Data as of Sep 18, 2026 · Based on 342 AI responses from ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode · See how Parse measures this
EdWeb is the top fit for principals who want frequent, free or low-cost, flexible webinars and ongoing edtech professional learning teachers can take year-round. For tailored coaching and school-specific plans choose Knowing Technologies; for vendor-specific certifications and hands-on hardware/software training choose Boxlight.
Brands AI recommends here
Named in 30% of answers
Named in 30% of answers
Named in 21% of answers
Named in 21% of answers
Absolutely. For a school-wide initiative, I’d structure the professional development around **instructional goals first and technology second**—so teachers leave with classroom practices they can actually use, rather than a tour of tools. ### A practical PD pathway Session | Focus | Teacher takeaway
Absolutely. For a school-wide initiative, I’d structure the professional development around instructional goals first and technology second—so teachers leave with classroom practices they can actually use, rather than a tour of tools.
| Session | Focus | Teacher takeaway |
|---|
The AI component is particularly timely. ISTE+ASCD currently offers a 15-hour AI Deep Dive for Educators covering AI fundamentals, instructional applications, assessment, and academic integrity. It also has a free Google AI Educator Series with short modules, synchronous cohorts, and train-the-trainer sessions.
For a school rather than individual teachers, ISTE also offers private cohorts/custom training, which could make sense if you want everyone working toward common practices.
Rather than a single "technology training day," consider a 6–8 week cycle:
That approach aligns well with Washington's Professional Growth Plan model, which is explicitly job-embedded, self-directed, goal-oriented, and evidence-based.
I would not make the PD primarily about learning individual apps. A stronger organizing question is:
"What can students do better because we used this technology?" For example, teachers might learn how technology can provide multiple ways for students to access information, express understanding, and engage with learning. That's closely aligned with Universal Design for Learning (UDL), which ISTE specifically connects with thoughtful classroom technology use.
If you tell me your grade level (elementary, middle, or high school), approximate number of teachers, and the technology your school already uses (Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Chromebooks, iPads, Canvas, etc.), I can build you a complete teacher PD program with session agendas, objectives, activities, handouts, and a year-long calendar.
Finding the right professional development (PD) for classroom technology comes down to balancing tech-savvy tools with sound pedagogy—ensuring teachers aren't just learning a gadget, but actually enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes.[[1]](https://www.cosn.org/edtech-professional-development/) Depending…
Finding the right professional development (PD) for classroom technology comes down to balancing tech-savvy tools with sound pedagogy—ensuring teachers aren't just learning a gadget, but actually enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes.
Depending on your teachers' comfort levels, budget, and goals, several well-regarded avenues and models can support your staff:
To help me narrow this down or build a tailored proposal for your school, could you share:
Investing in classroom technology professional development is one of the best ways to move teachers past basic tool adoption and into meaningful, student-centered learning. To help you curate or select the right pathway for your staff, here is an organized breakdown of top-tier professional development providers, key…
Investing in classroom technology professional development is one of the best ways to move teachers past basic tool adoption and into meaningful, student-centered learning.
To help you curate or select the right pathway for your staff, here is an organized breakdown of top-tier professional development providers, key implementation strategies, and high-impact focus areas tailored for a school setting.
When designing your PD calendar, consider centering sessions around these practical pillars:
To help narrow down the best specific option, tell me:
Absolutely. For a school-wide initiative, I’d recommend **hands-on professional learning focused on instructional practice**, rather than generic “technology training.” Here are several strong options I found: - **[iste.org](https://iste.org/professional-credentials?utm_source=chatgpt.com)** — A structured, self-paced…
Absolutely. For a school-wide initiative, I’d recommend hands-on professional learning focused on instructional practice, rather than generic “technology training.”
Here are several strong options I found:
For a principal, I'd consider a 3-part PD model:
Then add ongoing coaching rather than making PD a one-day event. Google, for example, distinguishes between trainers who provide group learning and certified coaches who work individually with teachers.
If you tell me (a) elementary, middle, or high school, (b) approximate number of teachers, (c) your technology ecosystem—Google, Microsoft, Chromebooks, iPads, etc.—and (d) your approximate PD budget, I can narrow this to 5 specific programs/providers and propose a full-year technology PD plan.
Designing a high-impact professional development (PD) program on classroom technology requires shifting the focus from *how to click the buttons* to *how the tool transforms pedagogy*. Here is a structured framework and top program recommendations to help you lead an effective tech rollout for your staff: ### Core…
Designing a high-impact professional development (PD) program on classroom technology requires shifting the focus from how to click the buttons to how the tool transforms pedagogy.
Here is a structured framework and top program recommendations to help you lead an effective tech rollout for your staff:
To help tailor a specific roadmap or schedule for your school, tell me:
Absolutely. For a school-wide initiative, I’d look for PD that is **hands-on, classroom-focused, and sustainable**, rather than a one-time “here are 20 apps” workshop. ### Strong options for your teachers - **ISTE+ASCD** — probably my first choice for a comprehensive technology-PD partner. They offer year-round…
Absolutely. For a school-wide initiative, I’d look for PD that is hands-on, classroom-focused, and sustainable, rather than a one-time “here are 20 apps” workshop.
Rather than making the PD simply “technology training,” I'd organize it around four outcomes:
A good structure would be one kickoff workshop + monthly 45–60 minute hands-on sessions + teacher implementation between sessions. Every session should end with teachers actually producing something they can use with students the following week.
Since you're in Ohio, there's another useful consideration: Ohio's professional-development rules emphasize PD that produces new or enhanced classroom knowledge and connects to student achievement, success, or wellness, with local professional development committees overseeing applicable plans.
If you tell me (1) grade levels, (2) approximate number of teachers, (3) what technology you already have—Google, Microsoft, Chromebooks, iPads, etc.—and (4) your approximate PD budget, I can put together a specific 2026–27 technology PD plan, including providers, costs, session topics, and a proposed year-long schedule.
As a school principal, I’d recommend choosing professional development that goes beyond “how to use the tools” and focuses on **instructional impact, teacher confidence, student engagement, and sustainable implementation**. Here are several strong options to consider: ## 1. Instructional technology integration (best…
As a school principal, I’d recommend choosing professional development that goes beyond “how to use the tools” and focuses on instructional impact, teacher confidence, student engagement, and sustainable implementation.
Here are several strong options to consider:
Possible topics:
edu.google.ca Google offers:
Good workshop themes:
Google also maintains a directory of service partners and certified trainers who provide school and district support.
microsoft.com Microsoft provides educator training, learning paths, communities, and resources around classroom technology and AI integration.
Potential sessions:
Many schools are looking for support around AI policies and classroom use. Options include:
Microsoft offers AI-focused educator learning paths, and Google has partnered with ISTE+ASCD on AI literacy training initiatives for educators.
Day 1: Building a shared vision
Day 2: Practical classroom tools
Day 3: AI and the future classroom
Follow-up support
If you share your school level (elementary/middle/high), technology environment, and approximate staff size, I can help narrow this to a few PD models that would fit.
You can build an effective classroom technology professional development program by focusing on **hands-on practice, peer collaboration, and immediate classroom application**.[](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJ1XsZwPkVk) [[1]](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJ1XsZwPkVk) Key Strategies for Tech PD - **Assess Needs…
You can build an effective classroom technology professional development program by focusing on hands-on practice, peer collaboration, and immediate classroom application.
Key Strategies for Tech PD
Popular Tech PD Platforms
If you tell me what specific devices or software your school uses (such as Google Classroom, iPads, or interactive whiteboards) and your teachers' general skill levels , I can suggest a customized training schedule or specific workshop topics.
Absolutely. For a school-wide initiative, I’d recommend treating **classroom technology PD as instructional professional learning**, not simply “how to use the devices.” The strongest programs connect technology to lesson design, student engagement, accessibility, assessment, digital citizenship, and increasingly AI.…
Absolutely. For a school-wide initiative, I’d recommend treating classroom technology PD as instructional professional learning, not simply “how to use the devices.” The strongest programs connect technology to lesson design, student engagement, accessibility, assessment, digital citizenship, and increasingly AI.
A useful framework is the iste.org, which focuses on educators as learners, leaders, collaborators, designers, facilitators, and analysts. ISTE also identifies “prepared educators” and adequate support as essential conditions for successful technology implementation.
I would structure a school-year program roughly like this:
The key difference: I'd avoid a one-day “technology boot camp.” A better model is a short kickoff workshop followed by monthly hands-on sessions + classroom implementation + coaching. That gives teachers a reason to use what they learn and lets you measure whether the PD is changing instruction.
If you tell me (1) grade levels, (2) approximate number of teachers, (3) what devices/platform you use (Chromebooks, iPads, Windows, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, etc.), and (4) your PD budget, I can put together a specific professional-development plan with recommended providers, estimated costs, and a 6- or 12-month training calendar.
You can find comprehensive, practical technology training programs for educators through platforms like [SimpleK12](https://www.simplek12.com/) , which offers bite-sized and ongoing online learning pathways designed specifically for teachers.[](https://www.simplek12.com/) [[1]](https://www.simplek12.com/) Effective…
You can find comprehensive, practical technology training programs for educators through platforms like SimpleK12 , which offers bite-sized and ongoing online learning pathways designed specifically for teachers.
Effective classroom technology professional development (PD) moves away from one-time workshops and focuses instead on sustained, hands-on integration.
Top Classroom Tech PD Programs & Platforms
Key Strategies for Principal Implementation
If you'd like, I can: