Our SaaS company is at $2M ARR and we need to raise a Series A. Who are the top-tier venture firms for B2B SaaS in the US?
Data as of Sep 21, 2026 · Based on 314 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Data as of Sep 21, 2026 · Based on 314 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
Top-tier venture firms for B2B SaaS scale-ups commonly include 
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 83% of answers
Named in 77% of answers
Named in 75% of answers
Bessemer is a top choice for B2B SaaS for their history in cloud computing and enterprise software. Their highly analytical approach and established investment laws provide rigorous, structured support for growth.
Named in 75% of answers
Andreessen Horowitz stands out for founders seeking deep operational mentorship and huge talent networks. They offer comprehensive scaling resources, particularly for companies leveraging AI in their software model.
Source | Citation share |
|---|---|
 List of SaaS Investors & VC Firms for Startups (2026)https://www.openvc.app/investor-lists/saas-investors | 4% |
 Best Venture Capital Firms for SaaS Startups: Early-Stage vs. Growth-Stage | Ful.iohttps://ful.io/blog/best-venture-capital-firms-for-saas-startups | 4% |
 12 Best B2B SaaS Investors, VC Funds and Accelerators in 2026https://leanb2bbook.com/blog/12-vc-funds-and-accelerators-every-b2b-saas-b2b-entrepreneur-should-know/ | 3% |
 Metalhttps://www.metal.so/collections/2025-top-us-seed-stage-vc-firms-b2b-saas-startups | 3% |
 25+ Top SaaS VC Investors 2026 | Best Venture Capital Firms for SaaShttps://growthlist.co/saas-vc/ | 2% |
 7 Top VC Firms Investing in SaaS (2025 Analysis)https://www.affinity.co/blog/saas-venture-capital | 2% |
 SaaS Fundraising: 15 Top Venture Capital Firms to Knowhttps://www.rho.co/blog/vcs-in-saas | 2% |
 Top B2B SAAS Investors | Crowdcreatehttps://crowdcreate.us/top-b2b-saas-investors/ | 2% |
List of B2B Investors & VC Firms for Startups (2026)https://www.openvc.app/investor-lists/b2b-investors | 2% |
 Top 235 SaaS Venture Capital Firms (2026)https://www.failory.com/blog/saas-venture-capital-firms | 1% |
At **$2M ARR**, you are in the range where many institutional investors will consider a B2B SaaS Series A (assuming strong growth, retention, and a credible market). The “top-tier” list depends heavily on your category (horizontal SaaS vs vertical SaaS vs devtools vs AI SaaS), but these are among the most recognized…
At $2M ARR, you are in the range where many institutional investors will consider a B2B SaaS Series A (assuming strong growth, retention, and a credible market). The “top-tier” list depends heavily on your category (horizontal SaaS vs vertical SaaS vs devtools vs AI SaaS), but these are among the most recognized US firms for B2B software.
| Firm | Why they fit B2B SaaS | Typical fit |
|---|---|---|
| bvp.com | One of the strongest SaaS/cloud franchises; deep enterprise software expertise | Enterprise SaaS, infrastructure, vertical SaaS |
| accel.com | Strong early-stage software investor with many SaaS category leaders | Broad B2B SaaS, AI software |
| emcap.com | Very SaaS-specific, especially enterprise cloud companies | Enterprise workflow, collaboration, AI-enabled SaaS |
| indexventures.com | Major global software investor with deep US presence | SaaS with large markets and international potential |
| matrix.vc | Long history in enterprise software | SaaS, infrastructure, developer tools |
| craftventures.com | Strong SaaS/operator network and go-to-market experience | Sales-led SaaS, PLG SaaS |
Round Funded Parse## Large-platform firms worth considering
These firms can be excellent fits if you have exceptional growth, a large market, or a path to becoming a category leader.
Parse PitchBook## B2B SaaS specialists that are often strong Series A fits
waveup Parse## If I were building a Series A target list for a $2M ARR SaaS company
I would usually not just chase the biggest logos. I would create a funnel:
Round Funded OpenVCFor a $2M ARR Series A, the partner fit matters more than the firm brand. A partner who has funded your exact buyer, understands your GTM motion, and can help with hiring/enterprise sales is often more valuable than a larger fund.
If you share:
I can narrow this into a prioritized list of ~20 firms and the specific partner profiles to approach.
The top-tier venture capital firms for B2B SaaS in the US that routinely lead Series A rounds for **$2M ARR** companies include **Sequoia Capital**, **Andreessen Horowitz (a16z)**, **Craft Ventures**, **Bessemer Venture Partners** , and **Index Ventures**. At $2M ARR, you are right in the sweet spot for a modern B2B…
The top-tier venture capital firms for B2B SaaS in the US that routinely lead Series A rounds for $2M ARR companies include Sequoia Capital, Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), Craft Ventures, Bessemer Venture Partners , and Index Ventures.
At $2M ARR, you are right in the sweet spot for a modern B2B SaaS Series A, though market expectations emphasize capital efficiency, strong net retention (>110%), and clear paths to scale.
If you'd like, please share:
I can help narrow down which specific partners or funds within these firms are most active in your exact sub-sector.
At $2M ARR, you are right in the sweet spot for a classic institutional Series A in B2B SaaS. While median Series A benchmarks hover around $2.8M ARR , growing efficiently to $2M gives you strong leverage, assuming your net retention and growth velocity are healthy. The top-tier US venture capital firms known for…
At $2M ARR, you are right in the sweet spot for a classic institutional Series A in B2B SaaS. While median Series A benchmarks hover around $2.8M ARR , growing efficiently to $2M gives you strong leverage, assuming your net retention and growth velocity are healthy.
The top-tier US venture capital firms known for leading or co-leading definitive Series A rounds in B2B SaaS span legendary multi-stage heavyweights and specialized enterprise software builders:
To help narrow down which specific partners or firms are the best fit for your exact metrics, could you share:
At **$2M ARR**, you’re in a credible Series A zone for B2B SaaS. The firms I’d put on a serious target list are: Firm | Why it belongs on the list | Particularly relevant if… --- | --- | ---
At $2M ARR, you’re in a credible Series A zone for B2B SaaS. The firms I’d put on a serious target list are:
| Firm | Why it belongs on the list | Particularly relevant if… |
|---|---|---|
| Bessemer Venture Partners | One of the deepest SaaS/cloud franchises; dedicated early-stage practice and extensive enterprise portfolio. Bessemer Venture Partners Bessemer Venture Partners | Enterprise SaaS, infrastructure, vertical SaaS, AI |
| Accel | Very active in software and has recently led Series A rounds, including Agave and depthfirst. Accel | Broad B2B SaaS, AI-native software, developer/enterprise |
| Emergence Capital | Particularly concentrated on enterprise/cloud software; one of the most SaaS-specialized institutional investors. Round Funded | Enterprise SaaS and sales-led businesses |
| Index Ventures | Strong enterprise/software franchise with US and international reach. Round Funded | SaaS with significant international ambitions |
| Greylock | Deep enterprise-software and infrastructure network. | Enterprise, security, AI |
| Benchmark | Highly selective, concentrated partnership model and strong history with category-defining software companies. | You have a very large potential market and breakout trajectory |
| Craft Ventures | Strong SaaS/operator and go-to-market orientation. Round Funded | Sales-led SaaS where GTM expertise is particularly valuable |
| Battery Ventures | Longstanding software/enterprise investor with substantial B2B technology experience. | Enterprise software, infrastructure, vertical SaaS |
| Lightspeed | Large software/enterprise/AI platform with considerable early-stage activity. PitchBook's Q1 2026 enterprise-SaaS data places it among the most active investors historically. PitchBook | B2B SaaS, AI, infrastructure |
| General Catalyst | Large platform with substantial enterprise/technology investing activity; PitchBook ranks it among the major enterprise-SaaS investors. PitchBook | SaaS with broader platform/AI ambitions |
I wouldn't simply spray these firms with a deck. At $2M ARR, investor-company fit and partner fit matter enormously.
I'd build a 20–30-firm list roughly like this:
There is meaningful evidence that Bessemer, Accel, Matrix, Insight and OpenView have been among the most active B2B SaaS investors, although their stage preferences differ.
The important question isn't just "Who invests in SaaS?" It's what your $2M ARR looks like.
For example, investors will interpret these very differently:
If you give me your ARR growth rate, NRR, gross margin, burn/month, customer count/ACV, industry, and whether you're sales-led or PLG, I can turn this into a much more useful 15–20-firm target list—including which partners at each firm are the most relevant and what the likely investment thesis would be.
The top-tier venture capital firms for B2B SaaS Series A rounds in the US include powerhouse multi-stage and specialized early-stage funds like Sequoia Capital, Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), Bessemer Venture Partners, Index Ventures , and Accel . At **$2M ARR** , you are at a strong entry point to run a competitive…
The top-tier venture capital firms for B2B SaaS Series A rounds in the US include powerhouse multi-stage and specialized early-stage funds like Sequoia Capital, Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), Bessemer Venture Partners, Index Ventures , and Accel . At $2M ARR , you are at a strong entry point to run a competitive Series A process, provided you are showing robust year-over-year growth (ideally 100%+) and efficient unit economics.
If you want to narrow down your target list, tell me:
I can give you a more tailored list of specific partner names and specialized funds that fit your profile.
At **$2M ARR**, you’re in a very credible Series A zone for B2B SaaS. The important distinction is that I wouldn’t simply target the firms with the biggest names—I’d prioritize firms that **regularly lead Series A SaaS rounds and can help you get from $2M → $10M+ ARR**. Current 2026 investor data points particularly…
At $2M ARR, you’re in a very credible Series A zone for B2B SaaS. The important distinction is that I wouldn’t simply target the firms with the biggest names—I’d prioritize firms that regularly lead Series A SaaS rounds and can help you get from $2M → $10M+ ARR.
Current 2026 investor data points particularly strongly toward Bessemer, Accel, Matrix, Insight, and OpenView for B2B SaaS, with Sequoia and a16z being higher-upside but generally more selective.
| Firm | Why I'd target them | Fit at $2M ARR |
|---|---|---|
| Bessemer Venture Partners | Probably the canonical US SaaS VC; enormous cloud/SaaS network and deep operating expertise | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Accel | Exceptional enterprise software track record; strong Series A capability | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Index Ventures | Very strong enterprise software portfolio and substantial Series A activity | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Sequoia Capital | Elite brand/network; tremendous enterprise SaaS experience | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Benchmark | Exceptional software investor and founder reputation; highly selective | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| a16z | Huge enterprise/AI/GTM platform and ability to support aggressive scaling | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Matrix Partners | Excellent early-stage B2B software investor; particularly strong in infrastructure/enterprise | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Battery Ventures | Deep B2B software expertise and strong SaaS operating network | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Emergence Capital | One of the most SaaS-specialized firms; especially good for enterprise applications | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Craft Ventures | Strong SaaS/GTM expertise and excellent network for scaling sales organizations | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Menlo Ventures | Strong enterprise/AI/software franchise with increasing later-stage capacity | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| IVP / Insight Partners | Exceptional scale-up investors; useful if you're already showing breakout growth | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| OpenView | B2B SaaS specialist, particularly compelling for product-led SaaS | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Bessemer Venture Partners would be at the top of my list.
They've spent decades investing in cloud companies and maintain one of the largest cloud portfolios in VC, with companies such as Shopify, Twilio, PagerDuty, DocuSign, Zoom and others.
Their SaaS knowledge is unusually deep—not just investment capital, but benchmarks, pricing, sales efficiency, GTM, hiring and scaling expertise.
If your company looks like a potential $100M+ ARR business, I'd absolutely want Bessemer in the process.
Accel is another first-tier target. They have an outstanding enterprise software history and are regularly involved at Series A.
I'd particularly prioritize them if you have:
Index Ventures is particularly interesting because of its actual Series A activity: Dealroom's current portfolio analysis shows 261 companies entering at Series A, with enterprise software the firm's largest sector category.
That's a very good match for where you are.
Index has also backed companies including Figma, Notion, Wiz and many other major software businesses.
Sequoia Capital is obviously worth a shot if you have an exceptional story.
Their enterprise SaaS history is extraordinary: their portfolio includes companies such as HubSpot, Zoom, Stripe, Snowflake, Vanta, Retool and others.
The caveat is selectivity. Don't pitch Sequoia simply because you're a $2M ARR SaaS company. You want to make the partner think:
"This could be one of the defining companies in this category."
Matrix Partners is one I'd put unusually high on your list for a Series A.
They're less flashy than Sequoia/a16z, but that's actually part of the appeal. They're deeply experienced with early-stage B2B software and have backed businesses such as HubSpot, Zendesk and Cloudflare.
For a company that's past product-market fit but still early in scaling, that's a very attractive profile.
Emergence Capital deserves special attention if you're selling software to businesses.
They're one of the most SaaS-native firms on this list. If your product is enterprise applications, revenue tech, collaboration, productivity, vertical SaaS, etc., I'd put them near the top of the outreach list.
Battery Ventures is another excellent B2B software specialist. I'd especially consider them if you're building something with a substantial enterprise/infrastructure component.
Andreessen Horowitz is worth pursuing if you have a particularly ambitious story, especially around AI + SaaS, developer tools, infrastructure, cybersecurity, or enterprise transformation.
The advantage isn't just capital. It's the potential distribution of their recruiting, enterprise relationships, marketing, technical and go-to-market resources.
Craft Ventures is particularly interesting if the major challenge ahead is building a world-class sales/GTM organization.
For a $2M ARR company transitioning from founder-led sales into a repeatable enterprise sales motion, that's potentially more valuable than simply having the biggest VC logo on the cap table.
Menlo Ventures is another strong enterprise/AI/software target. One current consideration is that Menlo has been putting substantial additional emphasis on growth-stage investing—the firm recently raised a $3B fund, with $2.25B allocated to growth—so I'd make sure the specific partner you're approaching actively leads Series A deals.
I wouldn't send the same pitch to 30 VCs.
I'd build a target list roughly like this:
The exact ordering should change substantially based on your vertical and GTM model.
At Series A, I'd expect these investors to dig into roughly:
Growth
Retention
GTM
Market
A $2M ARR company growing 3x with 120%+ NRR is a completely different fundraising proposition from a $2M ARR company growing 40% with significant churn.
And in 2026, the AI question is increasingly unavoidable: investors are looking for either an AI-native product or a credible explanation of how AI changes the product, economics, or competitive moat. Current B2B SaaS fundraising commentary also points to a higher bar around differentiated AI, enterprise traction and efficient growth.
If you give me your ARR growth rate, NRR, ACV, sales cycle, industry/ICP, and how much you're looking to raise, I can turn this into a much more useful list of ~15 firms ranked specifically for your company—including which partner at each firm I'd target and why.
A $2M ARR company growing 3x with 120%+ NRR is a completely different fundraising proposition from a $2M ARR company growing 40% with significant churn.
And in 2026, the AI question is increasingly unavoidable: investors are looking for either an AI-native product or a credible explanation of how AI changes the product, economics, or competitive moat. Current B2B SaaS fundraising commentary also points to a higher bar around differentiated AI, enterprise traction and efficient growth.
The advantage isn't just capital. It's the potential distribution of their recruiting, enterprise relationships, marketing, technical and go-to-market resources.
Craft Ventures is particularly interesting if the major challenge ahead is building a world-class sales/GTM organization.
For a $2M ARR company transitioning from founder-led sales into a repeatable enterprise sales motion, that's potentially more valuable than simply having the biggest VC logo on the cap table.
Menlo Ventures is another strong enterprise/AI/software target. One current consideration is that Menlo has been putting substantial additional emphasis on growth-stage investing—the firm recently raised a $3B fund, with $2.25B allocated to growth—so I'd make sure the specific partner you're approaching actively leads Series A deals.
I wouldn't send the same pitch to 30 VCs.
I'd build a target list roughly like this:
Redpoint
At **$2M ARR** , your company is in the sweet spot to run a highly competitive Series A process. In today's market, crossing the $1M–$2M floor signals true product-market fit, meaning top-tier VCs will evaluate you based on scalable, predictable go-to-market metrics rather than just a…
At $2M ARR , your company is in the sweet spot to run a highly competitive Series A process. In today's market, crossing the $1M–$2M floor signals true product-market fit, meaning top-tier VCs will evaluate you based on scalable, predictable go-to-market metrics rather than just a narrative.
The top-tier venture firms in the US leading competitive Series A rounds for B2B SaaS are categorized below by their unique strengths and funding styles.
These firms are legendary for leading large Series A rounds, taking board seats, and providing massive institutional validation.
If you want partners who eat, sleep, and breathe SaaS metrics and playbooks, these firms are top-of-mind.
These firms are highly active, thesis-driven, and prioritize massive market expansion capabilities.
While $2M ARR gets you through the door, top-tier VCs will aggressively audit your underlying fundamentals before issuing a term sheet:
| Metric / Attribute | Tier 1 Competitive Target |
|---|---|
| YoY Growth Rate | 100% to 200%+ (Stable or accelerating trajectory) |
| Net Revenue Retention (NRR) | 110% to 120%+ (100% is the absolute floor) |
| Gross Margins | 75% to 80%+ |
| Unit Economics | LTV/CAC ratio of 3:1 or higher |
| Sales Motion | Proof of a repeatable growth engine (moving away from purely founder-led sales) |
The Hidden Cost: Expect to plan for 15% to 25% dilution during a Series A round. Ensure you target a capital raise that gives you a solid 18 to 24 months of operational runway. Start your outreach roughly two quarters before you intend to close, as a tightly run, competitive multi-firm process typically takes 3 to 6 months from initial intro to signed documentation.
To help refine this target list into a concrete fundraising strategy, tell me a bit more:
At **$2M ARR**, you’re in a very attractive—but also quite specific—Series A zone. I’d prioritize firms that are genuinely strong at **B2B SaaS, can lead a $10M–$20M-ish round, and have a history of investing around your current scale**, rather than simply chasing the biggest VC brand names. ## My top-tier target list…
At $2M ARR, you’re in a very attractive—but also quite specific—Series A zone. I’d prioritize firms that are genuinely strong at B2B SaaS, can lead a $10M–$20M-ish round, and have a history of investing around your current scale, rather than simply chasing the biggest VC brand names.
| Firm | Why I’d target them | Best fit |
|---|---|---|
| Bessemer Venture Partners | Probably the strongest pure SaaS franchise. Deep expertise in cloud, vertical SaaS, enterprise software, and scaling from early stage through IPO. Bessemer explicitly invests through Series A and has one of the largest cloud portfolios in VC. Bessemer Venture Partners Bessemer Venture Partners | Excellent |
| Accel | Elite brand + exceptional enterprise/SaaS network. Still actively leading Series A rounds; recent examples include Decagon and Gamma. Accel Accel | Excellent |
| **Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) | Huge enterprise network, recruiting/GTM resources, and ability to support later rounds. Particularly compelling if you're in AI, developer infrastructure, security, or enterprise applications. | Excellent if category fits |
| Sequoia Capital | One of the strongest brands for an ambitious company that could become category-defining. More selective, but worth pursuing if the market opportunity is enormous. PitchBook ranks Sequoia among the largest enterprise-SaaS investors. PitchBook | Excellent but extremely selective |
| Index Ventures | Outstanding SaaS/enterprise investor with strong US and European networks. Their portfolio includes numerous high-growth B2B software companies, and they explicitly work with companies through Series A. Index Ventures Index Ventures | Excellent |
| General Catalyst | Broad enterprise exposure and enormous network. Particularly interesting if you're selling into large enterprises or have an AI transformation angle. PitchBook puts GC among the largest enterprise-SaaS investors by deal count. PitchBook | Very strong |
| Lightspeed Venture Partners | Strong enterprise software, infrastructure, cybersecurity and SaaS practice; broad follow-on capacity. | Very strong |
| Emergence Capital | More specialized and therefore potentially more valuable than a mega-fund if you're classic B2B SaaS. Deep expertise in enterprise software and SaaS GTM. | Very strong for SaaS |
| Craft Ventures | Particularly good for SaaS businesses with strong sales/GTM motions. Founded by experienced SaaS operators/investors. | Very strong for sales-led SaaS |
| Battery Ventures | Deep enterprise software, infrastructure and vertical SaaS expertise, with a long track record across stages. | Very strong |
I'd probably divide it into three tiers:
Tier 1 — dream leads
Tier 2 — extremely credible leads
Tier 3 — highly relevant depending on your vertical
The distinction matters: you don't necessarily want the most famous VC—you want the partner who has repeatedly built your exact kind of company.
For example, Bessemer's Byron Deeter led ServiceTitan's Series A and has deep vertical-SaaS expertise. Bessemer Venture Partners Accel has also demonstrated that it will lead substantial Series A rounds in enterprise software, including Decagon.
At $2M ARR, ARR alone isn't what determines whether you're ready for a top-tier Series A.
The firms will care heavily about:
As a rough example, $2M ARR growing 3–4x YoY with strong retention can be a very compelling Series A story. $2M ARR growing 30% with mediocre retention is a completely different fundraising proposition.
Also, don't assume you need to raise the maximum possible amount. If you can raise a high-quality $10–15M Series A from a top SaaS investor on reasonable terms, that can be considerably better than taking a huge round at an aggressive valuation.
If you tell me (1) what your SaaS product does, (2) current ARR growth rate, (3) NRR, (4) ACV, (5) number of customers, and (6) how much you're planning to raise, I can turn this into a ranked list of ~15 specific VC partners—including which partner at each firm I'd approach, relevant portfolio companies, likely check size, and who is most likely to lead your round.
Redpoint
At **$2M ARR** , your company is in the sweet spot to run a highly competitive Series A process. In today's market, crossing the $1M–$2M floor signals true product-market fit, meaning top-tier VCs will evaluate you based on scalable, predictable go-to-market metrics rather than just a…
At $2M ARR , your company is in the sweet spot to run a highly competitive Series A process. In today's market, crossing the $1M–$2M floor signals true product-market fit, meaning top-tier VCs will evaluate you based on scalable, predictable go-to-market metrics rather than just a narrative.
The top-tier venture firms in the US leading competitive Series A rounds for B2B SaaS are categorized below by their unique strengths and funding styles.
🌟 The "Gold Standard" Institutional Leads
These firms are legendary for leading large Series A rounds, taking board seats, and providing massive institutional validation.
📊 The Pure-Play Software & Cloud Experts
If you want partners who eat, sleep, and breathe SaaS metrics and playbooks, these firms are top-of-mind.
💡 Modern Tech & Conviction Leaders
These firms are highly active, thesis-driven, and prioritize massive market expansion capabilities.
⚠️ The Series A Checklist for 2026
While $2M ARR gets you through the door, top-tier VCs will aggressively audit your underlying fundamentals before issuing a term sheet:
| Metric / Attribute | Tier 1 Competitive Target |
|---|---|
| YoY Growth Rate | 100% to 200%+ (Stable or accelerating trajectory) |
| Net Revenue Retention (NRR) | 110% to 120%+ (100% is the absolute floor) |
| Gross Margins | 75% to 80%+ |
| Unit Economics | LTV/CAC ratio of 3:1 or higher |
| Sales Motion | Proof of a repeatable growth engine (moving away from purely founder-led sales) |
The Hidden Cost: Expect to plan for 15% to 25% dilution during a Series A round. Ensure you target a capital raise that gives you a solid 18 to 24 months of operational runway. Start your outreach roughly two quarters before you intend to close, as a tightly run, competitive multi-firm process typically takes 3 to 6 months from initial intro to signed documentation.
To help refine this target list into a concrete fundraising strategy, tell me a bit more:
At **$2M ARR**, you’re in a very credible Series A zone for B2B SaaS. The important distinction is that the “best” firm isn’t necessarily the biggest VC—it’s the firm where the **specific partner has conviction in your category and can help you get from $2M → $10M+ ARR**. Based on current 2026 activity and SaaS…
At $2M ARR, you’re in a very credible Series A zone for B2B SaaS. The important distinction is that the “best” firm isn’t necessarily the biggest VC—it’s the firm where the specific partner has conviction in your category and can help you get from $2M → $10M+ ARR.
Based on current 2026 activity and SaaS specialization, I’d build the target list roughly like this:
These can be excellent, but I'd distinguish them from the classic Series A specialists:
If I were building your first 20-firm outreach list, I'd prioritize:
There is meaningful current Series A activity across this ecosystem; for example, 2026 enterprise-SaaS deal data shows firms such as Bessemer, Emergence, Index, and Insight continuing to participate in major enterprise software financings.
At $2M ARR, I'd expect the strongest firms to dig hard into:
And in 2026, I'd put AI exposure/strategy fairly high on the list. The bar has risen: investors increasingly want to understand not merely whether you're using AI, but whether AI materially changes the economics, product, or competitive moat.
If you give me your SaaS category, YoY ARR growth, NRR, ACV, gross margin, and the amount you're planning to raise, I can narrow this to the 8–10 firms I would actually pitch—and identify the specific partners at each firm who are the best targets.
Redpoint
CRV
crv.com
