We are auditing our supply chain for slavery risks. Who provides supply chain intelligence data?
Data as of Sep 21, 2026 · Based on 294 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Data as of Sep 21, 2026 · Based on 294 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
To audit your supply chain for slavery risks, you can utilize specialized intelligence platforms. EcoVadis is widely recommended for sustainability-focused ESG ratings and questionnaires.
Exiger provides AI-powered mapping for complex sub-tier visibility.
Sourcemap offers deep traceability from raw materials to finished goods, and
Everstream Analytics provides predictive risk monitoring to detect emerging labor issues early.
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 62% of answers
Best for enterprise supply chain visibility. It uses AI to map multi-tier supplier networks, helping teams quickly identify risks or connections related to forced labor and regulatory requirements.
Named in 51% of answers
Ideal for ESG and sustainability teams needing standardized supplier sustainability ratings and modern slavery compliance tools to manage risk and perform regular assessment workflows.
Named in 38% of answers
Named in 35% of answers
If you’re auditing **modern-slavery / forced-labor exposure**, there are several distinct types of supply-chain intelligence providers. The right category depends on whether you need **risk scoring, actual supplier-network mapping, or evidence for due diligence**. -…
If you’re auditing modern-slavery / forced-labor exposure, there are several distinct types of supply-chain intelligence providers. The right category depends on whether you need risk scoring, actual supplier-network mapping, or evidence for due diligence.
For a serious slavery-risk audit, these aren't necessarily substitutes:
| Need | Relevant provider type |
|---|---|
| “Which countries/sectors/materials have elevated forced-labor risk?” | Maplecroft |
| “Who actually supplies whom beyond Tier 1?” | Sayari, Prewave, IntegrityNext |
| “Which specific suppliers/facilities have forced-labor indicators?” | Sayari, Prewave |
| “What is the ESG risk profile of each supplier?” | EcoVadis, IntegrityNext |
| “Can we substantiate a finding with underlying records?” | Sayari is particularly oriented toward primary-source evidence |
| “Can we continuously monitor the supply base?” | Prewave, IntegrityNext, EcoVadis |
One important distinction: supplier questionnaires and ESG ratings are not the same thing as independent supply-chain intelligence. For example, Sayari explicitly focuses on independently verifying trade relationships and ownership rather than relying solely on supplier self-reporting.
If you tell me your industry and geography (e.g., apparel sourcing from Asia, electronics, food/agriculture, etc.), I can also compare the major providers on Tier-N visibility, forced-labor data sources, geographic coverage, API availability, evidence quality, and typical procurement/audit use cases.
When auditing a supply chain for modern slavery and forced labor risks, organizations typically rely on specialized intelligence platforms, supply chain mapping tech, and risk analytics providers. These vendors combine artificial intelligence, public-interest research, satellite/shipping data, and direct supplier…
When auditing a supply chain for modern slavery and forced labor risks, organizations typically rely on specialized intelligence platforms, supply chain mapping tech, and risk analytics providers. These vendors combine artificial intelligence, public-interest research, satellite/shipping data, and direct supplier engagement to flag human rights violations.
Key providers of supply chain intelligence data for slavery and human rights risks fall into several categories:
To help narrow down which provider fits your audit, could you tell me:
Yes. There are several established providers, but they cover somewhat different parts of the slavery/forced-labor intelligence problem. Provider | What they primarily provide | Useful for slavery-risk audit? --- | --- | ---
Yes. There are several established providers, but they cover somewhat different parts of the slavery/forced-labor intelligence problem.
| Provider | What they primarily provide | Useful for slavery-risk audit? |
|---|---|---|
| Sourcemap | Multi-tier supply-chain mapping, supplier/sub-supplier discovery, transaction-level traceability, watchlist screening and evidence collection | Very relevant where you need to establish where materials actually came from and build an auditable chain of custody. Sourcemap Sourcemap |
| Sedex | Supplier/site data, country/sector/site risk assessments, supplier questionnaires and SMETA audit information | Very relevant for labor-rights and forced-labor risk at supplier sites, particularly when supplier participation and audit evidence matter. Sedex Sedex |
| Assent | Supplier due-diligence data, forced-labor questionnaires, adverse-media monitoring, sanctions/watchlists and deeper supplier screening | Very relevant, particularly for manufacturers with complex supplier networks and regulatory compliance requirements. Assent Assent |
| Maplecroft | Country-, industry- and location-level human-rights/labor-risk intelligence and indices | Strong for inherent-risk assessment—e.g., identifying countries, commodities and sectors where forced/child labor risk warrants enhanced due diligence. Maplecroft Maplecroft |
For a serious slavery-risk audit, I'd distinguish risk intelligence from evidence:
Important distinction: a country-risk score or a clean supplier questionnaire isn't evidence that a particular shipment is free of forced labor. For an audit, you generally want to combine inherent risk + supplier/site evidence + independent intelligence + actual supply-chain traceability.
If you tell me your industry (e.g., apparel, electronics, food, automotive), geography, and whether you're auditing for UFLPA/EU Forced Labour Regulation/UK Modern Slavery Act or general ESG, I can narrow this to the most relevant data providers and explain what data each one actually gives you.
Auditing your supply chain for modern slavery and forced labor risks requires specialized intelligence providers that map sub-tier suppliers, screen adverse media, and track geographic or sector-specific vulnerabilities. Top providers offering supply chain intelligence and ethical sourcing data include: -…
Auditing your supply chain for modern slavery and forced labor risks requires specialized intelligence providers that map sub-tier suppliers, screen adverse media, and track geographic or sector-specific vulnerabilities.
Top providers offering supply chain intelligence and ethical sourcing data include:
To help narrow down which platform fits your organization best, tell me:
For a slavery/modern slavery risk audit, companies typically combine **supply chain mapping data, supplier intelligence, trade data, sanctions/regulatory data, labor-risk datasets, and audit information**. Providers vary depending on whether you need supplier screening, deep-tier mapping, forced-labor detection, or…
For a slavery/modern slavery risk audit, companies typically combine supply chain mapping data, supplier intelligence, trade data, sanctions/regulatory data, labor-risk datasets, and audit information. Providers vary depending on whether you need supplier screening, deep-tier mapping, forced-labor detection, or regulatory reporting.
| Provider | What they provide | Best fit |
|---|---|---|
| Exiger | AI-driven supply chain intelligence, entity resolution, trade mapping, forced-labor risk indicators, UFLPA-related screening | Large enterprises needing deep supply chain intelligence and regulatory evidence Exiger Exiger |
| Altana | Global supply chain graph, trade and entity data, risk analytics | Mapping complex multi-tier supply chains and identifying hidden supplier relationships AIAG |
| Resilinc | Supply chain mapping, supplier risk monitoring, disruption and compliance intelligence | Manufacturing, electronics, automotive, healthcare supply chains AIAG |
| Kharon | Entity intelligence and risk screening, including forced-labor-related risk signals | Screening suppliers against high-risk entities and government enforcement concerns AIAG |
| Verité | Forced labor due diligence intelligence through CUMULUS Forced Labor Screen™, including labor supply chain and recruitment-risk analysis | Human-rights-focused due diligence and worker-risk assessment Verité |
| Source Intelligence | Supply chain compliance software, supplier assessments, sustainability and forced-labor risk data | Supplier engagement programs and compliance workflows Sayari |
| EcoVadis | Supplier sustainability ratings, including labor and human rights criteria | Supplier ESG scoring and procurement programs BIICL |
| IntegrityNext | Automated supplier risk screening, forced-labor indicators, supplier assessments | Ongoing supplier monitoring and regulatory compliance workflows EN Integrity Next |
| Sphera | Supply chain risk management and human rights/social assessments | Companies needing ESG and supply chain risk management integration Sphera |
| Fair Supply | Supplier risk scoring, modern slavery risk analysis, multi-tier supply chain visibility | Modern slavery statements and supplier risk prioritization Fair Supply |
| Supply Trace | Open-access supply chain risk intelligence using trade data and research | Research, initial screening, and targeted investigations Supply Trace |
Many corporate programs also combine commercial tools with public sources:
For a large multinational audit, a common combination is a supply chain graph provider (such as Altana or Exiger) + human-rights specialist data (such as Verité) + supplier engagement platform (such as Source Intelligence, IntegrityNext, or EcoVadis) rather than relying on a single database.
If you are auditing for a specific regulation (for example UFLPA, UK Modern Slavery Act, Canada Fighting Against Forced Labour Act, or EU Forced Labour Regulation) the best provider shortlist changes.
Auditing a supply chain for modern slavery and forced labor risks requires a mix of **sub-tier supply chain mapping**, **geopolitical/commodity risk scoring** , and **real-time adverse media monitoring**.[](https://www.integritynext.com/forced-labor-prevention)…
Auditing a supply chain for modern slavery and forced labor risks requires a mix of sub-tier supply chain mapping, geopolitical/commodity risk scoring , and real-time adverse media monitoring.
The primary providers of supply chain intelligence data and platforms specialized in identifying modern slavery and ethical risks include:
If you'd like, let me know:
I can help you narrow down which platform type fits your audit scope best.
Auditing a supply chain for modern slavery and forced labor risks requires combining **multi-tier supplier mapping**, **adverse media/watchlists** , and **on-the-ground social audit data**. Major providers offering specialized supply chain intelligence and risk analytics data tailored to human rights and slavery…
Auditing a supply chain for modern slavery and forced labor risks requires combining multi-tier supplier mapping, adverse media/watchlists , and on-the-ground social audit data.
Major providers offering specialized supply chain intelligence and risk analytics data tailored to human rights and slavery compliance include:
If you'd like, I can:
Detail how to integrate ERP data with these risk intelligence platforms Outline the specific data requirements for UFLPA or CSRD compliance
For a slavery/forced-labor supply chain risk audit, companies typically combine **supply chain mapping platforms**, **human rights risk intelligence databases**, **trade/customs data**, **supplier screening**, and **worker-focused intelligence**. The right provider depends on whether you need Tier 1 visibility,…
For a slavery/forced-labor supply chain risk audit, companies typically combine supply chain mapping platforms, human rights risk intelligence databases, trade/customs data, supplier screening, and worker-focused intelligence. The right provider depends on whether you need Tier 1 visibility, deep-tier tracing, regulatory compliance (e.g., UFLPA), or broader ESG/human-rights monitoring.
| Provider | What they provide | Best fit |
|---|---|---|
| Resilinc | Multi-tier supply chain mapping, supplier risk monitoring, event intelligence, forced-labor compliance workflows | Manufacturing, electronics, automotive, complex global supply chains AIAG |
| Altana | AI-powered supply chain graph intelligence using trade and commercial data | Mapping opaque supplier networks and trade relationships AIAG |
| Exiger | AI-driven supply chain risk intelligence, forced-labor screening, entity resolution, trade compliance data | Companies needing regulatory-grade investigations and audit evidence Exiger |
| Kharon | Risk intelligence focused on sanctions, entities, and forced-labor exposure (including UFLPA-related screening) | U.S. import compliance and high-risk entity screening AIAG |
| Verité | CUMULUS Forced Labor Screen™, labor-risk assessments, recruitment and worker-risk intelligence | Deep human-rights due diligence and forced-labor-specific analysis Verité |
| SUPPLIERASSURANCE | Supplier due diligence questionnaires, risk management, reporting workflows | Supplier engagement and compliance programs AIAG |
| EcoVadis | Sustainability ratings, supplier assessments, responsible sourcing data | Broad ESG supplier screening programs |
| Dun & Bradstreet | Business identity data, supplier intelligence, risk analytics | Supplier master-data enrichment and risk screening BIICL |
| FRDM | Forced-labor risk mapping and supplier screening | Modern slavery-focused assessments BIICL |
| Supply Trace | Open-access supply chain risk intelligence combining customs data and research | Apparel and emerging supply-chain transparency use cases Supply Trace |
| SlaveCheck | Human-sourced intelligence plus AI-based modern slavery due diligence | Labor-intensive sectors needing worker-level insight SlaveCheck |
Many audits also incorporate:
A typical mature program might use:
For a corporate audit, the shortlist I would usually evaluate first is:
The best choice depends heavily on your industry (e.g., apparel, electronics, automotive, agriculture, minerals), geography, and whether you need evidence suitable for regulators or customer audits.
Yes. If your audit is specifically focused on **modern slavery / forced-labor exposure**, there is a fairly mature market for supply-chain intelligence data. The providers differ significantly in whether they offer **trade-flow intelligence, supplier/entity intelligence, human-rights risk scores, or actual…
Yes. If your audit is specifically focused on modern slavery / forced-labor exposure, there is a fairly mature market for supply-chain intelligence data. The providers differ significantly in whether they offer trade-flow intelligence, supplier/entity intelligence, human-rights risk scores, or actual forced-labor investigations.
I'd divide the data stack into three layers:
| Need | Strong candidates |
|---|---|
| Who actually supplies whom? | Sayari, Exiger |
| Forced-labor / UFLPA intelligence | Kharon, Exiger, Verité CUMULUS |
| Country/industry human-rights risk | Maplecroft, EiQ |
| Open/free preliminary research | Supply Trace |
A particularly useful approach is not to rely on supplier questionnaires alone. Trade and corporate-relationship data can uncover Tier 2/3+ relationships that suppliers don't disclose. Sayari explicitly positions its product around independently verifying networks beyond Tier 1, while the 2026 Sayari–Source Intelligence integration connects entity-level forced-labor indicators with specific products, components and materials.
Also, this is increasingly a regulatory rather than merely ESG issue: the EU Forced Labour Regulation is scheduled to permit products made with forced labor to be banned beginning in December 2027.
If you tell me your industry, countries of sourcing, and whether you're looking for a data feed/API or a ready-made screening platform, I can narrow this to the 3–5 best vendors and compare coverage, methodology, pricing model, and audit evidence.
Auditing a supply chain for modern slavery and forced labor requires looking past tier-1 direct vendors into deep, multi-tier upstream networks (raw materials, harvesting, and extraction).[](https://www.integritybridge.com/resources/using-data-analytics-to-manage-modern-slavery-risk)…
Auditing a supply chain for modern slavery and forced labor requires looking past tier-1 direct vendors into deep, multi-tier upstream networks (raw materials, harvesting, and extraction).
Supply chain intelligence and risk-mapping data providers specialize in this area through AI, trade data, and localized social audits:
To help narrow down which intelligence provider fits your audit, could you share: