For a distributed field service company, which VoIP solutions make it easiest to route calls based on location or schedule?

For a distributed field service company, routing calls seamlessly based on geographic location, time zones, or rotating on-call schedules requires a robust cloud PBX or contact center solution with visual dial plans and strong CRM/dispatch integration.

The top VoIP solutions that make location- and schedule-based routing easiest include:

1. GoToConnect
   • Why it shines for scheduling: Features a visual drag-and-drop Dial Plan Editor that maps out call flows, time-of-day routing, and holiday schedules without needing IT support. You can literally look at a flowchart to see how after-hours or weekend calls route to mobile techs or emergency dispatch.
   • Best for: Teams that want an intuitive, visual interface to handle complex schedule changes on the fly.
2. RingCentral (RingEX)
   • Why it shines for location & multi-site: Excels at multi-location management under a single administrative umbrella. It offers advanced multi-site routing , geo-based caller routing, and shared queues so that if a customer calls from a specific regional area code, it prioritizes the local dispatch or field team assigned to that territory.
   • Best for: Larger, multi-region field operations that need enterprise-grade reliability and centralized analytics.
3. Nextiva
   • Why it shines for field service workflows: Offers robust advanced call management, flexible auto-attendants (IVR), and location-based rules that tie easily into mobile devices. Their system lets you set strict business hours, rolling forwarding, and simultaneous rings so on-call techs never miss an urgent dispatch.
   • Best for: Mid-sized field service teams wanting a balance of ease-of-use and dependable mobile app integration.
4. Specialized Field Service VoIP / Integrations (e.g., Voxtix or FieldPulse Engage)
   • Why it shines: Rather than a standalone generic business phone, these integrate natively or pair closely with field management platforms like ServiceTitan. They feature automated caller-ID lookup (routing a client straight to the tech or dispatcher handling their specific account or geographic zone) and specialized on-call escalation trees.
   • Best for: Companies that want call logs and routing triggers tightly coupled with dispatching software.

To help narrow down the best fit, could you share:

• How many field locations or regions do you operate in?
• Do you currently use a Field Service Management (FSM) tool (like ServiceTitan, FieldEdge, or Salesforce) that the phone system needs to integrate with?

For a distributed field service company, the easiest VoIP systems for location-based and schedule-based call routing are usually the ones with strong multi-site management, visual call flows, business-hours rules, queues, and integrations with field service software.

Best options

Parse iTechGuides## My shortlist by field-service scenario

1. RingCentral — best for complex dispatch operations

Choose this if you have:

• Multiple service territories
• Regional dispatch teams
• Different hours by location
• Overflow rules
• On-call technicians

A typical flow could be:

Customer calls → identify region → send to local dispatch queue → if unavailable, route to backup region → after-hours, send to on-call technician RingCentral is strong when your routing logic starts looking like a dispatch center rather than a simple office phone tree.

2. 8x8 — best for many locations

8x8 is a strong fit when each branch needs its own:

• Phone numbers
• Hours
• Auto attendants
• Holiday schedules
• Local routing rules

It works well for companies where each territory operates somewhat independently but management wants one centralized phone system.

3. Nextiva — easiest administration

Nextiva is often a good middle ground for service companies that need:

• Location-specific schedules
• Department/queue routing
• Simple admin management
• CRM connections

It is less about extremely complex dispatch logic and more about making common routing scenarios easy to manage.

4. Dialpad — best if you want smart routing

Dialpad is worth considering if you want:

• Geographic routing based on caller information
• AI-assisted call handling
• Modern mobile workflows

It can be especially attractive if dispatchers and field staff are primarily mobile users.

One important design choice

There are two very different meanings of "location routing":

1. Caller location routing

• Example: area code or ZIP code sends calls to the nearest office.
• Most enterprise VoIP systems can do this.

2. Customer address → service territory → assigned technician routing

• Example: "123 Main St belongs to the North District team and technician Jane is on call."
• This usually requires integration with your field service management (FSM) or CRM system rather than relying only on the phone system.

For most growing field service companies, I’d rank them:

1. RingCentral — most capable for complex dispatch
2. 8x8 — best for many branches/territories
3. Nextiva — easiest to operate day-to-day
4. Dialpad — best if AI and mobile workflows matter

If you share your approximate number of technicians/locations and whether calls should route by customer ZIP/service address or simply by branch and business hours, the best fit changes quite a bit.

For a distributed field service company, the easiest VoIP solutions are the ones that let you combine:

• Geographic routing (customer ZIP code, area code, service territory, branch)
• Time-based routing (business hours, shifts, holidays, after-hours)
• Queue/availability routing (dispatchers, technicians, on-call staff)
• Mobile routing (field workers answering from apps)
• FSM/CRM integrations (routing by actual service address or customer record)

A good shortlist:

Parse TechRadar## My picks by scenario

1. Best overall: RingCentral

For a company with multiple service territories, dispatch teams, and rotating on-call coverage, RingCentral is usually the strongest fit. It handles complex combinations like:

Customer in Territory A → Territory A dispatcher → available technician queue → overflow to Territory B → after-hours emergency line It is particularly useful when you have different operating hours by region or need layered failover rules.

2. Best for many branches: 8x8

If your organization looks like:

• 20+ branches
• multiple states/time zones
• centralized administration with local autonomy

8x8 is worth a close look. Its multi-site approach maps well to branch-based field service organizations.

3. Easiest to manage: Nextiva

For a typical HVAC, plumbing, electrical, pest control, or repair company, Nextiva often provides enough routing power without the complexity of an enterprise contact center.

A common setup:

Local phone number → local dispatcher → technician group → answering service/on-call tech after hours Parse### 4. Best if you route by caller geography: Dialpad

If your logic is mainly:

"A customer calling from this area should go to this regional team" Dialpad’s geographic routing capabilities can be attractive. This is different from routing by the customer’s actual service address.

The key design question

There are two very different kinds of “location routing”:

1. Caller-based routing

• Area code
• Phone number
• Dialed local number

Example:

215 number → Philadelphia dispatch

2. Service-territory routing

• Customer address
• ZIP code
• CRM/FSM record
• Assigned technician

Example:

Customer address → North region → assigned HVAC technician

For field service, the second is usually the better architecture. A VoIP system alone often cannot know the customer’s service address; you typically connect it to a field-service platform or CRM so the call can be routed using customer data.

Practical recommendation

For most distributed field service companies:

1. RingCentral — if dispatch complexity is high
2. 8x8 — if you operate many locations
3. Nextiva — if you want easier administration
4. Dialpad — if caller geography and AI-assisted workflows matter most

If you share your approximate number of technicians/branches and whether you need routing by ZIP/service territory or just office hours/on-call schedules, the best choice can narrow quite a bit.

1. RingCentral — if dispatch complexity is high
2. 8x8 — if you operate many locations
3. Nextiva — if you want easier administration
4. Dialpad — if caller geography and AI-assisted workflows matter most

If you share your approximate number of technicians/branches and whether you need routing by ZIP/service territory or just office hours/on-call schedules, the best choice can narrow quite a bit.

Dialpad’s geographic routing capabilities can be attractive. This is different from routing by the customer’s actual service address.

The key design question

There are two very different kinds of “location routing”:

For a distributed field service company, routing calls seamlessly based on geographic location (like a customer's area code or zip code) and shifting tech schedules requires a cloud-based VoIP or CCaaS (Contact Center as a Service) platform with robust IVR (Interactive Voice Response), skill-based routing, and scheduling rules.

The top VoIP solutions that handle location- and schedule-based routing exceptionally well for distributed teams include:

• 1. RingCentral (RingEX) : Widely considered a gold standard for comprehensive admin controls. It features advanced Multi-Level Auto Attendants and Time-of-Day/After-Hours routing that can easily be customized down to specific regions or satellite offices. If a field tech logs off or their schedule changes in the system, calls can dynamically cascade to the next available regional rep or an on-call queue. You can review full platform specs on the RingCentral Website.
• 1. Nextiva : Highly rated for reliability and structured call management, Nextiva makes it simple to set up location-based rules and call queues without needing an enterprise-tier contact center setup. Their real-time presence indicators and intelligent routing let dispatchers see who is active in the field or clocked in, routing incoming local numbers directly to the closest available technician or regional group. More details are available via Nextiva's Business Phone Solutions.
• 1. Dialpad : If your field service team relies heavily on CRM data or you want automatic geo-routing, Dialpad offers brilliant Geographic Routing features (built into their support/sell tiers) that automatically route inbound calls based on the caller's area or country code. This ensures customers immediately land on the regional dispatch team closest to them without enduring unnecessary triage. Explore these features on the Dialpad Website.
• 1. Vonage : Known for flexible API and communication features, Vonage utilizes Smart Numbers and dynamic geographic routing tools that intelligently route calls based on caller origin codes and pre-set schedule matrices. It is particularly strong if you need to tie your phone logic into external field service management (FSM) software via integrations. Learn more on the Vonage Business Communications Platform.

To help narrow down the best fit, could you tell me:

• What Field Service Management (FSM) software (like Salesforce Field Service, ServiceTitan, or Jobber) are you using?
• Roughly how many field technicians or dispatchers do you need to route between?

For a distributed field service company, routing calls seamlessly based on geographic location (e.g., matching a caller's area code or zip code to the nearest technician or regional branch) and schedules (business hours, on-call shifts, and time zones) requires robust multi-site management.

The top VoIP and unified communications solutions that handle these specific routing needs with the least administrative friction include:

• RingCentral (MVP): Excellent for multi-site businesses. It allows you to build granular, time-based call handling rules down to the user, department, or office level. You can easily set conditional routing for after-hours, rotating on-call schedules, and multi-location overflows from a centralized admin console.
• Nextiva: Known for rock-solid reliability and centrally managed multi-site features. Nextiva makes it straightforward to configure location-specific routing and conditional forwarding (such as ringing local field offices first, then failing over to a national dispatch queue if unanswered).
• Cisco Webex Calling: A powerhouse for distributed or global operations. It features advanced time-of-day routing and geo-redundant routing policies based on location, making it ideal if your field service teams are spread across multiple regional territories or time zones.
• Dialpad: Great for modern, mobile-first field teams. It offers intelligent geographic routing (routing inbound calls based on the caller's area code) alongside flexible queue rules like round-robin or sequential routing that adapt cleanly to different shift schedules.

To help narrow down the best fit, tell me:

• How many field locations or regional branches do you have?
• Do you need after-call dispatch integrations (like CRM or field service management software integration)?
• Are you looking for a simple main-line IVR menu or automatic caller-to-location matching?

For a distributed field-service company, I’d focus on platforms that can combine time-of-day, time zone, site/location, queues, and fallback rules without requiring custom development.

Best fits

1. RingCentral — strongest overall

RingCentral is probably my first choice if you have, say, Nashville → Atlanta → Dallas service territories, with calls needing to reach the appropriate dispatch team.

Its answering rules support different business hours by employee/department, date ranges, holidays and after-hours destinations. Its routing capabilities also explicitly support time-based routing based on business hours, shift schedules, or location time zones, as well as splitting traffic between different teams or locations.

Example: Customer calls the main number → caller's selected ZIP/service area → Nashville dispatch queue → if outside Nashville hours, Atlanta queue → if nobody answers, centralized after-hours team.

2. 8x8 — excellent for geographically distributed operations

8x8 is particularly attractive when you have many branches with their own schedules. Its auto-attendant supports shared schedules, time zones, lunch periods, exceptions and holidays. You can route calls to queues, ring groups, extensions, external numbers, or other auto-attendants.

It also offers time-of-day routing based on an agent's time zone or predefined business hours, plus sequential, simultaneous, round-robin and weighted routing.

I'd favor 8x8 over RingCentral if your organization is essentially a collection of semi-independent local offices that need centralized administration.

3. Zoom Phone — easiest if you're already a Zoom shop

Zoom Phone makes business/closed/break/holiday hours configurable for call queues and auto receptionists, with different routing behavior for each period. It also supports multiple sites, which is useful for geographically distributed operations.

The big advantage is simplicity if your dispatchers and technicians already live in Zoom Workplace.

4. Dialpad — easiest administration

Dialpad is worth considering if you don't have a complicated telecom team. Its routing is configured through an online admin interface, with independent business hours for teams and routing based on things such as agent availability, skills and fallback destinations. It also supports routing according to time zone and schedule.

Its tradeoff is that I'd lean toward RingCentral/8x8 when geographic territory logic is the central requirement rather than general call-center routing.

My shortlist

For a field-service operation, I'd rank them:

1. RingCentral — best combination of geographic + schedule-based routing.
2. 8x8 — best for lots of locations/branches and sophisticated schedules.
3. Zoom Phone — best balance of routing and ease if you're already on Zoom.
4. Dialpad — best for a smaller operation wanting simple administration.

One important distinction: "location-based routing" can mean two very different things. If you mean caller location/ZIP code → nearest service territory, I'd specifically evaluate the vendors' IVR/ACD, CRM integration, and API capabilities, rather than just their business-hours features. That's a more demanding use case than simply routing Nashville calls during Nashville business hours.

If you tell me roughly how many locations/technicians you have and whether routing is based on caller ZIP, technician territory, or office hours, I can narrow this to the 2–3 best architectures.

Its answering rules support different business hours by employee/department, date ranges, holidays and after-hours destinations. Its routing capabilities also explicitly support time-based routing based on business hours, shift schedules, or location time zones, as well as splitting traffic between different teams or locations.

Example: Customer calls the main number → caller's selected ZIP/service area → Nashville dispatch queue → if outside Nashville hours, Atlanta queue → if nobody answers, centralized after-hours team.

2. 8x8 — excellent for geographically distributed operations

8x8 is particularly attractive when you have many branches with their own schedules. Its auto-attendant supports shared schedules, time zones, lunch periods, exceptions and holidays. You can route calls to queues, ring groups, extensions, external numbers, or other auto-attendants.

It also offers time-of-day routing based on an agent's time zone or predefined business hours, plus sequential, simultaneous, round-robin and weighted routing.

I'd favor 8x8 over RingCentral if your organization is essentially a collection of semi-independent local offices that need centralized administration.

3. Zoom Phone — easiest if you're already a Zoom shop

Zoom Phone makes business/closed/break/holiday hours configurable for call queues and auto receptionists, with different routing behavior for each period. It also supports multiple sites, which is useful for geographically distributed operations.

The big advantage is simplicity if your dispatchers and technicians already live in Zoom Workplace.

4. Dialpad — easiest administration

Dialpad is worth considering if you don't have a complicated telecom team. Its routing is configured through an online admin interface, with independent business hours for teams and routing based on things such as agent availability, skills and fallback destinations. It also supports routing according to time zone and schedule.

Its tradeoff is that I'd lean toward RingCentral/8x8 when geographic territory logic is the central requirement rather than general call-center routing.

My shortlist

For a field-service operation, I'd rank them:

For a distributed field service company, the easiest VoIP systems are usually the ones with visual call-flow builders, geographic routing, time-based rules, queues, and mobile-user support. The best fit depends on whether you need simple “send calls to the right branch” logic or more advanced dispatch-style routing.

Strong options for location + schedule-based routing

Features I would prioritize for field service

Look for these specifically:

• Geographic routing

• Caller’s area code, ZIP code, state, or assigned service territory routes to the correct branch/team.

• Example: Miami customer → Southeast dispatch queue; Dallas customer → Texas dispatch queue.

• Time-based routing

• Business hours, technician shifts, weekends, holidays, and after-hours escalation.

• Example: 8 AM–5 PM → local dispatch; after 5 PM → on-call technician.

• On-call schedules

• Rotate calls among technicians automatically rather than relying on manual forwarding.

• Skills-based routing

• Send HVAC, plumbing, electrical, medical equipment, or other specialty calls to qualified staff.

• Failover rules

• If a regional office does not answer, overflow to another branch or central dispatch.

Typical field-service setup

A common design is:

1. Customer calls a single main number.
2. IVR asks for ZIP code/service type.
3. System routes to the regional queue.
4. During business hours: - Dispatch team answers.
5. After hours: - Call goes to the scheduled on-call technician.
6. If unanswered: - Escalates to backup staff or a central team.

For a 50–500 technician operation, I would generally shortlist Nextiva, RingCentral, and GoTo Connect first. For a smaller operation where an office manager needs to change routing without IT help, GoTo Connect or Nextiva are often easier starting points.

If you share your approximate size (number of technicians/branches), whether customers call by phone number or ZIP/service territory, and whether you need dispatch integration (ServiceTitan, Salesforce, Jobber, etc.), I can narrow this down.

For a distributed field service company, routing calls seamlessly based on geographic location (e.g., area codes, regions, or closest branch) and dynamic schedules (e.g., on-call technicians, standard business hours, after-hours emergency rotations) requires robust cloud-based UCaaS (Unified Communications as a Service) or CCaaS (Contact Center as a Service) platforms.

The top VoIP solutions that make location- and schedule-based routing easiest include:

• RingCentral (RingEX): Widely recognized as a comprehensive enterprise suite, it features robust multi-site administration, custom rule engines, and visual IVR builders. It allows you to set granular business hours, holiday schedules, and location-based routing hierarchies so field teams or regional dispatchers catch the right calls.
• Nextiva: Excellent for multi-site and distributed operations. Nextiva provides centrally managed, location-specific routing options and advanced call handling that lets administrators map out rules for different branches, regions, or remote field staff easily.
• Dialpad: Features powerful AI-driven capabilities and Geographic Routing , which automatically routes inbound calls based on the area or country code of the caller to the corresponding regional team or support queue. It’s cloud-native, making updates to schedules or adding new field locations instantaneous.
• Aircall: Built heavily for streamlined call-center and routing workflows, Aircall excels at time-and-date-based routing combined with smart-region rules. It allows you to configure complex ring rules, business hours, and cascading distributions via an intuitive web dashboard and integrates tightly with field service CRMs.
• GoToConnect: Combines a dependable VoIP framework with user-friendly visual dial-plan editors. It makes setting up geo-based routing, location extensions, and complex time-of-day forwarding schedules simple without requiring an expensive enterprise telecom consultant.

If you'd like to narrow this down, let me know:

• Approximately how many field locations or dispatchers you have
• Whether you need integration with a specific Field Service Management (FSM) or CRM tool (like Salesforce or HubSpot)
• If you primarily need after-call automation or AI summaries

I can tailor a specific recommendation for your team.

For a distributed field service company, routing calls seamlessly based on geographic location (getting customers to the nearest regional tech, dispatcher, or branch) and schedules (handling after-hours emergency dispatches vs. normal business hours) is critical.

The top VoIP and UCaaS (Unified Communications as a Service) solutions that handle these requirements best range from robust enterprise systems to specialized field-service-friendly platforms:

1. RingCentral (RingEX) — Best for Multi-Site Scale

RingCentral offers powerful multi-site management that lets you break down a distributed organization into distinct geographic locations under one overarching account.

• Location Routing: Through its multi-site support, you can assign individual outbound/inbound caller IDs, localized main numbers, and customized auto-receptionists per regional site.
• Schedule Routing: Highly granular call queues allow you to set specific operational hours and time zones per department or local branch. If a branch in the Central Time zone closes, calls can automatically roll over to an Eastern Time zone office or an after-hours on-call rotation.
• Get started: Review enterprise options and features directly on RingCentral.

2. Dialpad — Best for Built-in Geo-Routing & AI

Dialpad features native Geographic Routing (Geo-routing) capabilities designed explicitly to map inbound callers to the correct physical branch or regional contact center based on their area code or location.

• Location Routing: You can set up dedicated Geo routers in the admin settings, attach local or toll-free numbers to them, and automatically segment incoming traffic before it even hits a dispatcher.
• Schedule Routing: Simple split-rule logic lets you define business hours and distinct off-hour routing paths (like routing straight to a mobile on-call technician queue or an emergency IVR). Its integrated AI can also transcribe and flag urgent dispatch keywords in real time.
• Get started: Explore plans and features on Dialpad.

3. Nextiva — Best All-Around Reliability & CRM Integration

Nextiva is a favorite for service-heavy and field-operasi businesses because its routing engine ties closely with customer data and handles high call volumes smoothly.

• Location & Schedule Routing: Offers flexible advanced call management (ACM) features, allowing rule-based routing dependent on time-of-day, day-of-week, and caller-ID-based location mapping.
• Field Service Edge: Nextiva shines when integrated with field service management (FSM) platforms (like ServiceTitan or custom CRMs), ensuring that when a customer calls from a recognized service address, the call can bypass standard menus and route straight to their assigned regional coordinator.
• Get started: Check out business tiers on Nextiva.

4. Specialized Cloud Providers (e.g., GoTo Connect or Voxtix)

If you want something streamlined specifically for trade/field service workflows without a massive enterprise footprint:

• GoTo Connect: Known for an intuitive drag-and-drop dial plan editor ("Dial Plan Editor") that makes drawing visual call flows for after-hours schedules, regional ring groups, and holiday overrides remarkably easy.
• Niche FSM-focused providers: Smaller cloud phone systems built explicitly for trade and field services often bundle dispatcher presence dashboards and direct integrations with field software right out of the box.

To help narrow down the ideal choice, tell me:

• Do you use a Field Service Management (FSM) software (like ServiceTitan, Jobber, etc.) that the VoIP needs to sync with?
• Roughly how many distinct physical locations or regional teams do you need to manage?

For a distributed field-service company, I’d shortlist 8x8, RingCentral, and Nextiva. The key distinction is whether you need simple time/location rules or more sophisticated dispatch logic.

1. 8x8 — best for multi-location operations

8x8 is probably my first choice if you have distinct service territories or branches.

Its Auto Attendant can be tied to a specific site/location, with its own time zone and schedule. 8x8 also supports multi-level call flows that can personalize routing based on customer location and priority, while managing multiple locations from one platform.

That maps nicely to something like:

Caller → ZIP/territory → Chicago dispatch team → available technicians → after-hours on-call technician It also handles business hours, lunch periods, holidays, exceptions and emergency/alternate routing.

Best if: your field operation is organized geographically and you want administrators to manage each territory centrally.

2. RingCentral — best for sophisticated routing

RingCentral is particularly strong if routing needs to incorporate shift schedules, time zones, call queues, overflow and priority.

Its routing capabilities explicitly support time-based routing according to business hours, shift schedules and location time zones. It also supports percentage, priority, simultaneous and overflow routing.

For example:

8 AM–5 PM → local territory queue 5 PM–10 PM → regional on-call team 10 PM–8 AM → national emergency line Queue overloaded → neighboring territory That makes it attractive when you're effectively running a dispatch center, rather than just a conventional office phone system.

3. Nextiva — easiest for straightforward schedule/location rules

Nextiva supports auto-attendant routing based on time of day and lets administrators assign schedules at the company, location, or individual-user level.

That's useful for a field-service organization where each branch has different operating hours:

Dallas: 7 AM–6 PM Chicago: 8 AM–5 PM Phoenix: 7 AM–7 PM Calls can follow the appropriate location's schedule without requiring everything to be managed as one national schedule.

My ranking

For your particular use case:

1. 8x8 — best overall for geographic territories + schedules + multiple sites
2. RingCentral — best if you need complex dispatch/queue/overflow logic
3. Nextiva — best if you prioritize simple administration and location-specific schedules

One important caveat: “route based on location” can mean two different things. If you mean the caller's ZIP code/area code determines which dispatch team gets the call, I'd weight the comparison differently than if you mean the technician's current GPS location determines who gets the call. The latter usually requires integrating the VoIP platform with your field-service management/dispatch software, rather than relying on the phone system alone.

8x8 is probably my first choice if you have distinct service territories or branches.

Its Auto Attendant can be tied to a specific site/location, with its own time zone and schedule. 8x8 also supports multi-level call flows that can personalize routing based on customer location and priority, while managing multiple locations from one platform.

That maps nicely to something like:

Caller → ZIP/territory → Chicago dispatch team → available technicians → after-hours on-call technician It also handles business hours, lunch periods, holidays, exceptions and emergency/alternate routing.

Best if: your field operation is organized geographically and you want administrators to manage each territory centrally.

2. RingCentral — best for sophisticated routing

RingCentral is particularly strong if routing needs to incorporate shift schedules, time zones, call queues, overflow and priority.

Its routing capabilities explicitly support time-based routing according to business hours, shift schedules and location time zones. It also supports percentage, priority, simultaneous and overflow routing.

For example:

8 AM–5 PM → local territory queue 5 PM–10 PM → regional on-call team 10 PM–8 AM → national emergency line Queue overloaded → neighboring territory That makes it attractive when you're effectively running a dispatch center, rather than just a conventional office phone system.

3. Nextiva — easiest for straightforward schedule/location rules

Nextiva supports auto-attendant routing based on time of day and lets administrators assign schedules at the company, location, or individual-user level.

That's useful for a field-service organization where each branch has different operating hours:

Dallas: 7 AM–6 PM Chicago: 8 AM–5 PM Phoenix: 7 AM–7 PM Calls can follow the appropriate location's schedule without requiring everything to be managed as one national schedule.

My ranking

For your particular use case: