost interceptors (often 3D-printed) to break the "cheap drone, expensive missile" cycle.
• Non-Kinetic Methods: High-power microwaves (HPM), AI-enabled nets, and electronic jamming are becoming standard to minimize collateral damage.
• AI Integration: Many systems rely on AI to guide the interceptors and to manage the high cognitive load of controlling multiple defensive assets simultaneously.
• Battle-Tested Solutions: Many companies are focusing on feedback from the conflict in Ukraine to rapidly iterate, with some deploying changes within weeks.

Would you like more details on the high-power microwave (non-kinetic) solutions, or are you more interested in the low-cost kinetic interceptors ? I can also provide information on major funding rounds and partnerships in this sector.

A wave of defense startups is focused on solving the cost-exchange problem: using a $100,000+ missile to defeat a $500–$20,000 drone is often economically unsustainable. The most interesting companies are building either low-cost kinetic interceptors (drone-on-drone) or non-kinetic systems (electronic warfare, high-power microwave, spoofing) that can engage many drones at low marginal cost.

Here's a snapshot of notable startups and emerging companies.

Startups pursuing inexpensive kinetic interceptors

The biggest trend is replacing expensive missiles with autonomous interceptor drones.

Examples include:

• Corvus is developing AI-guided interceptors intended to operate without GPS or RF links, making them harder to jam while remaining inexpensive enough for volume deployment.
• ASKARI Defense emphasizes manufacturability, including fully 3D-printed interceptor airframes intended for very low production cost.
• Kaedra Technologies is building a vertically integrated, low-cost interceptor using onboard computer vision instead of relying on expensive external infrastructure.
• Thalanor Dynamics is pursuing autonomous interceptors plus an AI payload that can convert compatible drones into interceptor platforms.

These companies generally aim to make the interceptor cost comparable to—or lower than—the attacking drone, which is a major shift from legacy air defense economics.

Startups emphasizing non-kinetic defenses

Rather than physically destroying drones, these companies focus on disrupting or redirecting them.

• Regulus Cyber began with GNSS spoofing technology and now integrates spoofing, RF detection, electronic attack, and autonomous counter-UAS command-and-control.

Non-kinetic approaches can be highly cost-effective against drones that depend on radio links or satellite navigation, though they are generally less effective against highly autonomous systems that do not rely on external communications.

Where the market appears headed

Recent conflicts have accelerated interest in:

• AI-enabled autonomous interceptors
• Computer-vision guidance that works without GPS
• Recoverable or reusable interceptors
• Distributed sensor networks
• Layered defenses combining detection, electronic warfare, and hard-kill options

The U.S. Department of Defense and European militaries are increasingly seeking systems that can be manufactured rapidly and fielded in large numbers, creating opportunities for startups rather than only traditional defense primes. Recent reporting also points to major increases in investment in drone and counter-drone capabilities.

Beyond startups: technologies influencing the field

Although they're established defense companies rather than startups, some larger players are shaping the technology direction:

• RTX/Raytheon has demonstrated a recoverable non-kinetic Coyote variant that uses a reusable payload to defeat drone swarms while minimizing collateral damage.
• Lockheed Martin recently unveiled Morfius X-Rotor, a reusable high-power microwave system intended to neutralize large numbers of drones in a single mission, illustrating growing interest in non-kinetic swarm defeat.

Overall, the startups attracting the most attention today tend to share one thesis: the winning counter-swarm solution will likely be inexpensive, autonomous, manufacturable at scale, and part of a layered defense that combines sensing, electronic warfare, and low-cost interceptors rather than relying solely on traditional missiles.

The main trend is that startups are trying to solve the cost-exchange problem: if an attacker can launch a $500–5,000 drone, defenders cannot afford to respond with interceptors costing hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars. That has created two broad startup categories:

1. Low-cost kinetic interceptors (drone-vs-drone or micro-missiles)
2. Non-kinetic ("soft-kill") systems such as electronic warfare (EW), high-power microwaves (HPM), lasers, and networked sensing

Here's a representative snapshot.

Non-kinetic startups look particularly promising

Several venture-backed companies are betting that soft-kill methods scale better economically than firing one interceptor per target.

• Epirus is probably the best-known startup in this category. Its Leonidas high-power microwave system is designed to disrupt drone electronics over an area, making it attractive for defeating multiple small drones with a single engagement.
• Dedrone concentrates on sensing, RF detection, and command software that can cue jammers or other effectors.
• Newer companies like SwarmSense are focusing on extracting coordination information from RF emissions and fusing radar, acoustic, and other sensors into a common operating picture.

The advantage of these approaches is that the marginal cost per engagement can be much lower than expendable interceptors, although effectiveness depends on factors like autonomy, frequency-hopping, fiber-optic guidance, shielding, weather, and line-of-sight.

Affordable kinetic interceptors

A second wave of startups accepts that electronic attack won't always work—especially against autonomous or fiber-optic-guided drones—and instead aims to make interceptors much cheaper.

Examples include:

• Skylance, pursuing inexpensive last-layer interceptors to reduce the cost ratio.
• Martel Defense, proposing a carrier drone that launches multiple small interceptors to engage Group 1/2 drones at relatively low cost.
• KINS Defense, developing aerial barrier/net concepts intended to provide low-cost physical interception.

Industry reporting also shows increasing interest in startups producing interceptor drones in the low-thousands to low-tens-of-thousands of dollars rather than traditional missile prices. Reuters and other outlets have highlighted firms such as SkyFall, General Cherry, and Firebolt Engineering pursuing this approach in response to the proliferation of inexpensive attack drones.

Where investors appear to be looking

The strongest investment themes are:

• Software-defined sensor fusion
• AI-based autonomous tracking
• High-power microwave systems
• Directed-energy weapons (especially where power and cooling constraints can be managed)
• Very inexpensive expendable interceptors
• Cooperative interceptor swarms

Rather than betting on a single technology, many defense customers are moving toward layered architectures: detection → identification → EW or directed energy when possible → inexpensive kinetic interceptors as a final layer.

That layered approach reflects a recognition that no single countermeasure is effective against every drone type or tactic, particularly as adversaries adopt autonomy, hardened electronics, or non-RF control links.

Startups are increasingly focused on affordable, high-volume, and non-kinetic defenses to counter drone swarms, shifting away from using million-dollar missiles against low-cost targets . Key players, particularly in Europe and the US, are developing AI-enabled interceptor drones, high-power microwaves, and smart jamming technologies.

Affordable Interceptor Drones (Hard-Kill)

• Nordic Air Defence : Develops 3D-printed, missile-shaped, low-cost interceptor drones for physical destruction of targets.
• Egide : A European company developing low-cost, mass-produced interceptors to combat drone swarms.
• Singularity Defense : A US startup that secured funding for low-cost, AI-powered "kamikaze" drone interceptors, designed for high-volume, low-cost deployment.
• Stravex Technologies : Developed the 'AgniStrike', an indigenous, AI-powered drone interceptor system designed for swarm interception.
• Skapion : Israeli startup developing high-capacity counter-drone systems with $36M in funding, aiming for "one-to-many" engagement.
• MARSS : Manufactures the AI-enabled INTERCEPTOR-MR, which is designed for low-cost, low-collateral drone neutralization.
• Merops : A new, low-cost interceptor drone system being deployed to counter Iranian-type Shahed drones, with projected costs reducing to $3,000–$5,000 per unit.

Non-Kinetic Defenses (Soft-Kill/Directed Energy)

• Epirus : Develops 'Leonidas,' a high-power microwave (HPM) system that can disable entire drone swarms with a single pulse.
• D-Fend Solutions : Provides 'EnforceAir,' which uses radio frequency cyber-takeover technology to force unauthorized drones into controlled landings.
• Fortem Technologies : Uses AI-enabled autonomous drones to deploy nets to capture hostile UAVs.
• Allen Control Systems (ACS) : Develops AI-driven software that turns traditional conventional weaponry into automated, low-cost counter-drone solutions.
• Hidden Level / SkySafe : Specializes in distributed sensor networks to detect, track, and identify unauthorized drone traffic.

Key Trends & Technologies

• "One-to-Many" Defense : The primary goal is finding solutions where a single defense unit can neutralize multiple threats, such as Lockheed Martin's MORFIUS (microwave) or Raytheon's Coyote Block 3.
• AI and Autonomy : Advanced algorithms are used for fast, automated targeting, removing the human from the immediate decision-making loop for faster engagement.
• Battlefield-driven Design : Many solutions, such as those from Munich-based firms, are refining their products based on direct feedback from the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

If you are looking for specific types of solutions, let me know if you prefer to know more about:

• Software-defined, non-kinetic jammers
• Kinetic (drone-vs-drone) interceptors
• High-energy laser systems

I can provide more detailed information based on your focus.