Data as of Aug 25, 2026 · Based on 287 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
For profitable companies looking to avoid selling or giving up equity, several firms provide royalty-based financing. These options allow you to access growth capital by trading a share of future revenue rather than selling ownership stake. Firms like Flow Capital, Decathlon Capital Partners, and
Cypress Growth Capital are frequently cited for businesses requiring scalable, non-dilutive capital without the rigid requirements of traditional equity sales or forced exit timelines.
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 52% of answers
Named in 33% of answers
Named in 32% of answers
Named in 30% of answers
Flow Capital provides cashflow-oriented, royalty-linked financing that can be structured without a fixed term. It is a suitable choice for companies in North America and the UK seeking flexibility without diluting their ownership.
Yes. What you’re describing is usually called **revenue-based financing (RBF)** or **royalty-based financing**: you receive growth capital without selling equity, and repay the investor through an agreed percentage of revenue until a predetermined return cap is reached.…
Yes. What you’re describing is usually called revenue-based financing (RBF) or royalty-based financing: you receive growth capital without selling equity, and repay the investor through an agreed percentage of revenue until a predetermined return cap is reached.
For a profitable company that wants to remain independent, I’d look first at these firms:
| Firm | Best fit | Typical structure / notes |
|---|---|---|
| flowcapital.com | Established, profitable/growing companies | Flexible royalty/revenue-linked growth capital; particularly interesting for companies that don't want an equity sale |
| decathloncapital.com | Established companies with meaningful revenue | One of the better-known U.S. royalty-based growth-capital investors |
| cypressgrowthcapital.com | B2B software / recurring-revenue businesses | Core offering is royalty-based financing; they explicitly position it as preserving equity. Cypress Growth Capital |
| novelcapital.com | SaaS/software | Generally $100K–$1M initial investments, potentially up to $5M; typically up to ~30% of ARR. Novel Capital |
| lightercapital.com | Technology/SaaS companies | Revenue-based financing specialist for technology businesses |
| chasegrowthcapital.com | Established businesses | Advertises roughly $1M–$3.5M, with royalties typically 1–5% of top-line revenue and no fixed monthly payment. Chase Growth Capital |
If your company is already profitable, don't automatically assume RBF is the cheapest form of capital. The appeal is primarily control and flexibility:
For example, if an investor gives you $2M for a 1.5× repayment cap, you would ultimately pay $3M. If the royalty were 4% of revenue, a $500K month would produce a $20K payment, while a $250K month would produce $10K. The exact economics vary considerably by provider and contract.
If you tell me (1) annual revenue, (2) EBITDA/profit, (3) industry, (4) how much capital you want, and (5) whether revenue is recurring or project-based, I can narrow this to 5–10 firms that are actually appropriate for your company, including likely deal size, revenue requirements, geographic restrictions, and whether they take a percentage of gross revenue, net revenue, or a specific royalty stream.
Royalty-based financing (often used interchangeably with **revenue-based financing** or **revenue-sharing** ) is an ideal vehicle for profitable, growing companies that want to inject capital for expansion without diluting equity, giving up board seats, or taking on rigid, fixed-payment bank…
Royalty-based financing (often used interchangeably with revenue-based financing or revenue-sharing ) is an ideal vehicle for profitable, growing companies that want to inject capital for expansion without diluting equity, giving up board seats, or taking on rigid, fixed-payment bank loans.
Investment firms and specialty finance funds providing this type of capital generally take a fixed percentage of your monthly top-line revenue until a total capped return (usually a multiple of the initial investment) is reached.
Prominent investment firms and funds specializing in royalty- and revenue-based financing include:
If you can share:
I can help narrow down which of these specific firms best matches your financial profile.
Royalty-based financing (often called **revenue-based financing** or **RBF** ) is ideal for profitable companies that want growth capital without giving up equity, taking on rigid fixed-payment bank debt, or selling the business. Repayments scale up or down based on a percentage of your monthly gross revenue or…
Royalty-based financing (often called revenue-based financing or RBF ) is ideal for profitable companies that want growth capital without giving up equity, taking on rigid fixed-payment bank debt, or selling the business. Repayments scale up or down based on a percentage of your monthly gross revenue or top-line receipts until a capped multiple (usually 1.3 x 1.3 x 1.3𝑥 to 2.0 x 2.0 x 2.0𝑥) is paid back.
Several prominent investment firms and platforms specialize in this type of non-dilutive financing, segmented by industry focus:
To help narrow down which firm is the best fit, could you share:
Yes. What you’re describing is usually called **revenue-based financing (RBF)**, **royalty-based financing**, or **royalty financing**: an investor provides growth capital in exchange for a percentage of future revenue until an agreed repayment multiple/cap is reached. It is generally **non-dilutive**, so the founders…
Yes. What you’re describing is usually called revenue-based financing (RBF), royalty-based financing, or royalty financing: an investor provides growth capital in exchange for a percentage of future revenue until an agreed repayment multiple/cap is reached. It is generally non-dilutive, so the founders retain ownership and control.
For a profitable company that does not want to sell, these are the firms I’d investigate first:
| Firm | Typical fit | What stands out |
|---|---|---|
| Decathlon Capital Partners | Established, profitable/growing companies | $4M–$100M revenue; specifically markets growth capital without equity dilution. decathloncapital.com |
| Chase Growth Capital | Established businesses needing ~$1M–$3.5M | Explicitly offers “Royalty Based Finance”; typically 1%–5% of monthly top-line revenue until the agreed return is reached. chasegrowthcapital.com |
| Cote Capital | Companies with valuable IP that can scale | Particularly interesting if your business has proprietary technology/IP. It takes a revenue/IP royalty rather than equity and explicitly says the entrepreneur retains control and chooses whether/when to exit. www.cotecapital.com |
| Novel Capital | SaaS/software with predictable recurring revenue | Generally $100K–$1M initial checks, potentially up to $5M; looks for $500K+ revenue, predictable revenue and strong growth. fund.novelcapital.com |
| Flow Capital | Growth companies with recurring/predictable revenue | A prominent name in royalty/revenue-linked growth financing; worth including in an RBF process. |
| Lighter Capital | Recurring-revenue SaaS | Another established non-dilutive/revenue-based financing option, particularly for software companies. |
If you're a conventional profitable business: I'd start with Decathlon and Chase Growth Capital. Decathlon's stated target is unusually well aligned with your situation: North American companies with at least two years of history, $4M–$100M revenue, attractive margins, and cash-flow-positive visibility. Its funding is repaid from a percentage of revenue over roughly 2–5 years.
If your company is IP-heavy: I'd put Cote Capital near the top. Its model is specifically an IP royalty/revenue share, rather than selling equity, and it is designed to let the owners decide if and when to sell the company.
Don't assume every company advertising “non-dilutive financing” is actually offering royalty financing. For example, Capchase currently emphasizes financing B2B contracts and loans rather than traditional RBF; its own materials distinguish its product from revenue-based financing.
If you give me annual revenue, EBITDA/net income, growth rate, industry, and how much capital you want, I can narrow this to 5–10 firms that are realistic fits, including typical check sizes and the economics you should expect.
Yes. What you’re describing is generally called **royalty-based financing (RBF)** or **revenue-based financing**: you receive growth capital without selling equity, and repay the investor through a percentage of revenue until an agreed return cap is reached.…
Yes. What you’re describing is generally called royalty-based financing (RBF) or revenue-based financing: you receive growth capital without selling equity, and repay the investor through a percentage of revenue until an agreed return cap is reached.
| Firm | Typical fit | What stands out |
|---|---|---|
| Flow Capital | Established SaaS / tech-enabled businesses | Royalty-linked, non-dilutive growth capital; commonly cited for larger, flexible transactions |
| Decathlon Capital Partners | Profitable, established companies | One of the better-known dedicated revenue/royalty financing investors |
| Cypress Growth Capital | Recurring-revenue businesses, particularly software | Growth capital without an equity sale |
| Novel Capital | B2B software / recurring revenue | Generally $100K–$1M initial investments, with financing up to $5M; looks for $500K+ revenue and predictable growth sourceforge.netfund.novelcapital.com |
| Round2 Capital | Software with recurring revenue | Explicitly structures financing as royalties on revenue; says its financings are non-dilutive and generally repay at a 1.4–2.0× cap round2cap.com |
| Chase Growth Capital | $3M–$50M annual revenue businesses | Specifically targets $1M–$3.5M growth financings in exchange for roughly 1–5% of monthly top-line revenue; no equity position chasegrowthcapital.com |
| Lighter Capital | SaaS / recurring-revenue companies | Dedicated revenue-based financing provider; particularly relevant if you're a software company |
| Bigfoot Capital | Recurring-revenue / technology businesses | Revenue-based and growth-capital structures |
The important distinction is that “royalty financing” means different things in different markets. For a normal operating company, you probably want revenue-based growth capital, not the royalty-finance funds that buy pharmaceutical, music, mining, or other specific royalty streams. For example, Royalty Pharma and HealthCare Royalty specialize in life-sciences royalty assets rather than financing an ordinary profitable operating company.
There are actually three structures I'd investigate:
For an already profitable company, I'd focus on firms willing to underwrite EBITDA/cash flow, rather than the fintech-style RBF providers aimed at smaller businesses. That's likely to produce substantially better economics.
One particularly interesting benchmark is Chase Growth Capital: it explicitly markets royalty financing as an alternative to both private equity and traditional debt, with the company retaining ownership and control.
If you tell me (a) annual revenue, (b) EBITDA/profit, (c) industry, (d) how much capital you want, and (e) whether you want growth capital or liquidity for the owners, I can narrow this to 5–10 firms that are realistic candidates and compare their likely check sizes, revenue requirements, royalty rates, and return caps.
Royalty-based financing—more commonly referred to as **revenue-based financing (RBF)** or **revenue-sharing** —is an ideal path for profitable, independent companies that want growth capital without giving up equity, taking on rigid bank covenants, or selling the…
Royalty-based financing—more commonly referred to as revenue-based financing (RBF) or revenue-sharing —is an ideal path for profitable, independent companies that want growth capital without giving up equity, taking on rigid bank covenants, or selling the business.
The right investment firm for your company typically depends on your specific business model (e.g., SaaS, e-commerce, B2B services, or traditional brick-and-mortar). Prominent investment firms and platforms specializing in non-dilutive, revenue-tied financing include:
If you share:
I can help narrow down which of these specific providers is the best match for your profile.
Yes. What you're describing is usually called **royalty-based financing (RBF)** or **revenue-based financing**: an investor provides growth capital in exchange for a percentage of ongoing revenue until an agreed repayment cap is reached. Unlike private equity, it generally doesn't require selling equity or agreeing to…
Yes. What you're describing is usually called royalty-based financing (RBF) or revenue-based financing: an investor provides growth capital in exchange for a percentage of ongoing revenue until an agreed repayment cap is reached. Unlike private equity, it generally doesn't require selling equity or agreeing to an exit.
| Firm | Typical fit | Structure / size |
|---|---|---|
| Chase Growth Capital | Profitable established small/mid-sized businesses | $1M–$3.5M; roughly 1–5% of monthly revenue; no equity or board seat |
| Cypress Growth Capital | Companies wanting to remain closely held | Royalty-based growth capital; payments adjust with revenue |
| Novel Capital | Particularly SaaS/software and recurring-revenue businesses | Generally $100K–$1M initial investment, potentially up to $5M; up to ~30% of annual revenue |
| Cote Capital | IP-driven companies with substantial growth potential | Revenue/IP royalty in exchange for growth capital; specifically designed as an alternative to equity |
| Specialty Capital | Smaller businesses with established revenue | Revenue-based financing with individualized underwriting |
A particularly interesting match for your description is Chase Growth Capital. It explicitly targets companies doing $3M–$50M in annual revenue seeking $1M–$3.5M, and says the owner retains 100% of the equity and control.
Cypress Growth Capital is another strong candidate if staying privately held is important: it specifically markets royalty financing to owners who want to keep the company closely held and says it doesn't require a board seat or control provisions.
If you're a software/SaaS company, Novel is worth investigating. It describes its financing as royalty-based/RBF and looks for predictable revenue, at least $500K of revenue, and strong growth.
Don't let the terminology confuse you. There are two somewhat different markets:
For a profitable operating company that doesn't want to sell, I'd focus on the first category.
If you tell me (1) annual revenue, (2) EBITDA/profit, (3) industry, (4) how much capital you want, and (5) whether revenue is recurring or project-based, I can narrow this to 5–10 firms that are genuinely plausible fits, including their likely check sizes and terms.
Royalty-based financing (RBF)—often interchangeable with **revenue-based financing** or **revenue sharing** —is an ideal instrument for profitable companies that want growth capital without giving up equity or control.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revenue-based_financing)…
Royalty-based financing (RBF)—often interchangeable with revenue-based financing or revenue sharing —is an ideal instrument for profitable companies that want growth capital without giving up equity or control.
Top-tier investment firms and specialized fintech lenders provide non-dilutive, revenue-tied financing, segmented by your company’s industry and scale:
For B2B SaaS and Subscription Models
For E-Commerce, Consumer Brands, and Inventory-Heavy Businesses
For General Small-to-Mid-Sized / Traditional Businesses
If you tell me your industry , your approximate annual revenue (ARR or gross sales) , and what you plan to use the capital for , I can narrow down which of these providers is the best match.
Yes. What you’re describing is usually called **royalty-based financing (RBF)** or **revenue-based financing**: an investor gives the company growth capital in exchange for a percentage of future revenue until an agreed repayment amount/cap is reached. You keep your equity and generally avoid an exit requirement.…
Yes. What you’re describing is usually called royalty-based financing (RBF) or revenue-based financing: an investor gives the company growth capital in exchange for a percentage of future revenue until an agreed repayment amount/cap is reached. You keep your equity and generally avoid an exit requirement.
| Firm | Particularly relevant if… | Typical structure / size |
|---|---|---|
| Chase Growth Capital | You’re an established, profitable operating company | Reports $1M–$3.5M investments, generally 1–5% of monthly revenue, with ~4–6 year repayment periods. It specifically markets the product as an alternative to selling equity. chasegrowthcapital.comchasegrowthcapital.com |
| Decathlon Capital Partners | You have meaningful revenue and want non-dilutive growth capital | One of the better-known dedicated revenue-based finance investors; generally aimed at established companies rather than startups. parse.gl |
| Flow Capital | You’re a growth-stage company with predictable cash flow | Provides royalty/revenue-linked financing and is geared toward companies that don't want conventional equity financing. parse.gl |
| Cypress Growth Capital | You’re B2B software/technology | Focuses heavily on recurring-revenue technology businesses and can structure growth capital without traditional control equity. parse.gl |
| Novel Capital | You’re SaaS/software with recurring revenue | Says it generally invests $100K–$1M initially and can provide up to $5M; its stated target includes $500K+ revenue and predictable revenue. chasegrowthcapital.comfund.novelcapital.com |
If your company is profitable and doesn't want to sell, I'd prioritize institutional RBF/royalty investors rather than ordinary online "revenue-based lenders." The economics can be substantially different.
For example, Chase describes a structure where the investor gets 1–5% of monthly top-line revenue, with payments moving up or down alongside revenue, and the company retains 100% of its equity and control.
The key terms I'd negotiate are:
One thing to watch: RBF can be expensive capital even when it looks attractive because there is no stated interest rate. Compare the implied annualized cost of capital against a bank loan, asset-based facility, or conventional private credit.
If you tell me your annual revenue, EBITDA/profit, industry, desired investment amount, and approximate growth rate, I can narrow this to 5–10 firms that are actually appropriate for your company and estimate what a royalty deal might look like.
**Royalty-based financing (RBF)** , also known as revenue-based financing, is an ideal option for profitable companies that want to grow without selling equity or giving up control.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revenue-based_financing)…
Royalty-based financing (RBF) , also known as revenue-based financing, is an ideal option for profitable companies that want to grow without selling equity or giving up control.
Instead of traditional equity or fixed-payment bank loans, these firms provide upfront capital in exchange for a small percentage of your ongoing gross monthly revenue. Repayments fluctuate naturally with your sales volume until a predetermined repayment cap (typically 1.1x to 2.5x the original investment) is reached, at which point the obligation disappears entirely.
Top Royalty-Based & Revenue-Based Financing Firms
Investment firms generally specialize by industry and revenue scale. The top options for profitable, established businesses are organized below by category:
Comparing Funding Options
To understand how royalty-based financing stacks up against other methods you might consider while avoiding an outright equity sale, review this overview:
| Feature | Royalty-Based Financing (RBF) | Traditional Term Loan | Venture Debt / Specialty Funds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Dilution | None — you retain 100% control. | None. | Minimal (may require small warrants). |
| Repayment Structure | Flexible % of monthly sales. | Rigid, fixed monthly payments. | Fixed payments + interest rates. |
| Collateral Needed | Unsecured; tied to cash flow. | Hard assets or personal guarantees. | Often requires general UCC lien. |
| Best For | Variable/seasonal sales or fast scale. | Highly predictable, stable margins. | Institutional growth or runway extension. |
Crucial Qualification Metrics
Before approaching these firms, keep in mind they will look closely at these foundational metrics rather than your personal credit score:
To help narrow down the right platform for your company, could you share: